Notebookcheck

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 for laptops is a mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). Compared to the faster RTX 2000 GPUs (e.g. RTX 2060), the 1650 integrates no Raytracing or Tensor cores. The performance should be slightly faster than the old GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. Compared to the desktop version, the mobile GTX1650 uses all 1024 shaders of the TU117 chip.

Starting March 2020, the GTX 1650 Mobile is also available with fast GDDR6 graphics memory (N18P-G61) as a refresh.

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal.

Compared to the bigger Turing chips (like the TU116 of the GTX 1660 Ti and the RTX lineup), the TU117 does not include the new NVENC encoder but an older one similar to the one used in Pascal and Volta.

The power consumption of the 1650 for laptops is specified at 50 Watt TGP (Total Graphics Power) by Nvidia and therefore 15 Watt higher than the efficient (and slower) Max-Q variant of the 1650. The TU117 chip is manufactured in 12nm FFN at TSMC.

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce GTX 1600 Series
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) (compare) 1536 @ 1500 - 1770 (Boost) MHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) (compare) 1408 @ 1530 - 1785 (Boost) MHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (compare) 1536 @ 1455 - 1590 (Boost) MHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) (compare) 1408 @ 1530 - 1785 (Boost) MHz192 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q (compare) 1536 @ 1140 - 1335 (Boost) MHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Desktop) (compare) 1024 @ 1530 - 1725 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (compare) 1024 128 Bit
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 1024 @ 1395 - 1560 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop) (compare) 896 @ 1485 - 1665 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q (compare) 1024 128 Bit
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (compare) 1024 @ 1020 - 1245 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
CodenameN18P-G0, N18P-G61
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines1024 - unified
Core Speed1395 - 1560 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed8000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5, GDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory4096 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12_1
technology12 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement23.04.2019
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.nvidia.com/en-gb/geforce/gam...

Benchmarks

3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
min: 3080     avg: 3570     median: 3607.5 (26%)     max: 3751 Points
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
min: 2909     avg: 3473     median: 3506 (24%)     max: 3700 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 200727     avg: 305634     median: 364872 (69%)     max: 376241 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
min: 57517     avg: 84527     median: 79709.5 (11%)     max: 120012 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 16079     avg: 24256     median: 24087.5 (36%)     max: 30573 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 38016     avg: 54186     median: 57558.5 (30%)     max: 61286 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 6909     avg: 7981     median: 8073 (28%)     max: 8367 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 7741     avg: 9180     median: 9283 (23%)     max: 9536 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 60813     avg: 104654     median: 101952 (14%)     max: 149698 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 10546     avg: 11795     median: 11845 (34%)     max: 13143 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 10885     avg: 13081     median: 13229 (26%)     max: 13575 points
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 +
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - OpenGL, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080
97.6 fps (56%)
SPECviewperf 13 Solidworks (sw-04) +
Siemens NX (snx-03) +
Showcase (showcase-02) +
Medical (medical-02) +
Maya (maya-05) +
Creo (creo-02) +
Catia (catia-05) +
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) +
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 +
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
60 fps (38%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
min: 170.1     avg: 177     median: 177.1 (45%)     max: 184.1 fps
GFXBench - Car Chase Onscreen on screen
min: 60     avg: 99     median: 99 (37%)     max: 137.9 fps
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
min: 1294     avg: 1479     median: 1478.5 (28%)     max: 1663 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
min: 2474     avg: 2873     median: 2872.5 (27%)     max: 3271 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
min: 6891     avg: 6931     median: 6931 (25%)     max: 6971 Points
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra - Power Consumption *
min: 82     avg: 92.1     median: 92 (20%)     max: 105.8 Watt
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

2019
low 1280x720
63.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1920x1080
71.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
33.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
16.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
98  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
66.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
59.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
32.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
17  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
121  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
70.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
66.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
53.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
37.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
6.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
98.2 123 166 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
67.3 76.2 77.3 ~ 74 fps    + Compare