Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon HD 6720G2

AMD Radeon HD 6720G2

The AMD Radeon HD 6720G2 is the combination of a integrated AMD Radeon HD 6520G APU processor graphics card and a dedicated entry level AMD Radeon HD 6650M graphics card in CrossFire combination. It is called AMD Dual Graphics or asymmetric CrossFire and uses AFR (Alternate Frame Rendering) to render different frames on the two graphic cores. Therefore the combination also suffers from micro stuttering (different spaces between two images lead to stuttering altough the framerate is high enough for fluent gaming with only one GPU).

The performance of the Radeon HD 6720G2 depends greatly on the driver support for the used games. In some games the performance may even degrade by 10-15% compared to using only the APU graphics card. Currently (June 2011) only DirectX 10 and 11 graphics modes are supported and therefore lower settings and older games are not accelerated. Due to the micro stuttering and performance problems, Dual Graphics may impose more problems than bring performance gains.

The features like PureVideo HD (UVD3) or OpenCL support are similar to the two graphics cards.

As both graphics cards are rendering frames, the power consumption is clearly higher than using only one GPU.

Radeon HD 6000G2 Series

Radeon HD 6775G2 compare 880
Radeon HD 6755G2 compare 880
Radeon HD 6760G2 compare 880
Radeon HD 6740G2 compare 880
Radeon HD 6720G2 880
Radeon HD 6690G2 compare 880
Radeon HD 6680G2 compare 800
Radeon HD 6645G2 compare 560
Radeon HD 6640G2 compare 560
Radeon HD 6545G2 compare 480
Radeon HD 6540G2 compare 480
Radeon HD 6515G2 compare 400
Radeon HD 6510G2 compare 400
ArchitectureTerascale 2
Pipelines880 - unified
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0
technology40 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement14.06.2011

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1389     avg: 1406     median: 1404 (2%)     max: 1424 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1428     avg: 1479     median: 1456.5 (1%)     max: 1575 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 3864     avg: 3888     median: 3888 (1%)     max: 3913 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 3577     avg: 3600     median: 3603 (2%)     max: 3619 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 6160     avg: 6206     median: 6186 (8%)     max: 6271 Points
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
specvp11 sw-02 +
specvp11 proe-05 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 0.9     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (1%)     max: 0.93 fps
specvp11 maya-03 +
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 11.63     avg: 11.8     median: 11.8 (13%)     max: 12.02 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 +
specvp11 catia-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 2.8     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 2.84 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
59.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
19.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fifa 12

Fifa 12

2011
low 800x600
79.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
58.1  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
46.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
65.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
28  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
med. 1024x768
40  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
35.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
154.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
115.3  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
75.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
71.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1360x768
31.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1360x768
26.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 800x600
59.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
25.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
53.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
46  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
38  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
46 47.5 51.5 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
29.5 29.8 30.8 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
19.9 20.6 23.4 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
low 800x600
31.4 31.8 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
20.5 22.5 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18.6 20.7 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
37.8 56.6 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
33.5 47.9 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
24.5 40.2 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
96.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
58.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

2006
high 1024x768
30.2 31.3 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Anno 207059.121.319.4
Fifa 1279.958.146.7
Deus Ex Human Revolution65.428
Dirt 34035.3
Fifa 11154.1115.375.2
StarCraft 271.531.926.1
Metro 203359.925.6
Battlefield: Bad Company 253.14638
Risen483021
Need for Speed Shift322220
Colin McRae: DIRT 2474132
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare96.558.9
Call of Juarez Benchmark31
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

6
4
1
3
7
1
5
5
1









For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.28
log 06. 16:13:54

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 04 Dec 2024 05:29:11 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.033s ... 0.034s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.034s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.034s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 2630 +0.013s ... 0.046s

#8 got single benchmarks 2630 +0.013s ... 0.059s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.059s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.386s ... 0.446s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.446s

#12 Got 46 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.449s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.449s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.006s ... 0.455s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.297s ... 0.752s

#16 return log +0.008s ... 0.76s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon HD 6720G2 graphics card

 

Review Asus K53TA-SX026V (Fusion) Notebook

Frugal. Low energy needs, no annoying heat gain, and good battery life. Alongside these advantages, its dual-GPU system and quad-core processing power will appe...
AMD A6-3400M | AMD Radeon HD 6720G2 | 15.60" | 2.4 kg

Acer Aspire 5560G-6348G75MN: AMD A6-3400M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5560G-6348G75MN

Asus K53TA-A1: AMD A6-3400M, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Asus K53TA-A1

Lenovo IdeaPad Z575: AMD A6-3400M, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Z575

Asus X53TA-SX133V: AMD A6-3400M, 15.60"
  External Review » Asus X53TA-SX133V

Acer Aspire 7560G-6344G50Mnkk: AMD A6-3400M, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 7560G-6344G50Mnkk

Acer Aspire 5560G-6346G75Mnkk: AMD A6-3400M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5560G-6346G75Mnkk

Asus K53TA-SX026V: AMD A6-3400M, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Asus K53TA-SX026V

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter