Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The Nvidia RTX 3500 Ada Generation is a higher-end professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 5,120 CUDA cores and 12 GB of ECC GDDR6 VRAM. Brought into existence in 2023, this graphics adapter leverages TSMC's 5 nm process and Nvidia's Ada Lovelace architecture to achieve higher-than-average performance combined with moderate power consumption. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for the card is very wide at 60 W to 140 W leading to bizarre performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same product.

Hardware-wise, the RTX 3500 is a cut-down GeForce RTX 4070 Desktop, as far as we can tell. Consequently, both make use of the AD104 chip and have little difficulty running triple-A games at QHD 1440p.

Quadro series graphics cards ship with a different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional users rather than gaming. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation, certified drivers - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.

Architecture and Features

Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here (up to 16,384 versus 10,752); under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache, an optimized ray tracing routine (a different wat to determine what is transparent and what isn't is used), and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI tasks.

The RTX 3500 Ada features 40 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 160 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 5,120 CUDA cores. Multiply those numbers by 1.15 and what you get looks exactly like a desktop RTX 4070: 46, 184 and 5,888, respectively. Elsewhere, the graphics card comes with 12 GB of 192-bit wide ECC GDDR6 memory for a very healthy throughput of ~432 GB/s. Error correction can be turned off if desired. The fact that error correction is present here proves that the RTX 3500 Ada is indeed targeted at professional users.

Just like Ampere-based cards, the RTX 3500 makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however, DP 1.4a video outputs may prove to be a bottleneck down the line.

Performance

With its power target set to ~105 W, the RTX graphics card delivers a Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA score of 33 seconds which is a pretty good result. Most 2024 games are playable at 2160p on High with this GPU.

Nvidia's marketing materials mention "up to 23 TFLOPS" of performance, a 15% improvement over the 20 TFLOPS that the RTX 3000 Ada Generation is supposedly good for.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the TGP power target of the RTX 3500 is. One other thing worth mentioning is that enabling error correction appears to reduce the amount of video memory that is available to applications and games by up to a gigabyte.

Power consumption

Nvidia no longer divides its laptop graphics cards into Max-Q and non-max-Q models. Instead, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs, and the range can sometimes be shockingly wide. This is the case for the RTX 3500, as the lowest value recommended for it sits at just 60 W while the highest is more than two times higher at 140 W (this most likely includes Dynamic Boost). The slowest system built around an RTX 3500 Ada can easily be 60% slower than the fastest one. This is the kind of delta that we've been seeing on consumer-grade laptops featuring the latest GeForce RTX cards.

Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the RTX 3500 is built with makes for very decent energy efficiency, as of mid 2023.

RTX Ada Generation Laptop GPU Series

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 2048 64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
ArchitectureAda Lovelace
Pipelines5120 - unified
Raytracing Cores40
Tensor / AI Cores160
Theoretical Performance23 TFLOPS FP32
Memory Speed16000 effective = 2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory12 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth432 GB/s
APIDirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption115 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)
technology5 nm
PCIe4.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement21.03.2023
Link to Manufacturer Pageimages.nvidia.com
PredecessorRTX A3000 Laptop GPU

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
13191 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
12806 Points (26%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
26188 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
29248 Points (27%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
34779 Points (42%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
41630 Points (32%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
33 Seconds (5%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
21 Seconds (8%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
210.7 fps (52%)
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
239.1 fps (35%)
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
145.8 fps (25%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
103.1 fps (26%)
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
179.1 fps (49%)
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
23.7 fps (21%)
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
192.3 fps (77%)
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
247.8 fps (41%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
215.4 fps (58%)
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
437 fps (49%)
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
131.5 fps (22%)
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
215.2 fps (37%)
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
385.4 fps (44%)
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
76.8 fps (25%)
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
361.4 fps (53%)
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
382.8 fps (43%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
233.8 fps (37%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-07 4k
116 fps (34%)
specvp2020 solidworks-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-07 1080p
289.1 fps (61%)
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
436.9 fps (53%)
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
124.7 fps (34%)
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
446.3 fps (48%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
76.8 fps (12%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
105.4 fps (36%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
115.3 fps (56%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
134.2 fps (36%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
323.7 fps (33%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
50.2 fps (32%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
218 fps (31%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
74.3 fps (10%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
123.8 fps (56%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
68.6 fps (45%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
87.6 fps (29%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
317 fps (18%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
104.6 fps (3%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
124696 points (32%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
9608 points (2%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
175.5 Watt (24%)
0153045607590105120135150165180195Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
199.4 Watt (58%)
0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
192.6 Watt (24%)
0153045607590105120135150165180195Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
121.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
113.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
101.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
90.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
60.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
123.4
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
45.8
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off, no Path Tracing) 3840x2160
11.9
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
67.6
low 1920x1080
164.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
136.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
118.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
117.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
80.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
41.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
228  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
223  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
182.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
72.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
48.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
24  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
306
low 1920x1080
232.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
195.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
137.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
109.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
74.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
41.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
411  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
296  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
235  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
223  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
159.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
78.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
med. 1920x1080
133  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
135  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
127  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
109  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
62  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
144.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
137.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
110.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
92.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
200  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
167.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
128.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
97.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
54.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
201  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
177.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
162.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
153.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
134.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
184.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
181  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
170.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
115.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
97.5 99.7 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
59.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
48.6
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
179.4
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
184.9
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty121.2113.1101.890.360.221.3
Baldur's Gate 3164.8136.2118.6117.380.241.2
F1 22228223182.872.948.324
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands232.5195.4137.9109.374.441.6
Strange Brigade411296235223159.278.6
Far Cry 513313512710962
X-Plane 11.11144.6137.8110.992.7
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark200167.6128.997.554.2
Dota 2 Reborn201177.7162.1153.9134.4
GTA V184.3181170.1115.59959.6
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps



9


1
9


3
7


5
3

1
6
1
2
4
3
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 30. 20:14:58

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:39:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.041s ... 0.042s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.043s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.043s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11605 +0.013s ... 0.056s

#8 got single benchmarks 11605 +0.014s ... 0.07s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.07s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.916s ... 0.986s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.986s

#12 Got 56 rows for game benchmarks. +0.031s ... 1.017s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.017s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.01s ... 1.027s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.126s ... 1.153s

#16 return log +0.011s ... 1.164s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU graphics card

Nvidia RTX 3500 Ada performance debut: HP ZBook Fury 16 G11 workstation review

Nvidia RTX 3500 Ada performance debut: HP ZBook Fury 16 G11 workstation review

The ZBook Fury 16 series has been updated with new Raptor Lake-HX processor options for faster performance. The difference, however, is smaller than we would li...
Intel Core i9-14900HX | NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | 16.00" | 2.6 kg

HP ZBook Fury 16 G11: Intel Core i9-14900HX, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » HP ZBook Fury 16 G11

Dell Precision 7780: Intel Core i7-13850HX, 17.00", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Dell Precision 7780

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-03- 1)