Notebookcheck
 
 
 
 

AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)

AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)

The AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) is an integrated graphics card for the fastest mobile AMD Carrizo APUs. At its launch, the R7 is available on the top model FX9830P with 512 GCN shader units and a core clock of 900 MHz. The technical specifications do not differ from the AMD Radeon R7 in Carrizo, but the clock is up to 100 MHz higher. Depending on the cooling and the configurable TDP (12-45 Watts), the performance can differ quite a lot. The performance also depends on the memory (best performance with dual-channel DDR4).

Architecture and Features

According to AMD, the Radeon R7 consists of eight cores based on the third GCN generation (often called GCN 1.2 or 2.0 in the press). It is therefore very similar to the Tonga desktop chip and supports DirectX 12 (FL 12_0). Furthermore, its shaders can be used with Mantle, OpenGL and OpenCL. HSA 1.0 is supported for running code on both CPU and GPU cores simultaneously.

Compared to the Kaveri generation (Kaveri R7 with GCN 1.1), the new color compression in particular results in better memory utilization and improves the gaming performance by 5-7 %. 

The improved video decoder of Carrizo/Bristol Ridge now includes UVD 6 (Unified Video Decoder), which can decode HVEC / H.265 up to 4K in hardware. Furthermore, the VCE (Video Codec Engine) has been improved for faster transcoding of H.264. More information on architecture and features of the Bristol Ridge architecture can be found in our launch article.

Performance

Depending on the configurable TDP of the Bristol Ridge chips between 12 up to 45 Watts, there can be significant differences in games. Overall, the results are slightly better compared to the Carrizo Radeon R7 due to the higher clocks for comparable model. You can still use the Kaveri R7 benchmarks to check the gaming performance.

Power Consumption

Depending on the configurable TDP (cTDP), the 28 nm chip is specified at 12-45 Watts. It can therefore be used for thin and light notebooks as well as medium-sized devices or All-in-Ones (AiO).

ManufacturerAMD
Radeon R (Stoney / Bristol Ridge) Series
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) 512 @ 0.9 GHz64/128 Bit
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) compare 384 @ 0.8 GHz64/128 Bit
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) compare 192 @ 0.8 GHz64 Bit
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) compare 192 @ 0.6 GHz64 Bit
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) compare 128 @ 0.6 GHz64 Bit
CodenameBristol Ridge
ArchitectureGCN 1.2
Pipelines512 - unified
Core Speed900 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit
Shared Memoryyes
DirectXDirectX 12 (FL 12_0)
Transistor Count2410 Million
technology28 nm
FeaturesUVD 6, VCE
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement01.06.2016
CPU in Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD FX-9830P4 x 3000 MHz, 25-45 W? MHz900 MHz
AMD PRO A12-9830B4 x 3000 MHz, 25-45 W? MHz900 MHz
AMD FX-9800P4 x 2700 MHz, 15 W? MHz758 MHz
» show 3 more
min. - max.? MHz758 - 900 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
5 pt (5%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180 -73%
...
AMD Radeon R5 M255 -3%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 -2%
Intel HD Graphics 615 -2%
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M -2%
AMD Radeon R5 M240 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M -1%
AMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo) 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M 0%
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
AMD Radeon R7 M370 1%
AMD Radeon R7 M340 1%
AMD Radeon R7 M260 1%
AMD Radeon R5 M230 2%
AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics 3%
AMD Radeon HD 7610M 3%
Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) 4%
AMD Radeon R7 M265 4%
AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 4%
...
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 1796%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 338     avg: 365     median: 358 (2%)     max: 398 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 325     avg: 344     median: 347 (2%)     max: 359 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 34845     avg: 49654     median: 52245.5 (8%)     max: 59281 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 32062     avg: 34971     median: 32389 (4%)     max: 40461 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 3162     avg: 4026     median: 3942 (5%)     max: 5173 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 3477     avg: 5531     median: 5311 (3%)     max: 8107 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 667     avg: 938     median: 866 (2%)     max: 1230 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 750     avg: 1081     median: 1013 (2%)     max: 1466 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 44545     avg: 48082     median: 46007 (6%)     max: 53693 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1737     avg: 1859     median: 1794 (4%)     max: 2130 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1820     avg: 1913     median: 1852 (3%)     max: 2210 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
3.5 fps (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
13.9 fps (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
19.5 fps (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
25.9 fps (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
25.7 fps (7%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
23.8 fps (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
23.7 fps (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 175     avg: 179     median: 178.5 (2%)     max: 182 Samples/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 358     avg: 363     median: 362.5 (1%)     max: 367 Samples/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 1093     avg: 1346     median: 1450 (3%)     max: 1495 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
29.1 Watt (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
472 MHz (25%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Ark Survival Evolved

Ark Survival Evolved

2017
low 1280x720
13.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)

Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)

2017
low 1280x720
13.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Team Fortress 2

Team Fortress 2

2017
low 1280x720
46.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
40.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Rocket League

Rocket League

2017
low 1280x720
57  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Ghost Recon Wildlands

Ghost Recon Wildlands

2017
low 1280x720
11.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
20.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Resident Evil 7

Resident Evil 7

2017
low 1280x720
31.9 36.7 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dishonored 2

Dishonored 2

2016
low 1280x720
11  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Titanfall 2

Titanfall 2

2016
low 1280x720
34  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Farming Simulator 17

Farming Simulator 17

2016
low 1280x720
63.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
47.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Battlefield 1

Battlefield 1

2016
low 1280x720
23.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Civilization VI

Civilization VI

2016
low 1024x768
30.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Deus Ex Mankind Divided

Deus Ex Mankind Divided

2016
low 1280x720
10 15.5 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7 11.6 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Mirror's Edge Catalyst

Mirror's Edge Catalyst

2016
low 1280x720
16.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Ashes of the Singularity

Ashes of the Singularity

2016
low 1280x768
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Division

The Division

2016
low 1280x720
17.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry Primal

Far Cry Primal

2016
low 1280x720
15  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
XCOM 2

XCOM 2

2016
low 1280x720
18.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Rise of the Tomb Raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider

2016
low 1024x768
18 20.6 21.6 22.5 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11 12.4 13.2 14.2 ~ 13 fps    + Compare