Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon HD 7660G

AMD Radeon HD 7660G

The AMD Radeon HD 7660G or HD7660G is a processor graphics card in the Trinity APUs from AMD. It is the fastest version and is featured only in the A10 series. It is based on the VLIW4 architecture of the Radeon HD 6900 desktop series and doesn't offer a dedicated graphics memory.

Trinity got its name due to the fact that it consists out of three different architecture parts. The CPU cores are based on the Piledriver architecture (Bulldozer successor), the GPU cores on Northern Islands GPU cores (6900 desktop series architecture) and the video processing engine and multi-display connectivity from the new Southern Islands GPU architecture (HD 7900 series).

The integrated UVD3 video decoder (Avivo HD) allows the full decoding of Multi-View Codec (MVC), MPEG-4 Part 2 (DivX, xVid), MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 and Adobe Flash HD videos.

The performance of the Radeon HD 7660G differs from the used benchmark. In synthetic benchmarks like 3DMark 11 it reaches the level of the dedicated Radeon HD 7670M. However, in games (and playable settings) the performance is more similar to the AMD Radeon HD 6630M. Therefore, the performance is significantly better than the Intel HD Graphics 4000 in the Ivy Bridge Quad-Core models.

The shaders of the chip can also be used for general computing. More information and benchmarks of OpenCL and DirectCompute 11 tests can be found in our Trinity Test of the A10-4600M.

The APU is still manufactured in 32nm and as most A10 series parts should be classified with a 35 Watt TDP, the HD 7660G is best suited for laptops of 13-14-inch an up.

Radeon HD 7000G Series

Radeon HD 7660G 384 @ 0.5 - 0.69 GHz
Radeon HD 7620G compare 384 @ 0.36 - 0.5 GHz
Radeon HD 7640G compare 256 @ 0.5 - 0.69 GHz
Radeon HD 7600G compare 384 @ 0.32 - 0.42 GHz
Radeon HD 7500G compare 256 @ 0.33 - 0.42 GHz
Radeon HD 7520G compare 192 @ 0.5 - 0.69 GHz
Radeon HD 7420G compare 128 @ 0.48 - 0.66 GHz
Radeon HD 7400G compare 192 @ 0.33 - 0.42 GHz
CodenameTrinity
ArchitectureTerascale 3
Pipelines384 - unified
Core Speed497 - 686 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.2
Transistor Count1.3 Million
technology32 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement15.05.2012
Information24 TMUs, 68 ROPs, 6 Compute Units (OpenCL 1.2)
CPU in Radeon HD 7660GGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD A10-4600M4 x 2300 MHz, 35 W497 MHz686 MHz
AMD A10-4657M4 x 2300 MHz, 35 W497 MHz686 MHz
min. - max.497 MHz686 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
specvp11 sw-02 +
specvp11 proe-05 +
specvp11 maya-03 +
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
specvp11 ensight-04 +
specvp11 catia-03 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
15.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
47.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
49.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
29.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
37.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
46.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Mad Max

Mad Max

2015
med. 1366x768
16.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
48.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
15.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
89  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
27.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
20  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
36  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fifa 15

Fifa 15

2014
high 1366x768
32 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
40.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
82  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
39  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
18.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph