Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Arc Graphics 140T

Intel Arc 140T

Intel Arc 140T is the iGPU used in the Intel Arrow Lake H/HX processor series. It is based on the Xe+ architecture (and not the newer Xe2 architecture that e.g. the Arc Graphics 140V in Lunar Lake uses). The graphics adapter features 8 cores (128 CUs, 8 Raytracing units) with XMX instructions for improved AI performance and 8 MB L2-Cache.

Thanks to the similar core count and clock speed but higher TDP, the performance should be similar to the Xe2 based Intel Arc 140V iGPU. First leaked benchmarks even showed a vastly better performance. All in all, we think that the Arc 140T will be only suited for entry level gaming in lowest settings.

The Arc 140T is integrated in the H and HX series of CPUs but use an own chiplet that is manufactured at TSMC in 5nm (N5P process).

ArchitectureXe+
Pipelines8 - unified
Raytracing Cores8
CacheL2: 8 MB
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12 Ultrimate
Date of Announcement06.01.2025
CPU in Arc 140TGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H16 x 4500 MHz, 45 W? MHz2350 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H16 x 4500 MHz, 28 W? MHz2300 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H16 x 4400 MHz, 28 W? MHz2250 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H16 x 4400 MHz, 28 W? MHz2250 MHz
min. - max.? MHz2250 - 2350 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.4 pt (10%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 2769     avg: 4131     median: 4330 (12%)     max: 4694 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 2466     avg: 3735     median: 3985 (8%)     max: 4212 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 497297     avg: 507977     median: 507977 (51%)     max: 518657 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 199219     avg: 215572     median: 209928 (25%)     max: 237569 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 36844     avg: 38751     median: 38605 (36%)     max: 40950 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 48687     avg: 51791     median: 51962 (13%)     max: 54553 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 4899     avg: 7997     median: 8186 (12%)     max: 9595 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5433     avg: 8683     median: 9173 (8%)     max: 10299 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 231964     avg: 265891     median: 249117 (28%)     max: 316591 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3927     avg: 5780     median: 5779.5 (7%)     max: 7632 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 29556     avg: 31458     median: 31457.5 (30%)     max: 33359 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 35478     avg: 37762     median: 37762 (15%)     max: 40046 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 9776     avg: 12816     median: 13218 (16%)     max: 14934 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 9684     avg: 12370     median: 12566 (10%)     max: 14932 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 52307     avg: 55244     median: 55385 (16%)     max: 58039 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 46778     avg: 49641     median: 50059 (27%)     max: 52086 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 48490     avg: 51505     median: 51505 (56%)     max: 54520 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 45558     avg: 47033     median: 46776 (61%)     max: 48766 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 25.4     avg: 27.9     median: 27.9 (8%)     max: 30.4 fps
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 65     avg: 73.3     median: 73.3 (18%)     max: 81.6 fps
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 3.75     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (1%)     max: 4.02 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 27.7     avg: 31     median: 31 (5%)     max: 34.2 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
19.3 fps (5%)
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 69     avg: 73.6     median: 73.6 (20%)     max: 78.2 fps
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 0.81     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (1%)     max: 0.92 fps
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
36.1 fps (14%)
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 71.4     avg: 71.6     median: 71.6 (12%)     max: 71.8 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 69     avg: 69.5     median: 69.5 (10%)     max: 69.9 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 67.1     avg: 70.3     median: 70.3 (19%)     max: 73.4 fps
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 6.64     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (1%)     max: 7.05 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 26.9     avg: 28.7     median: 28.7 (5%)     max: 30.5 fps
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
31.1 fps (5%)
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 78.3     avg: 80.5     median: 80.5 (9%)     max: 82.7 fps
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 6.39     avg: 6.6     median: 6.6 (2%)     max: 6.81 fps
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 48.8     avg: 49.9     median: 49.9 (7%)     max: 51 fps
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 96.9     avg: 98.3     median: 98.3 (11%)     max: 99.6 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 58.1     avg: 59.3     median: 59.3 (9%)     max: 60.5 fps
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 6.76     avg: 6.9     median: 6.9 (1%)     max: 7.02 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 16.9     avg: 17.3     median: 17.3 (5%)     max: 17.7 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 119     avg: 123.5     median: 123.5 (13%)     max: 128 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 6.84     avg: 6.9     median: 6.9 (1%)     max: 6.89 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 37.1     avg: 38     median: 38 (13%)     max: 38.8 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 23.8     avg: 24.1     median: 24.1 (12%)     max: 24.3 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 25.3     avg: 26     median: 26 (7%)     max: 26.6 fps
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
min: 6.27     avg: 6.5     median: 6.5 (1%)     max: 6.81 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
min: 6.8     avg: 6.9     median: 6.9 (4%)     max: 7.08 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
min: 51.3     avg: 52.2     median: 52.2 (7%)     max: 53.1 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
min: 7.27     avg: 7.6     median: 7.6 (1%)     max: 7.94 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
min: 24     avg: 25.4     median: 25.4 (11%)     max: 26.7 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
min: 14.3     avg: 14.5     median: 14.5 (9%)     max: 14.6 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
min: 16.6     avg: 17.2     median: 17.2 (6%)     max: 17.8 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 13323     avg: 18160     median: 19230 (14%)     max: 21927 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 155.37     avg: 163     median: 159.1 (52%)     max: 174.65 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 152     avg: 197.1     median: 205 (12%)     max: 219.75 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 38.3     avg: 41.2     median: 41.2 (15%)     max: 44.1 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 81.3     avg: 90.8     median: 90.8 (16%)     max: 100.3 fps
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 208.5     avg: 229.6     median: 229.6 (17%)     max: 250.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 155.2     avg: 164.9     median: 164.9 (16%)     max: 174.6 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 249.6     avg: 269.5     median: 269.5 (6%)     max: 289.3 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 374.3     avg: 405.3     median: 405.3 (17%)     max: 436.2 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 822.6     avg: 875     median: 874.8 (7%)     max: 927 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 499.3     median: 315 (8%)     max: 1528 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
min: 3.64     avg: 96.9     median: 143.6 (26%)     max: 143.6 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 30391     avg: 40119     median: 41216 (11%)     max: 43036 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 26352     avg: 34505     median: 35881 (9%)     max: 38138 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 965     avg: 1108     median: 1156 (4%)     max: 1203 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 3657     avg: 3852     median: 3762 (7%)     max: 4137 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 7612     avg: 7772     median: 7757 (6%)     max: 7948 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 42.8     avg: 50.1     median: 49.9 (7%)     max: 57.7 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 48.7     avg: 59.4     median: 57.7 (17%)     max: 70 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.4     avg: 55.5     median: 55.6 (7%)     max: 67.4 Watt
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.326     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (1%)     max: 0.4468 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
53.5 76 76.5 77.7 78.7 82.3 86.5 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47.4 69.4 69.5 70.3 71.5 74.1 77.6 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.5 54.2 55.2 56.6 58.9 59.3 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.8 18.1 19.3 19.9 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
127.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
88.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
66.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
202.1
low 1920x1080
24.8 35.8 35.9 37.3 37.3 37.6 38.4 40.8 41.7 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.8 30 30.4 30.8 32.3 33.5 34.7 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17 25.2 26.6 27 27.7 28.7 29.7 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.4 20.9 22.8 23.5 24.1 24.5 24.7 24.8 26.5 27.3 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
54.2
57
53.8
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
21
24.8
26.2
21.1
21.5
23.2
21.7
21.9
14.8
low 1920x1080
25.6 35.6 36.9 37.8 38.8 39.1 39.4 40.9 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.3 28.4 28.8 29.8 30 30.3 30.7 31.4 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.6 24.8 25.1 25.3 25.7 26 26 26.9 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.2 23 24.4 24.4 24.7 24.8 25.2 25.4 26.4 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
51.7
55.2
58
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
102.2 158.1 160.5 194.2 200 208 216 ~ 177 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36 61.6 75.8 83.6 90.2 90.9 92.1 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32.1 56.6 64.8 71.2 75.1 75.1 76.5 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.8 46.2 48.6 53.9 59 61.2 61.6 63.1 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
80 87 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
48 48 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44 45 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38 42 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
52.1 53.1 53.3 55.7 56.3 56.4 58.8 61.7 62.9 64.3 73.4 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43.2 44.4 44.7 44.9 45.1 47.1 47.3 47.3 52 54.9 57.7 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34.3 36.1 37.2 37.7 38.1 38.4 38.5 38.8 43.3 46.3 49.2 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
47 72.3 72.9 75.2 80.1 80.6 80.8 81.6 88.7 90.1 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25.4 40.1 40.8 42 44.2 44.9 46.9 47.1 47.1 47.9 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.5 25.8 26 27.9 29.4 30.6 31.4 31.7 33 33.1 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23.4  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
98.9 100.1 102.9 103.5 104.1 104.7 104.8 105.6 105.6 107.7 109.1 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
61.9 63.9 68.8 75.4 76.8 78.3 82.9 83.5 84.7 89.6 91.2 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49.7 51.8 53.1 53.6 65 69.6 76.8 80.1 82.5 83.5 88.1 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51.5 61.1 68.9 69.5 75.5 76.7 80.1 82.1 83.2 83.8 94.9 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
158.7 164.4 ~ 162 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
100.9 109.9 ~ 105 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
54.9 63.6 ~ 59 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
28.1 31.2 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
72.3
64.5
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
134.6 156.4 168.9 171 172 176.5 176.6 ~ 165 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
111.4 152.3 153.9 160 161.1 164.9 165.2 ~ 153 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.5 39.7 41.2 41.7 41.7 43.2 43.8 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.4 15.9 16.3 16.8 17 17 17.1 18 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
112.8
133.7
122.9
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
125
150.8
137.3
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2476695419
Total War Pharaoh127.888.366.559.8
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty37312623
Baldur's Gate 337292524
Strange Brigade177766453
Far Cry 584484540
X-Plane 11.11594840
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark77432923.4
Dota 2 Reborn104786975
The Witcher 31621055930
GTA V1651534016
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3
4
4
1
4
5
1
3
5
3
4
4
1
1





For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 02. 08:57:40

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 01 Aug 2025 05:45:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.01s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.01s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12966 +0.03s ... 0.04s

#8 got single benchmarks 12966 +0.038s ... 0.079s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.079s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +1.373s ... 1.452s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.453s

#12 Got 412 rows for game benchmarks. +0.089s ... 1.542s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.542s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.009s ... 1.551s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.165s ... 1.716s

#16 return log +0.004s ... 1.72s

Notebook reviews with Intel Arc Graphics 140T graphics card

Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G7 review - The affordable office laptop stands out from the competition with its 120 Hz display

Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G7 review - The affordable office laptop stands out from the competition with its 120 Hz display

Lenovo has updated its affordable 14-inch office laptop, equipping it with Intel's Arrow Lake processors and a new high-resolution IPS display with a refresh ra...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 14.00" | 1.4 kg
Geekom Mini IT15

2025 Mini PC review: Geekom Mini IT15, a mini-workstation with Intel Core Ultra for professionals and creatives, reviewed

Geekom's Mini IT15 is a powerful and compact desktop PC powered by the latest-gen Intel Core Ultra processor. The manufacturer promises high performance and ver...
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 595 g
This affordable Lenovo laptop is more upgradeable than most ThinkPads: ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 IAL review

This affordable Lenovo laptop is more upgradeable than most ThinkPads: ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 IAL review

The ThinkBook brand is always in the shadows of the much more well-known and popular ThinkPad. While the ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 IAL is not going to kill the demand ...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 14.00" | 1.5 kg
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 convertible review: Double the screen without double the weight

Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 convertible review: Double the screen without double the weight

The eye-catching Yoga Book 9 is back this year in a larger 14-inch form factor for even more screen real estate than before. You'll love the new model if you en...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 14.00" | 1.2 kg
2025 RedmiBook Pro 14

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 review - Now with Arrow Lake and 16 hours of battery life

The 2025 RedmiBook Pro 14 features Intel Arrow Lake CPUs, a brighter 120 Hz IPS display, and improved battery life. Despite a price increase, it remains a stron...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 14.00" | 1.4 kg

Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » Intel Arc Graphics 140T analysis – Arrow Lake-H iGPU gains frame generation support

MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » Intel Arc Graphics 140T analysis – Arrow Lake-H iGPU gains frame generation support

Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » Intel Arrow Lake-H CPU analysis: Core Ultra 200H makes Lunar Lake almost redundant

MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » Intel Arrow Lake-H CPU analysis: Core Ultra 200H makes Lunar Lake almost redundant

Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » Asus Zenbook Duo OLED review - The multi-screen convertible now with Intel Arrow Lake

MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo review - The multimedia laptop with a speedy Arrow Lake CPU and impressive runtimes

Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10

Asus VivoBook S16 OLED S5606CA: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S16 OLED S5606CA

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UX3405CA: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UX3405CA

Honor MagicBook Pro 14 (2025): Intel Core Ultra 9 285, 14.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Honor MagicBook Pro 14 (2025)

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 9 285H: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 9 285H

LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90TP: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 16.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90TP

MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG

Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA

Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G7-21SYS00H00: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » 14-inch office laptop with great maintenance options: ThinkPad E14 G7 offers 2 SSD and 2 RAM slots

Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » This Lenovo ThinkBook laptop is an upgradeability dream - and it is affordable

Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00E00: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
   » Is the Core Ultra 7 255H worth it in the ThinkPad E16 G3? We tested it

Khadas Mind 2s: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 0.4 kg
   » Modular Khadas Mind 2s mini PC reviewed: Portable desktop replacement can fit into pockets

Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14 Arrow Lake CPU throttling is a bit steeper than we would like

   » Latest Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14 weighs even less than the smaller 13-inch version while offering larger displays

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-02- 4)