Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon RX 8050S

AMD Radeon RX 8050S

AMD Radeon RX 8050S - is an integrated graphics unit installed in the AMD's Strix Halo APU series. The iGPU features 32 CUs and is based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The raw performance is similar to the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 laptop GPU according to first leaked benchmarks and therefore capable of handling even demanding games.

AMD Radeon RX 8000S Series

Radeon RX 8060S compare 40 @ 2.9 GHz
Radeon RX 8050S 32 @ 2.8 GHz
Radeon RX 8040S compare 16 @ 2.8 GHz
Pipelines32 - unified
Raytracing Cores32
Core Speed2800 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyes
Date of Announcement06.01.2025
CPU in Radeon RX 8050SGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen AI Max 39012 x 3200 MHz, 55 W? MHz2800 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 39012 x 3200 MHz, 55 W? MHz2800 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI Max 3858 x 3600 MHz, 55 W? MHz2800 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 3858 x 3600 MHz, 55 W? MHz2800 MHz
min. - max.? MHz2800 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
8.8 pt (26%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 9006     avg: 9007     median: 9007 (24%)     max: 9008 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 8898     avg: 9502     median: 9502 (19%)     max: 10106 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
65007 Points (61%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
130145 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
21299 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
23521 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
570519 Points (63%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
29391 Points (36%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
36323 Points (28%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
79256 Points (23%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
61398 Points (80%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
194.3 fps (38%)
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
277.5 fps (34%)
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
135.8 fps (38%)
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
358.5 fps (38%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
49.1 fps (8%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
100.7 fps (35%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
68.4 fps (33%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
17019 points (12%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
309 fps (18%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.9 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
79.8 fps (30%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
182.6 fps (33%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
583 fps (43%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
516 fps (49%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
595 fps (13%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
714 fps (30%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
2044 fps (16%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
104.6 fps (3%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
66413 points (17%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
59450 points (15%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
2952 Samples/s (11%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
6623 Samples/s (12%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
19535 points (16%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
105.3 Watt (14%)
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
106.5 Watt (31%)
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
104.1 Watt (13%)
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
0.5 fps per Watt (2%)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
181.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
143.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
53.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
51.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
40.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
34.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered

The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered

2025
low 1920x1080
61.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
49.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
61  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
324  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
176.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
97.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
101.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
76.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
62.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
42.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
77.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
58.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
51.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
50.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080 cinem.
43.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
40.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
178.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
169.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
111.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
63.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
56.5
low 1920x1080
115.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
85.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
70.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
68.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
480  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
214  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
186  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
160.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
139  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
100  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
96  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
85  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
100.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
66.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
54.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
175.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
104.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
73.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
213  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
174.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
393  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
156.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
91.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
182  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
180.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
160  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
76.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
176.7
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
181.2
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 25181.4143.5
Doom: The Dark Ages53.251.640.634.3
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered61.449.7
Assassin's Creed Shadows615645
Civilization 7324176.197.6
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2101.676.662.342.4
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle77.1
Space Marine 258.251.750.549
Star Wars Outlaws43.940.9
F1 24178.7169.4
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty111.163.1
Baldur's Gate 3115.785.670.168.7
Strange Brigade480214186160.6
Far Cry 51391009685
X-Plane 11.11100.766.354.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark175.6104.973.5
Dota 2 Reborn213174.652.150.7
The Witcher 3393156.491.7
GTA V182180.316076.5
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3
7
9

5
5
6

5
5
3

4
5
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 04. 20:36:34

#0 ran 1s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 04 Jul 2025 05:34:58 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.032s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.032s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12964 +0.033s ... 0.065s

#8 got single benchmarks 12964 +0.011s ... 0.076s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.076s

#10 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.29s ... 0.366s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.155s ... 0.521s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.185s ... 0.706s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.015s ... 0.721s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.014s ... 0.735s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.067s ... 0.802s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.802s

#17 Got 58 rows for game benchmarks. +0.019s ... 0.821s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.821s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.013s ... 0.834s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.135s ... 0.969s

#21 return log +0.008s ... 0.977s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-02-13)