Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Arc Graphics 140T

Intel Arc 140T

Intel Arc 140T is the iGPU used in the Intel Arrow Lake H/HX processor series. It is based on the Xe+ architecture (and not the newer Xe2 architecture that e.g. the Arc Graphics 140V in Lunar Lake uses). The graphics adapter features 8 cores (128 CUs, 8 Raytracing units) with XMX instructions for improved AI performance and 8 MB L2-Cache.

Thanks to the similar core count and clock speed but higher TDP, the performance should be similar to the Xe2 based Intel Arc 140V iGPU. First leaked benchmarks even showed a vastly better performance. All in all, we think that the Arc 140T will be only suited for entry level gaming in lowest settings.

The Arc 140T is integrated in the H and HX series of CPUs but use an own chiplet that is manufactured at TSMC in 5nm (N5P process).

ArchitectureXe+
Pipelines8 - unified
Raytracing Cores8
CacheL2: 8 MB
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12 Ultrimate
Date of Announcement06.01.2025
CPU in Arc 140TGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H16 x 4500 MHz, 45 W? MHz2350 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H16 x 4500 MHz, 28 W? MHz2300 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H16 x 4400 MHz, 28 W? MHz2250 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H16 x 4400 MHz, 28 W? MHz2250 MHz
min. - max.? MHz2250 - 2350 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.6 pt (11%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 4330     avg: 4485     median: 4484.5 (12%)     max: 4639 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 4074     avg: 4134     median: 4134 (8%)     max: 4194 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
237569 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
40950 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
54553 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 8721     avg: 9158     median: 9158 (14%)     max: 9595 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 9173     avg: 9736     median: 9736 (9%)     max: 10299 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
316591 Points (35%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 13286     avg: 14110     median: 14110 (17%)     max: 14934 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 12445     avg: 13689     median: 13688.5 (10%)     max: 14932 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
58039 Points (17%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
52086 Points (28%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
48766 Points (64%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
21927 points (16%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
159.1 fps (52%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 203     avg: 204     median: 204 (12%)     max: 205 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
44.1 fps (18%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
100.3 fps (18%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
250.7 fps (19%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
174.6 fps (19%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
289.3 fps (6%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
436.2 fps (18%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
927 fps (7%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 327     avg: 353     median: 353 (9%)     max: 379 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 41775     avg: 42406     median: 42405.5 (11%)     max: 43036 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 34146     avg: 36142     median: 36142 (9%)     max: 38138 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
1156 Samples/s (4%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
3762 Samples/s (7%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
7948 points (7%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 49.2     avg: 53.5     median: 53.5 (7%)     max: 57.7 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 48.7     avg: 58.8     median: 58.8 (19%)     max: 68.8 Watt
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 47     avg: 57.2     median: 57.2 (7%)     max: 67.4 Watt
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.368     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (59%)     max: 0.4468 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
77.7 82.3 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
69.5 74.1 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
56.6 58.9 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.3 19.9 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
37.6 41.7 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
32.3 34.7 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.7 29.7 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.1 27.3 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
21
24.8
low 1920x1080
39.4 40.9 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30.7 31.4 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.7 26.9 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.4 26.4 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
200 216 ~ 208 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
90.2 90.9 ~ 91 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
75.1 75.1 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
61.2 61.6 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
80 87 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
48 48 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44 45 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38 42 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
55.7 56.3 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
44.7 45.1 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38.4 38.8 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
80.6 90.1 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
46.9 47.9 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.4 30.6 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
105.6 107.7 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
83.5 84.7 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
76.8 80.1 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
69.5 83.8 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
156.4 172 ~ 164 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
152.3 161.1 ~ 157 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.7 43.2 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.8 17 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2480725820
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty40342926
Baldur's Gate 340312625
Strange Brigade208917561
Far Cry 584484540
X-Plane 11.11564539
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark854730
Dota 2 Reborn107847877
GTA V1641574217
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3
4
2

5
3
1
2
5
2
4
1
2






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.29
log 25. 11:02:56

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 05:07:00 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12966 +0.03s ... 0.039s

#8 got single benchmarks 12966 +0.01s ... 0.049s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.049s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.62s ... 0.669s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.669s

#12 Got 204 rows for game benchmarks. +0.048s ... 0.717s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.717s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.006s ... 0.723s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.068s ... 0.791s

#16 return log +0.004s ... 0.795s

Notebook reviews with Intel Arc Graphics 140T graphics card

Intel Arc Graphics 140T analysis – Arrow Lake-H iGPU gains frame generation support

Intel Arc Graphics 140T analysis – Arrow Lake-H iGPU gains frame generation support

Intel is equipping the new Arrow Lake-H mobile processors with the Arc Graphics 140T and 130T, which are enhanced versions of the Intel Arc Graphics from the Me...
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 14.00" | 1.8 kg
Intel Arc Graphics 140T analysis – Arrow Lake-H iGPU gains frame generation support

Intel Arc Graphics 140T analysis – Arrow Lake-H iGPU gains frame generation support

Intel is equipping the new Arrow Lake-H mobile processors with the Arc Graphics 140T and 130T, which are enhanced versions of the Intel Arc Graphics from the Me...
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 16.00" | 1.6 kg
Intel Core Ultra 200H (Image source: Intel)

Intel Arrow Lake-H CPU analysis: Core Ultra 200H makes Lunar Lake almost redundant

Intel is introducing its new Arrow Lake-H series mobile processors (Core Ultra 200H), covering a power range of 28 to 115 watts. We examine two implementations ...
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 14.00" | 1.8 kg
Intel Core Ultra 200H (Image source: Intel)

Intel Arrow Lake-H CPU analysis: Core Ultra 200H makes Lunar Lake almost redundant

Intel is introducing its new Arrow Lake-H series mobile processors (Core Ultra 200H), covering a power range of 28 to 115 watts. We examine two implementations ...
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 16.00" | 1.6 kg
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED review - The multi-screen convertible now with Intel Arrow Lake

Asus Zenbook Duo OLED review - The multi-screen convertible now with Intel Arrow Lake

The Zenbook Duo is one of the first devices to be equipped with the new Arrow Lake mobile processors from Intel and it's still a highly interesting device thank...
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 14.00" | 1.8 kg

MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo review - The multimedia laptop with a speedy Arrow Lake CPU and impressive runtimes

Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-02- 4)