Verdict – A budget gamer without the budget look (mostly)
With the Omen Max taking over the high-end slot, HP’s 2025 Omen 16 is now positioned as the more affordable model. However, you wouldn’t notice that right away: its cohesive design, solid input devices, and excellent CPU/GPU performance make it feel anything but cheap. It’s a budget gamer without some of the usual compromises.
That said, some corners have been cut. HP saved on Wi-Fi and USB ports, which is acceptable. The smaller battery is another minor tradeoff. The biggest letdown, though, is the display—not terrible, but clearly below today’s standard and lacking visual punch. If HP offered a better screen even on the lower-end configs, the Omen 16 could easily be our go-to recommendation for gamers on a budget.
Pros
Cons
Table of Contents
- Verdict – A budget gamer without the budget look (mostly)
- Specifications
- Case & Connectivity – Stylish, but trimmed down
- Input devices – New layout, familiar feel
- Display – Some good options, ours isn’t one
- Performance – Strong gaming for the money
- Emissions & Power - Staying cool under pressure
- Possible alternatives in comparison
Our Omen 16 test configuration comes with Ryzen 9 8940HX, RTX 5060, 16 GB RAM, and a 1 TB SSD. It’s not the cheapest RTX 5060 laptop out there, but the pricing still seems like a good middle ground between budget and performance.
HP’s shift toward more affordable builds was already noticeable in the Omen 17 (2024), and this new Omen 16 clearly builds on that direction.
Specifications
Case & Connectivity – Stylish, but trimmed down
The chassis has been redesigned this year: instead of a 16:9 screen, we now get a 16:10 display, which makes the bottom bezel slimmer. The dimensions have changed slightly—less width, a bit more depth, same thickness. The display opens up to about 135 degrees, with minor wobble in the hinges.
The overall black design language with the mirrored OMEN logo remains mostly unchanged. Compared to last year’s more rounded model, the new version reintroduces a few sharper lines and edges.
HP has switched from an aluminum base to an all-plastic build. That makes it a little less rigid, and the keyboard deck can flex slightly—but not enough to be a problem. Fingerprints, however, show up quickly on the dark surfaces.
HP also cut back on ports: gone are the two Thunderbolt/USB 4 connectors. The lone USB-C port now supports only USB 3.2 Gen 2, while two of the three USB-A ports are still Gen 1 (5 Gbit/s). There’s no card reader either—similar to Lenovo’s LOQ 15 .
Wireless connectivity also took a step back. Instead of Wi-Fi 6E, HP now uses a Realtek Wi-Fi 6 module, which delivers mediocre transfer speeds. The XMG Core 15 and the Lenovo LOQ 15 show similar results, though.

Sustainability
HP doesn’t give precise numbers for our configuration. However, a sustainability report for the 15.6-inch Omen 16 cites 270–1,110 kg CO₂e per device. HP also claims to use ocean-bound plastic in the display bezels, recycled plastic in the keycaps, and recycled metal in components like the hinges and base.
The packaging was mostly cardboard, though the power adapter still came wrapped in plastic.
Input devices – New layout, familiar feel
The keyboard layout has changed: there’s now a numeric keypad, but the arrow keys are smaller and half-height. Key spacing has been slightly reduced, and the right Ctrl key has been replaced by a Copilot key.
The 4-zone RGB backlight offers two brightness levels. HP touts 26-key rollover with anti-ghosting. Key travel is short but feels deeper than it is, thanks to well-damped feedback. Typing is fast, comfortable, and quiet.
The touchpad (12.5 × 8 cm) offers excellent glide and precise clicks with clean feedback.
Display – Some good options, ours isn’t one
HP lists several display options for the Omen 16 lineup. Our review unit uses one of the weakest panels: a 1200p IPS display (300 nits, 144 Hz, 62.5% sRGB). Other versions range from a 1080p 300-nit 100% sRGB variant on Ryzen 7 configs up to a 1600p 500-nit 240 Hz 100% sRGB panel for Ryzen AI or Intel Core Ultra models.
Our measurements confirmed the 300-nit brightness and solid uniformity, though we noticed a small light spot at the bottom right. Contrast is fine, but color coverage is poor—under 60% sRGB, which even other budget laptops now manage to exceed.
On the bright side, there’s no PWM flicker, though response times are sluggish, as seen in similar budget devices like the LOQ 15 or Alienware 16 Aurora.
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 328 cd/m²
Contrast: 1262:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.73 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.8}
calibrated: 4.22
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.05 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
38.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
58.1% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
40% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.63
CCT: 6718 K
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng AUODBB2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 144 Hz | HP Omen 16 (2024) BOE BOE0B7D, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1", 240 Hz | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 LEN151WQXGA, OLED, 2560x1600, 15.1", 165 Hz | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) NE153QDM-NZ2 (BOE0D5F), IPS, 2560x1600, 15.3", 300 Hz | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 CSOT MNF601BA1-4, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Alienware 16 Aurora BOE NE16N41, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 75% | 125% | 80% | 73% | 78% | |
Display P3 Coverage (%) | 40 | 68.6 72% | 99.9 150% | 71.7 79% | 67.3 68% | 70.8 77% |
sRGB Coverage (%) | 58.1 | 98.6 70% | 100 72% | 99.9 72% | 99.2 71% | 99.9 72% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 38.7 | 70.6 82% | 98.3 154% | 73.6 90% | 69.1 79% | 72.1 86% |
Response Times | 51% | 98% | 65% | -16% | -65% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 27.6 ? | 14.1 ? 49% | 0.42 ? 98% | 12.4 ? 55% | 33.9 ? -23% | 49.5 ? -79% |
Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 19.4 ? | 9.3 ? 52% | 0.4 ? 98% | 5 ? 74% | 21.2 ? -9% | 29.3 ? -51% |
PWM Frequency (Hz) | 1152 ? | |||||
PWM Amplitude * (%) | 11 | |||||
Screen | 15% | 54% | 15% | 30% | 10% | |
Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 328 | 292 -11% | 492 50% | 545 66% | 318 -3% | 345.3 5% |
Brightness (cd/m²) | 313 | 291 -7% | 495 58% | 530 69% | 300 -4% | 324 4% |
Brightness Distribution (%) | 91 | 85 -7% | 92 1% | 94 3% | 89 -2% | 88 -3% |
Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.26 | 0.24 8% | 0.54 -108% | 0.2 23% | 0.23 12% | |
Contrast (:1) | 1262 | 1217 -4% | 1009 -20% | 1590 26% | 1501 19% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.73 | 2.36 50% | 0.9 81% | 2.29 52% | 1.33 72% | 3.22 32% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 17.47 | 4.08 77% | 1.8 90% | 5.42 69% | 4.42 75% | 5.68 67% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.22 | 0.93 78% | 1.05 75% | 0.94 78% | 0.93 78% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.05 | 3 -46% | 1.2 41% | 3.5 -71% | 1.9 7% | 4.5 -120% |
Gamma | 2.63 84% | 2.101 105% | 2.16 102% | 2.317 95% | 2.187 101% | 2.1 105% |
CCT | 6718 97% | 5976 109% | 6291 103% | 6957 93% | 6678 97% | 7041 92% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 47% /
33% | 92% /
81% | 53% /
36% | 29% /
33% | 8% /
14% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
19.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.6 ms rise | |
↘ 9.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.9 ms rise | |
↘ 14.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8215 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Performance – Strong gaming for the money
Our test model packs AMD's Ryzen 9 8940HX and Nvidia's RTX 5060, paired with 16 GB RAM and a 1 TB SSD. That positions it as an upper entry- to mid-range gaming laptop, more than capable of running most titles smoothly at native resolution.
Testing conditions
Instead of bundling functions into one app, HP pre-installs several utilities—Support Assistant, Hardware Diagnostics, and the Omen Gaming Hub, where performance modes (Eco, Balanced, Performance, Unleashed) and lighting settings can be adjusted. We used Performance mode for all benchmarks.
The Gaming Hub, however, is cluttered with ads and promotions—including scratch cards and “rewards.” It feels bloated and sluggish, more like adware than a control panel.
Performance mode | Cinebench R15 | CPU TDP | 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics | Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra | Noise Cyberpunk |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unleashed | 4,857 | 82 W | 31,331 | 84.6 fps | 52.7 dB |
Performance | 4,296 | 73, drops to 61 W | 25,485 | 78.1 fps | 49 dB |
Balanced | 4,121 | 68, drops to 56 W | 26,919 | 65.4 fps | 40.45 dB |
Eco | 4,204 | 78, drops to 56 W | 13,800 | 60 fps | 29 dB |
Battery | 2,987 | 36 W | 18,609 | 47 fps | 31 dB |
Processor
The AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (16 cores, 32 threads) delivers strong and consistent performance in Cinebench R15 loop testing, with only minimal throttling.
Across all CPU benchmarks, it outperforms most rivals. It even beats the Intel i9-14900HX in its predecessor in sustained performance, though initial burst performance is about the same. Overall, it’s a very capable CPU. Expect around 40% lower performance on battery power.
Cinebench R15 Multi test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance rating | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (27145 - 32521, n=2) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 40970, n=140, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2267, n=140, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (1917 - 1930, n=2) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (10439 - 12720, n=2) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 16108, n=139, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 870, n=139, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (745 - 747, n=2) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (4296 - 5406, n=2) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (1537 - 6271, n=139, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
Average of class Gaming (188.8 - 343, n=138, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (290 - 292, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Alienware 16 Aurora |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (80 - 517, n=135, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (101 - 116, n=2) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (103455 - 133175, n=2) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 148086, n=137, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (7360 - 7407, n=2) | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7508, n=137, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
Alienware 16 Aurora |
Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 22104, n=137, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (11447 - 16362, n=3) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (2767 - 2835, n=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3253, n=137, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 27010, n=136, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (13357 - 19421, n=2) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=136, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (1925 - 1961, n=2) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Alienware 16 Aurora |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (25.7 - 36.2, n=2) | |
Average of class Gaming (7.7 - 44.3, n=137, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 88.8, n=136, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (40.5 - 45.9, n=2) |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (0.4215 - 0.4334, n=2) | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3551 - 0.759, n=138, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance rating | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Alienware 16 Aurora |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (43311 - 52718, n=2) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=136, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Alienware 16 Aurora |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (171374 - 212581, n=2) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=136, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Alienware 16 Aurora |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (7988 - 9259, n=2) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=136, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Alienware 16 Aurora |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (169334 - 172010, n=2) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=136, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (26855 - 29514, n=2) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average of class Gaming (5020 - 33636, n=136, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Alienware 16 Aurora |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (90684 - 113321, n=2) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=136, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Alienware 16 Aurora |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (150768 - 168749, n=2) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 247074, n=136, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Alienware 16 Aurora |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (1784 - 2092, n=2) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=136, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Alienware 16 Aurora |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (23193 - 28180, n=2) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=136, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Alienware 16 Aurora |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=136, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (18283 - 34819, n=2) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng |
System performance
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Performance rating | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Alienware 16 Aurora -4! | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 -2! | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) -3! |
PCMark 10 / Score | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=115, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=119, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=115, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=115, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=109, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=109, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=109, last 2 years) | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=109, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
Average of class Gaming (237 - 532, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 345, n=108, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=122, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 8054 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
Average of class Gaming (21750 - 104987, n=136, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (29102 - 51173, n=2) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=136, last 2 years) | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (35634 - 62219, n=2) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=136, last 2 years) | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (32239 - 61929, n=2) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=136, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (83.5 - 83.9, n=2) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng |
* ... smaller is better
DPC latency
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP |
* ... smaller is better
Mass storage
* ... smaller is better
Read continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU performance
The RTX 5060 runs at its full NVIDIA-rated power limit. In synthetic tests, the Omen 16 performs right on average, while in real games, it performs top and matches the Lenovo Legion 5 15.
At 1080p/1200p, the Omen 16 easily handles most modern games at max settings, though the full 144 Hz refresh rate is only achievable in lighter titles or with DLSS enabled.
DLSS Quality mode helps maintain native frame rates in Baldur’s Gate 3 and enables QHD gaming in many cases.
Expect about 27% GPU performance loss on battery (Fire Strike).
3DMark 11 Performance | 30945 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 58934 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 28480 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 11484 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating - Percent | |
Average of class Gaming | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) -2! | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 169.9, n=137, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
Alienware 16 Aurora |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Gaming (34.5 - 246, n=103, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 186.9, n=124, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 215, n=135, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Alienware 16 Aurora |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 456, n=123, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Alienware 16 Aurora |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 248, n=138, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (33.4 - 150.2, n=141, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Alienware 16 Aurora | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
F1 25 | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (46.3 - 117.9, n=13, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (46.3 - 50, n=3) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (132 - 291, n=17, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (146 - 165.5, n=4) | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (152 - 308, n=17, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (152 - 190.4, n=4) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 184.1 | 181.1 | 176.3 | 127.5 | ||||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 221 | 187.6 | 184.2 | 161.6 | ||||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 204 | 125.7 | 111 | |||||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 135.6 | 112.2 | 93.9 | |||||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 492 | 303 | 238 | 217.8 | 155.7 | 83 | ||
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 155.8 | 125.2 | 110.4 | 109.1 | 114.3 | 75.5 | 63.8 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 121.1 | 109.2 | 95.3 | 86.6 | 65.2 | 56.1 | ||
F1 25 (2025) | 189.8 | 174.9 | 154 | 25 |
Emissions & Power - Staying cool under pressure
Noise
In Performance mode, the fans usually spin even at idle (~27 dB). In Balanced or Eco, they often stay silent. Under full load, we measured up to 52 dB, though gaming typically stays around 49–50 dB—average to good overall.
Noise level
Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 27.64 dB(A) |
Load |
| 49.5 / 52.73 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1 | HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 260, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN | Alienware 16 Aurora GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Core 7 240H | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -10% | 1% | -4% | -40% | -1% | |
off / environment * (dB) | 23 | 25 -9% | 25.5 -11% | 24 -4% | 25 -9% | 22.9 -0% |
Idle Minimum * (dB) | 23 | 29 -26% | 25.5 -11% | 25 -9% | 43 -87% | 24 -4% |
Idle Average * (dB) | 23 | 30 -30% | 25.5 -11% | 27 -17% | 45 -96% | 25.6 -11% |
Idle Maximum * (dB) | 27.64 | 31 -12% | 26.9 3% | 29 -5% | 48 -74% | 25.6 7% |
Load Average * (dB) | 49.5 | 46 7% | 34.6 30% | 48 3% | 53 -7% | 46.8 5% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 49.5 | 50.1 -1% | 49 1% | 51 -3% | 49.9 -1% | |
Load Maximum * (dB) | 52.73 | 47 11% | 50.1 5% | 50 5% | 53 -1% | 55.6 -5% |
Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 47 |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
Surprisingly, the Omen 16 stays very cool even under stress. Surface temperatures rarely exceed 37°C, even after prolonged load—excellent results.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.9 °C / 3.4 F).
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 AMD Ryzen 7 250, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -12% | -11% | -21% | -23% | |
Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 36 | 47 -31% | 42.2 -17% | 49 -36% | 49 -36% |
Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 37 | 57 -54% | 51.7 -40% | 59 -59% | 58 -57% |
Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 30 | 25 17% | 28.5 5% | 28 7% | 32 -7% |
Idle Bottom * (°C) | 32 | 26 19% | 29.2 9% | 31 3% | 29 9% |
* ... smaller is better
Speakers
The stereo speakers are weak—too quiet, lacking bass, and even mids and highs are uninspiring. A headphone jack is conveniently placed mid-left.
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Power consumption
Plugging in an external display activates the dedicated GPU, which increases idle power draw. Under load, power consumption is slightly higher than average. Efficiency isn’t its strength, but the 230W power adapter is well-sized.
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1 | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 260, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN | Alienware 16 Aurora GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Core 7 240H | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 12% | -1% | -30% | 8% | -52% | |
Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 7.8 | 6.9 12% | 10.6 -36% | 20 -156% | 4.4 44% | 14.2 ? -82% |
Idle Average * (Watt) | 8.8 | 10.7 -22% | 12.1 -38% | 20.7 -135% | 18 -105% | 20.3 ? -131% |
Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 21.5 | 11.3 47% | 15.9 26% | 22.7 -6% | 18.2 15% | 27.3 ? -27% |
Load Average * (Watt) | 119 | 69.7 41% | 95 20% | 71 40% | 87.1 27% | 111.9 ? 6% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 192 | 162.6 15% | 169 12% | 153.1 20% | 123 36% | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 164.5 | 165 -0% | 165 -0% | 151.1 8% | 120.6 27% | |
Load Maximum * (Watt) | 208 | 233.6 -12% | 192 8% | 172 17% | 183 12% | 263 ? -26% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / Stresstest
Power consumption with external monitor
Battery life
The 70 Wh battery is relatively small—exept for the LOQ 15, competitors like the Legion 5 or previous Omen models have 80 Wh or more. Expect roughly 5 hours of light use (web browsing or movie playback) away from an outlet.
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 70 Wh | HP Omen 16 (2024) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 80 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 99.8 Wh | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 60 Wh | Alienware 16 Aurora Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 96 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery runtime | 18% | 70% | 98% | -5% | 50% | 31% | |
H.264 (h) | 5.1 | 11.5 125% | 7.78 ? 53% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 (h) | 5 | 5.9 18% | 9.7 94% | 9.9 98% | 4.5 -10% | 7.5 50% | 6.57 ? 31% |
Load (h) | 1.3 | 1.2 -8% | 1.3 0% | 1.414 ? 9% | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd (h) | 0.9 | ||||||
Reader / Idle (h) | 6.9 | 9.79 ? |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
- 10/07/2025 v8
Christian Hintze
Possible alternatives in comparison
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $19.99 BestParts New CPU+GPU Coolin... 2. $16.99 Fleshy Leaf CPU+GPU Cooling ... 3. $35.99 Replacement Backlit Keyboard... List Price: 1500 Euro | 2.4 kg | 23.7 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,258.00 HP Omen 16 2024 Gaming Lapto... 2. $1,335.46 HP OMEN 16 inch Laptop, FHD ... 3. $1,198.88 HP OMEN 16 inch Laptop, FHD ... List Price: 3200 Euro | 2.4 kg | 23.5 mm | 16.10" 2560x1440 182 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 AMD Ryzen 7 260 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,299.00 Lenovo Legion 5 Gen 10 Gamin... 2. $1,513.99 Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP10 RTX ... 3. $1,099.99 Lenovo Legion 5 15.1" OLED W... List Price: 1449€ | 1.9 kg | 21.5 mm | 15.10" 2560x1600 200 PPI OLED | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | List Price: 1840 EUR | 1.9 kg | 22 mm | 15.30" 2560x1600 197 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 AMD Ryzen 7 250 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,629.00 Lenovo LOQ Gaming Laptop, 15... 2. $75.99 Ruilezyo 300W Laptop Charger... 3. $115.99 20V 12.25A 245W Slim Tip Cha... | 2.4 kg | 24 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
Alienware 16 Aurora Intel Core 7 240H ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory | List Price: 1100 USD | 2.6 kg | 15.2 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.