Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The Nvidia RTX 5000 Ada Generation, not to be confused with the A5000, P5000 and the RTX 5000 Turing Generation, is a super-powerful professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 9,728 CUDA cores and 16 GB of ECC GDDR6 VRAM. Brought into existence in 2023, this graphics adapter leverages TSMC's 5 nm process and Nvidia's Ada Lovelace architecture to achieve great performance combined with reasonable power consumption. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for the card is very wide at 80 W to 175 W leading to bizarre performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same product.

Hardware-wise, the RTX 5000 is a GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop in disguise. Consequently, both make use of the AD103 chip and have little difficulty running triple-A games at UHD 2160p.

Quadro series graphics cards ship with much different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional users rather than gamers. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.

Architecture and Features

Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here (up to 16,384 versus 10,752); under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache and an optimized ray tracing routine (a different way to determine what is transparent and what isn't is used) and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of proprietary Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI tasks.

The RTX 5000 features 76 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 304 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 9,728 CUDA cores, making it a lot faster than the RTX 4000 Ada Generation. Elsewhere, the graphics card comes with 16 GB of 256-bit wide ECC GDDR6 memory for an impressive throughput of ~576 GB/s. Error correction can be turned off if desired. The fact that error correction is present here proves that the RTX 5000 is indeed targeted at professional users.

Just like Ampere-based cards, the RTX 5000 makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however DP 1.4a video outputs can potentially prove to be a bottleneck down the line.

Performance

The average RTX 5000 Ada Generation in our extensive database is noticeably inferior to the GeForce RTX 4080 in some tests but is totally comparable to the GeForce RTX 4090 in other ones, such as the Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan test.

Nvidia's marketing materials mention "up to 42.6 TFLOPS" of performance which is very impressive. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation delivers up to 33.5 TFLOPS, for reference, while the RTX 500 Ada is only good for 9 TFLOPS.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the TGP power target of the RTX 5000 is. One other thing worth mentioning is that enabling error correction appears to reduce the amount of video memory that is available to applications and games by up to a gigabyte.

Power consumption

Nvidia no longer divides its laptop graphics cards into Max-Q and non-max-Q models. Instead, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs, and the range can sometimes be shockingly wide. This is the case with the RTX 5000 Ada, as the lowest value recommended for it sits at just 80 W while the highest is more than two times higher at 175 W (this most likely includes Dynamic Boost). The slowest system built around an RTX 5000 Ada can easily be 60% slower than the fastest one. This is the kind of delta that we've already seen on consumer-grade laptops featuring the latest GeForce RTX cards.

Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the RTX 5000 is built with makes for very decent energy efficiency, as of mid 2023.

RTX Ada Generation Laptop GPU Series

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 2048 64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
ArchitectureAda Lovelace
Pipelines9728 - unified
TMUs304
ROPs112
Raytracing Cores76
Tensor / AI Cores304
Core Speed930 - 1680 (Boost) MHz
CacheL2: 64 MB
Memory Speed20000 effective = 2250 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory16 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth576 GB/s
APIDirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption150 Watt (80 - 150 Watt TGP)
Transistor Count76.3 Billion
technology4 nm
PCIe4 x16/x8
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement21.03.2023
Link to Manufacturer Pageimages.nvidia.com
PredecessorRTX A5500 Laptop GPU

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 14644     avg: 15317     median: 15316.5 (44%)     max: 15989 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 14861     avg: 15540     median: 15539.5 (41%)     max: 16218 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 26765     avg: 27801     median: 27801 (49%)     max: 28837 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 30422     avg: 33145     median: 33145 (37%)     max: 35868 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 39530     avg: 39552     median: 39552 (55%)     max: 39574 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 51771     avg: 53053     median: 53052.5 (46%)     max: 54334 Points
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 21     avg: 22     median: 22 (3%)     max: 23 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 15     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (6%)     max: 16 Seconds
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 201.1     avg: 213.1     median: 213.1 (53%)     max: 225.04 fps
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 291.54     avg: 300.1     median: 300.1 (44%)     max: 308.58 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 153.14     avg: 162.8     median: 162.8 (35%)     max: 172.49 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 132.41     avg: 134.5     median: 134.5 (34%)     max: 136.68 fps
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 181.58     avg: 185.8     median: 185.8 (51%)     max: 190.08 fps
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 29.61     avg: 30.6     median: 30.5 (27%)     max: 31.48 fps
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 193.92     avg: 198.7     median: 198.7 (79%)     max: 203.54 fps
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 236.39     avg: 252.1     median: 252.1 (42%)     max: 267.81 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 209.31     avg: 218     median: 218 (58%)     max: 226.6 fps
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 530.43     avg: 541     median: 540.7 (60%)     max: 550.94 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 154.11     avg: 172.2     median: 172.2 (38%)     max: 190.3 fps
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 169     avg: 172.6     median: 172.6 (36%)     max: 176.21 fps
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 391.57     avg: 408.2     median: 408.2 (46%)     max: 424.73 fps
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 105.16     avg: 107.4     median: 107.4 (35%)     max: 109.73 fps
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 375.06     avg: 386.4     median: 386.4 (56%)     max: 397.76 fps
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 374.43     avg: 391.8     median: 391.8 (44%)     max: 409.2 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 272.05     avg: 275.2     median: 275.2 (48%)     max: 278.36 fps
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-07 4k
128.1 fps (37%)
specvp2020 solidworks-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-07 1080p
307.2 fps (82%)
specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
min: 307.72     avg: 324     median: 324 (63%)     max: 340.35 fps
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 520.25     avg: 537     median: 537.2 (88%)     max: 554.23 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 85.08     avg: 85.7     median: 85.7 (88%)     max: 86.29 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 419.68     avg: 439.8     median: 439.8 (64%)     max: 459.91 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 104.5     avg: 107.1     median: 107.1 (86%)     max: 109.65 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 133.03     avg: 151.3     median: 151.3 (75%)     max: 169.52 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 122.66     avg: 126.4     median: 126.4 (82%)     max: 130.04 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 161.47     avg: 168.1     median: 168.1 (76%)     max: 174.72 fps
specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k +
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
min: 237     avg: 299.6     median: 299.6 (31%)     max: 362.19 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
min: 36.13     avg: 36.5     median: 36.5 (35%)     max: 36.81 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
min: 115.93     avg: 116.2     median: 116.2 (55%)     max: 116.47 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 347     avg: 367.5     median: 367.5 (21%)     max: 388 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 742     median: 742.3 (5%)     max: 1380 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 162695     avg: 166244     median: 166244 (48%)     max: 169792 points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 124149     avg: 131449     median: 131448 (43%)     max: 138748 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 133     avg: 154.6     median: 154.6 (22%)     max: 176.1 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 134.7     avg: 158.6     median: 158.6 (22%)     max: 182.5 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 134     avg: 161.7     median: 161.7 (36%)     max: 189.4 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190Tooltip
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

2023
low 1920x1080
125  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
116.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
94.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
108.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
63.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
28.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
127.9
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
47.9
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off, no Path Tracing) 3840x2160
20.1
low 1920x1080
172.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
155.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
139.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
134.6  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
100.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
53.3  fps    + Compare
3840x2160
87.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
118  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
93.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
69.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
43.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
98  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
94  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
90  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
81  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
60  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
34  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
228 232 249 ~ 236 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
218 224 246 ~ 229 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
202 211 217 ~ 210 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
84.5 86.2 91.1 ~ 87 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
56.1 60.1 64.4 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
28.8 29.6 33.4 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
294
322
269
low 1920x1080
196.5 220 267.5 ~ 228 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
179.4 202.3 227.7 ~ 203 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
145.5 152.6 171.7 ~ 157 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
124 125 139.4 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
87.1 90.1 99.4 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
48.4 50.9 53.9 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
110.5 124.9 ~ 118 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
106.8 122.7 ~ 115 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
104.9 107.7 ~ 106 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
100 103.8 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
66.2 74.7 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
32.2 37 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
405 411 ~ 408 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
314 337 ~ 326 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
276 306 ~ 291 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
252 283 ~ 268 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
190.6 216 ~ 203 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
105.1 105.3 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
144 145 158 ~ 149 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
132 134 144 ~ 137 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
127 129 138 ~ 131 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
119 131 132 ~ 127 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
113 114 129 ~ 119 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
70 72 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
132.8 155.3 175.5 ~ 155 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
113.9 133 153.9 ~ 134 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
88.7 102.4 122.4 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
74.8 86.2 102.6 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
196.3 196.6 196.9 ~ 197 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
165.4 165.6 179.9 ~ 170 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
127.4 132.5 149.1 ~ 136 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
100.8 103.8 120 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
60.4 63.2 68.7 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
169.4 178 211 ~ 186 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
149.2 161.7 191.7 ~ 168 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
150.1 154 188.2 ~ 164 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
139.9 144 166.7 ~ 150 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
130 142.5 157.3 ~ 143 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
411.3 412.7 510.5 ~ 445 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
329.6 351.2 430.3 ~ 370 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
256 258.7 298.1 ~ 271 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
137 137.6 156.5 ~ 144 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
97 103.9 105.2 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
185.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
179.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
175.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
117.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
106.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
108  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
55.3
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
179.9
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
184.8
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty125116.694.6108.563.728.8
Baldur's Gate 3172.3155.2139.2134.6100.553.3
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart11893.969.454.543.433.3
Returnal989490816034
F1 22236229210876031
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands2282031571299251
Cyberpunk 2077 1.61181151061027035
Strange Brigade408326291268203105
Far Cry 514913713112711971
X-Plane 11.1115513410588
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark19717013610864
Dota 2 Reborn186168164150143
The Witcher 3445370271144102
GTA V185.4179.7175.3117.1106.6108
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


3
11


4
10


5
9

1
5
6

1
9
1
1
6
6
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 27. 07:00:34

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.056s ... 0.057s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.057s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.057s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11597 +0.014s ... 0.071s

#7 got single benchmarks 11597 +0.022s ... 0.093s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.093s

#9 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.454s ... 0.547s

#10 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.007s ... 0.554s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.357s ... 0.91s

#12 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.911s

#13 Got 165 rows for game benchmarks. +0.094s ... 1.004s

#14 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.004s

#15 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.012s ... 1.016s

#16 benchmarks composed for output. +1.046s ... 2.062s

#17 return log +0.108s ... 2.17s

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-03- 2)