Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L in review: Compact gaming notebook with Turbo reserves

2 kg gamer. The Zephyrus M15's main components bring all the latest computer games smoothly to the 15.6-inch matte screen (4k, IPS, Pantone certified). The rest of the interior is equally good: 2x NVMe-SSD (RAID 0), 16 GB RAM (dual channel), Thunderbolt 3.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by Marvin Glöckner), Published 09/30/2020 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...

The Asus Zephyrus M15 GU502L is a slim, compact gaming laptop of the 15.6-inch format. The test device provided to us is powered by a Core i7-10750H processor and a GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q graphics core. With the Zephyrus M GU502GU, we have already tested an identical sister model. Competitors include devices such as the Schenker Key 15, Razer Blade 15, Gigabyte Aero 15 XB, Acer Predator Triton 500 and the MSI GS66 10SGS.

Since the Zephyrus M15 and the Zephyrus M are identical in construction, we will not elaborate much on the case, connectivity, input devices and speakers. You can read about these in our review of the Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU.

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L (ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-10750H 6 x 2.6 - 5 GHz, 70 W PL2 / Short Burst, 135 W PL1 / Sustained, Comet Lake-H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1125 MHz, Memory: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, 256bit, 27.21.14.5638 (Nvidia 456.38), Optimus

Memory

16 GB

, DDR4-3200, Dual Channel, one memory bank (occupied), 8 GB soldered

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz

Mainboard

Intel HM470

Storage

2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0), 1024 GB

, 2x M.2 (RAID 0), 903 GB free

Soundcard

Realtek ALC294 @ Intel Comet Point-LP PCH - cAVS

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: headphone output, microphone output, TPM 2.0

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 18.9 x 360 x 252 ( = 0.74 x 14.17 x 9.92 in)

Battery

76 Wh, 4940 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 15.4 V

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 65-Watt USB power supply (Type C), McAfee LiveSafe (trial version), MS Office 365 (trial version), 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2 kg ( = 70.55 oz / 4.41 pounds), Power Supply: 795 g ( = 28.04 oz / 1.75 pounds)

Price

2499 Euro

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

[+] Add to comparison

» Compare devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
82.5 %	09/2020	Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	2 kg	18.9 mm	15.60"	3840x2160
84.5 %	09/2020	Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	2 kg	19.8 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
86.9 %	08/2020	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	2.1 kg	17.8 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
85.8 %	05/2020	Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	2.2 kg	20 mm	15.60"	3840x2160
	04/2020	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	2.1 kg	18 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
84 %	05/2020	MSI GS66 10SGS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	2.2 kg	20 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

size comparison

Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L MSI GS66 10SGS Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q DIN A4 ❌

Connectivity - now with Thunderbolt 3

The GU502L and GU502GU do not differ in terms of the type and arrangement of their connections - with one exception. While the latter offers a USB Type C 3.2 Gen 2 slot, the M15 comes with Thunderbolt 3.

Right side: Thunderbolt 3, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type A), slot for a cable lock

Left side: AC adapter, Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type A), microphone input, headset jack

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1340 MBit/s ∼100% +19%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	1310 MBit/s ∼98% +16%
MSI GS66 10SGS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1243 (1000^min - 1395^max) MBit/s ∼93% +10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1240 (619^min - 1284^max) MBit/s ∼93% +10%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324)	1161 MBit/s ∼87% +3%
Average of class Gaming (450 - 1588, n=84, last 2 years)	1152 MBit/s ∼86% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1130 MBit/s ∼84%
Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	912 MBit/s ∼68% -19%
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1394 (843^min - 1528^max) MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1390 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1380 MBit/s ∼99% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1370 MBit/s ∼98%
MSI GS66 10SGS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1349 (804^min - 1497^max) MBit/s ∼97% -2%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324)	1261 MBit/s ∼90% -8%
Average of class Gaming (90 - 1743, n=84, last 2 years)	1174 MBit/s ∼84% -14%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	1170 MBit/s ∼84% -15%

Display - 4k IPS

The 15.6-inch matte screen features a native resolution of 3840x2160 pixels. Contrast (1,683:1) and brightness (376 cd/m²) are excellent. However, the response times of the 60 Hz panel could be better. Two optionally available FHD displays (144 Hz, 240 Hz) offer shorter response times.


369 cd/m²	381 cd/m²	358 cd/m²
370 cd/m²	387 cd/m²	368 cd/m²
375 cd/m²	384 cd/m²	400 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 400 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 376.9 cd/m² Minimum: 20 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 387 cd/m²
Contrast: 1683:1 (Black: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 0.7
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
99% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.178

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60	Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake Panda LM156LF-1F02, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO7A8C), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	MSI GS66 10SGS AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display		-6%	-3%	0%	28%	1%	1%
Display P3 Coverage	69.4	66.5 -4%	67.2 -3%	69.4 0%	99.9 44%	70.3 1%	69.9 1%
sRGB Coverage	99	90.8 -8%	96.2 -3%	98.8 0%	100 1%	99.5 1%	99.1 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	70.5	66.5 -6%	68.7 -3%	70.5 0%	98.2 39%	72.2 2%	71.1 1%
Response Times		78%	74%	82%	95%	68%	71%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	60 ?(29.2, 30.8)	6.4 ?(3.4, 3) 89%	10 ?(5.2, 4.8) 83%	3.2 ?(1.4, 1.8) 95%	2.2 ?(1, 1.2) 96%	14.4 ?(7.2, 7.2) 76%	11.2 ?(6, 5.2) 81%
Response Time Black / White *	25.6 ?(11.6, 14)	8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4) 66%	9.2 ?(4.4, 4.8) 64%	8 ?(4, 4) 69%	1.8 ?(1, 0.8) 93%	10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2) 59%	10 ?(5.2, 4.8) 61%
PWM Frequency					60 ?(80)
Screen		-64%	-92%	-43%	-28%	-43%	-14%
Brightness middle	387	297.7 -23%	300 -22%	345.4 -11%	385 -1%	320 -17%	339.4 -12%
Brightness	377	280 -26%	281 -25%	342 -9%	390 3%	318 -16%	331 -12%
Brightness Distribution	90	84 -7%	80 -11%	90 0%	93 3%	88 -2%	92 2%
Black Level *	0.23	0.43 -87%	0.29 -26%	0.34 -48%		0.24 -4%	0.24 -4%
Contrast	1683	692 -59%	1034 -39%	1016 -40%		1333 -21%	1414 -16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.8	3.13 -74%	5.39 -199%	3.18 -77%	2.46 -37%	4.03 -124%	1.58 12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.94	7.1 -80%	14.35 -264%	6.57 -67%	4.01 -2%	8.43 -114%	3.8 4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.7	3.06 -337%	1.73 -147%	1.77 -153%	2.6 -271%	0.98 -40%	1.47 -110%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.9	1.9 34%	9.8 -238%	3.8 -31%	1.39 52%	5.94 -105%	2.3 21%
Gamma	2.178 ^101%	2.23 ^99%	2.019 ^109%	2.15 ^102%	2.31 ^95%	2.42 ^91%	2.24 ^98%
CCT	6992 ^93%	6325 ^103%	8174 ^80%	7109 ^91%	6395 ^102%	6751 ^96%	6952 ^93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	99	59.2 -40%	69 -30%	64.3 -35%	98 -1%	66 -33%	64.8 -35%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	99	90.5 -9%	92 -7%	99 0%	100 1%	99 0%	99.4 0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		3% / -36%	-7% / -54%	13% / -19%	32% / 1%	9% / -21%	19% / -0%

* ... smaller is better

The X-Rite Pantone certification of the screen guarantees a very natural colour display. Even in factory condition, the display meets the target with a Delta E 2000 colour deviation of 1.8 (Delta E less than 3). It does not suffer from a blue cast. Calibrating the display provides further improvements. The colour deviation is reduced to 0.69 and grey scales are more balanced. The colour spaces AdobeRGB (99%) and sRGB (99%) are reproduced almost completely.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11.6 ms rise
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (22.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 29.2 ms rise
60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 30.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (35.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19232 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Asus equips the Zephyrus GU502L with a viewing angle stable IPS panel. The display can be read from any position. Outdoor use is certainly possible, given the sun doesn't shine too brightly.

The Zephyrus outdoors (overcast conditions)

Performance - Even more power thanks to Turbo profile

The Asus Zephyrus M15 GU502L represents a slim, compact 15.6-inch gaming notebook that brings every current game smoothly to the screen and also makes a good impression in all other application areas. Our test device is priced at around $3,000.

Testing conditions

The pre-installed Armoury Crate control center allows the choice of an energy profile. We have conducted our test with the "Performance" profile active. We have also run some benchmarks under the "Turbo" profile. For the battery tests we used the Windows energy schemes.

Processor

The Core i7-10750H six-core processor (Comet Lake) operates at a basic speed of 2.6 GHz. With Turbo Boost, the clock speed can be increased to 4.3 GHz on six cores and up to 5 GHz on a single core. Hyper-Threading (two threads per core) is supported.

For a short time the CPU processes the multithread test of the Cinebench R15 benchmark at 4.2 GHz. Then the clock rate drops to 3.9 GHz - 4.2 GHz. The single-thread test is run at 4.2 GHz - 4.8 GHz. In battery operation, the speeds are reduced to 3.2 GHz - 3.6 GHz (multithread) and 3.6 GHz (single-thread).

We test whether the CPU Turbo is permanently used in mains operation by running the multithread test of Cinebench R15 in a loop for at least 30 minutes. The results decrease from the first to the fifth run and then remain at a fairly constant level. The CPU Turbo is working. Turbo clock rates increase slightly by choosing the Armoury Crate profile "Turbo".

Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1226 (1200.59-1340.53)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H; Turbo: Ø1314 (1300.81-1356.25)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1248 (1233.43-1260.16)

Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1289 (1270.12-1436.11)

Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1366 (1323.8-1373.01)

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1573 (1544.4-1818.6)

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1213 (1201.27-1287.87)

MSI GS66 10SGS Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1219 (1209.12-1272.47)

CPU clock rates during CB15 loop execution

CPU clock rates during CB15 loop execution (Turbo)

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

189 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1341 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

141.7 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Help

... in comparison

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 312, n=233, last 2 years)	247 Points ∼100% +31%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	213 Points ∼86% +13%
Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	205 Points ∼83% +8%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H	202 Points ∼82% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (184 - 213, n=45)	196.7 Points ∼80% +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 Intel Core i7-9750H	193 Points ∼78% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L Intel Core i7-10750H (Turbo)	192 Points ∼78% +2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H	190 Points ∼77% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L Intel Core i7-10750H	189 Points ∼77%
MSI GS66 10SGS Intel Core i7-10750H	188 Points ∼76% -1%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5554, n=237, last 2 years)	2475 Points ∼100% +85%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	1818 (1544.4^min - 1818.6^max) Points ∼73% +36%
Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	1436 Points ∼58% +7%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H	1373 (1323.8^min - 1373.01^max) Points ∼55% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L Intel Core i7-10750H (Turbo)	1354 Points ∼55% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L Intel Core i7-10750H	1341 Points ∼54%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H	1288 (1201.27^min - 1287.87^max) Points ∼52% -4%
MSI GS66 10SGS Intel Core i7-10750H	1273 (1209.12^min - 1272.47^max) Points ∼51% -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 Intel Core i7-9750H	1268 Points ∼51% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (804 - 1418, n=50)	1263 Points ∼51% -6%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (322 - 587, n=43)	389 Seconds * ∼100% -8%
MSI GS66 10SGS Intel Core i7-10750H	371 Seconds * ∼95% -3%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H	368 Seconds * ∼95% -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L Intel Core i7-10750H	358.8 Seconds * ∼92%
Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	347 Seconds * ∼89% +3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H	333 Seconds * ∼86% +7%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	285 Seconds * ∼73% +21%
Average of class Gaming (93 - 1259, n=234, last 2 years)	243 Seconds * ∼62% +32%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7332, n=230, last 2 years)	5735 MIPS ∼100% +17%
Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	5501 MIPS ∼96% +12%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	5457 MIPS ∼95% +11%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H	5285 MIPS ∼92% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (4504 - 5470, n=43)	5114 MIPS ∼89% +4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H	5015 MIPS ∼87% +2%
MSI GS66 10SGS Intel Core i7-10750H	4923 MIPS ∼86% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L Intel Core i7-10750H	4920 MIPS ∼86%
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 135927, n=229, last 2 years)	62802 MIPS ∼100% +71%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	47170 MIPS ∼75% +28%
Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	40206 MIPS ∼64% +10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H	38667 MIPS ∼62% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L Intel Core i7-10750H	36712 MIPS ∼58%
MSI GS66 10SGS Intel Core i7-10750H	35505 MIPS ∼57% -3%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H	35130 MIPS ∼56% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (26040 - 37345, n=43)	33946 MIPS ∼54% -8%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (169 - 825, n=232, last 2 years)	631 Points ∼100% +37%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	511 Points ∼81% +11%
Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	503 Points ∼80% +9%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H	488 Points ∼77% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (431 - 504, n=43)	473 Points ∼75% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 Intel Core i7-9750H	468 Points ∼74% +2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H	468 Points ∼74% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L Intel Core i7-10750H	461 Points ∼73%
MSI GS66 10SGS Intel Core i7-10750H	454 Points ∼72% -2%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13457, n=232, last 2 years)	5810 Points ∼100% +97%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	3801 Points ∼65% +29%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H	3256 Points ∼56% +10%
Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	3081 Points ∼53% +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 Intel Core i7-9750H	3015 Points ∼52% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L Intel Core i7-10750H	2955 Points ∼51%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H	2932 Points ∼50% -1%
MSI GS66 10SGS Intel Core i7-10750H	2928 Points ∼50% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (1749 - 3325, n=43)	2848 Points ∼49% -4%

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2139, n=228, last 2 years)	1649 Points ∼100% +35%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	1347 Points ∼82% +10%
Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	1347 Points ∼82% +10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H	1287 Points ∼78% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (1114 - 1333, n=43)	1263 Points ∼77% +3%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H	1233 Points ∼75% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L Intel Core i7-10750H	1221 Points ∼74%
MSI GS66 10SGS Intel Core i7-10750H	1207 Points ∼73% -1%
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 21853, n=228, last 2 years)	11009 Points ∼100% +75%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	8087 Points ∼73% +29%
Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	7516 Points ∼68% +20%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H	7345 Points ∼67% +17%
MSI GS66 10SGS Intel Core i7-10750H	6522 Points ∼59% +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L Intel Core i7-10750H	6283 Points ∼57%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H	6216 Points ∼56% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (4443 - 6674, n=43)	6135 Points ∼56% -2%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (3 - 34.8, n=234, last 2 years)	17.5 fps ∼100% +70%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	13 fps ∼74% +26%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H	11 fps ∼63% +7%
Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	10.6 fps ∼61% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L Intel Core i7-10750H	10.3 fps ∼59%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H	10.1 fps ∼58% -2%
MSI GS66 10SGS Intel Core i7-10750H	9.89 fps ∼57% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (5.54 - 11.6, n=43)	9.61 fps ∼55% -7%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L Intel Core i7-10750H	57.2 s * ∼100%
MSI GS66 10SGS Intel Core i7-10750H	56.9 s * ∼99% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (43.1 - 99.2, n=43)	53.3 s * ∼93% +7%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	52.4 s * ∼92% +8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H	52.1 s * ∼91% +9%
Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	51.3 s * ∼90% +10%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=230, last 2 years)	51.2 s * ∼90% +10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H	46.3 s * ∼81% +19%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
MSI GS66 10SGS Intel Core i7-10750H	0.631 sec * ∼100% -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L Intel Core i7-10750H	0.631 sec * ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (0.578 - 0.708, n=42)	0.611 sec * ∼97% +3%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H	0.606 sec * ∼96% +4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H	0.583 sec * ∼92% +8%
Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	0.573 sec * ∼91% +9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	0.547 sec * ∼87% +13%
Average of class Gaming (0.375 - 4.47, n=230, last 2 years)	0.514 sec * ∼81% +19%

* ... smaller is better

System Performance

The system works quickly and smoothly. The laptop has enough computing power for all common applications. Gaming, video editing and image processing do not pose any major challenges for the device. The PCMark results are good.

A single memory slot, occupied by an 8 GB module. An additional 8 GB is soldered.

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3409 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4848 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4396 points
PCMark 10 Score		5208 points
Help

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming (4477 - 9331, n=190, last 2 years)	7174 Points ∼100% +38%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	6739 Points ∼94% +29%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)	6580 Points ∼92% +26%
MSI GS66 10SGS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	6154 Points ∼86% +18%
Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	5909 Points ∼82% +13%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (5208 - 6301, n=3)	5584 Points ∼78% +7%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	5484 Points ∼76% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5273 Points ∼74% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)	5208 Points ∼73%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	5840 Points ∼100% +71%
Average of class Gaming (3570 - 6657, n=41, last 2 years)	5067 Points ∼87% +49%
MSI GS66 10SGS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4579 Points ∼78% +34%
Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	4375 Points ∼75% +28%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	4094 Points ∼70% +20%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (3409 - 4410, n=3)	3838 Points ∼66% +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)	3409 Points ∼58%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	6825 Points ∼100% +55%
MSI GS66 10SGS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	6219 Points ∼91% +41%
Average of class Gaming (4622 - 7104, n=40, last 2 years)	5988 Points ∼88% +36%
Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	5682 Points ∼83% +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5610 Points ∼82% +28%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (4396 - 5556, n=3)	4886 Points ∼72% +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)	4396 Points ∼64%

DPC Latencies

In our standardised latency monitor test (web surfing, 4K video playback, Prime95 high load), we observed anomalies in the DPC latencies. The system does not appear to be suitable for real-time video and audio editing.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	6244 μs * ∼100% -322%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)	1877 μs * ∼30% -27%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	1768 μs * ∼28% -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)	1481 μs * ∼24%
MSI GS66 10SGS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	1388 μs * ∼22% +6%
Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	269 μs * ∼4% +82%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices

Asus equips the GU502L with two 512 GB NVMe SSDs (M.2-2280) from Intel. These are configured in RAID 0, i.e. for the operating system, the two SSDs appear as one 1 TB SSD. All data stored on this array is distributed to both SSDs. This results in high transfer rates and short loading times. However, the SSDs used are not among the top models. The RAID array delivers lower transfer rates than a single top-of-the-line model from Samsung.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2812 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1794 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 550 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 450.4 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2440 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1698 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 52.5 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 123 MB/s

	Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)	Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	MSI GS66 10SGS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-18%	36%	15%	3%	16%	0%
Write 4K	123	156 27%	193 57%	139.8 14%	127.4 4%	131.7 7%	132.5 8%
Read 4K	52.5	60.7 16%	54.3 3%	48.62 -7%	147.5 181%	47.34 -10%	45.03 -14%
Write Seq	1698	968 -43%	2988 76%	2260 33%	485.9 -71%	2884 70%	1987 17%
Read Seq	2440	1619 -34%	2633 8%	2135 -12%	1352 -45%	2303 -6%	1434 -41%
Write 4K Q32T1	450.4	485 8%	540 20%	499.3 11%	476.5 6%	423.9 -6%	467.5 4%
Read 4K Q32T1	550	337.3 -39%	620 13%	552 0%	531 -3%	487.7 -11%	536 -3%
Write Seq Q32T1	1794	969 -46%	3284 83%	2960 65%	1061 -41%	2822 57%	2003 12%
Read Seq Q32T1	2812	1825 -35%	3564 27%	3269 16%	2552 -9%	3478 24%	3306 18%
AS SSD		-44%	128%	27%	-11%	42%	24%
Seq Read	2523	1221 -52%	2928 16%	1957 -22%	1200 -52%	2767 10%	1086 -57%
Seq Write	1578	911 -42%	2733 73%	2092 33%	836 -47%	2613 66%	1901 20%
4K Read	50.4	48.24 -4%	51.6 2%	50.2 0%	65.8 31%	47.55 -6%	51 1%
4K Write	115.6	99.2 -14%	129.8 12%	96.5 -17%	103.8 -10%	98.9 -14%	117.3 1%
4K-64 Read	634	321.4 -49%	1838 190%	1594 151%	789 24%	1205 90%	1503 137%
4K-64 Write	1114	744 -33%	2291 106%	2005 80%	929 -17%	2007 80%	1721 54%
Access Time Read *	0.095	0.071 25%	0.062 35%	0.057 40%	0.103 -8%	0.065 32%	0.059 38%
Access Time Write *	0.038	0.139 -266%	0.029 24%	0.112 -195%	0.045 -18%	0.038 -0%	0.1 -163%
Score Read	936	492 -47%	2183 133%	1840 97%	975 4%	1529 63%	1662 78%
Score Write	1388	934 -33%	2694 94%	2310 66%	1117 -20%	2367 71%	2029 46%
Score Total	2770	1681 -39%	5984 116%	5103 84%	2594 -6%	4677 69%	4588 66%
Copy ISO MB/s	2106	906 -57%	2183 4%	1793 -15%			2155 2%
Copy Program MB/s	549	486.6 -11%	2694 391%	573 4%			715 30%
Copy Game MB/s	854	952 11%	5984 601%	1418 66%			1506 76%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-31% / -34%	82% / 95%	21% / 22%	-4% / -5%	29% / 31%	12% / 15%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

GPU Performance

The dedicated GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q graphics core is an efficiency-trimmed version of the regular RTX 2070 designed for thin and light notebooks. Nvidia plans for this DirectX 12 GPU to have a speed level of 900 MHz (base) to 1,125 MHz (boost).

Higher speeds are feasible if the GPU does not reach a specified temperature and/or energy threshold. Thus we register a maximum of 2,009 MHz. The Witcher 3 is run at an average speed of 1,420 MHz or 1,676 MHz (Turbo). The GPU can use fast GDDR6 graphics memory (8,192 MB).

The results in the 3DMark benchmarks are at a normal level for the GPU. The "Turbo" performance scheme allows the graphics performance to increase significantly (see diagram). The UHD Graphics 630 GPU integrated in the processor is active and the laptop works with Nvidia's Optimus GPU switching technology.

3DMark 11 Performance		19044 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		39844 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		15573 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		6604 points
Help

... in comparison

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 49247, n=237, last 2 years)	26302 Points ∼100% +52%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	22326 Points ∼85% +29%
Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	21464 Points ∼82% +24%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	21121 Points ∼80% +22%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	20831 Points ∼79% +20%
MSI GS66 10SGS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	20117 Points ∼76% +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (11563 - 21191, n=31)	17489 Points ∼66% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	17321 Points ∼66%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	15054 Points ∼57% -13%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22529, n=238, last 2 years)	10365 Points ∼100% +56%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	8379 Points ∼81% +26%
Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	8331 Points ∼80% +26%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	7891 Points ∼76% +19%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	7829 Points ∼76% +18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (Turbo)	7735 Points ∼75% +17%
MSI GS66 10SGS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	7618 Points ∼73% +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (5948 - 8065, n=28)	6745 Points ∼65% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	6627 Points ∼64%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	5661 Points ∼55% -15%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=228, last 2 years)	35258 Points ∼100% +57%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	30456 Points ∼86% +35%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	28900 Points ∼82% +28%
Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	28817 Points ∼82% +28%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	28678 Points ∼81% +27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (Turbo)	27122 Points ∼77% +20%
MSI GS66 10SGS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	26855 Points ∼76% +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (14723 - 27694, n=31)	22548 Points ∼64% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	22516 Points ∼64%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	20311 Points ∼58% -10%

Gaming Performance

The built-in hardware brings all games in our database smoothly to the screen. You can always choose Full HD resolution and high to maximum quality settings. Resolutions beyond Full HD require a reduction of the quality level - especially when using the native screen resolution (3840x2160 pixels). The Armoury Crate profile "Turbo" increases refresh rates (see diagram).

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=233, last 2 years)	100.8 fps ∼100% +43%
Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	90.2 fps ∼89% +28%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H (Turbo)	83.8 fps ∼83% +19%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H	83.4 (67^min) fps ∼83% +18%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	79.1 (64^min) fps ∼78% +12%
MSI GS66 10SGS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H	74.3 fps ∼74% +5%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	74 (70^min - 78^max) fps ∼73% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H	70.7 fps ∼70%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (56 - 83.8, n=31)	66.3 fps ∼66% -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	55.2 fps ∼55% -22%

F1 2020 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (10.7 - 197.9, n=15, last 2 years)	123.8 fps ∼100% +23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H (Turbo)	109 (96^min - 123^max) fps ∼88% +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (101 - 109, n=2)	105 fps ∼85% +4%
Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	102 (94^min - 126^max) fps ∼82% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H	101 (83^min - 118^max) fps ∼82%

Horizon Zero Dawn - 1920x1080 Ultimate Quality
Average of class Gaming (17 - 163, n=13, last 2 years)	100.3 fps ∼100% +67%
Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	74 fps ∼74% +23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H (Turbo)	68 fps ∼68% +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (60 - 68, n=2)	64 fps ∼64% +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H	60 fps ∼60%

Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming (22.2 - 304, n=14, last 2 years)	165.4 fps ∼100% +32%
Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	155.1 fps ∼94% +23%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H	147 (94^min) fps ∼89% +17%
MSI GS66 10SGS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H	140 fps ∼85% +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H (Turbo)	137.9 fps ∼83% +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (125.6 - 137.9, n=4)	130.4 fps ∼79% +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H	125.6 fps ∼76%

Death Stranding - 1920x1080 Very High Preset
Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	112.8 fps ∼100% +39%
Average of class Gaming (14.3 - 163, n=20, last 2 years)	104.5 fps ∼93% +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H (Turbo)	97.9 fps ∼87% +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (81.3 - 97.9, n=2)	89.6 fps ∼79% +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H	81.3 fps ∼72%

Flight Simulator 2020 - 1920x1080 Ultra AA:TAA AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (45.9 - 74, n=4, last 2 years)	56.2 fps ∼100% +76%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H (Turbo)	35.5 fps ∼63% +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (32 - 35.5, n=2)	33.8 fps ∼60% +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H	32 fps ∼57%

To check whether the frame rates remain largely constant over a longer period of time, we run the game The Witcher 3 for about 60 minutes at Full HD resolution and maximum quality settings while not moving the game character. There is no noticeable drop in performance.