Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop

NVIDIA RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop

The Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation, not to be confused with the A500, P500 and the T500, is a lower-end professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 2,048 CUDA cores and a paltry 4 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. We believe this graphics card to be a heavily cut-down GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop; therefore, both should employ the Ada Lovelace AD107 chip built with TSMC's 5 nm process. The RTX 500 was launched in February 2024. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for this graphics card is moderately wide at 35 W to 60 W [the second figure includes the Dynamic Boost, it seems] leading to noticeable performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same graphics card.

Quadro series graphics cards ship with much different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional users rather than gamers. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation, certified drivers - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.

Architecture and Features

Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here; under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache, an optimized ray tracing routine (a different way to determine what is transparent and what isn't is used), and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of proprietary Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI applications.

The RTX 500 Ada features 16 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 64 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 2,048 CUDA cores. Increase those numbers by 25%, and you get the RTX 1000 Ada - as long as we pay no attention to clock speed differences, of course. Unlike costlier Ada Generation professional laptop graphics cards, the RTX 500 comes with just 4 GB of non-ECC VRAM; the lack of error correction makes this card less suitable for super-important tasks and round-the-clock operation. The VRAM is just 64-bit wide, delivering an anemic bandwidth of ~128 GB/s.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol, just like Ampere-based cards did. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however, DP 1.4a video outputs may prove to be a bottleneck down the line.

Performance

At 50 W (35 W + 15 W Dynamic Boost), the graphics card can handle most 2023 and 2024 games like Baldur's Gate 3 at 1080p on high graphics settings. With a Geekbench 6.2 OpenCL GPU score of 61,500 points and a Blender v3.3 Classroom CUDA score of 71 seconds, it's clear the Ada is so much faster than any integrated GPUs on the market including the 890M.

Power consumption

With the latest Nvidia graphics cards, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs within a fairly wide range. With the RTX 500 Ada, we have the lowest value recommended sitting at just at 35 W while the highest value is 60 W [this most likely includes Dynamic Boost]. Real-world performance of the slowest RTX 500 Ada will probably be around 40% lower than that of the fastest one.

Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the AD107 chip is built with makes for decent energy efficiency, as of early 2024.

RTX Ada Generation Laptop Series

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop compare 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop compare 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop compare 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop compare 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop compare 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop compare 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop 2048 @ 1.49 - 2.03 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
ArchitectureAda Lovelace
Pipelines2048 - unified
TMUs64
ROPs32
Raytracing Cores16
Tensor / AI Cores64
Core Speed1485 - 2025 (Boost) MHz
AI GPU154 TOPS INT8
CacheL1: 2 MB, L2: 12 MB
Memory Speed12000 effective = 1500 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth128 GB/s
APIDirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption60 Watt (35 - 60 Watt TGP)
technology5 nm
PCIe4.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement27.02.2024
Link to Manufacturer Pageimages.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
981 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
5441 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
10353 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 12761     avg: 13178     median: 13177.5 (20%)     max: 13594 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 14136     avg: 14610     median: 14610 (13%)     max: 15084 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 5745     avg: 5902     median: 5902 (16%)     max: 6059 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 5278     avg: 5449     median: 5448.5 (11%)     max: 5619 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
47157 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
92300 Points (23%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 20365     avg: 20396     median: 20395.5 (25%)     max: 20426 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 20239     avg: 20464     median: 20463.5 (16%)     max: 20688 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
66297 Points (19%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
64680 Points (35%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
50935 Points (67%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
59.2 fps (18%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 71     avg: 71.5     median: 71.5 (11%)     max: 72 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 39     avg: 41     median: 41 (15%)     max: 43 Seconds
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
92 fps (23%)
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
144 fps (21%)
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
57.6 fps (10%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
51.8 fps (13%)
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
131.7 fps (36%)
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
1.8 fps (2%)
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
121.6 fps (49%)
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
147 fps (24%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
157.6 fps (24%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
161.8 fps (43%)
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
267.4 fps (30%)
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
55.9 fps (10%)
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
141.9 fps (24%)
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
203.2 fps (23%)
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
2.8 fps (1%)
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
193.2 fps (28%)
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
244.4 fps (27%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
148.5 fps (23%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-07 1080p
min: 138.26     avg: 138.7     median: 138.7 (29%)     max: 139.14 fps
specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
136 fps (25%)
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 258.44     avg: 260.2     median: 260.2 (32%)     max: 261.92 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 59.75     avg: 62.5     median: 62.5 (17%)     max: 65.25 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
241.1 fps (26%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 2.78     avg: 19.5     median: 19.5 (3%)     max: 36.12 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 107.4     avg: 110.5     median: 110.5 (38%)     max: 113.62 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 56.25     avg: 57.5     median: 57.5 (28%)     max: 58.71 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 59.56     avg: 59.7     median: 59.7 (16%)     max: 59.92 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 252     avg: 273.5     median: 273.5 (16%)     max: 295 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
52.7 fps (20%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
126.4 fps (23%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
353.2 fps (26%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 209.8     median: 209.8 (5%)     max: 315 fps
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 61467     avg: 62502     median: 62502 (16%)     max: 63537 points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 34889     avg: 49556     median: 49555.5 (12%)     max: 64222 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
1760 Samples/s (6%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
5177 Samples/s (9%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
13116 points (11%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 73     avg: 75.9     median: 75.9 (10%)     max: 78.7 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
81.5 Watt (11%)
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
0.6 fps per Watt (52%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 84     avg: 85.4     median: 85.4 (24%)     max: 86.7 Watt
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 80.6     avg: 82.6     median: 82.6 (10%)     max: 84.6 Watt
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
0.4 fps per Watt (2%)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
130  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
96.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
73.6 74.6 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
21.8
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
112.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
80.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
56.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
88  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
78  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
58  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
33  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
199  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
129  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
73  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
39  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
78  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
69  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
52.9 72.8 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
37.7 55.5 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.4 45.6 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25 39.6 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
19.8  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
32.5
35.2
low 1920x1080
69.4 79.6 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53.6 61.9 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39 54.9 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.9 53.1 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
26.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
112.2
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
136.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
119.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
84.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
16  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
150.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
134.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
99.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
126  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
80  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
68  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
316 333 ~ 325 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
126 129.6 ~ 128 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
104 106.7 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
91 93.2 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
63  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
135  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
86  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
78  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
74  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
50  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
98 128.3 ~ 113 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
79.4 103.5 ~ 91 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
67 81.5 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
130.5 148.5 ~ 140 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
71 77.8 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50 57.1 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
36.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
176.2 178 ~ 177 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
156.1 163.3 ~ 160 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
145.6 148.1 ~ 147 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
136 137.4 ~ 137 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
278  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
175  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
91  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
36  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
182.7 183.8 ~ 183 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
177.4 178.9 ~ 178 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
138.2 139.1 ~ 139 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
64.6 69.7 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
45.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
174.4
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
180.9
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2513096.9747.44
F1 24112.980.826.51622
Ghost of Tsushima56.447.140.230.922
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora42383220
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 20238878584933
Total War Pharaoh199129735639
Assassin's Creed Mirage7869554032
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty6347363219.8
Baldur's Gate 37558474626.8
F1 23136.5119.884.12516
F1 22150.4134.499.632.9
Far Cry 61268068
Strange Brigade3251281059263
Far Cry 513586787450
X-Plane 11.111139174
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark140745436.1
Dota 2 Reborn177160147137
The Witcher 3278175915136
GTA V1831781396745.1
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
6
11

4
9
6
1
7
9
2
4
8
3
1
5
7
1



For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.34
log 31. 17:20:10

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 31 Oct 2025 05:36:11 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.042s ... 0.043s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.043s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.043s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12426 +0.013s ... 0.056s

#8 got single benchmarks 12426 +0.019s ... 0.075s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.075s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +1.053s ... 1.127s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.128s

#12 Got 113 rows for game benchmarks. +0.026s ... 1.153s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.153s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.011s ... 1.164s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.156s ... 1.32s

#16 return log +0.005s ... 1.326s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop graphics card

Compact 14-inch workstation with professional RTX – HP ZBook 8 G1i 14 review

Compact 14-inch workstation with professional RTX – HP ZBook 8 G1i 14 review

Compact but powerful, the HP ZBook 8 G1i pairs a professional Nvidia GPU with a hefty 64 GB of RAM. We tested how much performance this small workstation can re...
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H | NVIDIA RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop | 14.00" | 1.7 kg
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G5 laptop review - The mobile workstation now with an RTX 500 Ada and a 3K IPS panel

Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G5 laptop review - The mobile workstation now with an RTX 500 Ada and a 3K IPS panel

Lenovo has given the Intel version of the ThinkPad P14s G5 a completely new case including a 3K IPS panel. Apart from this, the mobile workstation is equipped w...
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | NVIDIA RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop | 14.50" | 1.7 kg

Dell Pro Rugged 14, Ultra 7 165U: Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, 14.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Dell Pro Rugged 14, Ultra 7 165U

Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G5 21G3S00A00: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.50", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G5 21G3S00A00

Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G5, Ultra 7 165H: Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G5, Ultra 7 165H

Dell Precision 3591, Ultra 5 135H: Intel Core Ultra 5 135H, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Dell Precision 3591, Ultra 5 135H

Dell Precision 3490: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Dell Precision 3490

Dell Precision 3590: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Dell Precision 3590

HP ZBook 8 G1i 14, RTX 500: Intel Core Ultra 7 265H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
   » HP ZBook 8 G1i 14 – A 14-inch creator workstation with seven display options to choose from

Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G5, Ultra 7 165H: Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, 14.50", 1.6 kg
   » 96GB RAM and RTX dGPU at a massive 64% discount: Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 5 now on sale

Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G5 21G3S00A00: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 14.50", 1.7 kg
   » Lenovo ThinkPad P14s with 96GB RAM, Core Ultra 7 and RTX graphics now discounted by 60%

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *
Arc B 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU

Class 3

UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-09-16)