Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The Nvidia RTX 4000 Ada Generation, not to be confused with the A4000, P4000 or RTX 4000 Turing Generation, is a very powerful professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 7,424 CUDA cores and 12 GB of ECC GDDR6 VRAM. Brought into existence in 2023, this graphics adapter leverages TSMC's 5 nm process and Nvidia's Ada Lovelace architecture to achieve great performance combined with moderate power consumption. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for the card is very wide at 60 W to 175 W leading to bizarre performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same product.

Hardware-wise, the RTX 4000 is a GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop in disguise. Consequently, both make use of the AD103 chip and have little difficulty running triple-A games at QHD 1440p.

Quadro series graphics cards ship with much different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional users rather than gamers. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.

Architecture and Features

Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here (up to 16,384 versus 10,752); under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache and an optimized ray tracing routine (a different way to determine what is transparent and what isn't is used) and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI tasks.

The RTX 4000 features 58 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 232 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 7,424 CUDA cores, making it a lot faster than the RTX 3500 Ada Generation. Elsewhere, the graphics card comes with 12 GB of 192-bit wide ECC GDDR6 memory for a very healthy throughput of ~432 GB/s. Error correction can be turned off if desired. The fact that error correction is present here proves that the RTX 4000 is indeed targeted at professional users.

Just like Ampere-based cards, the RTX 4000 makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however DP 1.4a video outputs can potentially prove to be a bottleneck down the line.

Performance

With its power target set to ~130 W, the Ada Generation graphics card delivers a Blender Classroom v3.3 CUDA score of 22 seconds which is a very good result. All 2024 games are playable at 1440p with the highest settings possible on this GPU.

Nvidia's marketing materials mention "up to 33.5 TFLOPS" of performance which is pretty impressive. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is good for a little over 42 TFLOPS, for reference.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the TGP power target of the RTX 4000 is. One other thing worth mentioning is that enabling error correction appears to reduce the amount of video memory that is available to applications and games by up to a gigabyte.

Power consumption

Nvidia no longer divides its laptop graphics cards into Max-Q and non-max-Q models. Instead, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs, and the range can sometimes be shockingly wide. This is the case with the RTX 4000, as the lowest value recommended for it sits at just 60 W while the highest is more than two times higher at 175 W (this most likely includes Dynamic Boost). The slowest system built around an RTX 4000 Ada can easily be 60% slower than the fastest one. This is the kind of delta that we've already seen on consumer-grade laptops featuring the latest GeForce RTX cards.

Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the RTX 4000 Ada is built with makes for very decent energy efficiency, as of mid 2023.

RTX Ada Generation Laptop GPU Series

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 2048 64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
ArchitectureAda Lovelace
Pipelines7424 - unified
Raytracing Cores58
Tensor / AI Cores232
Theoretical Performance33.6 TFLOPS FP32
Memory Speed16000 effective = 2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory12 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth432 GB/s
APIDirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption150 Watt (60 - 150 Watt TGP)
technology5 nm
PCIe4.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement21.03.2023
Link to Manufacturer Pageimages.nvidia.com
PredecessorRTX A3000 Laptop GPU

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
16013 Points (43%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
16308 Points (33%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
61459 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
152418 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
32984 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
40179 Points (37%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
39943 Points (48%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
54921 Points (42%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
22 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
15 Seconds (6%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
225.7 fps (56%)
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
308.5 fps (46%)
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
156.7 fps (27%)
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
180.9 fps (49%)
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
205.8 fps (82%)
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
269.8 fps (45%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
230.4 fps (62%)
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
555 fps (62%)
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
155.8 fps (27%)
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
272 fps (46%)
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
447.5 fps (51%)
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
106.8 fps (34%)
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
424.7 fps (62%)
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
417.6 fps (46%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
287.6 fps (45%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-07 4k
150.4 fps (44%)
specvp2020 solidworks-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-07 1080p
340.8 fps (72%)
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
550 fps (67%)
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
152 fps (42%)
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
478.6 fps (51%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
38.6 fps (6%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
138.7 fps (48%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
131.4 fps (64%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
174.9 fps (46%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
69.5 fps (45%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
299.3 fps (43%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
709 fps (100%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
144.9 fps (65%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
80.9 fps (53%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
114.5 fps (39%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
327 fps (19%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
104.6 fps (3%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
156713 points (41%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
104760 points (26%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
202 Watt (27%)
0153045607590105120135150165180195Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
225 Watt (66%)
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
219 Watt (28%)
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
0.4 fps per Watt (2%)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
129.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
115.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
108.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
98.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
68.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
133.9
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
54.8
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
97
low 1920x1080
178.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
160.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
141.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
137  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
90.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
211
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
275  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
264  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
238  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
95.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
65.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
343
low 1920x1080
275.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
232.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
171.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
137.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
92  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
326.3
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
452  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
372  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
323  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
292  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
210  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
168  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
148  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
138  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
128  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
125  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
166.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
113.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
207  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
185.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
150  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
119.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
215.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
189.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
185.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
164.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
185.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
183.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
179.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
125.6  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
118.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
183.1
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
186.5
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty129.3115.1108.498.368.5
Baldur's Gate 3178.3160.6141.613790.7
F1 2227526423895.565.7
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands275.4232.6171.4137.192
Strange Brigade452372323292210
Far Cry 5168148138128125
X-Plane 11.11166.8144113.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark207185.3150119.5
Dota 2 Reborn215.4189.7185.2164.4
GTA V185.8183.9179.4125.6118.7
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps



10


1
9


2
8


2
6


6
2



For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 12. 16:39:55

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 10 Jun 2025 05:35:53 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.036s ... 0.037s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.037s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.037s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11607 +0.013s ... 0.05s

#8 got single benchmarks 11607 +0.008s ... 0.058s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.058s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.589s ... 0.647s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.648s

#12 Got 46 rows for game benchmarks. +0.035s ... 0.682s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.682s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.688s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.079s ... 0.766s

#16 return log +0.005s ... 0.771s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-03- 1)