Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon 610M

AMD Radeon 610M

The AMD Radeon 610M is a pretty basic integrated graphics adapter that's found on many laptop as well as desktop AMD SoCs. It sports 2 RDNA 2 architecture CUs (128 unified shaders) running at a clock speed of up to 2.2 GHz. It can HW-decode many popular video codecs including first and foremost AVC, HEVC, VP9, AV1.

Performance

Its performance is close to what the Vega 6 and the 32 EU Iris Xe deliver. While this isn't a gaming GPU by any stretch of imagination, it actually is fast enough to run some competitive titles such as Counter-Strike 2 (~50 fps at 1080p / Low) as well as older (pre-2019) titles.

Power consumption

Considering how small the number of unified shaders and other components is here, the Radeon is unlikely to ever consume more than 10 W.

AMD Radeon 600M Series

Radeon 680M compare 768 @ 2.4 GHz
Radeon 660M compare 384 @ 1.9 GHz
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) compare 128 @ 2.2 GHz
Radeon 610M 128 @ 0.4 - 2.2 GHz
CodenameRDNA 2
ArchitectureRDNA 2
Pipelines128 - unified
TMUs8
ROPs4
Raytracing Cores2
Core Speed400 - 2200 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_2, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 2.1, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption15 Watt
technology6 nm
FeaturesTiled Rasterization, Shared Memory (up to Dual-Channel LPDDR5)
Date of Announcement20.09.2022
CPU in Radeon 610MGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D16 x 4300 MHz, 170 W? MHz2200 MHz
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X16 x 4300 MHz, 170 W? MHz2200 MHz
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X12 x 4400 MHz, 120 W? MHz2200 MHz
min. - max.? - 400 MHz1900 - 2200 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.8 pt (2%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 261     avg: 593     median: 665 (2%)     max: 779 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 224     avg: 511     median: 575.5 (1%)     max: 669 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 158230     avg: 162520     median: 160598 (16%)     max: 168733 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 52873     avg: 59767     median: 59737 (7%)     max: 66722 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 9212     avg: 14516     median: 15202 (14%)     max: 17177 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 11389     avg: 14040     median: 13981 (3%)     max: 15902 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 760     avg: 1740     median: 2081 (3%)     max: 2156 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 781     avg: 1842     median: 2192 (2%)     max: 2305 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 37716     avg: 79666     median: 83560 (9%)     max: 117848 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
10405 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
9640 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1227     avg: 3062     median: 3643 (4%)     max: 3929 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1029     avg: 2666     median: 3175 (2%)     max: 3399 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 3575     avg: 9244     median: 12065 (3%)     max: 12092 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 2705     avg: 7128     median: 9322 (5%)     max: 9358 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
36628 Points (40%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 7195     avg: 16168     median: 20555 (27%)     max: 20755 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 9.8     avg: 9.9     median: 10 (3%)     max: 10 fps
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
68.6 fps (17%)
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
30.1 fps (4%)
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
13.8 fps (2%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
10.1 fps (3%)
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
24.7 fps (7%)
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
27.6 fps (5%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
27 fps (4%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
74 fps (20%)
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
55.3 fps (6%)
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
13.8 fps (2%)
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
41.1 fps (5%)
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
2.4 fps (1%)
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
36.7 fps (4%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
26.7 fps (4%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
54.1 fps (7%)
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
6.1 fps (2%)
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
46.5 fps (5%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
2.5 fps (0%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
27.2 fps (9%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
14 fps (7%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
11.2 fps (3%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
30.6 fps (3%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
1.8 fps (1%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
1.6 fps (0%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
12.9 fps (6%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
11.1 fps (7%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 11925     avg: 14308     median: 14826 (11%)     max: 15655 points
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 61.8     avg: 86.3     median: 91.8 (5%)     max: 94.82 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.8     avg: 97.9     median: 97.9 (98%)     max: 97.9 %
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 85.9     avg: 98.4     median: 104.6 (3%)     max: 104.6 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
min: 3.64     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (1%)     max: 5.7 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 5686     avg: 5869     median: 5930 (2%)     max: 5990 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 7866     avg: 7902     median: 7878 (2%)     max: 7962 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 82     avg: 190.7     median: 120 (0%)     max: 370 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 142     avg: 325     median: 233 (0%)     max: 600 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 517     avg: 1358     median: 1630.5 (1%)     max: 1654 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 20.3     avg: 56.7     median: 70 (9%)     max: 79.9 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 17.3     avg: 54     median: 64.2 (9%)     max: 70.2 Watt
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
20.5 Watt (5%)
05101520253035Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra
0.3 fps per Watt (24%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
min: 0.113     avg: 0.2     median: 0.1 (12%)     max: 0.3156 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 81.2     avg: 84.9     median: 84.9 (11%)     max: 88.5 Watt
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
36.1 dB(A) (58%)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
1.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
29.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
9.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD FSR 2560x1440
8.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset + FSR Quality 1920x1080
26.3
low 1920x1080
5.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
2.4 3.1 ~ 3 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
4.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
low 1920x1080
4.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
15.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
10.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
15.5
low 1920x1080
6.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
10.8
low 1920x1080 cinem.
2.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
12
low FSR 68 1280x720
18
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
23.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Palworld

Palworld

2024
low 1920x1080
13.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
51.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
86.5
low 1920x1080
10.2 10.5 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
19.8
Steam Deck 1280x800
21.5
21
Ultra Preset (FSR2 on) 1920x1080
6
low 1920x1080
9.3 10.5 ~ 10 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
7 8.2 ~ 8 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
18.6
15.2
Low Preset FSR 2.2 Balanced 1920x1080
15.5
low 1920x1080
16.3 18.1 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.8 14.5 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.4 9.2 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
40.9
36.8
Valorant

Valorant

2020
QHD 2560x1440
61.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
low 1280x720
38.1 40.3 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.3 14.9 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.4 9 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.4 6.5 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
22.3
22.2
low 1280x720
32 35 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15 17 ~ 16 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14 16 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12 14 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
25.1 28.4 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.6 11.8 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.7 8.4 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.4 7 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
35.7 40 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.5 14 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.5 12.6 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.4 10.5 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
24.6
23.1
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
20.9 38.9 67.7 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.4 18.8 21.4 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.8 14.3 17 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.6 12 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
25 34 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13 15 ~ 14 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12 14 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11 13 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
18
14
low 1280x720
26.7 37.1 39.8 44.7 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17.7 23.5 23.7 26.2 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.8 19.5 20.8 22.9 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
23.4 25.6 25.9 26.8 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.9 11.4 12.3 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.1 8 8.8 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
81.6 195.8 ~ 139 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
50.9 76.9 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.4 34.9 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23 31.3 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
26.5 39.3 44 44.5 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
17.5 23.6 26.2 27 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
7.6 12.8 13.5 13.9 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
5.5 7.8 8.5 ~ 7 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
11.3
16
16.4
14.9
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
57.2 62.7 119.9 131.2 134.5 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
49.8 99.5 101.9 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.7 21.6 23.1 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.9 9.6 10.5 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
31.5
60.8
57.9
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
32.6
62.3
61.3
58.2
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Doom: The Dark Ages1.348
Assassin's Creed Shadows4
Civilization 729.815.99.065.99
Monster Hunter Wilds5.3
Kingdom Come Deliverance 23
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle4.89
Stalker 24.43
Call of Duty Black Ops 6111077
EA Sports FC 2515.115.2
God of War Ragnarök10.18
Final Fantasy XVI6.28
Space Marine 27.41
Star Wars Outlaws2.3
Black Myth: Wukong6
F1 2423.219.113.3
Ghost of Tsushima12
Palworld13.7
Counter-Strike 251.838.119.512.9
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty107.27
Baldur's Gate 3108
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands171496.92
Valorant61.1
Borderlands 3391596
Far Cry New Dawn34161513
Metro Exodus271187
Shadow of the Tomb Raider38131210
Strange Brigade43181411
Far Cry 530141312
X-Plane 11.11372320
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark25128
Dota 2 Reborn139642927
The Witcher 33924127
GTA V10184198
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
22
8
1
1
17
1
2
16


12


1

1



For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 02. 04:48:09

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 01 Jul 2025 05:34:46 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.034s ... 0.035s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.035s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.035s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11423 +0.039s ... 0.075s

#8 got single benchmarks 11423 +0.032s ... 0.107s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.107s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +1.035s ... 1.142s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.142s

#12 Got 158 rows for game benchmarks. +0.017s ... 1.158s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.158s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.017s ... 1.175s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.223s ... 1.398s

#16 return log +0.008s ... 1.406s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon 610M graphics card

Minisforum BD795i SE

Minisforum BD795i SE review: The Mini-ITX desktop mainboard with an AMD Ryzen 9 CPU as a DIY solution for gaming mini PCs

The Minisforum BD795i SE promises high performance and is ideal for building compact Mini-ITX PCs. With its factory-installed AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, it is aimed at...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX | AMD Radeon 610M
Minisforum BD790i review: Mini-ITX mainboard with an AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and PCIe 5.0 as a basis for small gaming PCs

Minisforum BD790i review: Mini-ITX mainboard with an AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and PCIe 5.0 as a basis for small gaming PCs

The Minisforum BD790i mainboard promises a great deal of performance and, as a result, could be an excellent basis for compact Mini-ITX PCs. We took a look at t...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX | AMD Radeon 610M
Minisforum BD770i (source: Minisforum)

Minisforum BD770i review: The mini-ITX motherboard with AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX as the basis for small gaming PCs

The Minisforum BD770i is a motherboard that includes a permanently soldered APU. The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX is installed here, along with a large heat sink. As a re...
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX | AMD Radeon 610M
Acer Aspire 3 with AMD Mendocino Ryzen 5 7520U in review

Acer Aspire 3 Laptop Review: An affordable Mendocino offering with excellent battery life and a sub-par screen

The Acer Aspire 3 with AMD's Mendocino-based Ryzen 5 7520U processor targets the low-end market with its affordable price. It features a 15.6-inch TN panel, a 5...
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U | AMD Radeon 610M | 15.60" | 1.8 kg
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX Analysis - Zen4 Dragon Range is faster and more efficient than Intel Raptor Lake-HX

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX Analysis - Zen4 Dragon Range is faster and more efficient than Intel Raptor Lake-HX

AMD's new Zen4 CPUs have finally arrived and the new flagship Ryzen 9 7945HX competes with Intel's Raptor Lake HX models. The performance of the new Zen4 cores ...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX | AMD Radeon 610M

Acer Aspire Go 15 AG15-21P: AMD Ryzen 5 7520U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire Go 15 AG15-21P

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1 15AMN7, R5 7520: AMD Ryzen 5 7520U, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1 15AMN7, R5 7520

Acer Aspire Go 14 AG14-21P: AMD Ryzen 3 7320U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire Go 14 AG14-21P

Asus Vivobook Go 14 E1404: AMD Ryzen 3 7320U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook Go 14 E1404

Acer Chromebook Plus 514 CB514-3H: AMD Ryzen 3 7320C, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Chromebook Plus 514 CB514-3H

HP 14-em0750nd: AMD Ryzen 5 7520U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP 14-em0750nd

Acer Aspire 3 A314-23P-R3QA: AMD Ryzen 5 7520U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 3 A314-23P-R3QA

Asus Chromebook CM34 Flip CM3401: AMD Ryzen 3 7320C, 14.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus Chromebook CM34 Flip CM3401

Asus VivoBook Go 14 E1404FA: AMD Ryzen 5 7520U, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Go 14 E1404FA

Acer Aspire 3 A314-23P: AMD Ryzen 3 7320U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 3 A314-23P

Asus VivoBook Go 15 E1504FA: AMD Ryzen 5 7520U, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Go 15 E1504FA

HP 15-fc0071ns: AMD Ryzen 5 7520U, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » HP 15-fc0071ns

Lenovo V15 G4 AMN: AMD Athlon Gold 7220U, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo V15 G4 AMN

Asus Vivobook Go 15 E1504F: AMD Ryzen 5 7520U, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook Go 15 E1504F

HP 14-em0000: AMD Ryzen 3 7320U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP 14-em0000

Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R7VH: AMD Ryzen 3 7320U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R7VH

Lenovo Ideapad 1 15AMN7, R3 7320U: AMD Ryzen 3 7320U, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 1 15AMN7, R3 7320U

Lenovo IdeaPad 1 15AMN7: AMD Ryzen 5 7520U, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 1 15AMN7

Asus Vivobook Go 14 2023, R5 7520U: AMD Ryzen 5 7520U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook Go 14 2023, R5 7520U

Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R75B: AMD Ryzen 3 7320U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R75B

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1 14AMN7, R3 7320U: AMD Ryzen 3 7320U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1 14AMN7, R3 7320U

Minisforum BD795i SE: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
   » AMD Ryzen 9-powered Minisforum 795S7 mini PC with RTX 4060 gets big price cut on Amazon

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
   » Asus ROG Strix G17 becomes super value as RTX 4070 and Ryzen 9 7940HX SKU records $450 price cut

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-11- 9)