XCOM 2 Notebook Benchmarks
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- News translator (DE-EN)
- Review translation proofreader (DE-EN)
Details here
For the original German article, see here.
Graphics
When the writer responsible for a benchmark article is inclined to play a game for hours rather than search for a fitting test sequence, the developers must have done a lot right. Like the precursor released in 2012 (XCOM Enemy Unknown), XCOM 2 proves to be an exciting and individually tailored mix of action, strategy and tactics -- very addictive. Yes, the missions and their sequences do repeat after a while, but the fundamental gaming principle with base building, research, character customization and turn-based battles certainly doesn't get old quickly.
The only thing that bothered us is that most of the missions only allow the player a certain amount of time. As a result, the gamer only has a few rounds to escort a VIP or obtain a particular object. Yes, on the one hand this mechanic provides a flush of excitement, but the pressure may scare off fans of calmer tactics. Additionally, during the course of some missions the player is confronted with sudden, unexpected events (example: a new kind of enemy spawns abruptly). This damages the gamer's sense of fairness and balance -- and that at the very beginning of the single-player campaign.
Firaxis Games could put a little more work into the controls as well. While operation is fundamentally simple and intuitive, in practice it's often a bit choppy, especially when objects in the way aren't hidden. But these things don't change the fact that we had a ton of fun in our trial run. Thanks to the well-executed video sequences and smart close-ups, XCOM 2 has simply got flair. Other crudely-staged tactical games don't hold a candle to this title.
The primary realm in which XCOM 2 deserves some critique is graphics. Cons include the rather long load times and the poor performance. Both at the base and on the missions, tracking shots and menu changes often lead to bothersome stuttering -- no matter how strong the computer's components are. In general, XCOM 2 demands a whole lot of a system's hardware. Without a quick GPU, the title won't be much fun.
On the other hand, the developers deserve hearty congratulations for the well deliberated settings options. As in the Rise of the Tomb Raider game we recently reviewed, the graphics options are divided into two menus. In sum, XCOM 2 offers about 20 settings -- which is more than respectable for a PC game (though unfortunately the options aren't explained). We especially liked the five presets that enable the player to quickly adjust the overall graphics quality. With a few exceptions, these presets are cleverly tuned. Since all of the settings are immediately adopted, there's no need to restart the game.
Visually, even at the Low preset XCOM 2 is reasonably attractive; from the High preset upwards, the game looks amazing. Only the "Minimum" preset strikes us as disappointing. When everything is activated, the title impresses with its crisp textures, excellent lighting and cool effects. Additionally, many maps are bursting with little ornamental objects, which does a lot to enhance the atmosphere. We didn't experience any crashes, image errors or significant bugs during our test. Only the Schenker W504 had problems when we connected a UHD display (no 4K resolution available).
Update from February 10th 2016: During further gaming sessions we did in fact encounter graphics errors and crashes. Tip: Those who are quickly frustrated should definitely select the lowest difficulty level. Even medium proves to be extremely challenging.
Benchmark
Due to the fluctuating performance and small maps, it was quite difficult to find an adequate benchmark sequence. After a lot of trial and error, the "Star Tower" operation proved to be the best solution. In this mission, the player carefully examines the ADVENT enemy's "Blacksite". To prevent the majority of the map being covered with the fog of war, after the player completes all the objectives the characters are distributed across the map. As the video reveals, we traveled with the camera from the mission starting point to the evacuation zone a total of three times, logging minimum to average frame rates as we went.
Depending on the player's surroundings, XCOM 2's performance is greatly variable. Maps with a desert-look run -- who'd have guessed -- considerably smoother than missions based in a city. Notebooks and desktop PCs have even more to chew on in forest and grassland maps. Our benchmark sequence is mostly composed of the latter, rendering it almost a worst-case scenario. If a device manages more than 25-30 fps here, the rest of the game should be playable. In XCOM 2's successor, we would definitely like to see an integrated benchmark that covers zones blanketed with various forms of vegetation.
Results
Although XCOM 2 isn't a first-person shooter or third-person title, the system requirements are very high. Owners of low-end graphics cards like the GeForce GT 740M or the HD Graphics 4600 / 5600 can forget it. Mid-range chips on par with the GeForce 940M or GT 750M are the first to manage 1280x720 pixels at the minimum preset. For a resolution of 1920x1080 pixels, the system's graphics card must be an upper mid-range or high-end model. Low details require a GTX 850M; medium settings won't run smoothly with anything less than a GTX 960M.
Those who prefer to play at high settings in Full HD will need a luxury model of the same caliber as the GTX 970M. Due to the 8x anti-aliasing, the maximum preset is too much for all current notebook chips, with the possible exception of the GTX 980 (the desktop version manages 30 fps). 3840x2160 pixels is nothing more than a dream at this point. Not even the leading desktop cards (AMD R9 Fury etc.) can run the game fluently at the High preset. As usual, XCOM 2 is generally limited by the GPU; only at minimum to low settings is the CPU occasionally the limiting factor. We certainly hope Firaxis Games soon releases a patch that improves the game's performance at a fundamental level.
XCOM 2 | |
3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:8x 1920x1080 Maximum Preset (8xMSAA instead of FXAA) AA:8xMS AF:16x 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:8x 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:FX AF:2x 1920x1080 Low Preset AF:Trilinear 1280x720 Minimal Preset AF:Bilinear | |
AMD Radeon R9 Fury, 4790K | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980, 6700K | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 4700MQ | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 4700MQ | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950, 6700K | |
AMD Radeon R7 370, 4790K | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M, 4700MQ | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M, 4700MQ | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ | |
AMD Radeon R9 M280X, FX-7600P | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M, 4700MQ | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M, 4340M | |
NVIDIA GeForce 940M, 5700HQ | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M, 4702MQ | |
NVIDIA GeForce 920M, 2970M | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M, 4200M | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M, 4200M | |
Intel HD Graphics 4600, 4700MQ |
Test Systems
Desktop PCs |
Custom Nvidia | Custom AMD |
---|---|---|
Mainboard |
Asus Z170-A | Intel |
Processor |
Intel Core i7-6700K | Intel Core i7-4790K |
Graphics Card |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 (4 GB), PNY GTX 950 (2 GB) | AMD Radeon R9 Fury (4 GB), AMD R9 290X (4 GB), MSI R7 370 (2 GB) |
Memory |
2x 8 GB G.Skill Trident Z DDR4-3000 | 2x 4 GB DDR3-1600 |
Mass Storage 1 |
Crucial MX100 SSD (256 GB) | Intel SSD 530 (240 GB) |
Mass Storage 2 |
Crucial M500 SSD (480 GB) | - Mass Storage 3 |
Schenker Notebooks |
Schenker W504 | Schenker XMG A505 | Schenker M504 | Schenker M503 | Schenker S413 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mainboard |
Intel HM87 | Intel HM87 | Intel HM86 | Intel HM86 | Intel HM87 |
Processor |
Intel Core i7-4700MQ | Intel Core i7-4720HQ | Intel Core i5-4340M | Intel Core i7-4702MQ | Intel Core i7-4750HQ |
Graphics Card |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M (8 GB), GTX 970M (6 GB), GTX 880M (8 GB), GTX 870M (6 GB), GTX 860M (4 GB) | Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M (2 GB) | Nvidia GeForce GTX 850M (2 GB) | Nvidia GeForce GT 750M (2 GB) | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
Memory |
2x 4 GB DDR3-1600 | 2x 4 GB DDR3-1600 | 2x 4 GB DDR3-1600 | 2x 4 GB DDR3-1600 | 2x 8 GB DDR3-1600 |
Mass Storage 1 |
Samsung SSD 840 EVO (250 GB) | Micron M600 SSD (128 GB) | Intel SSD 520 (240 GB) | Intel SSD 520 (240 GB) | Crucial M4 SSD (256 GB) |
Mass Storage 2 |
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD (500 GB) | HGST Travelstar 7K1000 (1.000 GB) | - | - | - Operating System |
Other Notebooks |
HP Envy 15-j011sg | Asus N551ZU-CN007H | MSI CX61-i572M281BW7 |
---|---|---|---|
Mainboard |
Intel HM87 | AMD K15.1 | Intel HM86 |
Processor |
Intel Core i5-4200M | AMD FX-7600P | Intel Core i5-4200M |
Graphics Card |
Nvidia GeForce GT 740M (2 GB) | AMD Radeon R9 M280X (4 GB) | Nvidia GeForce GT 720M (2 GB) |
Memory |
1x 8 GB DDR3-1600 | 2x 4 GB DDR3-1600 | 1x 8 GB DDR3-1600 |
Mass Storage 1 |
Samsung SSD 830 (256 GB) | HGST Travelstar 5K1000 (1.000 GB) | Western Digital Scorpio Blue (1.000 GB) |
Mass Storage 2 |
- | - | - Operating System |
4K Monitor |
Nvidia Driver | AMD Driver | Intel Driver |
---|---|---|---|
Asus PB287Q |
ForceWare 361.75 | Crimson 16.1.1 Hotfix | 15.40.10.64.4300 |