Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce 920M

NVIDIA GeForce 920M

The NVIDIA GeForce 920M (sometimes also NVIDIA GeForce GT 920M) is an entry level DirectX 12 graphics card. It is based on the 28 nm Kepler architecture and uses the same GK208 chip as the GeForce GT 730M, 825M and 740M. The 384 shaders are clocked at 954 MHz, while the memory (64-bit DDR3 interface) runs at 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective).

Architecture

GK208 is based on the Kepler architecture and offers two shader blocks, called SMX, each with 192 shaders for a total of 384 shader cores. The shaders are clocked at the same speed as the rest of the chip. Furthermore, the GK208 chip has 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs on a 64-bit memory interface.

PCIe 3.0 is now supported by the mobile Kepler series and GPU Boost 2.0 mode can automatically overclock the card if the laptop cooling system allows it. This feature is available on any notebook with a graphics card from the 800M series.

Performance

The GeForce 920M offers a performance similar to the AMD Radeon R7 M260 or R7 M360 and will handle modern games (as of 2014/2015) in low settings only. For comparison, a GeForce 930M is about 20 to 30 percent faster than the 920M.

Features

The feature set of the 920M corresponds to the GT 730M and 825M. This includes support for up to 4 active displays. Furthermore, high resolution monitors of up to 3840x2160 pixels can now be connected using DisplayPort 1.2 or HDMI 1.4a if available. HD-Audio codecs, such as Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD, can be transmitted via bitstream mode through the HDMI port. However, as most laptops will feature Optimus, the integrated GPU will likely have direct control over the display ports and may limit the feature set available by the Nvidia Kepler cards.

The 5th generation PureVideo HD video processor (VP5) offers hardware decoding of HD videos. Common codecs such as MPEG-1/2, MPEG-4 ASP, H.264 and VC1/WMV9 are fully supported up to 4K resolutions while VC1 and MPEG-4 are supported up to 1080p. Two streams can be decoded in parallel for features such as Picture-in-Picture. Another feature is the inclusion of a dedicated video encoding engine similar to Intel QuickSync that can be accessed via the NVENCI API.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the GeForce 920M is similar to the 825M and suited for 13-inch laptops and above.

GeForce 900M Series

GeForce 945M compare 512 @ 0.93 - 1.05 GHz128 Bit @ 2000 MHz
Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5) compare 384 @ 0.95 - 0.99 GHz64 Bit @ 5012 MHz
GeForce 940MX compare 384 @ 1.12 - 1.24 GHz64 Bit @ 4000 MHz
GeForce 940M compare 384 @ 1.07 - 1.18 GHz64 Bit @ 2000 MHz
GeForce 930MX compare 384 @ 0.95 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit @ 2000 MHz
GeForce 930M compare 384 @ 0.93 - 0.94 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
GeForce 920MX compare 256 @ 0.97 - 0.99 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
GeForce 920M 384 @ 0.95 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
GeForce 910M compare 384 @ 0.64 GHz64 Bit @ 2000 MHz
CodenameN16V-GM-S
ArchitectureKepler
Pipelines384 - unified
Core Speed954 MHz
Memory Speed1800 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5
Transistor Count1.3 Billion
technology28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, Verde Drivers, CUDA, 3D Vision, 3DTV Play, GPU Boost 2.0
Date of Announcement27.01.2015
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.geforce.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.5 pt (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 85619     avg: 89910     median: 90619 (10%)     max: 93491 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 4167     avg: 5212     median: 5240.5 (6%)     max: 5778 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 7053     avg: 7333     median: 7242 (2%)     max: 8206 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1023     avg: 1051     median: 1047.5 (2%)     max: 1099 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1120     avg: 1165     median: 1161.5 (1%)     max: 1259 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 36457     avg: 52038     median: 51654 (6%)     max: 70114 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1573     avg: 1797     median: 1822 (3%)     max: 1899 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1581     avg: 1711     median: 1718.5 (1%)     max: 1816 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 8626     avg: 9190     median: 9003.5 (12%)     max: 10128 Points
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 3.23     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (2%)     max: 3.68 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 1.28     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (1%)     max: 1.31 fps
specvp11 sw-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 7.34     avg: 8.1     median: 8.1 (6%)     max: 8.85 fps
specvp11 proe-05 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 1.5     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (2%)     max: 1.9 fps
specvp11 maya-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 6.27     avg: 6.5     median: 6.5 (5%)     max: 6.72 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 14.75     avg: 15.2     median: 15.2 (16%)     max: 15.55 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 17.77     avg: 18.3     median: 18.3 (9%)     max: 18.73 fps
specvp11 catia-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 7.22     avg: 7.4     median: 7.4 (4%)     max: 7.67 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 1793     avg: 4768     median: 5181.5 (4%)     max: 6030 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 10.21     avg: 31.3     median: 34 (12%)     max: 39.83 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 15.32     avg: 41     median: 44.3 (3%)     max: 51.3 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 33.9     avg: 35.6     median: 35.6 (1%)     max: 37.3 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 44.5     avg: 46.9     median: 46.9 (3%)     max: 49.2 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 95.8     avg: 98.4     median: 98.4 (1%)     max: 100.9 fps
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
16.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
74.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
70  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
67.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
65.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
29.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
24.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
9.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
17.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
40.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
59.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
20.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Hitman 2

Hitman 2

2018
low 1280x720
11.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
14.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
23  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
low 1280x720
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
24.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
152.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
23.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
66  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
33.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.5 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
40  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Destiny 2

Destiny 2

2017
low 1280x720
28.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
ELEX

ELEX

2017
low 1280x720
19.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
26  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
16.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
34  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
12.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
57.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
50.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
87  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
34.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
38.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium / Off FXAA 1366x768
32.1
med. 1366x768
59.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
30.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
23.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
38  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
12.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
17  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
30.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
54  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
38.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium (Render Scale 100 %) 2xAF FXAA 1920x1080
22.1
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
19.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x768
12.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
21.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
19.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
23.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
21  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
XCOM 2

XCOM 2

2016
low 1280x720
21.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
18.3 22.2 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.3 13.4 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
47.6 48.3 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.6 30.1 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
24.2 26.9 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.8 21.2 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
0 (!) 34.7 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
19  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fallout 4

Fallout 4

2015
low 1280x720
23.2 26.6 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.4 16.5 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
28.6 32.4 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.6 19.5 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
30.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 16

FIFA 16

2015
low 1280x720
69 (!) 81.5 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
46  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1366x768
82  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
61  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Mad Max

Mad Max

2015
med. 1366x768
26.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
67  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
57  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
14 16 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11 13 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7 8 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6 6 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
18.4 19.2 20.1 22.9 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.9 11.1 12.1 13.7 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.3 6.5 6.7 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.6 3.8 4 ~ 4 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
114 134.2 135.2 136.1 136.6 ~ 131 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31.1 33.1 33.2 34.3 44 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.9 16.8 16.9 17.3 22.8 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12 12.5 12.5 12.5 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
55.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
37.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
2.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
40.9 42.2 51.2 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.7 30 36.5 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.4 12.7 12.9 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7 7.3 7.7 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Evolve

Evolve

2015
low 1024x768
24.3 25.4 26.1 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.9 18.8 19 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.9 9.8 10 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.1 7.2 7.3 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Crew

The Crew

2014
low 1280x720
27.1 28.6 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.1 22.2 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11 12.3 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.2 8.3 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
31.6 31.7 32 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26.8 26.9 27 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.2 13.5 14.9 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.4 8.9 9.9 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 4

Far Cry 4

2014
low 1024x768
32.8 33.1 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20 21.6 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.2 9 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5 8.3 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
19.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
47.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
23.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
76 96 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
67 71 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36 44 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21 26 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
26.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
25  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
44 47 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.1 30.5 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.3 17.1 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.1 11.2 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
29.3 29.9 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
18.7 19.2 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.8 10.4 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.3 7.6 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 15

Fifa 15

2014
low 1280x720
68.3 71.6 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
52.4 55.2 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.2 34.1 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
89 175.8 179.2 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
68.5 73 74 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.8 31.5 34.8 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.7 23 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
46.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
106.6 120.3 124.8 128.5 ~ 120 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
51.9 52.5 55.3 57.4 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.7 24.1 27.8 28.1 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5 12.5 16.2 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
35.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
37.1 38.8 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
med. 1280x720
31.1 32.4 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.2 16.4 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
22.9 25 26.5 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.1 14.9 15.6 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
12.3 16.9 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.9 6 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
51.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
35.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
24.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
47.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
36.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
31.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
31.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
40.9 62.4 64.1 73.5 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.5 35.3 35.3 39.5 42 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
24.8 29.6 29.9 33.1 35 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.5 11 11.7 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
155 159.9 ~ 157 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
72.8 74.8 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
32.8 40.3 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5 14.8 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
83.6 83.6 83.8 84.6 85 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
42 42.9 43 43.3 43.9 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25 25.4 25.7 25.8 25.9 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11 11.8 11.8 11.8 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
33.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
42.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Torchlight 2

Torchlight 2

2012
ultra 1920x1080
61  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
110.3 111.2 ~ 111 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
69.2 72.7 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
55.4 59.6 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36.1 37.2 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
54.6 55 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.2 36.9 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
19.8 27 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.9 14 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
18  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
75.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
56.9  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
46.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 202016.3
League of Legends74.97067.465.1
Total War: Three Kingdoms29.47.9
Dirt Rally 2.024.92
Far Cry New Dawn13
Metro Exodus9.666.67
Just Cause 417.3
Darksiders III40.11912.210.2
Farming Simulator 1959.221.612.4
Fallout 7620.5
Hitman 211.3
Call of Duty Black Ops 414.8
Forza Horizon 4231615
FIFA 19
Shadow of the Tomb Raider17
F1 201812
Monster Hunter World15.8
The Crew 224.59.3
Far Cry 514
World of Tanks enCore152.125.48.9
X-Plane 11.1123.224.823.39
Kingdom Come: Deliverance15.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark13.4
Fortnite6629
Star Wars Battlefront 233.910.510.5
Need for Speed Payback
Call of Duty WWII4022.8
Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus
Destiny 228.1
ELEX19.3
The Evil Within 212
Middle-earth: Shadow of War26
FIFA 18
Ark Survival Evolved16.6
F1 20173415
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)12.3
Team Fortress 257.855
Dirt 450.420.5
Rocket League8731.720.6
Mass Effect Andromeda
For Honor34.4
Resident Evil 738.7
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare
Farming Simulator 1759.724.614.2
Battlefield 130.123.9
Civilization VI3819.3
Deus Ex Mankind Divided12.89.2
No Man's Sky17
Mirror's Edge Catalyst30.118.6
Overwatch5438.417.1
Doom19.816.8
Ashes of the Singularity12.76.96
Need for Speed 201621.3
Hitman 201619.815.7
The Division23.816.7
Far Cry Primal21
XCOM 221.5
Rise of the Tomb Raider20126.43.7
Rainbow Six Siege483015.212.4
Just Cause 3262110.39.1
Star Wars Battlefront17219.68.6
Assassin's Creed Syndicate19
Fallout 425169.36.2
Call of Duty: Black Ops 33119
Anno 220530.417.58.55.3
FIFA 16754628.2
World of Warships826128.718.1
Mad Max26.9
Dota 2 Reborn675727.325.3
Batman: Arkham Knight151286
The Witcher 3201274
Dirt Rally131351812
GTA V55.937.28.72.3
Battlefield Hardline4532127
Evolve2519107
The Crew2822128
Dragon Age: Inquisition3227149
Far Cry 4332187
Assassin's Creed Unity19.512.66.13.9
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare47.323.511.57.9
F1 201486694024
The Evil Within26.517.710.1
Ryse: Son of Rome25177.74.9
Alien: Isolation4629159
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor3019106
Fifa 15705434
Sims 4148723223
Risen 3: Titan Lords46.826.4119.1
GRID: Autosport120542614
Watch Dogs35.522.67.44.1
Wolfenstein: The New Order383215
Thief2515156
Battlefield 451.435.124.59.6
Total War: Rome II47.636.931.2
Metro: Last Light31.225
BioShock Infinite60363011
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm157743714
Tomb Raider84432612
Crysis 333.521.3
Hitman: Absolution42.528.713.65.3
Torchlight 261
Diablo III111715837
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim55362314
Batman: Arkham City1813
Mafia 275.456.946.5
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
47
32
12
5
47
16
6
41
10
1
38
2
2



1


For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 05. 17:25:36

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 04 Mar 2024 05:34:43 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.07s ... 0.071s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.071s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.071s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 6220 +0.031s ... 0.102s

#7 got single benchmarks 6220 +0.043s ... 0.145s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.145s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.839s ... 0.984s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.984s

#11 Got 421 rows for game benchmarks. +0.03s ... 1.014s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.014s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.084s ... 1.098s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +2.503s ... 3.6s

#15 return log +0.048s ... 3.648s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce 920M graphics card

Lenovo IdeaPad 300-15IBR Notebook Review

Lenovo IdeaPad 300-15IBR Notebook Review

Daily companion. Large display, enough performance to handle the various daily tasks on might encounter and an attractive price point: Lenovo's IdeaPad 300 cost...
Intel Pentium N3700 | NVIDIA GeForce 920M | 15.60" | 2.3 kg
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE

Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE Notebook Review

Average Joe? The Toshiba Satellite C55-C is an entry-level notebook designed for word processing and multimedia tasks. The spec sheet lacks any real highlights ...
Intel Core i3-5005U | NVIDIA GeForce 920M | 15.60" | 2.2 kg
Lenovo Yoga 500-14ISK Notebook Review

Lenovo Yoga 500-14ISK Notebook Review

Don't expect too much! Lenovo's Yoga 500 is another 2-in-1 convertible with a 14-inch screen on the market. It is supposed to continue the success of the Yoga ...
Intel Core i5-6200U | NVIDIA GeForce 920M | 14.00" | 1.8 kg
Lenovo U31-70 80M5003EGE Notebook Review

Lenovo U31-70 80M5003EGE Notebook Review

Lack of endurance. Lenovo's 13.3-inch subnotebook attracts with its good connectivity. However, the battery life is, unfortunately, just middling.
Intel Core i7-5500U | NVIDIA GeForce 920M | 13.30" | 1.5 kg
Lenovo B70-80 80MR0006GE

Lenovo B70-80 80MR0006GE Notebook Review

More than mediocre? The less expensive devices from Lenovo in particular often got a very mediocre rating in the recent past; the author was obviously disappoi...
Intel Core i5-5200U | NVIDIA GeForce 920M | 17.30" | 2.8 kg

Dell Inspiron 17-5758: Intel Core i7-5500U, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  Review » Dell Inspiron 17-5758 Notebook Review

Dell Inspiron 15-5558: Intel Core i5-5200U, 15.60", 2 kg
  Review » Dell Inspiron 15-5558 Notebook Review

Asus F555LJ-XX110H: Intel Core i3-5010U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  Review » Asus F555LJ (GeForce 920M) Notebook Review

Asus K541UJ-GQ125T: Intel Core i7-7500U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus K541UJ-GQ125T

Asus K541UJ-GQ109T: Intel Core i5-7200U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus K541UJ-GQ109T

Asus K541UJ-GQ108T: Intel Core i5-7200U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus K541UJ-GQ108T

Asus K541UJ-GQ481T: Intel Core i7-7500U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus K541UJ-GQ481T

Asus K541UJ-GQ127T: Intel Core i7-7500U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus K541UJ-GQ127T

Asus K541UJ-GQ110T: Intel Core i5-7200U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus K541UJ-GQ110T

Asus X555SJ: Intel Pentium N3700, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus X555SJ

Asus K541UV-XX335T: Intel Core i7-6500U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus K541UV-XX335T

Asus F556UJ-XO155T: Intel Core i3-6100U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus F556UJ-XO155T

Asus X556UJ-XO044T: Intel Core i7-6500U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus X556UJ-XO044T

Asus X556UJ-XO001T: Intel Core i7-6500U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus X556UJ-XO001T

Lenovo Yoga 500-14ISK: Intel Core i5-6200U, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 500-14ISK

Asus X302UJ: Intel Core i5-6200U, 13.30", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus X302UJ

Acer Aspire E5-573G-548N: Intel Core i5-5200U, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire E5-573G-548N

Lenovo B70-80 80MR0006GE: Intel Core i5-5200U, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo B70-80 80MR0006GE

Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1F0: Intel Core i3-4005U, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1F0

Asus X554LJ-XX002D: Intel Core i3-5010U, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus X554LJ-XX002D

Lenovo Yoga 500-14-80N400JKGE: Intel Core i5-5200U, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 500-14-80N400JKGE

Dell Inspiron 15-5558: Intel Core i5-5200U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 15-5558

Dell Inspiron 17-5758: Intel Core i7-5500U, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 17-5758-4753

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter