AMD Radeon Pro 455
The AMD Radeon Pro 455 is mobile graphics card for laptops that can be found in the high-end model of the Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 Late 2016. It is based on the small Polaris 11 chip which is manufactured in 14 nm FinFET at Globalfoundries. Compared to the Radeon RX 460 (see for benchmarks), the Pro 455 features only 768 instead of 896 shaders and definately lower clock speeds. The peak performance is rated at 1.3 TFLOPS and therefore 30% faster than the Pro 450, but clearly slower than the 1.86 TFLOPS of the Pro 460 and 2.2 TFLOPS of the RX460. The performance of the card could be similar to the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M as the RX 460 is similar to the GTX 965M. A major drawback is the small VRAM size of only 2 GB GDDR5. The optional Radeon Pro 460 offers 4 GB of VRAM, 1024 shaders and 1.86 TFLOPS and should be similar to the RX 460.
Apple and AMD don't provide driver updates for Windows using Bootcamp. The only option is to use modified drivers from BootcampDrivers.com.
The features of the Radeon Pro 455 are identical to the faster RX 460 and all other Polaris chips. See more details on the Polaris architecture here. According to AMD, the Pro 455 support DisplayPort 1.2 (altough 1.4 is supported by Polaris) and HDMI 2.0 (via USB-C adapter).
The power envelope of the faster Radeon Pro 460 is rated at 35 Watt according to the AMD blog post. Due to the slower specs, the Radeon Pro 455 should use slightly less.
| Manufacturer | AMD |
| Radeon RX 400M Series | |
| Codename | Polaris 11 |
| Architecture | Polaris |
| Pipelines | 768 - unified |
| Core Speed | 855 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 5000 MHz |
| Memory Bus Width | 128 Bit |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| Max. Amount of Memory | 2048 MB |
| Shared Memory | no |
| DirectX | DirectX 12 |
| Transistor Count | 3000 Million |
| technology | 14 nm |
| Features | DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready, HDMI 2.0, AMD FreeSync |
| Notebook Size | large |
| Date of Announcement | 27.10.2016 |
| Link to Manufacturer Page | http://creators.radeon.com/radeon-pro/ |
Benchmarks
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
1254 Points (7%)
...
...
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1118 Points (6%)
...
...
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
229045 Points (36%)
...
...
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
15766 Points (21%)
...
...
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
23434 Points (12%)
...
...
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
3463 Points (9%)
...
...
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
3759 Points (7%)
...
...
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
5774 Points (14%)
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 5%
...
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
5388 Points (9%)
...
...
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
16522 Points (16%)
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 7%
...
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
14879 Points (14%)
...
ATI Radeon HD 5850 -6%
...
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +25873 Points (48%)
...
...
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
16.4 fps (8%)
...
...
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
47.4 fps (21%)
...
...
specvp12 snx-02 +SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
13.9 fps (5%)
...
...
specvp12 showcase-01 +SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
20.3 fps (8%)
...
...
specvp12 mediacal-01 +SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
10.8 fps (10%)
...
...
specvp12 maya-04 +SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
30.2 fps (13%)
...
...
specvp12 energy-01 +SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
0.2 fps (1%)
...
specvp12 creo-01 +SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
32.8 fps (19%)
...
...
specvp12 catia-04 +SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
31.2 fps (11%)
...
...
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
26.4 fps (8%)
...
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
12740 points (60%)
...
...
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
100 fps (28%)
...
...
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
...
...
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
229 fps (2%)
...
...
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
59.7 fps (2%)
...
...
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
92.2 fps (10%)
...
...
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
27.9 fps (8%)
...
...
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
483 Samples/s (5%)
...
...
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
918 Samples/s (3%)
...
...
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
3049 points (6%)
...
...
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
56.1 Watt (10%)
...
...
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
48.3 Watt (8%)
...
...
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
Game Benchmarks
The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
...
...
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
...
...
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
...
...
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
...
...
...
...
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
...
...
...
...
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
...
...
...
...
...
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
...
...
...
...
...
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
...
...
...
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
...
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
...
...
...
...
...
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
...
...
...
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
...
...
...
...
...
...
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
...
...
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
...
...
...
...
...
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
