Notebookcheck

NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT

NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT

The Nvidia GeForce 9600M GT is a DirectX 10 graphics card for notebooks andsuccessor to the 8600M GT. Compared to the 8600M GT or 9500M GS, the 9600M GT was produced in 65nm (allows higher clock rates with the same current consumption) and features a new PureVideo HD video processor (VP3) and HybridPower support.

In conjunction with the Nvidia 9100M G integrated graphics, the 9600M GT supports Hybrid-SLI (only HybridPower). HybridPower is a technique to choose between the integrated and dedicated graphics core, if performance or battery runtime is needed. This works only in Windows Vista. Up to now the user has to use a tool to switch between the GPUs. Later Nvidia wants to switch automatically in the drivers. GeForceBoost is not supported with this card, as there would be no performance gain.

As the 8600M GT, the 9600M GT features 32 stream processors that do the graphic work of the vertex- and pixel-shaders.

The performance of the 9600M GT should be somewhere between the 9500M GS and the 8700M GT (depends if GDDR2 or GDDR3 memory chips are used).

Compared to desktop graphics cards, the 9600M GT is similar to the GeForce 9500GT (which also descends from the G96 core). The desktop CPU 9600 GT has a 256 bit memory bus and is therefore much faster.

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce 9600M Series
GeForce 9650M GT compare 32 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 9600M GT 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 9600M GS compare 32 @ 0.43 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
CodenameNB9P-GS
ArchitectureG9x
Pipelines32 - unified
Core Speed500 MHz
Shader Speed1250 MHz
Memory Speed800 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR2, GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory1024 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Transistor Count314 Million
technology65 nm
FeaturesPCI-E 2.0, 1250 MHz Shader Taktung, 400 MHz Speichertaktung bei GDDR2, 800 MHz bei GDDR3, PureVideo HD Technologie (VP3), Hybrid SLI mit HybridPower (mit aktuellen nVidia Chipsätzen).
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement04.06.2008
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/geforce_960...

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 16887     avg: 26807     median: 26648.5 (28%)     max: 34297 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 11820     avg: 14889     median: 16423.5 (9%)     max: 17184 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 5684     avg: 9592     median: 10440.5 (15%)     max: 11344 Points
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 +
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik (Spiele)
5.5 Points (81%)
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik
5.9 Points (87%)
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
91  fps    + Compare
ultra 1280x1024
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
82.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
38.5  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
19.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

2008
low 800x600
30.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
22.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
low 640x480
148  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
76  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 2

Far Cry 2

2008
high 1024x768
18  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Crysis Warhead

Crysis Warhead

2008
low 800x600
45  fps    + Compare
ultra 1024x768
7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Racedriver: GRID

Racedriver: GRID

2008
low 800x600
42.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
32.8  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
20.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
123.3 133.2 142 ~ 133 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
40.2 46.9 49 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
18.2 25.7 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
med. 1024x768
22.6 25.1 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
14 19.8 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
32.4 42.8 50.6 59.3 60.5 62.7 65.1 76.8 81 84.3 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
18.6 20.6 22.9 22.9 23.6 26 26.5 30.2 35 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
11.5 11.5 11.9 11.9 12.1 13.4 13.6 15.6 15.8 16 16.3 16.4 19.3 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
28.6
41.3
46.1
43
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
15.7
15.7
15.3
21.6
21.2
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
40.5
38.5
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
18.3
18.2
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
28.6
High 1280x800
9.3
12.7
12.6
High 1440x900
10.6
10.6
High 800x600
15.6
15.6
20
19.6
22.1
26.4
High 1680x1050
8.3
Medium 1680x1050
14.5
Low 1680x1050
33
Low 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
56.9
76.9
52.7
Med 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
33.5
36.7
33.7
44.5
Low 1366x768
55.8
34.5
Medium 1366x768
27.4
14.1
High 1366x768
14.9
10.2
Very High 1024x768
6.4
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
32.3 39.3 51 57.7 58 59.8 70.4 72.2 76 78 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
17.6 18.9 22 22.8 23.1 25.4 26 27.1 30.9 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
10.3 10.7 10.8 12 12.8 13 14 14.7 15 15.1 15.6 15.6 17.3 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
27.9
28
36.6
44.2
42.2
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
15.1
15.2
14.9
21.9
21.3
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
38.4
0
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
18.7
19
High 1440x900
10.1
10.3
Low 1680x1050
31.2
Medium 1680x1050
14.9
High 1680x1050
8
High 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
8
12.3
12
Med 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
29.8
33.9
32.1
37.3
Low 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
54.2
70.4
64.9
High 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
14.1
14.2
17.4
17.7
10.8
23.8
Low 1366x768
51.6
32.5
Medium 1366x768
25.8
15.5
High 1366x768
13.9
11.1
Very High 1024x768
6.3
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
49  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
24  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
59
High 2xAF 2xAA 800x600
31
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
42
High 2xAF 2xAA 1280x800
20
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

2006
high 1024x768
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Elder Scrolls IV - Oblivion

The Elder Scrolls IV - Oblivion

2006
high 1280x800
41  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
133  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
169 196 261 271 295 322 384 403 420 ~ 302 fps    + Compare
med. 800x600
29 31 33 34 35 106 124 153 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
27 29 30 31 32 38 56 56 57 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
250.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
82.6  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
20.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Counter-Strike Source

Counter-Strike Source

2004
high 1024x768
270  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
167.5 169.7 187.2 201 213.1 ~ 188 fps    + Compare
med. 640x480
155.4 192.6 198.5 210.4 ~ 189 fps    + Compare
high 800x600
146.8 166.8 170.9 205.7 ~ 173 fps    + Compare
ultra 1024x768
85 117.9 123.9 132.1 206.7 ~ 133 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
337 409.5 414.3 434.9 513.5 525 555 ~ 456 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16

Gaming Performance

The gaming benchmarks below were conducted with a 9600M GT containing 512 MB GDDR3 graphics memory and a fast Core 2 Duo CPU. Using a slower CPU and / or slower memory, a slower performance has to be expected (e.g., 20% slower with GDDR3).

Crysis: 1024x768, med: 25 fps -> playable (only in low fully playable)
Unreal Tournament 3: 1280x800, Stufe 3/5 -> fully playable
Call of Duty 4: 1024x768, high Details: 50 fps -> fully playable
Supreme Commander (Gameplay, Multiplayer 2vs2): 1024x768, med -> playable
Race Driver Grid: 1024x768, med -> fully playable
Colin Mc Rae Dirt: 1024x768, med Details: 30 fps -> playable
Gothic 3: 1024x768, high Details: 35 fps -> fully playable
Lost Planet: 1024x768, med Details, DX10: 30 fps -> playable

Current games (08-2008) are all fully playable (but not at the hightest settings) with the 9600M GT. Older or less demanding games can be played with full settings enabled. Compared to the old 8600M GT, the 9600M GT shows a clearly better performance (also because of the faster CPUs).

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT graphics card

Acer Aspire 5930G-864G32MN: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 15.40", 3 kg
  Review » Review Acer Aspire 5930G Notebook

Acer Aspire 6930G: Intel Core 2 Duo T5800, 16.00", 3.2 kg
  Review » Review Acer Aspire 6930G Notebook

Apple MacBook Pro 15: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 15.40", 2.5 kg
  Review » Review Apple MacBook Pro 15" v5 2008 (Unibody, 9600M GT + 9400M)

  Review » Review Update Apple MacBook Pro 5.1 (Unibody, 9600M GT + 9400M)

Apple MacBook Pro 15 inch 2009-06: Intel Core 2 Duo T9600, 15.40", 2.5 kg
  Review » Review Apple MacBook Pro 15 Mid 2009 2.8 GHz

Apple Macbook Pro 17 inch 2009-03: Intel Core 2 Duo T9550, 17.00", 3 kg
  Review » Review Apple MacBook Pro 17" Notebook (Aluminium Unibody, 17", 9600M GT, T9550)

  Review » Review MacBook Pro 17" Unibody Non-Glare

HP Pavilion dv5-1032eg: Intel Core 2 Duo P7350, 15.40", 2.7 kg
  Review » Short Review HP Pavilion dv5-1032eg Entertainment Notebook

HP Pavilion dv7-1050eg: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 17.10", 3.5 kg
  Review » Review HP Pavilion dv7-1050eg / 1045eg Notebook

HP Pavilion HDX16: Intel Core 2 Duo P8700, 16.00", 3.2 kg
  Review » Review HP Pavilion HDX16 Notebook

LG P310-S.CBRBG Camini: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400, 13.30", 1.7 kg
  Review » Review LG P310 "Camini" Notebook

MSI Megabook GX400: Intel Core 2 Duo P7350, 14.10", 2.3 kg
  Review » Review MSI GX 400 Notebook

MSI Megabook GX620: Intel Core 2 Duo P9500, 15.40", 2.7 kg
  Review » Review MSI Megabook GX620 Notebook

Samsung Aura P8400 Madril: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400, 15.40", 2.7 kg
  Review » User Review: Samsung R560 Madril Notebook

Zepto Mythos A15: Intel Core 2 Duo P9500, 15.40", 3.1 kg
  Review » Review Zepto Mythos A15 Notebook

Acer Aspire 5930G-864G32MN: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 15.40", 3 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5930G-864G32MN

Acer Aspire 5930G-944G32BN: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 15.40", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5930G

Acer Aspire 6935G: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 16.00", 3.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 6935G

Acer Aspire 7730G: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 17.00", 3.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 7730G

Acer Aspire 8730G: Intel Core 2 Duo T6400, 18.40", 4.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 8730G

Apple MacBook Pro 15: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 15.40", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Apple MacBook Pro Unibody

Apple MacBook Pro 15 inch 2009-06: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400, 15.40", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Apple MacBook Pro 15 inch (06/09)

Apple Macbook Pro 17 inch 2009-03: Intel Core 2 Duo T9550, 17.00", 3 kg
  External Review » Apple Macbook Pro 17“ 2009-3

Cyberpower Xplorer X5-7900: Intel Core 2 Duo P9600, 15.40", 3 kg
  External Review » Cyberpower Xplorer X5-7900

Fujitsu Amilo Xi3670: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000, 18.40", 4 kg
  External Review » Fujitsu Amilo Xi3670

Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo Xi3650: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 18.40", 3.9 kg
  External Review » Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo Xi3650

HP Pavilion dv5-1011ea: Intel Core 2 Duo P7350, 15.40", 2.9 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv5-1011ea

HP Pavilion dv5-1032eg: Intel Core 2 Duo P7350, 15.40", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv5-1032eg

HP Pavilion dv5-1040eg: Intel Core 2 Duo P7350, 15.40", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv5-1040eg

HP Pavilion dv5-1080el: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 15.40", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv5-1080el

HP Pavilion DV5-1199EG: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 15.40", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv5-1199EG

HP Pavilion dv7-1000ea : Intel Core 2 Duo P7350, 17.00", 3.5 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv7-1000ea

HP Pavilion dv7-1004ea: Intel Core 2 Duo P7350, 17.00", 3.5 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv7-1004ea

HP Pavilion dv7-1045eg : Intel Core 2 Duo P8400, 17.00", 3.5 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv7-1045eg

HP Pavilion dv7-1050eg: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 17.10", 3.5 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv7-1050eg

HP Pavilion dv7-1070eg: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 17.10", 3.5 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv7-1070eg

HP Pavilion dv7-1140eg : Intel Core 2 Duo P7350, 17.00", 3.5 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv7-1140eg

HP Pavilion dv7-1280EG: Intel Core 2 Duo P7450, 17.10", 3.5 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv7-1280EG

HP Pavilion dv7-1285dx: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 17.00", 3.5 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv7-1285dx

HP Pavilion dv7t: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 17.00", 3.2 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv7t

HP Pavilion HDX X16-1010EA: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400, 16.00", 3.5 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion HDX X16-1010EA

HP Pavilion HDX16: Intel Core 2 Duo P8700, 16.00", 3.2 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion HDX16

HP Pavilion HDX16t: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400, 16.00", 3.6 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion HDX16t

HP Pavilion HDX18 : Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 18.00", 4.5 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion HDX18

HP Pavilion HDX18t : Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 18.40", 4.1 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion HDX18t

Ibuypower Battalion 101 FX-924Z: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 15.40", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Ibuypower Battalion 101 FX-924Z

LG P310-S.CBRAG Tarsia : Intel Core 2 Duo T9500, 13.30", 1.6 kg
  External Review » LG P310-S.CBRAG Tarsia

LG P310-S.CBRBG Camini: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400, 13.30", 1.7 kg
  External Review » LG P310-S.CBRBG Tarsia

LG S510: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 15.40", 2.6 kg
  External Review » LG S510

MSI Megabook GX400: Intel Core 2 Duo P7350, 14.10", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Megabook GX400

MSI Megabook GX620: Intel Core 2 Duo P7350, 15.40", 2.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Megabook GX620

  External Review » MSI Megabook EX620

MSI Megabook GX630: AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80, 15.40", 2.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Megabook GX630

MSI Megabook GX720: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400, 17.10", 3.4 kg
  External Review » MSI Megabook GX720

Samsung R560: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400, 15.40", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Samsung R560

Sony Vaio VGN-AW11S/B: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400, 18.40", 3.8 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-AW11S/B

Sony Vaio VGN-AW11XU/Q: Intel Core 2 Duo T9600, 18.40", 4 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-AW11XU/Q

Sony Vaio VGN-AW11Z/B: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 18.40", 3.9 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-AW11Z/B

Sony Vaio VGN-AW125J/H: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400, 18.40", 3.8 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-AW125J/H

Sony Vaio VGN-AW170Y/Q : Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 18.40", 4 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio AW170Y/Q

Sony Vaio VGN-AW17GU : Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 18.40", 4 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-AW17GU

Sony Vaio VGN-AW180Y/Q : Intel Core 2 Duo T9600, 18.40", 3.9 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-AW180Y/Q

Sony Vaio VGN-AW190: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 18.40", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-AW190

Sony Vaio VGN-AW21VY/Q: Intel Core 2 Duo T9800, 18.40", 4 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-AW21VY/Q

Sony Vaio VGN-AW21XY/Q: Intel Core 2 Duo T9800, 18.40", 4 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-AW21XY/Q

Sony Vaio VGN-AW235J/B: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 18.40", 4 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-AW235J/B

Sony Vaio VGN-AW310J/H: Intel Core 2 Duo T6500, 18.40", 3.7 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-AW310J/H

Sony Vaio VGN-AW31M/H: Intel Core 2 Duo P8700, 18.40", 3.9 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-AW31M/H

Sony Vaio VGN-AW31XY: Intel Core 2 Duo T9900, 18.40", 4 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-AW31XY

Sony Vaio VGN-AW41MF/H: Intel Core 2 Duo P7450, 18.40", 3.9 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-AW41MF/H

Toshiba Qosmio F50-10M: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400, 15.40", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio F50-10M

Toshiba Qosmio F50-10Z: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400, 15.40", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio F50-10Z

Toshiba Qosmio G50-10H: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 18.40", 4.4 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio G50-10H

Toshiba Qosmio G50-10i : Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 18.40", 4.4 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio G50-10i

Toshiba Qosmio G50-115: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400, 18.40", 4.8 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio G50-115

Toshiba Qosmio G50-127 : Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 18.40", 4.4 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio G50-127

Toshiba Qosmio G55-Q802 : Intel Core 2 Duo P7350, 18.40", 5 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio G55-Q802

Zepto Mythos A15: Intel Core 2 Duo P9500, 15.40", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Zepto Mythos A15

Zepto Nexus A15: Intel Core 2 Duo P7350, 15.40", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Zepto Nexus A15

Zepto Nox A15: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400, 15.40", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Zepto Nox A15

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile *
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop)
GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile *
GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile *
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop)
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop)
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q *
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile *
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q *
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q *
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) *
GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q *
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q *
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) *
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200

Class 2

Radeon RX 5600M
Quadro P5000
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Radeon Pro 5600M *
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q *
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro M5500
Quadro P4000
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M *
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile *
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q *
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Quadro T500 Mobile *
GeForce MX450 *
GeForce GTX 980M
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
Radeon Pro Vega 20
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
GeForce GTX 970M
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Vega M GL / 870
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
Iris Xe G7 96EUs *
GeForce GTX 880M
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Quadro K5100M
Quadro P1000
Xe MAX
GeForce MX350 *
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
GeForce GTX 965M
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Quadro M2200
GeForce GTX 870M
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Radeon R9 M390
FirePro M6100
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro M1200
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 640
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
GeForce MX250
GeForce MX150
GeForce MX330 *
Quadro M2000M
Quadro K5000M
Quadro K4100M
Iris Xe G7 80EUs *
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon RX 540 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 860M
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M470X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
GeForce GTX 850M
Quadro M1000M
Quadro M620 *
GeForce 945M
Quadro K4000M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Radeon R9 M470 *
Quadro K3100M
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5)
FirePro W5130M
Quadro K3000M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
FirePro M6000
FirePro M5100
GeForce MX230

Class 3

Vega 8 R4000 *
Quadro K2100M
GeForce GT 755M
GeForce 845M
Radeon R9 M265X
Radeon R7 M465
FirePro W4170M
GeForce GT 750M
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GeForce MX130
GeForce 940MX
Quadro M520
Quadro K1100M
Vega 8
Vega 7 *
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) *
GeForce 930MX
M1 8-Core GPU *
M1 7-Core GPU *
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Radeon R7 M445
Quadro M500M
GeForce 840M
GeForce GT 745M
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
GeForce GT 740M
Iris Plus Graphics 650
GeForce 930M
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 530
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 645
GeForce 830M
GeForce MX110 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
GeForce 920MX
Iris Graphics 540
Quadro K2000M
GeForce GT 735M
GeForce 825M
FirePro M4000
GeForce GT 730M
FirePro M4100
Radeon R7 M265
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) *
GeForce GT 640M
Radeon R7 (Carrizo)
Radeon R7 (Kaveri)
Radeon R7 M460 *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon R8 M445DX
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M440
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 520
Radeon 610
Vega 6 *
Vega 5 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) *
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
HD Graphics 530
HD Graphics P530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
UHD Graphics 620
HD Graphics 620
Radeon R6 (Carrizo)
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R6 (Kaveri)
HD Graphics 5600
Radeon R6 M255DX
Quadro K1000M
Radeon R5 M330
Radeon R5 M430
Radeon R5 M255
Vega 3 *
GeForce 910M
GeForce 820M
HD Graphics 520
Iris Graphics 6100
UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) *
GeForce GT 720M

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics 6000
Quadro K610M
Iris Graphics 5100
HD Graphics 4600
HD Graphics 5500
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 615
Radeon R5 (Carrizo) *
Radeon R5 (Kaveri)
GeForce 710M
HD Graphics 5000
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 4400
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
HD Graphics 505
HD Graphics 5300
HD Graphics 4000
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)
Radeon R4 (Beema)
Radeon R4 (Kaveri)
Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
HD Graphics 4200
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics 500
GeForce 9600M GT
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell)
HD Graphics (Braswell)
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)

Class 5

HD Graphics (Haswell)
Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
Radeon R6 (Mullins)
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2016-01-26)