Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)

The Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) is an integrated graphics card in the Haswell codenamed processors (Celeron and Pentium). It is the successor the the Intel HD Graphics in the Ivy Bridge CPUs and performs slightly better. Depending on the processor model, the base and turbo clock rates may differ, resulting in varying graphics performance between CPU models.

In comparison to the HD 4000, the graphics core has been modified extensively. The GPU supports DirectX 11.1, OpenCL 1.2 and OpenGL 4.0. It also features an improved decoder for 4K videos and the fast Quick Sync encoder (deactivated in many entry level models).

The Performance of the HD Graphics (Haswell) is similar to the old HD Graphics 3000 or the AMD Radeon HD 8250. Only a few modern games like Dota 2 can be played fluently in very low details and resolutions.

Due to the 22nm 3D Tri-Gate production process, the power consumption should be relatively low (the development was focused on performance per Watt). The GPU can be found in ULV models and regular (37 W) dual core CPUs.

Manufacturer

Intel

HD Graphics Series

HD Graphics P530	24 @ 350 - 1050 MHz	64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5600	24 @ 300 - 1050 MHz	64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 6000	48 @ 300 - 1000 MHz	64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4600	20 @ 200 - 1350 MHz	64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5500	24 @ 300 - 950 MHz	64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5000	40 @ 200 - 1100 MHz	64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4400	20 @ 200 - 1100 MHz	64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5300	24 @ 100 - 900 MHz	64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4000	16 @ 350 - 1350 MHz	64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Broadwell)	12 @ 100 - 850 MHz	64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4200	20 @ 200 - 850 MHz	64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Skylake)	12 @ 300 - 800 MHz	64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell)	16 @ 320 - 700 MHz	64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Braswell)	16 @ 320 - 700 MHz	64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)	12 @ 320 - 640 MHz	64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Haswell)	10 @ 200 - 1000 MHz	64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)	16 @ 200 - 600 MHz	64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 3000	12 @ 350 - 1350 MHz	64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 2500	6 @ 650 - 1150 MHz	64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)	6 @ 350 - 1100 MHz	64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 2000	6 @ 850/1100 - 1350 MHz	64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	6 @ 350 - 1100 MHz	64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	4 @ 311 - 896 MHz	32/64/128 Bit

Codename

Haswell GT1

Architecture

Gen. 7.5 Haswell

Pipelines

10 - unified

Core Speed

200 - 1000 (Boost) MHz

Memory Bus Width

64/128 Bit

Shared Memory

yes

DirectX

DirectX 11.1, Shader 5.0

technology

22 nm

Date of Announcement

01.10.2012

CPU in HD Graphics (Haswell)		GPU Base Speed	GPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Pentium 3560M	2 x 2400 MHz, 37 W	400 MHz	1100 MHz
Intel Pentium 3550M	2 x 2300 MHz, 37 W	400 MHz	1100 MHz
Intel Celeron 2970M	2 x 2200 MHz, 37 W	400 MHz	1100 MHz
» show 10 more
Intel Celeron 2950M	2 x 2000 MHz, 37 W	400 MHz	1100 MHz
Intel Pentium 3558U	2 x 1700 MHz, 15 W	200 MHz	1000 MHz
Intel Pentium 3556U	2 x 1700 MHz, 15 W	200 MHz	1000 MHz
Intel Celeron 2981U	2 x 1600 MHz, 15 W	200 MHz	1000 MHz
Intel Celeron 2980U	2 x 1600 MHz, 15 W	200 MHz	1000 MHz
Intel Celeron 2957U	2 x 1400 MHz, 15 W	200 MHz	1000 MHz
Intel Celeron 2955U	2 x 1400 MHz, 15 W	200 MHz	1000 MHz
Intel Pentium 3561Y	2 x 1200 MHz, 11.5 W	200 MHz	850 MHz
Intel Pentium 3560Y	2 x 1200 MHz, 11.5 W	200 MHz	850 MHz
Intel Celeron 2961Y	2 x 1100 MHz, 11.5 W	200 MHz	850 MHz
min. - max.		200 - 400 MHz	850 - 1100 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy

3.2 pt (4%)

AMD Radeon HD 8180 -55%

...

Intel HD Graphics 500 -26%

Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) -19%

AMD Radeon HD 8280 -16%

AMD Radeon HD 7400G -14%

AMD Radeon HD 8330 -12%

Intel UHD Graphics 605 -12%

AMD Radeon HD 7420G -6%

AMD Radeon R4 (Kaveri) -6%

Intel HD Graphics 4000 -4%

Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)

AMD Radeon HD 8350G 1%

AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) 2%

AMD Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 3%

Intel HD Graphics 4200 3%

AMD Radeon HD 7620G 3%

Intel HD Graphics 5300 4%

AMD Radeon HD 8400 4%

Intel HD Graphics 505 7%

AMD Radeon R4 (Beema) 10%

...

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop) 2726%

100%

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics

43493 Points (8%)

+ 1 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score

min: 2141 avg: 2403 median: 2335.5 (3%) max: 3011 Points

+ 6 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics

min: 3111 avg: 3415 median: 3278 (2%) max: 4199 Points

+ 6 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score

min: 300 avg: 324 median: 314 (1%) max: 383 Points

+ 6 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics

min: 340 avg: 371 median: 362.5 (1%) max: 433 Points

+ 6 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics

min: 29291 avg: 34138 median: 34675 (5%) max: 40515 Points

+ 5 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score

min: 435 avg: 543 median: 544 (1%) max: 688 Points

+ 7 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU

min: 384 avg: 480 median: 484 (1%) max: 602 Points

+ 7 benchmarks and specifications - Hide comparison chart

AMD Radeon HD 6250 -64%

...

NVIDIA GeForce 410M -14%

AMD Radeon HD 8250 -12%

AMD Radeon HD 8240 -11%

AMD Radeon HD 6450M -8%

AMD Radeon HD 7420G -6%

AMD Radeon HD 6480G -3%

Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) -2%

AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) -2%

Intel HD Graphics 500 0%

Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)

AMD Radeon HD 6520G 3%

AMD Radeon HD 8280 3%

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M 4%

NVIDIA GeForce 610M 7%

NVIDIA NVS 4200M 8%

AMD Radeon HD 7470M 9%

Intel HD Graphics 4000 9%

AMD Radeon HD 6470M 11%

AMD Radeon HD 8330 11%

...

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 12129%

100%

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +

3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +

3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +

Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics

6.3 Points (80%)

+ 1 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics

4.7 Points (59%)

+ 1 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +

Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +

Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +

Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +

GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +

GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen

28.7 fps (5%)

+ 1 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan

45.8 fps (13%)

+ 1 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen

11.6 fps (3%)

+ 1 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen

20.5 fps (8%)

+ 1 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU

min: 77 avg: 93 median: 93 (1%) max: 109 Samples/s

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU

min: 115 avg: 140 median: 140 (1%) max: 165 Samples/s

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result

min: 355 avg: 370 median: 370 (1%) max: 385 points

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *

43.7 Watt (10%)

+ 1 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *

30.5 Watt (7%)

+ 1 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card

- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Fallout 76

2018

0 (!) fps + Compare

Hitman 2

2018

4.9 (!) fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

X-Plane 11.11

2018

14.3 fps + Compare

8 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Ark Survival Evolved

2017

5.9 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

F1 2017

2017

13 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Team Fortress 2

2017

62 fps + Compare

28.6 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.

Dirt 4

2017

16.4 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Rocket League

2017

45.1 fps + Compare

15.9 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.

Mass Effect Andromeda

2017

0 (!) fps + Compare

Resident Evil 7

2017

17.8 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Farming Simulator 17

2016

38.6 fps + Compare

21.6 fps + Compare

6.3 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.

Battlefield 1

2016

14.1 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Mirror's Edge Catalyst

2016

12.4 fps + Compare

7.1 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Overwatch

2016

26.1 fps + Compare

16.3 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Doom

2016

0 (!) fps + Compare

Hitman 2016

2016

6 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

The Division

2016

8.5 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Far Cry Primal

2016

9 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Rise of the Tomb Raider

2016

9.4 fps + Compare

5.3 fps + Compare

2.5 fps + Compare

1.8 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Rainbow Six Siege

2015

13.7 fps + Compare

8.9 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Just Cause 3

2015

11.7 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Star Wars Battlefront

2015

0 (!) fps + Compare

World of Warships

2015

41.4 fps + Compare

24.1 fps + Compare

11.4 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.

The Witcher 3

2015

8.9 fps + Compare

5.2 5.8 ~ 6 fps + Compare

3.1 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Dirt Rally

2015

52.4 fps + Compare

12.8 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.

Battlefield Hardline

2015

15.9 fps + Compare

11.2 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Evolve

2015

7.7 fps + Compare

5.7 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

The Crew

2014

9.7 fps + Compare

8.4 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Dragon Age: Inquisition

2014

10.9 fps + Compare

7 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

F1 2014

2014

31 fps + Compare

20 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Ryse: Son of Rome

2014

9 fps + Compare

5.8 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Alien: Isolation

2014

21.6 fps + Compare

12.9 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor

2014

13.5 fps + Compare

8.3 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Fifa 15

2014

16.4 fps + Compare

11.3 fps + Compare

Model	CPU	Memory	Core / Memory	GPU Memory	Value
MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD	2970M	8192 MB	1100 / MHz		43493

Model	CPU	Memory	Core / Memory	GPU Memory	Value
Packard Bell EasyNote TE69HW-29574G50Mnsk	2957U	4096 MB	200-1000 / MHz		2141
Acer Aspire E1-532	2955U	2048 MB	200-1000 / MHz		2169
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 15	3556U	4096 MB	200-1000 / MHz		2305
Acer Aspire V3-331-P982	3556U	4096 MB	200-1000 / MHz		2366
HP 350 G1 F7Z01EA	3558U	4096 MB	200-1000 / MHz		2426
MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD	2970M	8192 MB	1100 / MHz		3011

Model	CPU	Memory	Core / Memory	GPU Memory	Value
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 15	3556U	4096 MB	200-1000 / MHz		3111
Packard Bell EasyNote TE69HW-29574G50Mnsk	2957U	4096 MB	200-1000 / MHz		3201
Acer Aspire E1-532	2955U	2048 MB	200-1000 / MHz		3252
Acer Aspire V3-331-P982	3556U	4096 MB	200-1000 / MHz		3304
HP 350 G1 F7Z01EA	3558U	4096 MB	200-1000 / MHz		3423
MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD	2970M	8192 MB	1100 / MHz		4199

Model	CPU	Memory	Core / Memory	GPU Memory	Value
Acer Aspire E1-532	2955U	2048 MB	200-1000 / MHz		300
Acer Aspire V3-331-P982	3556U	4096 MB	200-1000 / MHz		304
Packard Bell EasyNote TE69HW-29574G50Mnsk	2957U	4096 MB	200-1000 / MHz		312
HP 350 G1 F7Z01EA	3558U	4096 MB	200-1000 / MHz		316
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 15	3556U	4096 MB	200-1000 / MHz		328
MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD	2970M	8192 MB	1100 / MHz		383

Model	CPU	Memory	Core / Memory	GPU Memory	Value
Acer Aspire E1-532	2955U	2048 MB	200-1000 / MHz		340
Acer Aspire V3-331-P982	3556U	4096 MB	200-1000 / MHz		347
HP 350 G1 F7Z01EA	3558U	4096 MB	200-1000 / MHz		361
Packard Bell EasyNote TE69HW-29574G50Mnsk	2957U	4096 MB	200-1000 / MHz		364
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 15	3556U	4096 MB	200-1000 / MHz		380
MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD	2970M	8192 MB	1100 / MHz		433