Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop is a mobile graphics card from the Blackwell family for laptops, which Team Green presented in April 2025 and became available in May. It is based on the GB206 chip and offers 3328 shader / CUDA cores, 104 tensor cores and 26 ray tracing units. The 8 GB GDDR7 graphics memory is connected via a 128-bit memory bus. Other features of the GPU include native PCIe 5 support, DisplayPort 2.1a, DirectX 12_2 Ultimate and support for DLSS4 and Reflex 2.

Performance

As always, the performance depends on the cooling and the maximum power consumption (TGP) of the RTX 5060 Laptop. In synthetic benchmarks, the new card is just ahead of the old RTX 4070 Laptop GPU in synthetic benchmarks. In our gaming tests, however, the mobile RTX 4070 is still slightly faster. As a result, the GPU is recommended for QHD gaming with maximum settings and DLSS or slightly reduced detail level in demanding games (such as F1 25).

Power consumption

The chip can be configured from 45 to 100 watts TGP and can be clocked differently accordingly. With 45 watts TGP, for example, the GP clocks from 952 - 1455 MHz, at the full 100 watts with 1950 - 2310 MHz.

The chip is produced in the 5nm process at TSMC (4N FinFET).

GeForce RTX 5000 Laptop GPU Series

GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop compare 10496 @ 0.99 - 1.52 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop compare 8192 @ 0.98 - 2.29 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop compare 5888 @ 0.85 - 2.22 GHz192 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop compare 4608 @ 0.91 - 2.35 GHz128 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 3328 @ 0.95 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 24000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop compare 2560 @ 1.02 - 2.66 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameGN22-X4
ArchitectureBlackwell
Pipelines3328 - unified
TMUs104
ROPs48
Raytracing Cores26
Tensor / AI Cores104
Core Speed952 - 1455 (Boost) MHz
Theoretical Performance9.684 TFLOPS FP16, 9.684 TFLOPS FP32
AI GPU572 TOPS INT8
CacheL1: 3.3 MB, L2: 32 MB
Memory Speed24000 effective = 1500 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR7
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth384 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_2, Shader 6.8, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.4
Power Consumption100 Watt (45 - 100 Watt TGP)
Transistor Count21.9 Billion
Die Size 181 mm²
Man. Technology5 nm
PCIe5
Displays4 Displays (max.), DisplayPort 2.1a
FeaturesDLSS4, Reflex 2, CUDA 12.8
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.01.2025
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com
PredecessorGeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
11.6 pt (35%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
min: 2585     avg: 2785     median: 2785 (19%)     max: 2985 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
min: 2072     avg: 2545     median: 2589 (18%)     max: 2806 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 11681     avg: 11931     median: 11804 (27%)     max: 12307 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
22281 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 21242     avg: 27584     median: 27579 (42%)     max: 31650 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 26022     avg: 31075     median: 31012 (28%)     max: 33912 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
258515 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 9228     avg: 11671     median: 11779 (31%)     max: 12847 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 9090     avg: 11529     median: 11863.5 (24%)     max: 12322 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 47731     avg: 58180     median: 53299 (50%)     max: 70684 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 86886     avg: 134968     median: 141578 (35%)     max: 168524 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 26544     avg: 33034     median: 33270 (40%)     max: 36789 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 31549     avg: 38549     median: 39295.5 (30%)     max: 41490 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
81794 Points (24%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
84501 Points (46%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
54494 Points (71%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 38     avg: 50.7     median: 40 (6%)     max: 186 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 21     avg: 22.9     median: 21 (8%)     max: 28 Seconds
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
14418 points (10%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
100.6 fps (33%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 188.3     avg: 250.6     median: 248 (14%)     max: 350 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
122.5 fps (46%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
277.7 fps (50%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
648 fps (48%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 37.8     avg: 156.5     median: 104.6 (3%)     max: 315 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 104228     avg: 108607     median: 108363 (28%)     max: 116422 points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 91239     avg: 99361     median: 103461 (26%)     max: 105121 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
6266 Samples/s (23%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
12980 Samples/s (23%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
24812 points (21%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 61.5     avg: 139.5     median: 147.2 (20%)     max: 183 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 109.7     avg: 169.7     median: 169 (47%)     max: 220 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 108.4     avg: 165.3     median: 165 (21%)     max: 212 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.3673     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (2%)     max: 0.576 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Death Stranding 2

Death Stranding 2

2026
low 1920x1080
78.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
68.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
62.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
47.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
37.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
22.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
36.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
51.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Crimson Desert

Crimson Desert

2026
low 1920x1080
116.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
68.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
67.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
55.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
42  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
23.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
33.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
51.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Resident Evil Requiem

Resident Evil Requiem

2026
low 1920x1080
147.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
101.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
94.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
43.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
19.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
2.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Max Settings + Path Tracing + DLSS Balanced 1920x1080
31.3
Call of Duty Black Ops 7

Call of Duty Black Ops 7

2025
low 1920x1080
145  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
127 130 130 138 ~ 131 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
95 95 96 103 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32 36 36 38 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
18 23 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
37  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 117: Pax Romana

Anno 117: Pax Romana

2025
med. 1920x1080
69 73.8 80.7 91.3 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50 55.4 59.4 67 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.1 28.4 30.5 33.9 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
102 110.1 118.4 136.7 ~ 117 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
79.9 88.6 93.5 104.9 ~ 92 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
55 59.8 61.9 70.2 ~ 62 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
47.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
71.5 82.1 83.4 91.7 ~ 82 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
58.3 65 66.3 72.7 ~ 66 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
31.1 35.7 37.1 40.9 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
26.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
70.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
36  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
47.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
42.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
34.7 40.3 41.2 48.9 ~ 41 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
28.7 31.6 34.1 39.3 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.3 20.5 21.2 24.8 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
11.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
21.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
184.4 189.8 210 263 ~ 212 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
152 174.9 177.1 190.4 217 ~ 182 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
146 152.7 154 165.5 174.4 ~ 159 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18 21.8 24 25 25.8 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
9.3 11.7 13 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
18.3 21 21.9 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
46.3
46.3
50
48.9
low 1920x1080
58.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.6 52.6 63.2 64.4 ~ 57 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
44.1 48.6 57.5 57.8 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
43.8 47.1 56.4 57.3 ~ 51 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
30.4 35 38.2 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
11.7  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
22.7  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
48 52.8 55.1 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
48.2 61 66.9 ~ 59 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
43.7 48.2 54.9 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
22.8 26.5 29.2 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
12.7 13.8 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
25.3 30 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
50 57 61 66 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47 53 56 58 61 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45 46 46 49 53 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31 33 35 36 40 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
25 26 28 29 34 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
24 33 41 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 2560x1440
55
med. 1920x1080
163.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
148.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
96  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
49.4 80.1 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45.2 53.8 68.3 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.6 33.5 36.5 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
13.9 17.8 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
10.6  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
25.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
77.6 102.8 106.3 ~ 96 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
64.9 85.9 86 ~ 79 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
46.1 60.4 61.1 ~ 56 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
43.6 45.6 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
57.4 57.6 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
102.1 127.7 ~ 115 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52.8 54.9 68.1 ~ 59 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
6.3 14.1 15.6 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
4.2 9.4 10.1 ~ 8 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
5.3  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
med. 1920x1080
54.3 58.8 63.4 ~ 59 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
48.5 52.3 56.3 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
41.1 42 44 ~ 42 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
31.8 32.4 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
62.8 70.1 ~ 66 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
131  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
93  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
84  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
64  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
83.8 84.9 88.6 ~ 86 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
62 62.5 65.9 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
45.4 47.9 49.3 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
33.2 35.2 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
43.5 46.4 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
66 78.7 ~ 72 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
65.7 77.4 ~ 72 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
65.2 76.7 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
54 55.6 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
62.8 70.3 ~ 67 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
46.5 51.7 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
43.6 46.8 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
37.8 38.1 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440 cinem.
27.2 27.6 ~ 27 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440 cinem.
37.9 38.6 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
83 100 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63 73 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
48 58 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26 31 32 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
19 22 23 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
9  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
30 36 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
cinematic RT: Very High DLSS 68 FG 2560x1440
31
29
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
181.2 243 255 273 284 ~ 247 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
176.8 219 231 254 268 275 ~ 237 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
154.3 195 206 214 219 230 ~ 203 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46.1 68.6 70.9 71 71.6 77.5 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
29.8 39 42.6 44.5 45.7 49.1 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
10.7  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
9.2  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
46 65 66.5 70.4 71.4 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
53.7 55.8 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
38.6 40.8 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
28.4 29 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
42.8 44 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
78.7 87.1 ~ 83 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
73.1 76.7 ~ 75 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
59 60.9 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
46.1 46.3 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
60.2 61.9 ~ 61 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
78.3 93.8 ~ 86 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
58.8 60.6 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
52.9 60 ~ 56 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
47 48.1 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
59.9 60.6 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
66.2 72.6 79 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
59.1 67.4 71.6 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
54.6 61.7 66.6 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
31.2 36.7 39.7 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
12.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Preset + High Ray Tracing 1920x1080
30.5
24.3
low 1920x1080
121.1 123.9 128.9 133.6 142.3 146.9 153.3 ~ 136 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
92.4 104.3 107.3 107.4 107.6 109.2 110.6 110.6 112 117.8 118.1 124.5 125.1 ~ 111 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79.9 86.7 92.5 93.2 93.4 93.5 93.9 95.3 95.6 100.6 100.8 104 104.4 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
68.1 75 80.1 81.8 83.2 83.3 84.3 85 86.6 87.2 88.6 89.9 90 90.8 94.9 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
48.1 48.5 53.5 54.1 55.4 55.5 56.1 57 57.9 58.8 59.2 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21.5 25.1 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
32.7  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
58.9 63.9 65.2 67.7 69.6 70 71.7 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
178.9
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
39.8
32.5
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off, no Path Tracing) 3840x2160
2.7
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
80
82.5
77.5
82
72.9
75.6
78.1
55.8
81.1
75.9
85.6
62.4
75.2
low 1920x1080
135.9 151.1 155.8 158.5 166.1 170 173.3 ~ 159 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
95 96.2 114.2 115.7 117 119.2 121.3 124.3 125.2 128.5 133 134.9 144.6 ~ 121 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
81.1 93 94.1 95.4 97.5 105.7 106 106.7 110.4 112.8 113 117 118 ~ 104 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
78.1 78.7 90 90.7 93.3 95.6 96.8 101 105.3 105.5 109.1 110.7 111.2 113.4 115.6 ~ 100 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
58.4 62.6 67.9 70.2 71.8 72.1 75.5 76.7 78 78.1 78.4 ~ 72 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
34.8 38.8 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
56.5 63.8 65.8 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
101.3 105.9 114.1 114.3 119.1 ~ 111 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
213.3
242
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
356 401 492 515 601 610 648 ~ 518 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
260 286 288 303 312 319 343 344 348 ~ 311 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
219 227 238 248 253 269 273 275 279 ~ 253 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
191.1 195 217.8 219 223 231 235 239 240 ~ 221 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
133.7 152 155.7 157.8 159.6 162 164.3 165 ~ 156 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
72.8 83 86.1 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
99.8 107.5 117.9 122.6 125.4 135 135.6 137.9 142.5 164.2 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
79.8 87 97.7 98.3 105.2 108.3 108.9 112.2 118.3 118.4 120.8 126.8 142.9 ~ 110 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
68.2 72.1 79.6 83.4 91.9 92.4 93.6 93.9 97.3 98.6 102.8 105.6 118.4 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
62.9 99.2 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
204 212 215 221 227 228 232 ~ 220 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
125.7 142 143.7 143.9 153.9 164.6 167.4 167.6 177.6 178.6 ~ 156 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
107 109.5 110 111 118.1 119.5 121.1 126 130.4 133.6 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
79.1 87 88.2 88.2 89.8 89.9 92.2 94 95.8 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
45 50.7 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
142.6 162 172.8 182 184.5 195.1 206 215 221 268 ~ 195 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
129.3 133.9 136.3 145.2 147.8 156.4 163.4 168.2 178.3 182.1 187.6 190.7 232 ~ 165 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
118.7 125.7 140.7 141.7 141.8 150.9 154.4 163.6 171.9 176.6 184.2 185 223 ~ 160 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
115 121.5 133.2 134.7 139.4 142.3 144.6 150.6 156.1 161.6 163.7 170.9 201 ~ 149 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
105.2 124.4 ~ 115 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
183.6 184.1 186.8 187.9 ~ 186 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
171.7 176.9 178.4 178.9 181.1 183.8 184.7 186.2 187.8 ~ 181 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
160.3 160.3 170.1 176.1 176.3 177.3 179.6 179.7 181.9 185.7 ~ 175 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
103.5 108.7 120 120.1 120.6 123.8 127.5 128.5 128.5 133.5 142.9 146.3 ~ 125 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
96.7 100.9 106.4 107 114.3 115.2 116 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
90.2 106 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
47.9
53.9
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
184.6
185.5
180.1
187.9
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
187.7
187.2
184.7
187.8
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Death Stranding 278.668.962.347.237.122.3
Crimson Desert116.768.967.355.94223.2
Resident Evil Requiem147.8101.394.143.419.62.84
Call of Duty Black Ops 7145131973621
Anno 117: Pax Romana79582923.4
ARC Raiders117926247.8
The Outer Worlds 282663626.7
Battlefield 670.136
Borderlands 442.841332111.5
F1 252121821592311
Doom: The Dark Ages58.55752513511.7
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered59492613
Assassin's Creed Shadows595548352814
Civilization 7163.1148.696
Monster Hunter Wilds655649.7291610.6
Kingdom Come Deliverance 296795645
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle115591285.3
Stalker 259524232
Call of Duty Black Ops 6144131938464
Until Dawn86634834
Space Marine 272727155
Star Wars Outlaws49453827
Black Myth: Wukong92685330219
F1 24247237203684210.7
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2554029
Ghost of Tsushima83756046
Horizon Forbidden West86605648
Alan Wake 27366613612.1
Cyberpunk 207713611195855523
Baldur's Gate 31591211041007237
Strange Brigade51831125322115681
X-Plane 11.111291109281
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark2201561198948
Dota 2 Reborn195165160149115
GTA V18618117512510898
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3
6
12

8
15
10

11
17
6
6
13
8
3
13
14
5
1
11
2
4

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 24. 18:15:19

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Mar 2026 13:16:09 +0100 +0.003s ... 0.003s

#4 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.027s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.027s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12924 +0.062s ... 0.089s

#8 got single benchmarks 12924 +0.108s ... 0.198s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.198s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +1.852s ... 2.05s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 2.05s

#12 Got 721 rows for game benchmarks. +0.219s ... 2.269s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 2.269s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.021s ... 2.29s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.482s ... 2.772s

#16 return log +0.131s ... 2.903s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop graphics card

Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 review: Can a German budget gaming laptop compete with the big players?

Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 review: Can a German budget gaming laptop compete with the big players?

With the Erazer Deputy 15 P1, Medion aims to challenge the competition in the affordable gaming-laptop segment. In addition to a powerful Core 7 CPU, the 15-inch laptop comes equipped with a GeForce RTX 5060. Can this "German" laptop hold its own against international rivals?
Intel Core 7 250H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 15.6", 2.2 kg
Affordable gaming for the masses? MSI Cyborg 17 squares up against the competition

Affordable gaming for the masses? MSI Cyborg 17 squares up against the competition

The lower price segment has become a battleground for gaming laptops, with manufacturers fighting for every inch. On paper, the MSI Cyborg 17 looks like a strong contender for the budget crown — but our review shows whether it delivers in real-world use.
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 17.3", 2.6 kg
XMG Apex 17 M25 on the desk

XMG Apex 17 review: RTX 5060 laptop with Ryzen 9 9955HX even outruns some RTX 5070 rivals

With the Apex 17 (Clevo V370FNNW-MG), XMG sticks to its formula: maximum performance, no frills. A Ryzen 9 9955HX meets a fully unleashed RTX 5060 — all starting at €1,899. But is raw performance alone enough to compete with other RTX 5060 machines and even some RTX 5070 laptops?
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 17.3", 2.8 kg
Challenge to the Lenovo Legion: XMG Core 16 VE (M25) gaming laptop review

Challenge to the Lenovo Legion: XMG Core 16 VE (M25) gaming laptop review

The XMG Core 16 VE aims to compete not only with budget gaming laptops, but also with premium models such as the Lenovo Legion 7. Read our review to find out whether it succeeds.
AMD Ryzen 7 255, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 16", 2.1 kg
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 review - One of the best 16-inch multimedia laptops

Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 review - One of the best 16-inch multimedia laptops

With the ThinkBook 16p G6, Lenovo currently offers one of the best multimedia laptops on the market, which shows significant improvements over its predecessor. With a matte 240 Hz panel, a powerful HX processor and the mobile RTX 5060, it is a very good overall package.
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 16", 2.1 kg

Tulpar T6 V3.5: Intel Core i7-14700HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  Review » Affordable gaming laptop with RTX 5060: Tulpar T6 V3.5 review

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng: AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  Review » The best budget gamer? HP Omen 16 laptop review

Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2 kg
  Review » Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 review: Formidable Razer Blade 16 competitor

Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25): AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 15.30", 1.9 kg
  Review » German competitor to the Legion 5: XMG Core 15 (M25) gaming laptop review

Alienware 16 Aurora: Intel Core 7 240H, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  Review » Alienware 16 Aurora review: Affordable starter laptop for 1080p Ultra gaming

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH G10 RTX 5060: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16IAH G10 Aura Edition Review: Great multimedia laptop impresses with 1,100-nits OLED

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10: AMD Ryzen 7 250, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  Review » Lenovo LOQ 15 laptop review: The mobile RTX 5060 celebrates its debut

Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 15.10", 1.9 kg
  Review » The best mainstream gamer in 2025 - Lenovo Legion 5 15 Laptop Review

MSI Stealth A16 5060 Engineering Sample: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00"
  Review » Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop Performance Preview - Almost at the level of the RTX 5070 Laptop

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00"
  External Review » Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403: AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403

Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61

Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761: Intel Core 7 250H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405

HP Victus 15-fb3000ng: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 15-fb3000ng

MSI Katana 15 HX B14WFK: Intel Core i7-14650HX, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana 15 HX B14WFK

Acer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-61: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-61

Alienware 16 Aurora: Intel Core 7 240H, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Alienware 16 Aurora

Lenovo LOQ 15IRX10, i7-14700HX: Intel Core i7-14700HX, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo LOQ 15IRX10, i7-14700HX

Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71, RTX 5060: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 14.50", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71, RTX 5060

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71, RTX 5060: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71, RTX 5060

Dell 16 Premium, RTX 5060: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 16.30", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Dell 16 Premium, RTX 5060

Gigabyte Gaming A16 3VH: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Gaming A16 3VH

Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 IAX: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 IAX

Acer Nitro V 16S AI ANV16S-61: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V 16S AI ANV16S-61

HP Victus 15-fa2000ng: Intel Core i7-13620H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 15-fa2000ng

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UM: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UM

Lenovo Legion Y7000 2025: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 15.30", 2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Y7000 2025

Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 15.10", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng: AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Omen 16-ap0091ng

HP Omen 16-ap0000ng: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Omen 16-ap0000ng

Acer Nitro V16 AI ANV16-42, RTX 5060: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V16 AI ANV16-42, RTX 5060

Alienware 16 Aurora, RTX 5060 : Intel Core 7 240H, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Alienware 16 Aurora, RTX 5060

Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UM: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 18.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UM

Gigabyte Gaming A16 CVH: Intel Core i7-13620H, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Gaming A16 CVH

HP Victus 15-fa2000na: Intel Core 7 240H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 15-fa2000na

Asus Zephyrus G16 GA605KM: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus G16 GA605KM

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ADR10: AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ADR10

Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52: Intel Core i7-13620H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52

Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10, RTX 5060: Intel Core i7-14700HX, 17.30", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10, RTX 5060

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10: AMD Ryzen 7 250, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10

Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10, i7-14700HX RTX 5060: Intel Core i7-14700HX, 15.10", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10, i7-14700HX RTX 5060

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403UM: AMD Ryzen 9 270, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403UM

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10, Ultra 9 285H: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH10, Ultra 9 285H

Honor MagicBook Pro 16 Hunter 2025: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Honor MagicBook Pro 16 Hunter 2025

Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10, i7-13650HX RTX 5060: Intel Core i7-13650HX, 15.10", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10, i7-13650HX RTX 5060

Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608JMR: Intel Core i7-14650HX, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608JMR

Lenovo LOQ 15IRX10: Intel Core i5-13450HX, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo LOQ 15IRX10

MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWFKG: Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWFKG

Asus V16 V3607VM: Intel Core 7 240H, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus V16 V3607VM

Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401KM, R7 260: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401KM, R7 260

Gigabyte Aero X16 1VH: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Aero X16 1VH

Monster Tulpar T7 V26.2.5: Intel Core i7-13620H, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Monster Tulpar T7 V26.2.5

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH G10 RTX 5060: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH G10 RTX 5060

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615JMR: Intel Core i7-14650HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G16 G615JMR

Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10

Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.50", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62

Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401KM: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401KM

Alienware 16X Aurora: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Alienware 16X Aurora

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615LM: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G16 G615LM

Schenker XMG Apex 17 M25: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, 17.30", 2.8 kg
   » Content creator hidden gem? QHD display in the XMG Apex 17 delivers extremely accurate colors after calibration

   » RTX 5060 laptop runs 60% quieter in Entertainment Mode with only 12% performance loss: XMG Apex 17 tested

   » XMG Apex 17 gets significantly more expensive: fastest RTX 5060 laptop now starts above €2,000

   » CPU king in gaming laptops: XMG Apex 17 with Ryzen 9 9955HX beats all RTX 5060 and RTX 5070 rivals

   » RTX 5060 beats RTX 5070: XMG Apex 17 surprises with unexpectedly strong gaming performance

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10: AMD Ryzen 7 250, 15.60", 2.4 kg
   » Lenovo LOQ 15 with 144 Hz screen, RTX 5050 discounted to record-low $599

Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.1 kg
   » Lenovo's ThinkBook 16p G6 is a great multimedia laptop

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng: AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
   » Omen 16: A damn good budget gamer with an ad-infested control center

   » Big changes for Omen gamers this year – HP Omen 16 review

Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2 kg
   » Lenovo Legion 7i 16 Gen 10 outperforms most other ultrathin laptops with similar RTX 5060 graphics

   » Lenovo launches Legion laptop lighter than even the Razer Blade 16 or MSI Stealth 16 AI

Alienware 16 Aurora: Intel Core 7 240H, 16.00", 2.6 kg
   » Alienware 16 Aurora entails a hidden disadvantage when compared to the 16X Aurora

   » Alienware 16 Aurora is actually sleeker and longer-lasting than the pricier 16X Aurora

Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 15.10", 1.9 kg
   » Massive discount: Lenovo Legion 5i Gen 10 with RTX 5070 and OLED display is 30% cheaper than list price

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10: AMD Ryzen 7 250, 15.60", 2.4 kg
   » RTX 50-powered Lenovo LOQ 15 Gen 10 gaming laptop with 144 Hz display scores big 33% price cut

Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 15.10", 1.9 kg
   » It does not always have to be a Pro: Lenovo Legion 5 15 offers almost everything gamers want

   » Lenovo ships the Legion 5 15 with one of the best OLED panels available

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

M5 Max 32-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Intel Graphics 2 Xe3
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-02-18)