Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

DLSS 4.5 in action: 007 First Light tech check with benchmarks

A worthy Bond successor.

While film adaptations of video games usually miss the mark, the reverse often turns out much better. A prime example is 007 First Light, which delivers an excellent showing. What do the gameplay and technology have to offer?
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, Ninh Duy (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇩🇪
Gaming Laptop Desktop Gamecheck

Technology, settings & benchmark

007 First Light comes from Danish developer IO Interactive, probably best known for the Hitman series and held in correspondingly high regard. 007 First Light largely confirms that reputation: its gameplay often recalls IO Interactive’s stealth series, but it also incorporates elements from other games, especially the Uncharted series. The title offers a well-balanced mix of action, driving, stealth, parkour, and pure exploration sections.

Overall, the missions are highly varied and stand out thanks to their clever design. The story is engaging and staged with a strong sense of cohesion, meaning that Bond fans are not the only ones likely to get their money’s worth. The characters are also well drawn and well written, with high-quality voice acting. The whole experience is accompanied by a successful, driving soundtrack that could have come straight from the films.

007 First Light
007 First Light
007 First Light
007 First Light
007 First Light
007 First Light
007 First Light
007 First Light
007 First Light

Graphically, the developers also deliver. 007 First Light scores points for the most part with very strong visuals, both in its characters and its environments, which are designed with great care and are often packed with detail. In our view, the lack of ray tracing barely matters. The technical foundation is IO Interactive’s in-house and proven Glacier engine, which has been substantially upgraded in some areas for 007 First Light. While the game’s initial launch is somewhat annoying, with shader compilation and several intro screens, subsequent loading times remain within reasonable limits.

007 First Light
007 First Light
007 First Light

The graphics menu leaves a mixed impression. On the one hand, the title offers a fairly large number of settings and modern features; on the other hand, practical presets are missing, and usability is also suboptimal. To change a setting, users first have to click the corresponding option, making other games significantly more convenient in this regard. At least changes are applied without requiring a restart. For upscaling, 007 First Light supports both FSR and DLSS; XeSS is not included. As expected from a current title, frame generation is also supported. 007 First Light is among the first games to support up to 6x frame generation, starting with the GeForce 5000 series.

The built-in VRAM display also earns the game some credit, although the title proves quite demanding in this respect - much like other games from 2025 and 2026. Depending on the resolution, full details require between 7 and 8 GB of VRAM. Visually, the title already cuts a fine figure even at minimum settings, as shown in the comparison images, although the frame rate improves only to a limited extent compared with the results at maximum settings.

Minimum settings
Minimum settings
Maximum settings
Maximum settings

For our benchmark sequence, we use the start of the chapter “The Needle’s Eye,” which, as shown in the video, features an automatically controlled car ride. As usual, we use CapFrameX for the performance measurements.

Results

FHD / 1,920 x 1,080

With at least a mid-range GPU, maximum settings at Full HD are not a major problem. For example, a GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop GPU achieves just under 60 fps here.

007 First Light
    1920x1080 Low Settings AF:16x     1920x1080 Medium Settings AF:16x     1920x1080 High Settings AF:16x     1920x1080 Ultra Settings AF:16x
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
163.7 (74.7min, 107.4P0.1, 119.9P1) fps ∼100%
150.8 (94.6min, 103.4P0.1, 113.3P1) fps ∼100%
141.3 (96.9min, 101.9P0.1, 115.6P1) fps ∼100%
134.8 (86.6min, 103.2P0.1, 113.9P1) fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
XMG Neo 16 E25
124.4 (60.2min, 87.8P0.1, 102.5P1) fps ∼76%
114 (34.8min, 78.4P0.1, 90.8P1) fps ∼76%
100.6 (16.1min, 71P0.1, 80.5P1) fps ∼71%
96.1 (20.4min, 63.6P0.1, 75.9P1) fps ∼71%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
Tuxedo Stellaris 16
116.2 (55.1min, 69.8P0.1, 97.6P1) fps ∼71%
108.7 (25.6min, 57.8P0.1, 87.2P1) fps ∼72%
93.2 (36.3min, 45.9P0.1, 78.3P1) fps ∼66%
89.4 (24.9min, 47P0.1, 75.4P1) fps ∼66%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
XMG Fusion 16 M25
69.6 (56.9min, 58P0.1, 60.2P1) fps ∼43%
62.6 (50.5min, 53P0.1, 54.3P1) fps ∼42%
57.7 (45min, 47.8P0.1, 50P1) fps ∼41%
55.2 (39.6min, 42.4P0.1, 49P1) fps ∼41%

QHD / 2,560 x 1,440 (+ upscaling)

Upscaling often only becomes relevant on QHD monitors. With a combination of ultra settings and DLSS Balanced, a mobile RTX 5060 still manages almost 50 fps.

007 First Light
    2560x1440 Ultra Settings AF:16x     2560x1440 Ultra Settings + DLSS Balanced AF:16x
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
94 (27min, 80.4P0.1, 83.7P1) fps ∼100%
120.7 (88.2min, 100.6P0.1, 105.6P1) fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
XMG Neo 16 E25
73.1 (59.4min, 61.5P0.1, 63.6P1) fps ∼78%
90.1 (59.8min, 70.8P0.1, 76.2P1) fps ∼75%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
Tuxedo Stellaris 16
62.5 (24min, 51P0.1, 54.8P1) fps ∼66%
77.8 (16.4min, 22.2P0.1, 59.4P1) fps ∼64%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
XMG Fusion 16 M25
36.6 (25.5min, 26P0.1, 29.9P1) fps ∼39%
48.1 (37.5min, 37.8P0.1, 43.6P1) fps ∼40%

UHD / 3,840 x 2,160 (+ upscaling)

High-end chips are recommended for UHD resolutions. Without upscaling, 3,840 x 2,160 pixels at maximum settings only run decently in the notebook segment on a Geforce RTX 5090. With DLSS Balanced, however, a mobile RTX 5080 is enough for very smooth frame rates.

007 First Light
    3840x2160 Ultra Settings AF:16x     3840x2160 Ultra Settings + DLSS Balanced AF:16x
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
49.8 (42.8min, 43.9P0.1, 44.8P1) fps ∼100%
86 (43.1min, 74.6P0.1, 77.2P1) fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
XMG Neo 16 E25
41.9 (35.9min, 36.2P0.1, 37.2P1) fps ∼84%
69.4 (15.4min, 51.3P0.1, 60.7P1) fps ∼81%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
Tuxedo Stellaris 16
34.7 (27.8min, 28.6P0.1, 30P1) fps ∼70%
59.6 (16.6min, 32P0.1, 51.7P1) fps ∼69%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
XMG Fusion 16 M25
16 (12.7min, 12.7P0.1, 13P1) fps ∼32%
35.2 (26.8min, 27P0.1, 30.2P1) fps ∼41%

(Multi) Frame Generation

If needed, users can also fall back on frame generation, which we tested with the RTX 5080 Laptop GPU mentioned above. As usual, this allows for significantly higher average frame rates, although the minimum fps remained similar in our tests.

3.840 x 2,160, Max. Settings DLSS Balanced DLSS Balanced + MFGx2 DLSS Balanced + MFGx4 DLSS Balanced + MFGx6
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop 60 fps (1% Low: 27 fps) 99 fps (1% Low: 33 fps) 166 fps (1% Low: 28 fps) 216 fps (1% Low: 29 fps)

Verdict - A highlight of PC entertainment

007 First Light shows itself from its best side not only in terms of gameplay, but also technically. The action thriller is already one of the best titles of 2026 and is likely to rank high on many year-end lists.

Testsysteme

XMG Neo 16 E25 (RTX 5090 Laptop)
XMG Neo 16 E25 (RTX 5090 Laptop)
Tuxedo Stellaris 16 Gen7 (RTX 5080 Laptop)
Tuxedo Stellaris 16 Gen7 (RTX 5080 Laptop)
XMG Fusion 16 M25 (RTX 5060 Laptop)
XMG Fusion 16 M25 (RTX 5060 Laptop)

Übersicht

As gaming benchmarks are very time-consuming and are sometimes delayed due to activation restrictions, we can only present a limited number of results when the articles are published. More GPUs will follow.

Show Restrictions
PosModel< PrevNext >007 First Light
 007 First Light (2026)
low
1920x1080
Low Settings
16xAF
med.
1920x1080
Medium Settings
16xAF
high
1920x1080
High Settings
16xAF
ultra
1920x1080
Ultra Settings
16xAF
QHD
2560x1440
Ultra Settings
16xAF
4K
3840x2160
Ultra Settings
16xAF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
163.7
150.8
141.3
134.8
94
49.8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
124.4
114
100.6
96.1
73.1
41.9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
116.2
108.7
93.2
89.4
62.5
34.7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
69.6
62.6
57.7
55.2
36.6
16
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
7.3
6.5
5.9
(-) * Smaller values are better. / n123 Number of benchmarks for this median value / * Approximate position

 

Legend
5Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > DLSS 4.5 in action: 007 First Light tech check with benchmarks
Florian Glaser, 2026-06- 3 (Update: 2026-06- 3)