Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Intel Xe MAX

The Intel Iris Xe MAX (DG1 Low Power - LP or iDG1LPDEV) is a dedicated PCIe 4.0 mobile entry-level graphics card with 96 execution units (EUs) based on the Gen 12 architecture. Compared to the integrated Intel Iris Xe in the Tiger Lake CPUs, the Xe MAX offers 4 GB dedicated LPDDR4x graphics memory (68 GB/s versus 56 GB/s for the MX350) and higher clock speeds of 1.65 GHz (vs. 1.35 GHz). Both support DP4A DLBoost instructions to speed up AI tasks and two media engines (including AV1 decoding in hardware). Currently the GPU is only available for Tiger Lake based laptops and offers some possibilities to use the iGPU and dGPU together (using the Deep Link software framework). The GPU uses hybrid graphics to turn off the Xe MAX when not in used (display ports are routed through the iGPU, but the Xe MAX features four dedicated display ports in comparison to the Nvidia GeForce MX350).

Furthermore, Intel supports to shift TDP between the two chips for better CPU performance or balancing graphics workloads.

The gaming performance is on average slightly better than a fast Intel Iris Xe iGPU with plenty of TDP and cooling headroom. There are even some games where the iGPU is faster thanks to Deep Link sharing power and cooling. Intel targets 1080p gaming with low to medium settings with the GPU and provided examples where the MAX is on par or better than a dedicated Nvidia GeForce MX350

According to Intel, the GPU is mostly aimed at content creators that can make use of the additional compute units, AI (DP4a) acceleration or media encoders.

As the Iris Xe Graphics, the Xe MAX supports Variable Rate Shading, Adaptive Sync, Async Compute, DirectX 12.1, OpenGL 4.6 and OpenCL 2.

As the Tiger Lake CPUs, the Iris Xe MAX dGPU is manufactured in the modern 10nm SuperFin process at Intel. Intel aims the Max-GPU for laptops with a combined power budget of 35 Watt and up. The power consumption of the GPU alone is specified similar to the 25W of the GeForce MX350 (we guess including the graphics memory).

CodenameiDG1LPDEV
ArchitectureGen. 12 Xe
Pipelines96 - unified
TMUs16
ROPs8
Core Speed1650 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed4266 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeLPDDR4x
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth68.3 GB/s
APIDirectX 12.1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption25 Watt
technology10 nm
PCIe4.0
Date of Announcement31.10.2020

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
2.9 pt (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1825     avg: 1879     median: 1876 (5%)     max: 1939 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1697     avg: 1735     median: 1743 (5%)     max: 1766 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 82964     avg: 177443     median: 177442 (20%)     max: 271921 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 19254     avg: 20527     median: 20526.5 (22%)     max: 21799 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 34947     avg: 37147     median: 36993 (10%)     max: 39502 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5412     avg: 5835     median: 5658 (10%)     max: 6610 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 6111     avg: 6297     median: 6333 (7%)     max: 6447 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 7720     avg: 8113     median: 8024 (11%)     max: 8594 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 7804     avg: 8133     median: 8214 (7%)     max: 8380 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
specvp12 snx-02 +
specvp12 showcase-01 +
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
specvp12 maya-04 +
specvp12 energy-01 +
specvp12 creo-01 +
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
specvp13 snx-03 +
specvp13 showcase-02 +
specvp13 medical-02 +
specvp13 maya-05 +
specvp13 energy-02 +
specvp13 creo-02 +
specvp13 catia-05 +
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 92.1     avg: 103     median: 105 (6%)     max: 112 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 42.9     avg: 46.2     median: 46.2 (7%)     max: 49.4 Watt
05101520253035404550Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 46.3     avg: 49.6     median: 49.6 (7%)     max: 52.8 Watt
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 45.9     avg: 50.7     median: 52.2 (11%)     max: 54.1 Watt
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.3391     avg: 0.4     median: 0.3 (34%)     max: 0.3747 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.3504     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (30%)     max: 0.3823 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
55.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
58  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Outriders

Outriders

2021
low 1280x720
55.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
30.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
28.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
26.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Hitman 3

Hitman 3

2021
low 1280x720
75.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
32.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1920x1080
44.2
low 1280x720
24.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
15.2
low 1280x720
22  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
49.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
23.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
32 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

2020
low 1280x720
39.5 44.8 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.7 21.6 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.7 15.2 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
35.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
65.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
86.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
33.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
29.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
90.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
48.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
120  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
41.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
29.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
45.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
52.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
27.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
med. 1920x1080
32.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
30.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
25.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
51.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
42.3
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
45.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
87.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
32.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
58.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
23.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
23.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
74.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
35.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
55.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
31.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
37  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
43.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
121  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
56.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
56.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
38.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
34.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
33.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
138  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
77.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
50.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
36.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
50  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
36
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
87.4 95.2 98.4 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39.1 39.4 41.2 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33 33.1 33.6 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28.3 28.5 28.9 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
20.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
11  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
38  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
30
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
377  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
86.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
41.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
33.4 39.8 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34.4 34.9 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28.9 29.7 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
med. 1920x1080
24.2 26.2 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17 18.2 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
52.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
68.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
38.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
59.1 68.3 70.1 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
40.3 50 81.6 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38.3 39.8 51.3 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.4 38.4 46.6 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
20.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
54.2 56.5 107.9 ~ 73 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
37.2 53.7 66.9 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
32 33.8 34.8 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.2 17.7 18.5 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
11.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
65.9 99.1 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
60.7 90.9 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24 30.9 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
50.9
78.5
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
49.2
57.5
89.2
low 1280x720
127.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
106  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
87.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Monster Hunter Stories 255.85852.5
Outriders55.630.728.826.1
Hitman 375.932.62926.7
Cyberpunk 2077 1.024.413.511
Immortals Fenyx Rising228
Yakuza Like a Dragon49.924.223.220.6
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla32196
Dirt 542201411.4
Mafia Definitive Edition35.421.519.5
Serious Sam 465.825.919.212.9
Crysis Remastered86.833.110.4
Death Stranding29.921.420.520.1
F1 202090.648.138.425.6
Gears Tactics12047.531.823.2
Doom Eternal41.829.2
Hunt Showdown45.419.915
Red Dead Redemption 252.327.418.2
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order32.730.225.1
Borderlands 351.328.618.211.7
Control45.919.114
Total War: Three Kingdoms87.232.520.413.8
Rage 258.927.823.723.2
Anno 180074.835.220.911.4
The Division 255.731.624.78.9
Far Cry New Dawn37232220
Metro Exodus43.923.71713.5
Apex Legends12156.64343
Battlefield V56.138.334.533.1
Farming Simulator 1913877.750.836.1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider502321
Strange Brigade9440332920.111
Far Cry 538262524
World of Tanks enCore37786.341.8
X-Plane 11.11373529
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark46.12518
Fortnite52.834.330.621.9
Rise of the Tomb Raider68.238.325.420.8
Dota 2 Reborn6657434120.1
The Witcher 37353341811.2
GTA V83762713.2
BioShock Infinite127.510687.839.4
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3
21
11
5
19
18
4
26
11
1
22
6

1


3


For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 17. 08:49:28

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.046s ... 0.047s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.047s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.047s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9956 +0.031s ... 0.078s

#7 got single benchmarks 9956 +0.013s ... 0.092s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.092s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.972s ... 1.064s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.064s

#11 Got 186 rows for game benchmarks. +0.032s ... 1.096s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.096s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.034s ... 1.13s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.503s ... 2.632s

#15 return log +0.046s ... 2.678s

Notebook reviews with Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics graphics card

Acer Swift 3X laptop in review: Intel Iris Xe MAX combines high battery life and gaming performance

Acer Swift 3X laptop in review: Intel Iris Xe MAX combines high battery life and gaming performance

Acer's Swift 3 series offers decent multimedia laptops. The Swift 3X comes with a dedicated GPU in addition to the iGPU. This provides solid performance for the...
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics | 14.00" | 1.4 kg
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ Convertible with Intel Iris Xe Max. (Image Source: Asus)

Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ Convertible Review: A good all-rounder with Iris Xe Max as its Achilles heel

As one of the first Intel Iris Xe Max-powered devices, the Asus VivoBook Flip 14 aims to bring a lot to the table for the mid-range laptop user. The VivoBook Fl...
Intel Core i5-1135G7 | Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics | 14.00" | 1.5 kg
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7506 2-in-1 Black Edition vs. Silver Edition: What's The Difference?

Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7506 2-in-1 Black Edition vs. Silver Edition: What's The Difference?

If you want one of the first Intel Xe Max laptops, then it's going to cost you about $1500 USD. Early adopters will definitely want to upgrade their drivers ASA...
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics | 15.60" | 1.9 kg

Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW

Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7506 2-in-1 Black Edition: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7506 2-in-1 Black Edition

Acer Swift 3X: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00"
  External Review » Acer Swift 3X

Acer Swift 3X SF314-510G-70DW: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » The Acer Swift 3X impresses with 18 hours of battery life and solid gaming performance in our review

Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7506 2-in-1 Black Edition: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60", 1.9 kg
   » That awkward moment when a Core i5-1135G7 can outperform the more expensive Core i7-1165G7

Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » Intel Iris Xe Max-powered Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470 in review: Good gains over Xe Graphics G7 96 EUs, MX350, and GTX 1050 in synthetic GPU tests

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > Intel Iris Xe MAX (DG1) Mobile GPU
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-10-31)