Notebookcheck Logo

HP Omen 17 (2024) review: RTX 4070 and Ryzen 7 show their size in the gaming laptop

Powerful build. The Omen 17 shows impressively what a 17-inch gaming laptop can be, offering midrange performance at a stable and high level, while the cooling works at a surprisingly moderate noise level thanks to its successful control implementation. Only some of the allrounder capabilities are slightly left behind.
HP Omen 17 review
HP Omen 17 review

Well-equipped for all the current games at a high level with an RTX 4070 and AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, the HP Omen 17 (2024) is at the starting blocks into the elevated midrange. In addition, there is a QHD display with a suitable resolution that also offers a 240 Hertz refresh rate. With this, all the basics for a good gaming laptop are covered.

With so much space, particularly inside, we can also expect some stable performance values that should turn out better compared to those of smaller laptops. We evaluate this in numerous benchmarks and gaming tests.

The fact that our test unit remains below the 2,000 Euro (~$2,172) price mark despite its elevated equipment level is not a given anymore at this point. To achieve that, you also have to accept several compromises, some of which are unnecessary. Our test will show whether it is still sufficient to stay ahead of the competitors such as the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 with an Intel processor or the Asus TUF Gaming A17 with the previous generation of the AMD Ryzen 9.

HP Omen 17-db0079ng
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS 8 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, 100 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1980 MHz, Memory: 2000 MHz, 120 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, Nvidia Game Ready 556.12, Advanced Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR5-5600, dual-channel
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPI, BOE0B67, IPS, glossy: no, 240 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Soundcard
AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: headset
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek RTL8852BE (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 30.1 x 398 x 278 ( = 1.19 x 15.67 x 10.94 in)
Battery
83 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 2 MPix HP True Vision 1080p
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Omen Gaming Hub, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.833 kg ( = 99.93 oz / 6.25 pounds), Power Supply: 832 g ( = 29.35 oz / 1.83 pounds)
Price
1900 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80.4 %v8
07/2024
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.8 kg30.1 mm17.30"2560x1440
80.3 %v8
07/2024
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
R9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.1 kg22.4 mm15.60"1920x1080
90.2 %v7 (old)
03/2024
Alienware m16 R2
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg23.5 mm16.00"2560x1600
87.6 %v7 (old)
04/2024
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
2.7 kg30.4 mm16.00"2560x1600
86.8 %v7 (old)
05/2024
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.6 kg25.95 mm16.00"2560x1600
85.6 %v7 (old)
01/2024
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg25.4 mm17.30"1920x1080

Note that we recently updated our rating system and that the results of version 8 are not comparable anymore with those of version 7. You can find additional information on this here.

Case - A large and heavy gamer

The case looks almost nondescript. Black plastic, which also feels like it, dominates all around. There are no visual highlights, small details, or even light effects to admire.

But once you try to lift the laptop - or when you take it directly out of the box in our case - it becomes clear that HP definitely didn't save on using massive components inside. The weight isn't far from the 3-kg mark (~6.6 lb), although the base remains unaffected if you lift it on only a single front corner. Everything remains stiff and tight.

The display hinges offer a similar impression, but the display lid could have used a little more stability, remaining fairly bendable without any additional metal frame.

In terms of overall size, there only few models that are even larger. A 40-cm (~15.7 in) width and 3-cm (~1.2 in) height even without the feet really don't sound like a lot of mobility. On the other hand, this ensures plenty of space for hardware and cooling, although it might turn out too large for some laptop bags or backpacks.  

Size Comparison

398 mm / 15.7 in 278 mm / 10.9 in 30.1 mm / 1.185 in 2.8 kg6.25 lbs395 mm / 15.6 in 264 mm / 10.4 in 25.4 mm / 1 in 2.5 kg5.53 lbs363.9 mm / 14.3 in 249.4 mm / 9.82 in 23.5 mm / 0.925 in 2.5 kg5.44 lbs354 mm / 13.9 in 264 mm / 10.4 in 30.4 mm / 1.197 in 2.7 kg5.84 lbs357.78 mm / 14.1 in 278.63 mm / 11 in 25.95 mm / 1.022 in 2.6 kg5.78 lbs354 mm / 13.9 in 251 mm / 9.88 in 22.4 mm / 0.882 in 2.1 kg4.68 lbs297 mm / 11.7 in 210 mm / 8.27 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Connection Equipment - Omen 17 with few areas to shine

Even though there would have been plenty of space, the connection ports are limited. And not only that, but they are also the slower versions. All the USB connections in the back only reach 10 Gbit/s and the one on the side even only 5 Gbit/s. USB4 or TB4 would have been four or eight times as fast. But at least the ports in the back should still allow you to play many games from an external SSD.

Likewise, the LAN port also only reaches 1 Gbit/s, while the better equipped competitors such as the Acer Predator Helios Neo go more with the times offering 2.5 Gbit/s. The position of the port on the left side is also less than optimal and would have been better in the back. In addition, there is neither a third video port nor a card reader.

At least, the HDMI and USB-C video outputs support displaying 4K@120Hz, allowing those who have a suitable TV to make good use of it.

Connections left side: 1 Gbit LAN port, headset
Connections left side: 1 Gbit LAN port, headset
Connections in back: power, 2x USB-A (10 Gbit/s), USB-C (10 Gbit/s, DP, PD)
Connections in back: power, 2x USB-A (10 Gbit/s), USB-C (10 Gbit/s, DP, PD)
Connections right side: USB-A (5 Gbit/s, PD)
Connections right side: USB-A (5 Gbit/s, PD)

Communication

Wi-Fi 6 module from Realtek
Wi-Fi 6 module from Realtek

The WLAN module works fine to the extent of its capabilities. At almost 1 Gbit/s under ideal conditions, it is almost as good as a wired connection. There were no drops worth mention during our test.

While the Wi-Fi 6 module ensures a stable and reliable connection, it is hardly suited for the transfer of larger amounts of data.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=153, last 2 years)
1237 MBit/s +46%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202
1205 (875min - 1438max) MBit/s +42%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
980 (886min - 1077max) MBit/s +15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
959 (491min - 1062max) MBit/s +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
Realtek RTL8852BE
875 (812min - 916max) MBit/s +3%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
Realtek RTL8852BE
850 (782min - 874max) MBit/s
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
Realtek RTL8852BE
806 (513min - 843max) MBit/s -5%
Average Realtek RTL8852BE
  (536 - 925, n=41)
792 MBit/s -7%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Gaming
  (726 - 1890, n=155, last 2 years)
1377 MBit/s +48%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202
1227 (1074min - 1317max) MBit/s +32%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
957 (475min - 998max) MBit/s +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
Realtek RTL8852BE
956 (936min - 974max) MBit/s +3%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
Realtek RTL8852BE
930 (466min - 946max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
927 (762min - 964max) MBit/s 0%
Average Realtek RTL8852BE
  (455 - 984, n=42)
846 MBit/s -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
Realtek RTL8852BE
843 (621min - 906max) MBit/s -9%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400Tooltip
HP Omen 17-db0079ng Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø850 (782-874)
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1205 (875-1438)
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø875 (812-916)
HP Omen 17-db0079ng Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø914 (466-946)
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1227 (1074-1317)
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø843 (621-906)

Webcam

Dual-array microphone, mechanical cover, and Full-HD.
Dual-array microphone, mechanical cover, and Full-HD.

A decent Full-HD resolution results in detailed images. But this only goes for sufficiently bright light in the room. Even a ceiling light that isn't very bright results in a drop of the image quality. The camera is hardly able to handle weak light conditions. Details get lost and the color reproduction suffers considerably. The color accuracy is only convincing for a camera housed in the display frame if the surrounding light is bright. So we cannot recommend using the camera for more than a few video calls.

This is unfortunate, because the microphone does have some potential. Although its recordings sound slightly tinny, they are always recorded at the same volume and sound very clear. You can even easily hear the voices from outside the room.

ColorChecker
6.6 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
7 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
11 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
9 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
ColorChecker HP Omen 17-db0079ng: 8.69 ∆E min: 5.44 - max: 14.79 ∆E

Maintenance

The HP Omen 17 collects a few positive points with its ease of opening the case bottom. Once you have removed the eight regular Philips screws, the case cover doesn't offer any resistance and can be easily removed without any use of force. 

This gives you access to clean the fans and replace all the important components. Two RAM slots, a WLAN module with easily accessible antenna plugs, two SSD slots, and a battery that can be easily removed are not things that many of the more compact laptops are able to offer, at least not in this complete combination.

In addition, there are copper covers for the M.2 SSD slots that apparently also have an effect, as we will find out later in the test. One of the slots is still available, making a later addition of storage space easily accomplishable.

Sustainability

The packaging consists mostly of cardboard and paper. Even the protective cover of the laptop and keyboard are made of paper. Only charger is wrapped in a protective plastic foil. In addition, there is also the easy maintenance of the laptop, which will surely benefit the longevity of the Omen 17. From the working memory up to the battery, everything can be replaced.

Then there is the moderate power consumption with everyday tasks that is mostly ranging below 10 watts. A typical desktop PC clearly has a disadvantage here.

And finally, HP publishes a yearly sustainability report that shows the initiatives by the manufacturer, which start from power generation from renewable sources and go up to the goal of equal treatment of all employees across all levels of the company structure. You can find out about the details here.

Warranty

While HP grants a two-year warranty, it doesn't offer any extras such as onsite repair. Depending on the vendor, you might also be able to book some additional warranty options there.

Input Devices - HP Omen 17 only offers standard fare

The keyboard doesn't look quite fitting for a gaming laptop. There is short key stroke, and the key resistance is hardly noticeable. In addition, the keyboard lacks the individually adjustable illumination. Even though you can select almost any color with fine adjustments of the brightness, all the keys are then illuminated in the same color. At least, the arrow keys should have been full-sized.

The touchpad shows a similar picture. Even though at 13 x 8 cm (5.1 x 3.15 in), it is comfortably sized and also responds very accurately, the key press appears less well-adjusted. More powerful pressure results in some noticeable clattering. While it is sufficient overall for everyday tasks - the keyboard also offers a tight frame and good typing experience - those who want to get into some more intense gaming are almost forced to use additional input devices.

Although you can freely choose the color, there are no effects.
Although you can freely choose the color, there are no effects.

Display - Well adjusted to the offered gaming performance

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid
At most minimal screen bleeding in the right corners
At most minimal screen bleeding in the right corners

If you think about what a good gaming display in a laptop has to be able to do, you would get the QHD display of the HP Omen 17 fairly accurately. Combined with a 17-inch diagonal, the resolution ensures a sharp and detailed image.

In addition to gaming, the 16:9 format is also well-suited for streaming. The colors on the IPS panel look fairly natural, and the matte surface also prevents annoying reflections.

The 240 Hertz refresh rate and sufficiently large color space ensure that the various game genres are displayed as desired. The response times in our measurements are also able to keep up with those of the better models, reaching a considerably higher level than those of the Asus TUF Gaming 17, for example.

What is less impressive is the contrast and black value. Even for an IPS panel, where we don't expect a perfect black anyways, the image looks too bright with absolute darkness. On the other hand, we are unable to detect any screen bleeding with our bare eyes at all, or only very little with long exposure. We also don't see any flickering from Pulse Width Modulation in our test.

In addition, HP also offers a Full-HD version with 144 Hertz, which might be a sensible option in combination with an RTX 4060.

354
cd/m²
330
cd/m²
323
cd/m²
353
cd/m²
363
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
368
cd/m²
352
cd/m²
317
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE0B67 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 368 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 341.1 cd/m² Minimum: 25 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 363 cd/m²
Contrast: 955:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.74 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95, calibrated: 1.43
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
68.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.235
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
BOE0B67, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"
Alienware m16 R2
BOE NE16NYH, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
BOE NE160QDM-NM7, Mini LED, 2560x1600, 16"
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Chi Mei N160GME-GTB, LED, 2560x1600, 16"
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AU Optronics B173HAN04.9, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AU Optronics B156HAN15.H, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display
6%
30%
26%
-39%
5%
Display P3 Coverage
66.2
71
7%
99.8
51%
95.9
45%
39.7
-40%
70.5
6%
sRGB Coverage
95.5
100
5%
100
5%
99.8
5%
59.1
-38%
98.5
3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
68.1
71.4
5%
90.8
33%
86.4
27%
41
-40%
72.7
7%
Response Times
28%
20%
30%
-198%
-148%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6)
5.7 ?(2.6, 3.1)
60%
5 ?(2, 3)
65%
5 ?(2.5, 2.5)
65%
39 ?(18, 21)
-171%
31.7 ?(14.7, 17)
-120%
Response Time Black / White *
8.3 ?(3.5, 4.8)
8.7 ?(4.6, 4.1)
-5%
10.4 ?(3, 7.4)
-25%
8.8 ?(4.7, 4.1)
-6%
26.9 ?(13.8, 13.1)
-224%
22.9 ?(11.7, 11.2)
-176%
PWM Frequency
2040 ?(10)
Screen
6%
29%
7%
-66%
-22%
Brightness middle
363
345.8
-5%
490
35%
521
44%
255.9
-30%
315
-13%
Brightness
341
337
-1%
487
43%
506
48%
248
-27%
303
-11%
Brightness Distribution
84
87
4%
94
12%
85
1%
91
8%
90
7%
Black Level *
0.38
0.3
21%
0.4
-5%
0.44
-16%
0.21
45%
0.25
34%
Contrast
955
1153
21%
1225
28%
1184
24%
1219
28%
1260
32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.74
1.99
-14%
1.08
38%
1.74
-0%
4.51
-159%
2.26
-30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.39
3.52
35%
2.38
56%
3.88
28%
20.77
-285%
7.37
-37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.43
0.62
57%
0.9
37%
0.52
64%
1.82
-27%
1.03
28%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.3
2.1
-62%
1.1
15%
3
-131%
3.2
-146%
4
-208%
Gamma
2.235 98%
2.32 95%
2.13 103%
2.164 102%
2.08 106%
2.116 104%
CCT
6346 102%
6369 102%
6724 97%
6816 95%
6054 107%
7570 86%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
13% / 9%
26% / 28%
21% / 14%
-101% / -79%
-55% / -34%

* ... smaller is better

The color reproduction is okay even without an additional calibration. We only measure a higher deviation with blue color that could also be noticeable with the bare eye. In the other color areas including the grayscale, the color reproduction is almost perfect in the state of delivery.

After the calibration, there are no outliers anymore and the color accuracy is at a high level throughout.

CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Saturation
CalMAN: Saturation
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: Saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)

The sRGB color space, which is recommended for gaming, isn't covered completely. But that should hardly be noticeable in practice, and simpler displays show a third less colors. However, some competitors such as the Alienware m16 R2 are able to reach a full 100% with the same panel technology. If you want to do image and video processing on the side, such a display would be the better choice.

HP Omen 17 vs sRGB
HP Omen 17 vs sRGB
HP Omen 17 vs AdobeRGB
HP Omen 17 vs AdobeRGB
HP Omen 17 vs DCI-P3
HP Omen 17 vs DCI-P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.5 ms rise
↘ 4.8 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 7.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.2 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17348 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

100% brightness
100% brightness
75% brightness
75% brightness
50% brightness
50% brightness
25% brightness
25% brightness
0% brightness
0% brightness

Outdoors, you should definitely sit in the shade if you still want to recognize anything on the screen. The limited brightness of the Omen 17 means that even the brightness of a slightly overcast sky can limit your ability to see anything on the display.

But the image looks pale even so. The colors have no vibrancy outdoors and are covered by a gray veil. If you want to enjoy gaming in colorful splendor, you have to play indoors.

The clouds cause heavy reflections.
The clouds cause heavy reflections.
Some shade ensures recognizable images.
Some shade ensures recognizable images.

In contrast to what we usually see in an IPS panel, the HP Omen with QHD resolution shows some clearly noticeable color changes starting from viewing angles of about 45 degrees. Until then, the image remains easily recognizable, and we also don't notice any decrease in brightness before that point. Beyond 45 degrees all the colors show a slight yellow tint.

Performance - The Omen 17 is a balanced gaming laptop

In terms of performance capabilities, our test unit with the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 places in the middle of the field of our comparison devices. However, both the CPU and GPU perform slightly below their maximum potential.

The Ryzen 7 runs constantly at 65 watts instead of 70 or even 80 watts as in the Schenker XMG Core 15, for example. The GPU is also slightly throttled and is only able to use 120 instead of the maximum possible 140 watts. Comparable gaming laptops such as the Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 are able to get a slightly higher performance from the graphics card, although that not only has advantages and won't necessarily lead to noticeably higher framerates.

With 32 Gigabytes of DDR5-5600, the RAM equipment is also solid. Since the memory can be replaced easily, it is also possible to expand it later. At this level, we don't expect a limiting effect from the fact that it is only 5,600 MHz.

A smaller version of the HP Omen 17 with the RTX 4060 is also available.

CPU-Z main page
CPU-Z main page
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z SPD
CPU-Z SPD
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
HWiNFO
 
 
 

Test Conditions

Three power profiles allow you to adjust the Omen 17 to most of the typical scenarios. You can find out the exact effect on the power consumption, fan behavior, and gaming performance from the table below.

We use the "Performance" profile for our benchmarks. In addition, you can make numerous adjustments that have a strong influence on the fan behavior. For example, the fan levels can be adjusted to be more powerful, or they could be reduced significantly even at the highest performance level, which would have an effect on the maximum performance.

Power Profile CPU load GPU load (including 15 Watt boost) Steel Nomad Cyberpunk 2077 QHD Ultra max. fan noise
Eco 65->35 Watt 40 Watt 24.37 FPS 60 FPS (Lock) 41 dB(A)
Balanced 65->35 Watt 90 Watt 25.23 FPS 75 FPS 43 dB(A)
Performance 100->65 Watt 120 Watt 27.43 FPS 80 FPS 48 dB(A)
The Omen Gaming Hub allows for individual fan adjustment.
The Omen Gaming Hub allows for individual fan adjustment.

Processor

The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS is a fast processor from the Hawk Point series that uses the Zen 4 architecture and almost reaches the performance of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS of the previous generation. It also performs at about eye level with the Intel Core i7-13700H.

However, the eight identical cores in the Ryzen 7 are repeatedly able to gain a small advantage ahead of the six performance cores in the i7-13700H, particularly while gaming.

While we can almost always observe a slight drop in the constant performance with the competitors, the CPU is able to perform constantly at a good level here.

You can find additional measurements and test results of various processors in our CPU benchmark list.

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

0245490735980122514701715196022052450269529403185343036753920416544104655Tooltip
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2557 (2454.44-2575)
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2777 (2743.86-2839.9)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4439 (4357.3-4809.43)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX: Ø3274 (3212.59-3455.14)
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2784 (2741.98-2817.3)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H: Ø2688 (2638-2777.2)
Tulpar T7 V20.6 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2730 (2699.97-2763)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
88 pt
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
76.3 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
66.7 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
63.3 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
63 pt
Alienware m16 R2 -1!
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
62.1 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
 
60.1 pt
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
57.8 pt
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
54.7 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
30411 Points +84%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
23207 Points +41%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=203, last 2 years)
21249 Points +29%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
18419 (18019.3min - 18419.5max) Points +12%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
18282 Points +11%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
17623 (17398.8min - 17622.8max) Points +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
17423 Points +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (15889 - 18037, n=6)
16600 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
16494 Points
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2193 Points +35%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
2103 Points +30%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
1904 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=201, last 2 years)
1864 Points +15%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1832 Points +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
1814 Points +12%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1749 Points +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (1623 - 1783, n=6)
1742 Points +7%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1623 Points
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
11604 Points +80%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
8361 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=201, last 2 years)
8080 Points +25%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7050 Points +9%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
6967 Points +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
6894 Points +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
6859 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (6231 - 7026, n=6)
6483 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
6440 Points
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
839 Points +23%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
803 Points +18%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
731 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 855, n=201, last 2 years)
717 Points +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
714 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (677 - 698, n=6)
687 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
681 Points
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
674 Points -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
670 Points -2%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4809 (4357.3min - 4809.43max) Points +87%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
3455 Points +34%
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=207, last 2 years)
3338 Points +30%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2840 (2743.86min - 2839.9max) Points +10%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2817 (2741.98min - 2817.3max) Points +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
2777 Points +8%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
2763 (2699.97min - 2763max) Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (2537 - 2908, n=6)
2628 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2575 (2454.44min - 2575max) Points
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
316 Points +17%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
294 Points +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
287 Points +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
284 Points +6%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
278 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (269 - 283, n=6)
277 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=204, last 2 years)
275 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
269 Points
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
256 Points -5%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
200 Seconds *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (179 - 216, n=6)
196.5 Seconds * +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
183 Seconds * +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
182 Seconds * +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=196, last 2 years)
174.7 Seconds * +13%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
174 Seconds * +13%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
140 Seconds * +30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
110 Seconds * +45%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
121465 MIPS +88%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
93134 MIPS +44%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=200, last 2 years)
83140 MIPS +28%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
73222 MIPS +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
72749 MIPS +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (64759 - 74664, n=6)
69087 MIPS +7%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
67581 MIPS +4%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
64759 MIPS
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
52867 MIPS -18%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7442 MIPS +43%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
6890 MIPS +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
6642 MIPS +28%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
6615 MIPS +27%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (5197 - 6714, n=6)
6280 MIPS +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=200, last 2 years)
6251 MIPS +20%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
6090 MIPS +17%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
5197 MIPS
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5037 MIPS -3%
Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
18590 Points +46%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
17292 Points +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 19665, n=105, last 2 years)
14198 Points +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (11073 - 14014, n=10)
12844 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
12697 Points
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12670 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
12662 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
12447 Points -2%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
8415 Points -34%
Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3025 Points +19%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
2975 Points +17%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2730 Points +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
2711 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (1490 - 3129, n=105, last 2 years)
2649 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (2540 - 2698, n=8)
2625 Points +3%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
2564 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2550 Points
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2383 Points -7%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
21335 Points +80%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
18225 Points +54%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=202, last 2 years)
14590 Points +23%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12328 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (11754 - 12726, n=7)
12070 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
11949 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
11864 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
11399 Points -4%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
8888 Points -25%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2210 Points +25%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
2131 Points +21%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2014 Points +14%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
1991 Points +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (1765 - 2004, n=7)
1933 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=202, last 2 years)
1866 Points +6%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
1793 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1765 Points
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1741 Points -1%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
32 fps +65%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
24.6 fps +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=200, last 2 years)
22.9 fps +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
21.9 fps +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
21.8 fps +12%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
21.2 fps +9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (18.6 - 22.7, n=6)
20.5 fps +6%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
19.4 fps
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
18 fps -7%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
77 s *
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
55 s * +29%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (44.5 - 77, n=6)
51.9 s * +33%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
49.8 s * +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
49.4 s * +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=197, last 2 years)
48.1 s * +38%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
47.9 s * +38%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
47.5 s * +38%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
42.5 s * +45%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
0.4935 sec *
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.487 sec * +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (0.4336 - 0.4935, n=6)
0.4538 sec * +8%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H
0.4442 sec * +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=201, last 2 years)
0.4419 sec * +10%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
0.4298 sec * +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
0.4278 sec * +13%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
0.3821 sec * +23%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3699 sec * +25%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2575 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
127.4 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
269 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
97.3 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
82.2 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82.1 pt
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
79.3 pt
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78.8 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
 
78.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
73.8 pt
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
63.9 pt
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
57.8 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
28889 KRay/s +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
28698 KRay/s +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (25916 - 29544, n=6)
26817 KRay/s 0%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
26816 KRay/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
26280 KRay/s -2%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
21558 KRay/s -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=197, last 2 years)
21254 KRay/s -21%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
18470 KRay/s -31%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
17448 KRay/s -35%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
125593 Points +11%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
123214 Points +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
122466 Points +8%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
113402 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (107613 - 125873, n=6)
113028 Points 0%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
107531 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=197, last 2 years)
105068 Points -7%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
92996 Points -18%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
88382 Points -22%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
6666 MB/s +38%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
5119 MB/s +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
5113 MB/s +6%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
5056 MB/s +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (4627 - 5180, n=6)
4830 MB/s 0%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4814 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=197, last 2 years)
4769 MB/s -1%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4242 MB/s -12%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
3920 MB/s -19%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
150835 Points +30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
144073 Points +24%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
125950 Points +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
121191 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (114899 - 124695, n=6)
117185 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
116204 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=197, last 2 years)
115397 Points -1%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
106470 Points -8%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84180 Points -28%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
16108 Points +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
15856 Points +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15511 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (14876 - 15519, n=6)
15181 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15101 Points
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13605 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=197, last 2 years)
13046 Points -14%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
10888 Points -28%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10617 Points -30%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
66238 Points +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
65523 Points +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
64437 Points +6%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
60582 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (57671 - 67367, n=6)
60417 Points 0%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
54174 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=197, last 2 years)
53075 Points -12%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
47685 Points -21%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
43349 Points -28%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
226181 MB/s +158%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=197, last 2 years)
109449 MB/s +25%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (67393 - 172642, n=6)
98619 MB/s +12%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
98391 MB/s +12%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
91719 MB/s +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
90481 MB/s +3%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87760 MB/s
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82757 MB/s -6%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
81519 MB/s -7%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
1861 MB/s +72%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1494 MB/s +38%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=197, last 2 years)
1322 MB/s +22%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1219 MB/s +13%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
1167 MB/s +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1152 MB/s +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
1150 MB/s +6%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1080 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (627 - 1080, n=6)
946 MB/s -12%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15675 KRay/s +10%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
15513 KRay/s +9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (13875 - 15911, n=6)
14329 KRay/s +1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
14253 KRay/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
14033 KRay/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=197, last 2 years)
11450 KRay/s -20%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
11438 KRay/s -20%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
9802 KRay/s -31%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
9400 KRay/s -34%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
49769 MPixel/s +21%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
46636 MPixel/s +13%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
41300 MPixel/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (38580 - 41668, n=6)
40214 MPixel/s -3%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
39532 MPixel/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=198, last 2 years)
39263 MPixel/s -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
33410 MPixel/s -19%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
33407 MPixel/s -19%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
12872 MPixel/s -69%

System Performance

During everyday tasks that we evaluated with PCMark 10 and some other similar benchmarks, there is basically no noticeable difference to comparable systems. The values are at the level of a more powerfully configured Ryzen 7 8845HS and in the middle of the field of competitors, although there is just barely a 10% difference between the highest and lowest value in the table.

The laptop is responsive at all times and doesn't show any wait times during installation processes or when numerous programs are open simultaneously. Even while playing a demanding game, it continues to be possible to switch to another application, although this is rarely recommended.

PCMark 10 in "Performance" mode
PCMark 10 in "Performance" mode
PCMark 10 in "Balanced" mode
PCMark 10 in "Balanced" mode
PCMark 10 in "Eco" mode
PCMark 10 in "Eco" mode
PCMark 10 / Score
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
8302 Points +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
8092 Points +4%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7943 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7800 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
7800 Points 0%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7761 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=176, last 2 years)
7741 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
7703 Points -1%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
7463 Points -4%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
11708 Points +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
11617 Points +11%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
11188 Points +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10896 Points +4%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10873 Points +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=175, last 2 years)
10817 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10499 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
10499 Points 0%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10330 Points -2%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
10273 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10269 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10202 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
10202 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=175, last 2 years)
9861 Points -3%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
9784 Points -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
9693 Points -5%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9422 Points -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
6662 Points -35%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
16027 Points +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
13618 Points +13%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
13035 Points +8%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
12909 Points +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
12182 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
12023 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
12023 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=175, last 2 years)
11917 Points -1%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
10308 Points -14%
CrossMark / Overall
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2235 Points +46%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2037 Points +33%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=159, last 2 years)
1885 Points +23%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1800 Points +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1797 Points +17%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1762 Points +15%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1722 Points +12%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1531 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
1531 Points 0%
CrossMark / Productivity
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2093 Points +41%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1874 Points +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=159, last 2 years)
1790 Points +20%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1761 Points +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1740 Points +17%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1694 Points +14%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1684 Points +13%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1488 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
1488 Points 0%
CrossMark / Creativity
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2455 Points +46%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2327 Points +38%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=159, last 2 years)
2066 Points +23%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1979 Points +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1918 Points +14%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1913 Points +14%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1841 Points +9%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1683 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
1683 Points 0%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2053 Points +64%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1756 Points +40%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=159, last 2 years)
1686 Points +34%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1593 Points +27%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1576 Points +26%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1480 Points +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1478 Points +18%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1255 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
1255 Points 0%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
323 Points +17%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
319 Points +16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
310 Points +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
308 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=177, last 2 years)
302 Points +10%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
294 Points +7%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
294 Points +7%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
275 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
275 Points 0%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
308 Points
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
307 Points
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
273 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
271 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (157.9 - 328, n=164, last 2 years)
264 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
263 Points
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
257 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
564 ms *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
564 ms * -0%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
546 ms * +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 674, n=189, last 2 years)
510 ms * +10%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
505 ms * +10%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
499 ms * +12%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
481 ms * +15%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
447 ms * +21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
443 ms * +21%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
7800 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
78885 MB/s +17%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
75827 MB/s +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (67615 - 69523, n=6)
68647 MB/s +2%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
67615 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=197, last 2 years)
63707 MB/s -6%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
63008 MB/s -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
61823 MB/s -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
59740 MB/s -12%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
24334 MB/s -64%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
87507 MB/s +44%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83034 MB/s +37%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76370 MB/s +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=197, last 2 years)
67396 MB/s +11%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
61696 MB/s +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
61456 MB/s +1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
60660 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (49866 - 61976, n=6)
57529 MB/s -5%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
23681 MB/s -61%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (85464 - 93239, n=6)
88778 MB/s +3%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86590 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
78716 MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
77444 MB/s -11%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
72700 MB/s -16%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70034 MB/s -19%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
66009 MB/s -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=197, last 2 years)
65571 MB/s -24%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
22986 MB/s -73%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126.2 ns * -25%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
101 ns *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (85.6 - 107.1, n=6)
95.5 ns * +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=197, last 2 years)
93.4 ns * +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
92.6 ns * +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
91.8 ns * +9%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
91.1 ns * +10%
Tulpar T7 V20.6
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
88.3 ns * +13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
79.9 ns * +21%

* ... smaller is better

DPC Latencies

Our test unit in its current configuration isn't necessarily suited for real-time audio and video processing, since you have to expect some small stutters. The network drivers and DirectX graphics kernel prevent a better result. With some changed drivers or a later software update, this situation might improve or even get worse.

What stands out is the high utilization of the iGPU while playing a 4K video. While a 60% utilization is still defendable, this is almost twice that of the integrated graphics solution from Intel. And 13 dropped frames within a timespan of one minute are not an optimal result either.

LatencyMon results
LatencyMon results
LatencyMon driver list
LatencyMon driver list
4K video streaming
4K video streaming
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
5821.3 μs * -197%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2037.7 μs * -4%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1962 μs *
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1776.4 μs * +9%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1451.9 μs * +26%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
790.8 μs * +60%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Solution

The large copper cooling body with heat paste shows its effect.
The large copper cooling body with heat paste shows its effect.

The SSD used here definitely doesn't reach absolute top speeds. For example, the storage solution in the Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 is able to perform 30% better in terms of sequential access. But this only rarely contributes to an increase in the frame rates while gaming. We might only observe a minimal, if any, improvement during intense multitasking with many parallel access tasks.

On the other hand, the Omen 17 shows how good cooling of the SSD should look like. In contrast to many similarly constructed competitors including the ROG Strix Scar, the constant performance remains permanently at a good, even if not outstanding, level.

The second slot for an M.2-NVMe SSD also has a cooler that is already preinstalled. So if you like, you can add a faster or at least larger drive here.

WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
Sequential Read: 3717MB/s
Sequential Write: 1997MB/s
4K Read: 51.5MB/s
4K Write: 176.5MB/s
4K-64 Read: 846MB/s
4K-64 Write: 1888MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.062ms
Access Time Write: 0.021ms
Score Read: 1270Points
Score Write: 2264Points
Score Total: 4108Points
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
92.2 pt
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
80.4 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
74.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
70.8 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
59.6 pt
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
 
50.9 pt
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
47.6 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
45.8 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4480 (4426.62min - 4479.73max) MB/s +62%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
4104 (4091.75min - 4103.68max) MB/s +49%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=178, last 2 years)
3510 MB/s +27%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3426 (3325.1min - 3425.77max) MB/s +24%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (2406 - 4093, n=15)
3089 MB/s +12%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2943 (2931.61min - 2942.92max) MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2775 (2749.58min - 2774.95max) MB/s +1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2760 (2709.34min - 2760.41max) MB/s
seq write
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
4533 (4522.27min - 4532.95max) MB/s +56%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4371 (4342.15min - 4371.09max) MB/s +50%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
4177 (3972.19min - 4177.49max) MB/s +44%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=178, last 2 years)
3809 MB/s +31%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3126 (3069.81min - 3126.43max) MB/s