NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
The Nvidia GeForce 9650M GT is a DirectX 10 graphics card for notebooks and technically a higher clocked 9600M GT. It is produced in 55nm and therefore the current consumption is similar to the 9600M GT which is produced in 65nm. As the 9600M GT it features the PureVideo HD video processor (VP3 ) and HybridPower support.
In conjunction with the Nvidia 9100M G integrated graphics, the 9650M GT supports Hybrid-SLI (only HybridPower). HybridPower is a technique to choose between the integrated and dedicated graphics core, if performance or battery runtime is needed. This works only in Windows Vista. Up to now the user has to use a tool to switch between the GPUs. Later Nvidia wants to switch automatically in the drivers. GeForceBoost is not supported with this card, as there would be no performance gain.
As the 8600M GT and 9600M GT, the 9650M GT features 32 stream processors that do the graphic work of the vertex- and pixel-shaders.
The performance of the 9650M GT should be somewhere near the 9650M GS because of the high shader clock rate (with GDDR3). According to Zepto (first manufacturer who announced the card) the 9650M GT should be up to 20% faster than a 9600M GT (in 3DMark06).
Compared to desktop graphics cards , the 9650M GT is similar to the GeForce 9500GT (which also descends from the G96 core). The desktop CPU 9600 GT has a 256 bit memory bus and is therefore much faster.
GeForce 9600M Series Codename NB9P-GT Architecture G9x Pipelines 32 - unified Core Speed 550 MHz Shader Speed 1325 MHz Memory Speed 800 MHz Memory Bus Width 128 Bit Memory Type GDDR2, GDDR3 Max. Amount of Memory 1024 MB Shared Memory no API DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 Power Consumption 23 Watt Transistor Count 314 Million technology 55 nm Features PCI-E 2.0, 400 MHz Speichertaktung bei GDDR2, 800 MHz bei GDDR3, PureVideo HD Technologie (VP3), Hybrid SLI mit HybridPower (mit aktuellen nVidia Chipsätzen). Notebook Size medium sized Date of Announcement 19.08.2008
Benchmarks 1306 Points (0%)
...
...
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
1054 Points (1%)
...
...
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 22522 avg: 24042 median: 23209 (24%) max: 26575 Points
...
...
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 12933 avg: 13029 median: 13031 (7%) max: 13117 Points
...
...
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 8350 avg: 8387 median: 8374 (9%) max: 8454 Points
...
...
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
6000 points (8%)
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings (3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings) GeForce 9650M GT ? / 800 MHz6000
...
...
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
min: 4166 avg: 4808 median: 4880 (7%) max: 5800 Points
...
...
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 +
4679 Points (6%)
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 Asus N50Vn (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800) P8400 GeForce 9650M GT 1 GB 3 GB 4679
...
...
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 +
4826 Points (7%)
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 Asus X57Vn (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768) P8400 GeForce 9650M GT 550 / 400 MHz 1 GB 3 GB 4826
...
...
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik (Spiele)
5.3 Points (78%)
...
...
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik
5 Points (74%)
...
...
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 3542 avg: 3798 median: 3632 (3%) max: 4138 points
...
...
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
...
...
...
...
...
...
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
40.5 [X] Asus N50Vn Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 2.3GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
21.7 [X] Asus N50Vn Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 2.3GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
25 [X] Asus X57Vn Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 2.3GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
14.2 [X] Asus X57Vn Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 2.3GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
High 1280x800
11.3 [X] Asus N50Vn Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 2.3GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
High 1440x900
8.4 [X] Asus X57Vn Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 2.3GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
High 800x600
20.3 [X] Asus N50Vn Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 2.3GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
High 1680x1050
6.6 [X] Asus L50Vn Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 2.5GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
Medium 1680x1050
11.5 [X] Asus L50Vn Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 2.5GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
Low 1680x1050
13.4 [X] Asus L50Vn Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 2.5GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
Low 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
55 [X] Asus N50Vn Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 2.3GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
Med 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
34.6 [X] Asus N50Vn Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 2.3GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
...
...
...
...
...
...
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
38.1 [X] Asus N50Vn Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 2.3GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
20.7 [X] Asus N50Vn Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 2.3GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
24.9 [X] Asus X57Vn Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 2.3GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
13.9 [X] Asus X57Vn Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 2.3GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
High 1440x900
8 [X] Asus X57Vn Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 2.3GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
Low 1680x1050
21 [X] Asus L50Vn Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 2.5GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
Medium 1680x1050
11.4 [X] Asus L50Vn Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 2.5GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
High 1680x1050
6.3 [X] Asus L50Vn Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 2.5GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
High 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
10.8 [X] Asus N50Vn Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 2.3GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
Med 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
32 [X] Asus N50Vn Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 2.3GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
Low 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
56.8 [X] Asus N50Vn Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 2.3GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
High 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
18.4 [X] Asus N50Vn Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 2.3GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
...
...
...
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
226 [X] Asus X57Vn Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 2.3GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
376 [X] Asus N50Vn Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 2.3GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
472 [X] Asus L50Vn Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 2.5GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
~ 358 fps
+ Compare
- Hide Comparison
...
...
27 [X] Asus X57Vn Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 2.3GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
120 [X] Asus L50Vn Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 2.5GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
130 [X] Asus N50Vn Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 2.3GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
~ 92 fps
+ Compare
- Hide Comparison
...
...
27 [X] Asus X57Vn Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 2.3GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
41 [X] Asus N50Vn Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 2.3GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
41 [X] Asus L50Vn Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 2.5GHz
GeForce 9650M GT
~ 36 fps
+ Compare
- Hide Comparison
...
...
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
...
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.25
log 29. 08:38:49
#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s
#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Aug 2023 15:32:04 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#3 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.029s
#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s
#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.029s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 877 +0.014s ... 0.043s
#7 got single benchmarks 877 +0.018s ... 0.061s
#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.061s
#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.282s ... 0.343s
#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.343s
#11 Got 52 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.347s
#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.347s
#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.349s
#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.133s ... 0.483s
#15 return log +0.056s ... 0.538s
Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT graphics card
Review Asus M70V Notebook Infusion Reloaded. Following the Asus M50V, the much anticipated M70V finally became available but will it be able to compete with other well known manufacturer...
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 | NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT | 17.10" | 4 kg
Review Asus M50V Notebook Multimedia Talent from Asus. Even after the manufacturer Asus had got the stone rolling in the netbook sector with its Eee PC 701 only just a year ago and could...
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 | NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT | 15.40" | 3.1 kg
Asus M50VN : Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 15.40", 3 kgExternal Review » Asus M50VN
Asus N80VN : Intel Core 2 Duo P7350, 14.10", 2.6 kgExternal Review » Asus N80VN
Asus M70VN : Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 17.10", 4 kgExternal Review » Asus M70VN
Asus L50VN : Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 15.40", 3 kgExternal Review » Asus L50VN
Asus X57VN : Intel Core 2 Duo T5800, 15.40", 2.8 kgExternal Review » Asus X57VN
Please share our article, every link counts!
» Comparison of GPUs
» Benchmark List
» Notebook Gaming List
Class 1 NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Class 2 Radeon PRO W6600M *
Class 3 UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics Xe 24EUs *
Class 4
Class 5 * Approximate position of the graphics adapter
Working For Notebookcheck
Are you a techie who knows how to translate? Then join our Team!
Details here
Top 10 Laptops Multimedia , Budget Multimedia , Gaming , Budget Gaming , Lightweight Gaming , Business , Budget Office , Workstation , Subnotebooks , Ultrabooks , Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros , under 500 USD/Euros , 1,000 USD/Euros , for University Students , Best Displays
Top 10 Smartphones Smartphones , Phablets , ≤6-inch , Camera Smartphones
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2016-01-26)
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
