Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU

Intel Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL

The Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 is an integrated graphics card in Panther Lake SoCs with 4 Xe3 cores (32 EUs / 512 ALUs), 4 raytracing cores and a clock rate of up to 2450 MHz. In contrast to the large 12-core Arc B390 variant, the GPU tile is not manufactured by TSMC but by Intel (ev Intel 4).

Despite internal improvements to the architecture, the gaming performance should be comparable to an AMD Radeon 760M and significantly below the Arc Graphics 140V in Lunar Lake. The 4-core variant in Arrow Lake called Intel Graphics should be clearly beaten.

The new media engine now supports AV1 encode and decode, VVC decode, AVC 10-bit and eDP 1.5.

The GPU chiplet is produced at Intel in the Intel 3 (3nm "class") process.

Arc Xe3 Series

Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU compare 96 @ 2.5 GHz
Arc B370 Panther Lake iGPU compare 80 @ 2.4 GHz
Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL 32 @ 2.5 GHz
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 PTL compare 16
CodenamePanther Lake
iGPUIntegrated Graphics
Pipelines32 - unified
Raytracing Cores4
Core Speed2500 (Boost) MHz
AI GPU40 TOPS INT8
CacheL2: 4 MB
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0
Man. Technology5 nm
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1 FRL, DisplayPort 2.1 UHBR20
Date of Announcement05.01.2026
CPU in Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTLGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H16 x 1600 MHz, 25 W? MHz2500 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 7 366H16 x 1600 MHz, 25 W? MHz2500 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H16 x 1500 MHz, 25 W? MHz2450 MHz
min. - max.? MHz2300 - 2500 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.1 pt (9%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
min: 413     avg: 476.3     median: 447 (3%)     max: 564 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
min: 519     avg: 585     median: 613 (4%)     max: 622 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 2213     avg: 2350     median: 2343 (5%)     max: 2501 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 17209     avg: 19204     median: 19203.5 (10%)     max: 21198 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
5526 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
12119 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 4771     avg: 6200     median: 6327 (10%)     max: 6763 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5127     avg: 6840     median: 7030 (6%)     max: 7415 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
185618 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 2392     avg: 3189     median: 3237 (8%)     max: 3518 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 2117     avg: 2854     median: 2905 (6%)     max: 3136 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 23108     avg: 29181     median: 29355 (28%)     max: 34848 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 30345     avg: 40249     median: 41335 (10%)     max: 46309 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 5964     avg: 7844     median: 8078 (10%)     max: 8558 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 5433     avg: 7128     median: 7317 (6%)     max: 7678 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 103     avg: 182     median: 178.1 (10%)     max: 216 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 161.1     median: 104.6 (1%)     max: 315 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 7.0 - Geekbench 7.0 GPU OpenCL
min: 17946     avg: 21687     median: 23544 (12%)     max: 23570 Points
Geekbench 6.7 - Geekbench 6.7.1 GPU OpenCL
min: 21473     avg: 23646     median: 23676.5 (6%)     max: 25097 points
Geekbench 6.7 - Geekbench 6.7.1 GPU Vulkan
min: 21306     avg: 24930     median: 25255 (6%)     max: 28602 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 40     avg: 46.8     median: 47.2 (6%)     max: 51.8 Watt
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 26.3     avg: 48.8     median: 49.9 (14%)     max: 59.6 Watt
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.8     avg: 47.8     median: 47.6 (6%)     max: 59.6 Watt
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.3305     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (1%)     max: 0.4815 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Pragmata

Pragmata

2026
low 1920x1080
27.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
16.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
25.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
8.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
52  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
48.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
59.8 62 65.5 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50.3 53 54.6 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38.4 39 41.3 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
11
11.8
low 1920x1080
32.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
31
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
33.1 53.5 55.6 60.4 62.5 64.1 65.9 66.7 66.8 66.9 67.2 68 69.3 73.4 76.2 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30.6 49.7 52.7 56.6 57 57.5 61.3 61.5 62.3 63.8 64.1 64.1 64.3 67.6 70.5 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.6 37.7 40.8 41.7 42.2 42.4 43 45.8 46.1 46.1 46.5 46.7 48 50.3 50.5 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7 11.4 12.9 13.2 13.8 14.1 14.2 14.2 14.3 14.7 14.8 14.8 14.9 15.1 15.3 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
78.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
59.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
33.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
30.8 32.7 34.3 35.1 35.2 35.3 36.8 36.8 37.1 37.3 37.3 38.6 38.6 38.7 38.8 38.8 39 39.2 39.4 40.2 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.6 25.8 26 26.3 26.4 26.9 27 27.7 28.2 28.4 28.8 29.1 29.1 29.2 29.3 29.5 29.8 29.8 29.8 30.9 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.4 20.7 21 21.1 21.2 22.1 22.1 23.8 24.4 24.4 24.5 25 25.1 25.3 25.4 25.5 25.6 25.7 26.1 26.8 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.8 17.6 17.7 17.7 19 19.1 19.9 19.9 20.2 20.5 20.8 21.1 21.2 21.5 21.6 21.6 21.6 21.7 21.8 22.6 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
59.3
58.7
65
62
66.2
61.3
61.6
65.1
48.6
64.4
68.3
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
7.6
8.3
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
18.1
19.1
17.1
18.6
16.6
20.8
18.2
20
14.9
19.6
20.1
20.1
17.6
17.7
19.7
17.1
20.5
19.9
18.4
18.3
20.9
low 1920x1080
26.4 27.4 28.1 28.4 28.7 29.2 31.4 31.5 31.5 31.6 31.9 32.5 32.9 33 33.1 33.3 33.6 34.3 34.8 ~ 31 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21 22.1 22.1 22.2 22.9 23 23.1 23.9 25.1 25.6 25.6 26 26.1 26.3 27 27.1 27.1 27.4 27.7 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18 19 19.4 19.4 19.6 19.6 19.9 21 21.7 21.9 21.9 22.1 22.9 23.1 23.5 23.7 23.7 23.9 24.3 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.7 18.7 19 19.2 19.4 19.4 19.5 20.3 21.2 21.4 21.6 22.1 22.4 22.8 23 23.1 23.2 23.5 23.7 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
40.6
39.7
47.1
45.3
46.5
40.9
45.1
47.9
36.9
46.8
47.7
46.8
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
86.8 107.3 118.5 119.6 142.1 172.6 173.9 184.9 187.5 190.5 190.6 192.1 195.4 197 197.9 198.1 ~ 166 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36.6 38.2 45.4 46.2 53.8 64.7 68 68.3 69.7 70.4 70.5 71.8 72.5 76.2 77.1 81.1 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.7 35.9 38.1 39.9 45.5 56.7 56.8 56.9 58.8 58.9 59.1 60 61.9 62 62.1 64.1 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26 28.9 34.2 40.9 43.3 47.2 48 48.5 50.6 51.1 52.1 52.2 52.4 53 54.6 56.5 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
33 34.8 35 36 36.2 37 37.3 37.6 37.8 40.4 40.5 40.9 41.7 41.7 42.2 43.6 44.6 45.1 45.3 45.6 45.7 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24.6 27.2 28.8 28.9 29.2 29.4 29.6 29.6 30.6 30.9 31 32.6 32.8 33 33.2 33.5 34.3 35.4 36 37 37.6 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.2 22.9 24.7 25.2 25.5 26.6 27.3 27.6 27.8 28.6 29.5 29.6 30.1 30.1 30.5 30.7 30.7 31.1 32.4 33.2 33.2 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
34.3 53.7 58 58.8 64.3 64.5 66.3 66.9 67.3 67.5 68.4 69 69.4 72.3 73 73.4 74.1 74.4 76.4 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.6 29 30.7 31.5 34.5 34.6 34.9 35.4 36.2 36.3 36.6 36.7 36.8 37.2 37.3 37.5 37.6 37.7 39.5 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.8 21.7 22.5 24.5 24.8 25.1 25.1 25.4 25.8 25.9 26 26.1 26.2 26.3 26.8 27.1 27.2 27.2 27.4 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
74 101.7 102.9 103.9 104.1 105.1 107.1 108.3 109.6 110.2 112.3 123.9 128.1 129 133.5 139.2 143.4 145.2 148.9 158.9 177 ~ 122 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
53.3 67.5 68.2 70.2 72.4 72.7 73.5 74.9 80.3 82.1 88.5 89 89.4 89.9 90 91.5 93.3 95.9 96.1 99.2 109.1 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.3 71.5 72.6 73.5 73.7 75.1 77.7 79.5 81.2 81.6 81.8 81.9 82.1 82.1 85.4 85.8 87.6 89.7 92.6 94 97.8 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47.7 65.7 68.4 69.4 69.6 70.7 73 74.2 77.3 77.4 77.8 77.8 79.9 80.3 81 83.3 84.3 84.9 89.7 90.7 91.7 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
93.7 146.6 146.6 153.6 157.9 162.4 162.6 165.6 167.7 168.5 169.3 169.3 170.2 170.4 172 177.4 180.8 182 182.4 ~ 163 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
84.8 129.4 137.9 145.9 149.5 150.4 154.6 156.4 157.2 158.1 158.4 161.6 162.7 163 164.3 168.9 170.6 171 174.7 ~ 154 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.4 39.2 45.9 46.6 48.3 48.4 50.6 51.1 51.4 51.5 51.8 52.4 52.8 52.9 53.7 54.8 54.8 55.2 58.2 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.3 15.7 18 18.8 19.8 20.4 20.8 20.9 21 21.1 21.6 21.8 21.8 21.8 21.8 21.9 22 23.8 23.8 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
145.8
144.8
153.6
133.4
139.2
126.6
155.3
159.6
143.8
149.3
153.6
102.5
127.9
157.3
65.1
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
156.6
151.1
160.9
133.2
144.6
131.2
161.1
169.5
148.9
156.6
163.9
106.1
149
167
68.6
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
007 First Light1714.813.612.8
Pragmata27.720.816.6
Crimson Desert16.513.91312.4
Resident Evil Requiem25.318.816.28.21
Call of Duty Black Ops 75247339
ARC Raiders48.823.517.511.4
F1 2562534010
Kingdom Come Deliverance 232.723.718.812.6
Black Myth: Wukong1814116
F1 2463594314
Counter-Strike 278.859.133.420.9
Cyberpunk 207737282420
Baldur's Gate 331252221
Strange Brigade166635346
X-Plane 11.11403229
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark663525
Dota 2 Reborn122838177
GTA V1631545020
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
5
6
4
3
9
6
2
1
11
6
1
13
1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Amazon: No results found for your request.

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 08. 22:02:21

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 07 Oct 2026 05:31:56 +0200 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 composed specs +0.019s ... 0.022s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.022s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.022s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13353 +0.044s ... 0.066s

#8 got single benchmarks 13353 +0.085s ... 0.15s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.15s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +1.738s ... 1.888s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.888s

#12 Got 605 rows for game benchmarks. +0.136s ... 2.024s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 2.024s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.012s ... 2.037s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.238s ... 2.275s

#16 return log +0.3s ... 2.574s

Notebook reviews with Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU graphics card

Dell Pro 7 14 P714260 review: Sticking with Intel has its advantages

Dell Pro 7 14 P714260 review: Sticking with Intel has its advantages

Dell's premier Pro 7 14 business laptop comes in both AMD and Intel flavors with very similar price points between them. After having tested both, however, there's no wrong option for the majority of users unless if certain edge characteristics are favored.
Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 14", 1.4 kg
Up to 72 GB RAM and easy to repair - Schenker Element 16 E26 Laptop Review

Up to 72 GB RAM and easy to repair - Schenker Element 16 E26 Laptop Review

The Schenker Element 16 is a new 16-inch multimedia/business laptop with Intel Panther Lake processors and a focus on repairability and upgradeability. You get a good matte 120 Hz IPS screen and long battery runtimes, but only slow iGPU options and poor speakers.
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 16", 1.9 kg
Lightweight powerhouse laptop with 32 GB RAM: HP EliteBook X G2i review

Lightweight powerhouse laptop with 32 GB RAM: HP EliteBook X G2i review

Lenovo has the ThinkPad X1 Carbon, HP has the EliteBook X. The newest model of this premium business laptop, the HP EliteBook X G2i, features a strong Intel Panther Lake processor, 32 GB of RAM as well as 5G in a lightweight, high-quality design - a winning combination.
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 14", 1.2 kg
Dell Pro 7 13 2-in-1 convertible review: Laser-focused for office work

Dell Pro 7 13 2-in-1 convertible review: Laser-focused for office work

The Dell Pro 7 13 2-in-1 optimizes usability and connectivity features at the cost of fancy display options and graphics. Typists and docking station users will find a lot to like, but occasional graphics editors will want to look elsewhere.
Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 13.3", 1.4 kg
Asus ExpertBook P5605CAA review: Trading AMD Ryzen for Intel Core Ultra

Asus ExpertBook P5605CAA review: Trading AMD Ryzen for Intel Core Ultra

Unlike the AMD version, our Intel version includes Thunderbolt 4 ports and longer runtimes despite the smaller battery size. Nonetheless, there are some notable tradeoffs including slightly slower processor performance and support for "only" up to 64 GB of RAM instead of 96 GB.
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 16", 1.8 kg

HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI: Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI review: HP's strongest convertible yet is also one of the priciest

Dell 16S DS16260: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » Dell 16S DS16260 review: A better Dell 16 Plus

Dell 14S DS14260: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » Dell 14S DS14260 review: As powerful as an XPS 14

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.1 kg
  Review » Flagship business laptop with almost 24 hours of battery life - Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 Review

Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  Review » Asus ZenBook S14 2026 Laptop Review - Brighter OLED, but a slow Panther Lake iGPU

Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G9 IPL 21UX005PGE: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » 32 GB DDR5 RAM and affordable: Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G9 IPL laptop review

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 11: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 11 review: Most compelling convertible yet from Lenovo

MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 13.30", 0.9 kg
  Review » MSI Prestige 13 AI+ laptop review: The perfect companion for on the go?

MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 0.6 kg
  Review » MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG review: Mini PC with up to an insane 128 GB of RAM

Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 7 21WN00A0GE: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » A new repairability champion: Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 7 laptop review

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1 kg
  Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 review: Best XPS 14 alternative yet

Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro Laptop Review - Better than the new XPS 16

Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  Review » Dell XPS 16 review: Two steps forward, one step back

Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 review: Still great, but not nearly as special

Asus VivoBook S16 S3607AA: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S16 S3607AA - Reviews and Specs

HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI: Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI - Reviews and Specs

MSI Modern 14S AI+ G3MG: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 14S AI+ G3MG - Reviews and Specs

Acer TravelMate P2 TMP214-57: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate P2 TMP214-57 - Reviews and Specs

Dell XPS 14 (2026), Ultra 5 325: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 14 (2026), Ultra 5 325 - Reviews and Specs

Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-I71: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-I71 - Reviews and Specs

Lenovo Yoga 9 2in1 14IPH11: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 9 2in1 14IPH11 - Reviews and Specs

HP OmniBook 5 NGAI 14-hh0000: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook 5 NGAI 14-hh0000 - Reviews and Specs

Dell 14S DS14260: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Dell 14S DS14260 - Reviews and Specs

Dell 16S DS16260: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Dell 16S DS16260 - Reviews and Specs

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 11: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 11 - Reviews and Specs

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 OLED: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00"
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 OLED - Reviews and Specs

MSI Modern 16S AI+ G3M: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 16S AI+ G3M - Reviews and Specs

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE - Reviews and Specs

Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G7: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G7 - Reviews and Specs

HP OmniBook Ultra AI 14-kd0000: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook Ultra AI 14-kd0000 - Reviews and Specs

HP OmniBook 5 16-bm0000: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook 5 16-bm0000 - Reviews and Specs

Honor MagicBook 16 2026: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Honor MagicBook 16 2026 - Reviews and Specs

Asus Vivobook 14 X1407AA: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 14 X1407AA - Reviews and Specs

HP OmniBook X 14-ka0000ng: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook X 14-ka0000ng - Reviews and Specs

Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G9 IPL: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G9 IPL - Reviews and Specs

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G14: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G14 - Reviews and Specs

Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8: Intel Core Ultra 5 335, 13.80", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8

HP OmniBook X 14-ka: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook X 14-ka

Asus Vivobook 16 X1607AA: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 16 X1607AA

Microsoft Surface Pro 13 (2026): Intel Core Ultra 5 335, 13.00", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Pro 13 (2026)

Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IPH11: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IPH11

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11

MSI Prestige 14 AI+ D3M: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 14 AI+ D3M

Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro

Samsung Galaxy Book6 NP760VJG-KG5DE: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book6 NP760VJG-KG5DE

MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ D3MTG: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ D3MTG

Acer Aspire 14 AI A14-I71M: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 14 AI A14-I71M

MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 13.30", 0.9 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG

MSI Prestige 16 AI+ C3MG: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 16 AI+ C3MG

MSI Prestige 16 Flip AI+ C3MTG (2026): Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 16 Flip AI+ C3MTG (2026)

Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA

Dell XPS 14 (2026) DA14260: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 14 (2026) DA14260

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i 14IPH11: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i 14IPH11

Dell XPS 16 (2026) DA16260: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 16 (2026) DA16260

HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G14 vs HP EliteBook X G2i: Business laptop showdown

   » ePrivacy screens: Avoid this feature when buying a laptop

   » Almost Lunar Lake levels: Intel keeps its Panther Lake promise of efficiency

Schenker Element 16 E26: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » Review verdict for the Schenker Element 16 - Good all-rounder with replaceable parts

HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » This laptop repairability feature is finally making a comeback

   » One of the best laptop keyboards: HP should use this everywhere

   » 32 percent faster: This premium HP laptop had a Panther Lake transformation

HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI: Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » There's only one EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 configuration worth getting if vPro isn't needed

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.1 kg
   » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2026 vs. 2019 - Is this really progress?

   » Review verdict for the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 - An excellent business laptop, but pay attention to the display

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 OLED: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00"
   » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 OLED vs. IPS - A difficult decision

Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » The new Asus Zenbook S14 2026 is a great laptop, but it deserves the Core Ultra X chips with the Arc B390 iGPU

   » The slim Asus Zenbook S14 shows the big issue of Intel's Panther Lake processors

Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G9 IPL 21UX005PGE: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » This Lenovo laptop with 32 GB RAM offers a huge potential for future upgrades

   » Why 2026 laptops like this Lenovo ThinkBook face an uphill battle

   » This 14-inch Lenovo laptop shows how expensive PCs with 32 GB RAM are becoming

   » New era for storage: Chinese made laptop SSD tested in Lenovo laptop for the first time

   » ThinkBook or ThinkPad? We compare two popular 14-inch Lenovo laptops

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 11: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 11 pen charging is neat, but the drawbacks are evident

   » Only one ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 11 configuration offers significant improvements to graphics performance

MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 0.6 kg
   » MSI Cubi AI+ 3MG is over 60 percent faster than before, but it could have been even better

   » MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG tiny PC supports a massive 128 GB of removable RAM

   » MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG vs. Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG: Improvements almost everywhere

Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 7 21WN00A0GE: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » Consequence of the RAM crisis: Lenovo's screen downgrade on the ThinkPad T14 Gen 7

   » Lunar Lake is still the Intel battery life king: ThinkPad T14 Gen 7 vs. T14 Gen 6

   » This keyboard issue is finally fixed with the new ThinkPad T14 Gen 7

   » One controversial design change: Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 7 vs T14 Gen 6 photo comparison

   » ThinkPad T14 Gen 7: These features work with Linux - and these do not

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1 kg
   » Lenovo keeps shipping laptops with high refresh rate displays set to 60 Hz. Here's the easy fix

   » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14 Aura is one of the lightest laptops with Core Ultra X7, but there's a catch

   » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Ultra Aura undercuts Dell XPS 14 by over $300 and with twice the RAM

Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
   » Samsung's Galaxy Book6 Pro is a good multimedia laptop, but $2100 is too expensive

Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325: Intel Core Ultra 5 325, 16.00", 1.7 kg
   » 2026 Dell XPS 16 runs noticeably warmer than last generation model

   » Panther Lake XPS 16 is so efficient, it draws just 1.5 W when idling for insanely long battery life

   » Our first Core Ultra 5 325 benchmarks are in and results are nearly identical to the Core Ultra 7 355

Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » Intel 4 Xe3 GPU is over 50 percent slower than the flagship Arc B390 according to first benchmarks

   » First Core Ultra 7 355 benchmarks are in and they're nowhere near as good as the Core Ultra X7

Samsung Galaxy Book6 NP760VJG-KG5DE: Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 16.00", 1.8 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy Book6 Series Hands-On: All models, prices, and launch date

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

M5 Max 32-Core GPU *
M5 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

M4 9-Core GPU *
Adreno 850 *
UHD Graphics 750
CXTP-48-1536 *

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-02-18)