Notebookcheck Logo

MSI Cubi AI+ 3MG is over 60 percent faster than before, but it could have been even better

The same Core Ultra 9 386H CPU in the MSI Cubi 3MG can run up to 25 percent faster on certain laptops
ⓘ Notebookcheck
The same Core Ultra 9 386H CPU in the MSI Cubi 3MG can run up to 25 percent faster on certain laptops
Its Panther Lake-H CPU is impressive for the size and a huge upgrade over the CPU in the Cubi AI+ 2MG, but the super-small form factor has compromised performance somewhat.

The latest 2026 Cubi NUC from MSI ships with an H-series Panther Lake CPU to replace the Lunar Lake CPU on last year's model. Panther Lake can run substantially faster than last generation Lunar Lake options as the same CPU in the 2026 Cubi NUC can also be found on gaming laptops like the Razer Blade 16. On the MSI mini PC, however, some compromises have been made for the smaller form factor.

As shown by the comparison graphs below, the Core Ultra 9 386H CPU in the Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG is over 60 percent faster than the Core Ultra 7 258V in the Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG in terms of raw multi-thread performance. Power consumption would be just a few watts more as well and so the significant performance advantage requires just a small 8 percent uptick in power requirements for superior performance-per-watt.

The issue arises when comparing the new MSI mini PC to laptops sporting the same Core Ultra 9 386H CPU. The Razer Blade 16, for example, runs 20 to 25 percent faster than the MSI due to its much larger form factor and more capable cooling solution. Meanwhile, the same CPU in the MSI can only sustain Turbo Boost clock rates for about 20 seconds before needing to throttle as exemplified below by the initial spikes in CineBench R15 xT scores and power consumption when running Prime95.

The 2026 Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG is indubitably a huge improvement over its predecessor, but it could have been even faster given what the Core Ultra 9 386H is capable of on other machines.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

065130195260325390455520585650715780845910975104011051170123513001365143014951560162516901755182018851950201520802145221022752340240524702535260026652730279528602925299030553120Tooltip
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H: Ø2385 (2352.8-2791.74)
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V: Ø1475 (1459.06-1488.32)
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H Intel Core Ultra 9 386H: Ø2941 (2806.23-3172.09)
CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.6: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance rating
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
86.6 pt
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
73.7 pt
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
58.1 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
20750 (18849.5min - 20749.6max) Points +22%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
17015 (15002.4min - 17015.3max) Points
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
10524 (10414.4min - 10524.2max) Points -38%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
2087 Points +4%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
2010 Points
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
1957 Points -3%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
8162 Points +21%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
6724 Points
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
4121 Points -39%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
795 Points +4%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
767 Points
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
741 Points -3%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
3172 (2806.23min - 3172.09max) Points +14%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
2792 (2352.8min - 2791.74max) Points
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
1488 (1459.06min - 1488.32max) Points -47%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
313 Points +13%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
297 Points +8%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
276 Points
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
326 Seconds * -55%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
210 Seconds *
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
171 Seconds * +19%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
71655 MIPS +24%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
57560 MIPS
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
34645 MIPS -40%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
6367 MIPS +16%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
5816 MIPS +6%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
5488 MIPS
Geekbench 6.6 / Multi-Core
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
16903 Points +18%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
14323 Points
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
8964 Points -37%
Geekbench 6.6 / Single-Core
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
2886 Points +4%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
2778 Points
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
2748 Points -1%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
17017 Points +19%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
14283 Points
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
7574 Points -47%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
2109 Points +6%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
2022 Points +2%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
1992 Points
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
24.5 fps +26%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
19.5 fps
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
13.3 fps -32%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
54.3 s *
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
45.1 s * +17%
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
38.5 s * +29%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
0.4505 sec * -4%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
0.4326 sec *
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
0.4096 sec * +5%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption external Monitor

05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø56.3 (51-98.4)
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø49.7 (36.7-60)
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø51.1 (48.8-53.7)
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø34 (20.7-43)
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø47.6 (46.4-51.5)
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø41.1 (26.8-58.9)
Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo

No comments for this article

Got questions or something to add to our article? Even without registering you can post in the comments!
No comments for this article / reply

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > News > News Archive > Newsarchive 2026 06 > MSI Cubi AI+ 3MG is over 60 percent faster than before, but it could have been even better
Allen Ngo, 2026-06- 6 (Update: 2026-06- 3)