Notebookcheck

Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)

Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)

The Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) is an integrated graphics card in the Haswell codenamed processors (Celeron and Pentium). It is the successor the the Intel HD Graphics in the Ivy Bridge CPUs and performs slightly better. Depending on the processor model, the base and turbo clock rates may differ, resulting in varying graphics performance between CPU models.

In comparison to the HD 4000, the graphics core has been modified extensively. The GPU supports DirectX 11.1, OpenCL 1.2 and OpenGL 4.0. It also features an improved decoder for 4K videos and the fast Quick Sync encoder (deactivated in many entry level models).

The Performance of the HD Graphics (Haswell) is similar to the old HD Graphics 3000 or the AMD Radeon HD 8250. Only a few modern games like Dota 2 can be played fluently in very low details and resolutions.

Due to the 22nm 3D Tri-Gate production process, the power consumption should be relatively low (the development was focused on performance per Watt). The GPU can be found in ULV models and regular (37 W) dual core CPUs.

ManufacturerIntel
HD Graphics Series
HD Graphics P530 24 @ 350 - 1050 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5600 24 @ 300 - 1050 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 6000 48 @ 300 - 1000 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4600 20 @ 200 - 1350 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5500 24 @ 300 - 950 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5000 40 @ 200 - 1100 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4400 20 @ 200 - 1100 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5300 24 @ 100 - 900 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4000 16 @ 350 - 1350 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Broadwell) 12 @ 100 - 850 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4200 20 @ 200 - 850 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Skylake) 12 @ 300 - 800 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) 16 @ 320 - 700 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Braswell) 16 @ 320 - 700 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) 12 @ 320 - 640 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Haswell) 10 @ 200 - 1000 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) 16 @ 200 - 600 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 3000 12 @ 350 - 1350 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 2500 6 @ 650 - 1150 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) 6 @ 350 - 1100 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 2000 6 @ 850/1100 - 1350 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) 6 @ 350 - 1100 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Bay Trail) 4 @ 311 - 896 (Boost) MHz32/64/128 Bit
CodenameHaswell GT1
ArchitectureHaswell
Pipelines10 - unified
Core Speed200 - 1000 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit
Shared Memoryyes
DirectXDirectX 11.1, Shader 5.0
technology22 nm
Date of Announcement01.10.2012
CPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Pentium 3560M2 x 2400 MHz, 37 W400 MHz1100 MHz
Intel Pentium 3550M2 x 2300 MHz, 37 W400 MHz1100 MHz
Intel Celeron 2970M2 x 2200 MHz, 37 W400 MHz1100 MHz
» show 10 more
min. - max.200 - 400 MHz850 - 1100 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 2141     avg: 2403     median: 2335.5 (5%)     max: 3011 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 3111     avg: 3415     median: 3278 (2%)     max: 4199 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 300     avg: 323.8     median: 314 (1%)     max: 383 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 340     avg: 370.8     median: 362.5 (1%)     max: 433 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 29291     avg: 34138     median: 34675 (5%)     max: 40515 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 435     avg: 543.3     median: 544 (2%)     max: 688 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 384     avg: 479.6     median: 484 (1%)     max: 602 points
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 +
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 +
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
min: 115     avg: 140     median: 140 (1%)     max: 165 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
min: 355     avg: 370     median: 370 (2%)     max: 385 Points
Power Consumption - FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test - Power Consumption (external Monitor) 1280x720
43.7 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra 1920x1080
30.5 Watt (8%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailled information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Ark Survival Evolved

Ark Survival Evolved

2017
low 1280x720
5.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Team Fortress 2

Team Fortress 2

2017
low 1280x720
62  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
16.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Rocket League
low 1280x720
45.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Mass Effect Andromeda
low 1280x720
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
Resident Evil 7
low 1280x720
17.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Farming Simulator 17
low 1280x720
38.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Battlefield 1
low 1280x720
14.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Mirror's Edge Catalyst
low 1280x720
12.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
26.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
Hitman 2016
low 1280x720
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Division
low 1280x720
8.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry Primal
low 1280x720
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Rise of the Tomb Raider
low 1024x768
9.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
5.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
2.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
1.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Rainbow Six Siege
low 1024x768
13.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Just Cause 3
low 1024x768
11.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Star Wars Battlefront
low 1024x768
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
World of Warships
low 1366x768
41.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
The Witcher 3
low 1024x768
8.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
5.2 5.8 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
3.1  fps    + Compare