HP Omen 17 (2023) review: Gaming laptop uses RTX 4080

The 2023 model of the Omen 17, which is a high-end gaming laptop, uses the same case that we already know from the predecessor but includes current hardware: The laptop is run by Raptor Lake and Ada Lovelace chips. HP combines a Core i9 with an RTX 4080 GPU, asking for almost 3,300 Euros ($3,582) for the whole package. The competitors include laptops such as the Alienware m17 R5, the Razer Blade 16 (Early 2023), the Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ, and the Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H.
You can find information on the case, equipment, input devices, and speakers in our review of the predecessor model, which is identical in those regards.
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- Specialist News Writer
- Magazine Writer
- Translator (DE<->EN)
Details here
Possible Competitors in Comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.4 % | 03/2023 | HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 27 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
86.1 % | 01/2023 | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT | 3.4 kg | 26.7 mm | 17.00" | 3840x2160 | |
91.2 % | 02/2023 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 21.99 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.4 % | 02/2023 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 26 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.4 % | 03/2023 | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 30.4 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
Join our Support Satisfaction Survey 2023: We want to hear about your experiences!
Participate here
Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1,000 USD/Euros, for University Students, Best Displays
Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤6-inch, Camera Smartphones
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (48.5 - 209, n=92, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (72 - 269, n=83, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Average of class Gaming (740 - 1780, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (629 - 1861, n=82) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (839 - 1890, n=82) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |

Display - QHD including sRGB coverage
While at this point many competitors prefer to use 16:10 displays, HP remains faithful to the 16:9 format in the Omen. A positive trait is that the responsive 165-Hz panel doesn't show any PWM flickering at any brightness level.
The brightness and contrast of the matte 17.3-inch display (2,560 x 1,440 pixels) fulfill the requirements (> 300 cd/m² and 1,000:1). However, the Omen display offers the lowest brightness among the displays from our competitors. The Legion 7 Pro has the brightest panel here.
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 371 cd/m²
Contrast: 1159:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.74 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 1.01
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
69.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng BOE BOE09BF, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30 | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AU Optronics AUODBA3, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.00 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 CSOT T3 MNG007DA4-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H MNG007DA2-3 (CSO1628), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ TL160ADMP03-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | HP Omen 17-ck1075ng BOE09EE, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 24% | 26% | 2% | 23% | -11% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 67.4 | 97.2 44% | 98.5 46% | 69.1 3% | 97 44% | 59.03 -12% |
sRGB Coverage | 97.6 | 99.6 2% | 100 2% | 99.7 2% | 99.9 2% | 87.46 -10% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69.6 | 88.4 27% | 89.7 29% | 71.2 2% | 84.9 22% | 61.04 -12% |
Response Times | -18% | 12% | 28% | 47% | -1% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 15.6 ? | 16.4 ? -5% | 6.6 ? 58% | 12.3 ? 21% | 5.1 ? 67% | 14 ? 10% |
Response Time Black / White * | 8.9 ? | 11.6 ? -30% | 12 ? -35% | 5.9 ? 34% | 6.6 ? 26% | 10 ? -12% |
PWM Frequency | 100 ? | |||||
Screen | -88% | -12% | 25% | 3% | -15% | |
Brightness middle | 371 | 484 30% | 456.8 23% | 511 38% | 470 27% | 321 -13% |
Brightness | 350 | 449 28% | 437 25% | 469 34% | 459 31% | 302 -14% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 87 -3% | 83 -8% | 86 -4% | 93 3% | 84 -7% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.55 -72% | 0.35 -9% | 0.4 -25% | 0.42 -31% | 0.41 -28% |
Contrast | 1159 | 880 -24% | 1305 13% | 1278 10% | 1119 -3% | 783 -32% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.74 | 4.8 -176% | 3.7 -113% | 0.95 45% | 1.86 -7% | 1.62 7% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.59 | 7.48 -108% | 6.42 -79% | 2.07 42% | 3.87 -8% | 4.08 -14% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.01 | 4.74 -369% | 0.66 35% | 0.91 10% | 0.93 8% | 1.93 -91% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 5.5 -96% | 2.6 7% | 0.6 79% | 2.7 4% | 1.24 56% |
Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.42 91% | 2.3 96% | 2.176 101% | 2.246 98% | 2.41 91% |
CCT | 6474 100% | 6148 106% | 6108 106% | 6545 99% | 6711 97% | 6261 104% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -27% /
-54% | 9% /
-0% | 18% /
21% | 24% /
13% | -9% /
-12% |
* ... smaller is better
In the state of delivery, the color reproduction is already very good, and it can be further improved with a calibration, which causes the color deviation to drop from 1.74 to 1 (target value < 3). In addition, the grayscale is then also reproduced more evenly.
The display is able to cover the sRGB color space almost completely, but not the AdobeRGB and DCI-P3 color spaces. The displays of most competitors perform better here, with only the panel of the Legion ranging at the same level.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
8.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.7 ms rise | |
↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.3 ms rise | |
↘ 8.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18925 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Performance - The HP laptop offers powerful hardware
With the Omen 17, Hewlett Packard offers a 17.3-inch laptop that is targeted for QHD gaming but also strikes a good figure in other application areas that require a high performance. The necessary computing performance is provided by Raptor Lake and Ada Lovelace chips. Our test unit of the Omen is available for about 3,300 Euros (~$3,582).
Test Conditions
The preinstalled Omen Gaming Hub software represents the control center of the laptop. In addition to selecting a power mode (see table), it also allows you to undervolt the CPU and configure an individual fan curve. Since the "Performance" mode created some problems in our test unit (strange stutters and performance drops), we mainly used the "Balanced" power mode together with automatic fan control. Optimus was activated.
Performance | Balanced | Eco | |
---|---|---|---|
Power Limit 1 | 100 Watt | 55 Watt | 55 Watt |
Power Limit 2 | 130 Watt | 130 Watt | 130 Watt |
Processor
The Core i9-13900HX processor (Raptor Lake) consists of sixteen Efficiency cores (no hyperthreading, 1.6 to 3.9 GHz) and eight Performance cores (hyperthreading, 2.2 to 5.4 GHz), resulting in a total of 32 logical CPU cores.
In mains operation, the processor runs through the CPU tests of the Cinebench R15 benchmark with medium-high to high (multithread) and high to maximum (single-thread) clock speeds. While the single-thread performance (254 points) drops slightly in battery operation, the drop in the multithread performance is significant (1,303 points).
The benchmark results range at the level (single-thread) of the average for the CPU or below (multithread). Overall, the "Performance" mode only results in a slight performance advantage, with the AIDA benchmarks profiting the most. On the other hand, it will also cause the CPU speed to remain at a high level under constant multithread load, as the CB15 loop test shows.
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
Cinebench R23 | |
Multi Core | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (26407 - 32623, n=17) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34521, n=238, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Single Core | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1972 - 2097, n=14) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2169, n=236, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9992 - 12541, n=15) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=240, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (756 - 810, n=15) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average of class Gaming (169 - 825, n=240, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (turbo) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (4274 - 4970, n=16) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=243, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (turbo) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (278 - 304, n=16) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 312, n=244, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Gaming (91 - 1259, n=241, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (101 - 153, n=16) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H |
7-Zip 18.03 | |
7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (93947 - 127283, n=15) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=237, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (6610 - 7177, n=15) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=238, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
Geekbench 5.4 | |
Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (18109 - 21075, n=16) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=236, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Single-Core | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1924 - 2093, n=16) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2139, n=236, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (24.2 - 34.4, n=16) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=241, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=237, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (32.8 - 50.8, n=15) |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Average of class Gaming (0.375 - 4.47, n=237, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (0.375 - 0.4234, n=16) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (v6.75.6100) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H (v6.85.6300) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (v6.85.6300) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17589 - 27615, n=16) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100, Leistung) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) (v6.75.6100) | |
Average of class Gaming (2585 - 55084, n=214, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H (v6.85.6300) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (v6.75.6100) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (v6.85.6300) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (88686 - 136688, n=16) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100, Leistung) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) (v6.75.6100) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100) | |
Average of class Gaming (12439 - 234848, n=214, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H (v6.85.6300) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (v6.75.6100) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (v6.85.6300) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (4362 - 7029, n=16) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100, Leistung) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100) | |
Average of class Gaming (629 - 9930, n=214, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) (v6.75.6100) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (v6.75.6100) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H (v6.85.6300) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (125644 - 141385, n=16) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (v6.85.6300) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100, Leistung) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) (v6.75.6100) | |
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 186519, n=214, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (v6.75.6100) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (v6.85.6300) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H (v6.85.6300) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (12334 - 17179, n=16) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100, Leistung) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) (v6.75.6100) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100) | |
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 30810, n=214, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H (v6.85.6300) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (v6.75.6100) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (v6.85.6300) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (43850 - 69202, n=16) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100, Leistung) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) (v6.75.6100) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100) | |
Average of class Gaming (7135 - 124377, n=214, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (89413 - 236139, n=16) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (v6.75.6100) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H (v6.85.6300) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (v6.85.6300) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100, Leistung) | |
Average of class Gaming (18146 - 236139, n=214, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) (v6.75.6100) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H (v6.85.6300) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (v6.75.6100) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (v6.85.6300) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1284 - 1958, n=16) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100, Leistung) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100) | |
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2231, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) (v6.75.6100) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H (v6.85.6300) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (v6.75.6100) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (v6.85.6300) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9481 - 15279, n=16) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100, Leistung) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) (v6.75.6100) | |
Average of class Gaming (1437 - 29473, n=214, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (v6.85.6300) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100, Leistung) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H (v6.85.6300) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (42994 - 51994, n=16) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (v6.75.6100) | |
Average of class Gaming (8341 - 52949, n=215, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) (v6.75.6100) |
System Performance
The smoothly running system offers sufficient computing performance for power-hungry application areas such as rendering and gaming. The transfer rates of the working memory range at normal levels for DDR5-5600 storage. They are accompanied by good PC-Mark results.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (7609 - 7830, n=2) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Average of class Gaming (4477 - 9331, n=195, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (11703 - 11824, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average of class Gaming (7334 - 12176, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (9976 - 10788, n=2) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Average of class Gaming (6161 - 11833, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Average of class Gaming (5288 - 16424, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (10135 - 10319, n=2) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (974 - 2295, n=117, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (907 - 2166, n=117, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (1027 - 2514, n=117, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 2275, n=117, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5074 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 6244 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 7609 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (67716 - 78835, n=16) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average of class Gaming (18074 - 80776, n=214, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (73998 - 88462, n=16) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average of class Gaming (20318 - 89096, n=214, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (65472 - 77045, n=16) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Average of class Gaming (15975 - 80441, n=214, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (80.4 - 91.1, n=16) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average of class Gaming (76.2 - 135.3, n=229, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Solution
The Omen offers space for two PCIe 4 SSDs in the M.2-2280 format. The PCIe 4 SSD (1 TB) from SK Hynix that is used here delivers very good transfer rates. However, in the later parts of the DiskSpd loop, we observe some occasional performance drops, probably due to thermal throttling.