Serious Sam 4 Laptop and Desktop Benchmarks

Old-school charm, but technically half-baked Fans of the Serious Sam series are finally getting their money's worth again, almost ten years after the third chapter - Flaky shooting fun against gigantic hordes of crazy creatures. Unfortunately, developer Croteam, in all in the excitement, forgot to optimise the engine.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (translated by Alex Alderson), Published 10/02/2020 🇩🇪 🇷🇺

Technology

Serious Sam 4 feels purely playful, like a mixture of Doom (disgusting monsters) and Borderlands (funny sayings). As with both of those games, Serious Sam 4 plays at a frenetic pace, with the main character moving through the different levels at insane speeds. The extremely fast movement combined with great weapon feedback of various shots and sounds is a lot of fun, too.

On the other hand, the basic technical framework underpinning Serious Sam 4 performs less well. Despite the rather expedient look, which in part hardly deviates from its almost 10-year-old predecessor, Serious Sam 4 turns out to be quite hardware-hungry.

The many technical problems that we encountered during our tests are just as serious as Sam himself. Here is a list of the problems we came across when playing Serious Sam 4:

Altering settings often lead to a crash.
Sometimes the game does not close correctly, or the synchronisation with Steam servers takes forever.
Annoying intermediate stutters can occur irrespective of hardware and settings.
The loading times are extremely long even with an SSD
Every now and then, a restart results in some settings being changed.
The maximum resolution often cannot be selected on external monitors, like 4K.
After levels have been loaded, the game often has to warm up for a while or hangs completely for several seconds.
The game is often CPU-limited even at higher graphics levels and resolutions, which is very unusual for a first-person shooter.
The integrated benchmark likes to mess around.
The VRAM requirement is extremely steep. If you have a card with less than 4 GB of VRAM, then you can save yourself from purchase the game unless you are willing to accept awful visual. The game also requires 6-8 GB of VRAM for higher graphics levels and resolutions, which is borderline absurd considering the graphics on offer here.

In general, the graphics did not blow us away, even at the highest possible graphics settings. Yes, some elements are quite attractive, such as the splatter effects, but the texture sharpness and the number of polygons are way down on what other modern games currently offer. Additionally, the surroundings sometimes look quite sterile, despite the inclusion of vegetation and other details. The sheer mass of enemies only makes up for that to a limited extent, in our opinion.

To be clear, a good shooter can do without the graphical superiority that some games offer. However, if a game is as hardware hungry as Serious Sam 4 is, then one should expect decent graphics in return.

Serious gamers, meanwhile, will be happy that Serious Sam 4 includes a huge amount of graphics options with which to tinker. What is offered is rather too much of a good thing for the average gamer as you have to work your way through various submenus - as can be seen in the screenshots above - which is quite uncomfortable. However, there are presets based around CPU speed, GPU speed and VRAM volume.

In terms of APIs, Serious Sam 4 supports not only DirectX 11, but also DirectX 12 and Vulkan. In our experience, Vulkan provides the best frame rate but also increases the chance of problems presenting themselves. Hence, we used DX12 for our benchmark results for greater stability.

Benchmark

We are fans of the built-in benchmark function, which can be found under Extras. The benchmark comprises several levels, but we limited our tests to the mission Four Horsemen of the Apocalpyse. We let the benchmark run for 60 seconds each time, as the video below demonstrates. Since the benchmark sequence is never 100% identical, there are certain fluctuations in the results.

In our opinion, Serious Sam 4 is playable at 50 FPS and upwards, primarily because of its first-person perspective and its fast-paced gameplay. With that said, Serious Sam 4 never feels completely smooth.

Results

FHD (1,920 x 1,080)

We would recommend using a recent upper mid-range graphics card to play Serious Sam 4 at Full HD. Specifically, a GeForce GTX 1650 or Radeon RX 5500M should do when playing the game at medium details, while we would recommend a GeForce GTX 1660 Ti or higher for gaming at maximum settings.

Serious Sam 4
1920x1080 Medium (DX12) 1920x1080 High (DX12) 1920x1080 Ultra (DX12) AA:2xMS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop) MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, i9-9900K	123 (7.84^min, 79.5^P1) fps ∼53% 117 (26.3^min, 80.8^P1) fps ∼8% 108 (21^min, 76.2^P1) fps ∼55%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG, i9-9900K	107 (6.12^min, 66.6^P1) fps ∼46% 105 (13.2^min, 65.9^P1) fps ∼7% 89.4 (9.65^min, 58^P1) fps ∼46%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop) MSI GeForce RTX 2070, i9-9900K	105 (26.5^min, 74.2^P1) fps ∼45% 98.9 (20.7^min, 61.1^P1) fps ∼7% 83.4 (26.7^min, 51.6^P1) fps ∼43%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop) MSI GeForce RTX 2080, i9-9900K	101 (7.59^min, 62.2^P1) fps ∼43% 94.5 (3.58^min, 59.2^P1) fps ∼7% 85.3 (3.17^min, 50.9^P1) fps ∼44%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop) MSI GeForce RTX 2060, i9-9900K	100 (3.66^min, 36.5^P1) fps ∼43% 104 (5.26^min, 57.5^P1) fps ∼7% 70 (8.11^min, 36.6^P1) fps ∼36%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile MSI GE65 Raider 9SE, i7-9750H	83.3 (8.49^min, 53.9^P1) fps ∼36% 57.7 (2.44^min, 31.4^P1) fps ∼4% 50.3 (1.968^min, 23.1^P1) fps ∼26%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile Alienware 17 R4, i7-7820HK	75 (8.3^min, 43.6^P1) fps ∼32% 56.4 (5.38^min, 30.1^P1) fps ∼4% 54.4 (15^min, 34.1^P1) fps ∼28%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile MSI GP65 Leopard 9SF, i7-9750H	73.9 (2.73^min, 34.4^P1) fps ∼32% 71.4 (2.8^min, 33.7^P1) fps ∼5% 61.3 (2.51^min, 26.3^P1) fps ∼31%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD, i7-9750H	69 (2.36^min, 30.3^P1) fps ∼29% 68.3 (12.2^min, 39.6^P1) fps ∼5% 51.5 (2.47^min, 22.7^P1) fps ∼26%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile Asus G752VS, 6820HK	68.5 (7.26^min, 41.9^P1) fps ∼29% 55.5 (2.56^min, 29.3^P1) fps ∼4% 46.5 (1.967^min, 22.7^P1) fps ∼24%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile MSI GP75 Leopard 9SC, i7-9750H	56.1 (9.2^min, 38.6^P1) fps ∼24% 45.1 (13.7^min, 24.6^P1) fps ∼3% 24.4 (0.824^min, 6.85^P1) fps ∼12%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile MSI GT62VR, 6820HK	55.5 (6.44^min, 32^P1) fps ∼24% 41.5 (2.23^min, 18.9^P1) fps ∼3% 33.3 (2.53^min, 13.5^P1) fps ∼17%
AMD Radeon RX 5500M MSI Alpha 15, R7 3750H	51 (2.61^min, 20.5^P1) fps ∼22% 48.4 (11.1^min, 27.4^P1) fps ∼3% 24.6 (2.02^min, 8.25^P1) fps ∼13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile MSI GE72 7RE, i7-7700HQ	31.4 (9.01^min, 21.8^P1) fps ∼13% 22.2 (1.078^min, 6.04^P1) fps ∼2% 9.66 (0.726^min, 2.34^P1) fps ∼5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile MSI GL62M 7RD, i7-7700HQ	25.8 (8.19^min, 15.7^P1) fps ∼11% 15 (1.62^min, 4.1^P1) fps ∼1% 5.99 (0.793^min, 1.356^P1) fps ∼3%
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 MSI Prestige 14, i7-10510U	13 (1.896^min, 4.24^P1) fps ∼6% 8.16 (1.41^min, 1.734^P1) fps ∼1%
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 MSI Prestige 14, i7-10710U	10.6 (1.24^min, 3.26^P1) fps ∼5% 3.81 (0.4147^min, 0.999^P1) fps ∼0%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop) Aorus Z370 Ultra Gaming Desktop DDR4-2666, KFA2 GeForce RTX 2060 Super, i7-8086K	90.1 (23.7^min, 58^P1) fps ∼46%

QHD (2,560 x 1,440)

If you want to play with full details at QHD (2,560 x 1,440), then you cannot get away with anything less than a high-end and expensive card at the level of the GeForce RTX 2070.

Serious Sam 4
2560x1440 Ultra (DX12) AA:2xMS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti	107 (27.6^min, 65.8^P1) fps ∼63%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 2080	80.3 (11.7^min, 47.4^P1) fps ∼47%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG	78.6 (11.4^min, 52^P1) fps ∼46%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop), i7-8086K Aorus Z370 Ultra Gaming Desktop DDR4-2666, KFA2 GeForce RTX 2060 Super	74.3 (13.9^min, 49.1^P1) fps ∼43%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 2070	67.8 (24.1^min, 45.4^P1) fps ∼40%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 2060	57.6 (21.3^min, 36.5^P1) fps ∼34%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H MSI GP65 Leopard 9SF	54.5 (16.3^min, 33.7^P1) fps ∼32%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK Alienware 17 R4	52.6 (3.55^min, 24.8^P1) fps ∼31%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK Asus G752VS	43.9 (14^min, 25.8^P1) fps ∼26%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H MSI GE65 Raider 9SE	43.6 (11.8^min, 25.1^P1) fps ∼25%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD	39.6 (11.4^min, 24.1^P1) fps ∼23%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6820HK MSI GT62VR	27.7 (12.9^min, 16.8^P1) fps ∼16%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H MSI GP75 Leopard 9SC	21.7 (1.313^min, 10.4^P1) fps ∼13%
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H MSI Alpha 15	16 (2.6^min, 5.41^P1) fps ∼9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ MSI GE72 7RE	8.28 (1.025^min, 2.83^P1) fps ∼5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ MSI GL62M 7RD	4.17 (0.2558^min, 0.631^P1) fps ∼2%

UHD (3,840 x 2,160)

Serious Sam 4 is beyond the capabilities of all laptop GPUs bar the GeForce RTX 2080 when running at a mixture of UHD (3,840 x 2,160) and ultra settings. You can opt for a lesser graphics card, but you can only expect smooth all-round performance with the GeForce RTX 2080. The situation may improve with future patches, though.

Serious Sam 4
3840x2160 Ultra (DX12) AA:2xMS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti	86.3 (23.2^min, 61.3^P1) fps ∼53%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 2080	54 (17.6^min, 31.4^P1) fps ∼33%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop), i7-8086K Aorus Z370 Ultra Gaming Desktop DDR4-2666, KFA2 GeForce RTX 2060 Super	44.6 (9.2^min, 27.3^P1) fps ∼27%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 2070	42.8 (15.4^min, 28^P1) fps ∼26%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 2060	36.6 (14.8^min, 23.1^P1) fps ∼22%

Please note

Since gaming tests are very time-consuming and are often hindered by installation or activation limits, we can only provide you with some of the benchmarks, initially. Results for more graphics cards will be added in the coming days and weeks.

Übersicht

Frame times of the benchmark run

The below chart shows the frame times in milliseconds that the GeForce RTX 2070 and Radeon RX 5500M took to calculate each frame at FHD and ultra graphics settings. Smaller and consistent values provide a better gaming experience, in this regard.

Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0): Ø16.7 (9.33-74.01)

MSI Alpha 15 Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H: Ø40.6 (15.52-495.96)

Testsysteme

Device	Graphics Card	Processor	RAM	OS
Desktop PC I	MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (11 GB GDDR6) MSI GeForce RTX 2080 (8 GB GDDR6) MSI GeForce RTX 2070 (8 GB GDDR6) MSI GeForce RTX 2060 (6 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-9900K	4 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-bit
Desktop PC II	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (11 GB GDDR5X) Asus GeForce GTX 980 Ti (6 GB GDDR5) XFX Radeon R9 Fury (4 GB HBM) Sapphire Radeon R9 290X (4 GB GDDR5) Sapphire Radeon R9 280X (3 GB GDDR5) MSI Radeon R7 370 (2 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-8086K, Aorus Z370 Ultra Gaming	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-bit
Desktop PC III	NVIDIA Titan RTX (24 GB GDDR6) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super (8 GB GDDR6) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (8 GB GDDR6) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (8 GB GDDR6) KFA2 GeForce RTX 2060 Super (8 GB GDDR6) NVIDIA Titan X (Pascal) (12 GB GDDR5X) KFA2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super (6 GB GDDR6) PNY GeForce GTX 1660 (6 GB GDDR5) Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR5) Zotac GeForce GT 1030 (2 GB GDDR5) AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5700 (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (8 GB GDDR6)) AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (8 GB HBM2) XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 (8 GB GDDR5)	AMD Ryzen 9 3900X	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-bit
MSI GT76	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-9900K	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-bit
MSI GP65	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-9750H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-bit
MSI GE65	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (6 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-9750H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-bit
MSI GP65	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (6 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-9750H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-bit
MSI GP75	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-9750H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-bit
Alienware 17 R4	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (8 GB GDDR5X)	Intel Core i7-7820HK	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-bit
Asus G752VS	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-6820HK	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-bit
MSI GT62VR	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-6820HK	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-bit
MSI GE72	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (2 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-7700HQ	2 x 4 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-bit
MSI GL62	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (2 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-7700HQ	2 x 4 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-bit
MSI Prestige 14	NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (2 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-10710U	1 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-bit
MSI Prestige 14	NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (2 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-10510U	1 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-bit
MSI Alpha 15	AMD Radeon RX 5500M (4 GB GDDR6)	AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-bit

4K Monitors	NVIDIA drivers	AMD drivers
Asus PB287Q, Philips Brilliance 329P9H	ForceWare 456.38	Adrenalin 20.9.1

Read all 1 comments / answer

Loading Comments

Comment on this article

Editor of the original article: Sebastian Jentsch - Managing Editor Consumer Laptops - 1748 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2010

Computers always had an important place in my life, starting with an Intel 80286 microprocessor in the early 1990s. I became interested in the productive side of technology, especially in campus radio, while studying at TU Chemnitz and during a trainee program in Belfast. Hardware interests led me to manage Notebookjournal.de, which is now a division of Notebooksbilliger, for a few years. I became self-employed in 2010 and took the next logical step in my career by starting to write for Notebookcheck.

contact me via: Xing

Translator: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 8587 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Prior to writing and translating for Notebookcheck, I worked for various companies including Apple and Neowin. I have a BA in International History and Politics from the University of Leeds, which I have since converted to a Law Degree. Happy to chat on Twitter or Notebookchat.

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Serious Sam 4 Laptop and Desktop Benchmarks

Florian Glaser, 2020-10- 2 (Update: 2022-01-21)

Pos	Model	< Prev Next > Serious Sam 4 (2020)
Pos	Model	low 1280x720 Lowest (DX12)	med. 1920x1080 Medium (DX12)	high 1920x1080 High (DX12)	ultra 1920x1080 Ultra (DX12) 2xMSAA	QHD 2560x1440 Ultra (DX12) 2xMSAA	4K 3840x2160 Ultra (DX12) 2xMSAA
11	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	156.9ⁿ²	130.1ⁿ²	123.35ⁿ²	118.25ⁿ²	115.95ⁿ²	106.25ⁿ²
19	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080	171.75ⁿ²	136.9ⁿ²	129.9ⁿ²	124.75ⁿ²	118.8ⁿ²	114.85ⁿ²
23	AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT	122	79	82	73	78	75
27	NVIDIA Titan RTX	138.2	108.1	106.4	99.1	92.4	71.2
30	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		121	109	103	94.4	65.6
32	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070	155ⁿ²	126.3ⁿ²	121.1ⁿ²	101.6ⁿ²	91.65ⁿ²	67.1ⁿ²
34	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)	185	123	117	108	107	86.3
36	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	144.5ⁿ⁴	101.6ⁿ⁴	93.3ⁿ⁵	83.8ⁿ⁵	67.2
41	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU		110	99.2	82.4	64.2	40.5
46	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super (Desktop)	134.4	113.6	107.7	104.6	94.2	67.7
51	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)	175	101	94.5	85.3	80.3	54
52	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile			113	95	84.2	54.4
53	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	130ⁿ³	91.3ⁿ³	82.15ⁿ⁴	70.5ⁿ⁵	55.9
55	AMD Radeon RX 6800S		112	103	88.3	70.1	44.8
64	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	145	107	105	89.4	78.6
65	AMD Radeon RX 6700M		105	98	79.8
67	NVIDIA Titan X Pascal	141.6	107.4	100.4	84	71.4	45.2
71	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop)	133.9	105.8	101	87.3	75.2	51.5
74	AMD Radeon VII	157.9	112.2	97.2	77.9	65.8	46.5
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Serious Sam 4
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
75	AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop)	153.3	106.5	98.4	83.7	70.3	47.6
76	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop)	172	105	98.9	83.4	67.8	42.8
80	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	108	79.5	81.35ⁿ²	72.7ⁿ²	57.3ⁿ²
81	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	124ⁿ³	94ⁿ³	86.6ⁿ³	75.25ⁿ⁴	63.7	39.8
86	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop)	144.5	104.2	89.4	82.25ⁿ²	73.55ⁿ²	43.1ⁿ²
90	AMD Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop)	144.6	106.5	93.2	75.2	64.6	42.3
93	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	119	73.9	71.4	61.3	54.5
96	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)	180	100	104	70	57.6	36.6
98	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64	148.6	101.1	88.5	68.1	55.5	38.2
99	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	92.5	75	56.4	54.4	52.6
104*	Intel Arc A730M		72.7	54.8	42.5	34.7
105*	AMD Radeon RX 6700S		102	94.9	82.9	73.1
107	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	127	87.7	81.9	67.7
111*	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	123.5ⁿ²	83.45ⁿ²	74.25ⁿ²	59.85ⁿ²	48.2	31
117	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	114.5ⁿ⁴	82.1ⁿ⁴	69.9ⁿ⁴	59.25ⁿ⁶	43.6
120	AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (Desktop)	104	93.9	70.3	66	58.1	38.3
122	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q				52.3	44.2	31
124	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	90	68.5	55.5	46.5	43.9
128	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop)	144.1	88.1	71.3	53.6	41.9	25.6
130	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop)	164.7	72.1	60.2	45.7	37.6	25.7
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Serious Sam 4
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
134	AMD Radeon RX 5600M		71.8	67.4	56.2	45.2
136	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	103	69	67.7ⁿ²	51.9ⁿ²	39.6
137	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU		79.1ⁿ³	66.7ⁿ³	50ⁿ³	36.8
141	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)	141.5	81.4	68	50.5	38.8	24.4
144	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)	138.9	71.7	53.2	24.3	21.1	15.4
150	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU		63.5	48.9	39.1	29.9
157	AMD Radeon RX 590 (Desktop)	147.8	79.9	65.1	47.4	38.4	25.2
168	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	77.8	55.5	41.5	33.3	27.7
169	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	120.5ⁿ²	56.6ⁿ²	45.8ⁿ²	33.7ⁿ²
170	AMD Radeon RX 5500M	75.5	51	48.4	24.6	16
179	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	123	42.8	31.9	28.4
182	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop)	138.7	57.5	43.3	17.8	13.7	9.9
183	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	107.15ⁿ²	52.25ⁿ²	42.85ⁿ²	26.1ⁿ²	21.7
190*	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	105.25ⁿ²	49.7ⁿ²	38.8ⁿ²	25.7ⁿ²	22.3
222	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	118	31.4	22.2	9.66	8.28
225	AMD Radeon 680M	106
231*	NVIDIA GeForce MX450	86.4ⁿ³	14.1ⁿ³	10.8ⁿ³
246	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	113	25.8	15	5.99	4.17
256	AMD Radeon 660M	113	29.2	24.1
267	AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	82.8	30.1	24.1
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Serious Sam 4
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
282	Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics	65.8	25.9	19.2	12.9
289	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	70.2ⁿ²	23.25ⁿ²	18.3ⁿ²	12.65ⁿ²	11	7.51
290	NVIDIA GeForce MX350	70.65ⁿ⁴	12.6ⁿ³	8.05ⁿ³
305	NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)	80	10
307	NVIDIA GeForce MX250	67.2	9.79	6.75
308	NVIDIA GeForce MX330	85.7	13	8.16
310	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	99.4	14.6	10.1	6.67
353*	Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	40.4	7.4
390*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs	61.3	11.9	8.22
391*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	58.6	12	8.06
400*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	73.3ⁿ²	26.25ⁿ²	17.55ⁿ²	12.48ⁿ²	11.3
408	AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	68.85ⁿ²	21.35ⁿ²	16.1ⁿ²	10.33ⁿ²
432	NVIDIA GeForce 930MX	43.2	6.83
549	Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)	33.6
550	Intel UHD Graphics 630	31.9	6.96
552*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	33.7	6.05
560	Intel UHD Graphics 620	19.4	4.28
682*	Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)	6.75

Legend
5	Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
	May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
	May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?	Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
	Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.