Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 laptop review: A well-rounded gaming package

When the wind god plays games. With a Core i9-12900H, RTX 3070 Ti, and DDR5 RAM, the Zephyrus M16 contains some powerful hardware. Our extensive test shows whether the gaming laptop is still able to impress toward the end of the Alder Lake and RTX 30xx generation.

Christian Hintze (translated by Mark Riege), Published 02/17/2023 🇩🇪 🇸🇪 ...

The M16 (2022) GU603zw inherits from its predecessor of the same name, upgrading the package with a powerful i9 Alder Lake CPU and RTX 3070 Ti. All that comes in a fairly slim and compact 16-inch form factor with a 16:10 display (2,560 x 1,500 pixels) that just barely misses our list of best mobile gaming laptops, since it weighs only 75 grams (~2.6 oz) too much (>2 kg = 4.4 lb). This would have been the first 16-inch device in the list.

Since 16-inch gaming laptops with a 16:10 display are still the minority, we also include "conventional" 16:9 devices with similar hardware in our comparison. In addition to the predecessor, these are particularly the Schenker Vision 16 Pro and the Lenovo Legion 5 Pro, but also the Schenker XMG Focus 16 and the Corsair Voyager a1600.

Test device courtesy of Asus

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z (ROG Zephyrus M16 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i9-12900H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 90 W PL2 / Short Burst, 90 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 120 W TDP ( including 20 W Dynamic Boost), Geforce 528.24, MUX Switch + Optimus

Memory

32 GB

, 1x 16 GB Samsung DDR5-4800 plus 1x 16 GB soldered

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3), IPS, glossy: no, HDR, 165 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Storage

Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, 1024 GB

, 960 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: headset port, Card Reader: MicroSD

Networking

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 19.9 x 355 x 243 ( = 0.78 x 13.98 x 9.57 in)

Battery

90 Wh Lithium-Ion, 90WHrs, 4S1P, 4-cell Li-ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 720P HD IR camera for Windows Hello
Primary Camera: 1 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 2x 2W stereo speakers, Keyboard: Backlit chiclet keyboard with single-zone RGB, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.075 kg ( = 73.19 oz / 4.57 pounds), Power Supply: 761 g ( = 26.84 oz / 1.68 pounds)

Price

3000 Euro

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

[+] Add to comparison

» Compare devices

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
87.8 %	02/2023	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	19.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
85.6 %	07/2021	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2 kg	20 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
87.8 %	11/2022	Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	1.7 kg	17.1 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
87.7 %	10/2022	Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	26.6 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
87 %	01/2023	Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2.2 kg	24.3 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
86.6 %	12/2022	Corsair Voyager a1600 R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	2.4 kg	19.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600

Case - Slim 16-inch gaming laptop

Since practically nothing has changed in the case, we refer you to our test of the M16 from 2021, which gives detailed descriptions of the case, maintenance options, and input devices.

Size Comparison

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Corsair Voyager a1600 Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti DIN A4 ❌

Connection Equipment - HDMI 2.1 and Thunderbolt 4

Left: AC, HDMI 2.1 TMDS, GigabitLAN, USB-A 3.2 Gen2, USB-C/Thunderbolt 4 (incl. DP and PD), USB-C 3.2 Gen2 (incl. DP and PD), headset port

SD Card Reader

The SC card reader is limited to microSD cards, but at least our AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60 fits snugly without sticking out. Compared to the predecessor, which already performed well, the speed is again slightly increased.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	138.1 (127.28^min - 140.64^max) MB/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming (48.5 - 209, n=91, last 2 years)	105.6 MB/s ∼76% -24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	96 MB/s ∼70% -30%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	84.86 MB/s ∼61% -39%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro V60)	78.2 MB/s ∼57% -43%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	77 (59.03^min - 141.54^max) MB/s ∼56% -44%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	261.31 MB/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	187 MB/s ∼72% -28%
Average of class Gaming (72 - 269, n=82, last 2 years)	129.1 MB/s ∼49% -51%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	89.78 MB/s ∼34% -66%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	86.79 MB/s ∼33% -67%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro V60)	82.5 MB/s ∼32% -68%

Communication

Asus uses the Intel AX211 module, which also supports the 6-Ghz network. Compared to the MediaTek module from the predecessor, the transfer rates increase significantly. The performance is very constant.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x	1875 (859^min - 1931^max) MBit/s ∼100% +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1596 (1559^min - 1632^max) MBit/s ∼85%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1569 (594^min - 1673^max) MBit/s ∼84% -2%
Average of class Gaming (980 - 1875, n=41, last 2 years)	1511 MBit/s ∼81% -5%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti MediaTek RZ616	1483 (1373^min - 1637^max) MBit/s ∼79% -7%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (891 - 1851, n=100)	1417 MBit/s ∼76% -11%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x	1780 (896^min - 1840^max) MBit/s ∼100% +32%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1576 (1508^min, 1508^P1 - 1653^max) MBit/s ∼89% +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1347 (1002^min - 1458^max) MBit/s ∼76%
Average of class Gaming (740 - 1780, n=83, last 2 years)	1342 MBit/s ∼75% 0%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (629 - 1861, n=83)	1320 MBit/s ∼74% -2%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1655 (1550^min - 1681^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1637 (829^min - 1653^max) MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti MediaTek RZ616	1576 (1546^min - 1644^max) MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming (886 - 1857, n=43, last 2 years)	1546 MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (883 - 1857, n=99)	1508 MBit/s ∼91% -9%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x	886 (444^min - 941^max) MBit/s ∼54% -46%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1694 (1645^min, 1645.58^P1 - 1715^max) MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1619 (1564^min - 1655^max) MBit/s ∼96%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (839 - 1890, n=83)	1435 MBit/s ∼85% -11%
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=90, last 2 years)	1435 MBit/s ∼85% -11%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x	852 (425^min - 931^max) MBit/s ∼50% -47%

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1596 (1559-1632)

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti MediaTek RZ616; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1483 (1373-1637)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1655 (1550-1681)

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti MediaTek RZ616; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1575 (1546-1644)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø548 (470-602)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø697 (360-761)

Webcam

ColorChecker Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z: 19.46 ∆E min: 3.32 - max: 29.53 ∆E

Display - 16 inches with QHD+ and 165 Hz

Even though it shares the same basic specs (16 in, IPS, 16:10, 2,560 x 1,600, 165 Hz) with the predecessor, Asus uses a different panel now. Instead of using a panel from AU Optronics, this time it comes from BOE. While the panel is even slightly brighter (481 nits), the brightness distribution is more uneven, and the brightness decreases considerably toward the left bottom corner in particular. Due to a significantly improved black value, the contrast value increases positively.

The response times are relatively fast, although the predecessor responded even faster here. PWM is not used for brightness control, and some slight screen bleeding is only apparent in dark scenes.


498 cd/m²	534 cd/m²	527 cd/m²
464 cd/m²	497 cd/m²	483 cd/m²
436 cd/m²	449 cd/m²	441 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3)

X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 534 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 481 cd/m² Minimum: 28.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 484 cd/m²
Contrast: 2367:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.53 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 3.53
ΔE Greyscale 1.74 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
83.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 3)

	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H AU Optronics AUOC199, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti N160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) BOE NE16oQDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Corsair Voyager a1600 BOE0A3B, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Display			-15%	-15%	-14%	-14%
Display P3 Coverage	92.8		68.7 -26%	67.3 -27%	68.3 -26%	68.7 -26%
sRGB Coverage	98.5		96.7 -2%	96.1 -2%	96.6 -2%	98.2 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	83.1		70 -16%	69.5 -16%	70.6 -15%	70.1 -16%
Response Times		39%	-37%	-51%	-62%	-36%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	7.6 ?(3.4, 4.2)	4.8 ?(2, 2.8) 37%	14.3 ?(6.8, 7.5) -88%	14.4 ?(7.6, 6.8) -89%	16.4 ?(7.4, 9) -116%	13 ?(7, 6) -71%
Response Time Black / White *	10 ?(4.6, 5.4)	6 ?(2, 4) 40%	8.6 ?(3.9, 4.7) 14%	11.2 ?(6, 5.2) -12%	10.8 ?(5, 5.8) -8%	10 ?(5, 5) -0%
PWM Frequency
Screen		-28%	-34%	-11%	-40%	-21%
Brightness middle	497	448 -10%	364 -27%	522.8 5%	460 -7%	355 -29%
Brightness	481	446 -7%	347 -28%	503 5%	442 -8%	340 -29%
Brightness Distribution	82	86 5%	89 9%	84 2%	89 9%	91 11%
Black Level *	0.21	0.48 -129%	0.3 -43%	0.41 -95%	0.32 -52%	0.53 -152%
Contrast	2367	933 -61%	1213 -49%	1275 -46%	1438 -39%	670 -72%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.53	2.76 22%	3.3 7%	2.47 30%	3.65 -3%	2.43 31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.15	7.09 -15%	6.6 -7%	6.56 -7%	7.49 -22%	4.31 30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	3.53	2.86 19%	2.5 29%	0.61 83%	3.65 -3%	1.14 68%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.74	3.1 -78%	5.2 -199%	3 -72%	5.87 -237%	2.62 -51%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.153 ^102%	2.14 ^103%	2.27 ^97%	2.42 ^91%	2.28 ^96%
CCT	6418 ^101%	6826 ^95%	6331 ^103%	6719 ^97%	6711 ^97%	6909 ^94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		87
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		100
Total Average (Program / Settings)		6% / -16%	-29% / -30%	-26% / -17%	-39% / -38%	-24% / -22%

* ... smaller is better

Asus advertises 100% coverage of the DCI-P3 color space, but we measure "only" 92.8%. The AdobeRGB color space is still covered to 83%. At least in the test field of our selected competitors, this still results in the top position. Overall, the display is also suited for professional editing of pictures and videos.

In the state of delivery, the panel is already well calibrated. At only 1.74, the DeltaE value of the gray scale is particularly low. In the ColorChecker, our Portrait Display Calman Color Calibration tool measures slightly higher deviations. An additional calibration doesn't improve these values further, but rather messes up the grayscale that is already very good.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.6 ms rise
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.4 ms rise
7.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19035 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Despite the good brightness of the display, you should still avoid direct sunlight outdoors and make sure you look at the screen straight from the front, since otherwise the visibility drops quickly.

The display contents can be read easily even from extreme viewing angles. When looking at the screen from the sides, the brightness is lower than when looking from top or bottom viewing angles.

Performance - 120-Watt RTX 3070-Ti slightly below average

The ROG Zephyrus is available in various equipment configurations. The M16 is also supposed to be available with an Intel CPU of the 13th generation and RTX 40xx soon, while our test unit still uses a Core i9-12900H and RTX 3070 Ti.

Alternatively, almost anything is possible starting from the RTX 3050 Ti up to the RTX 3080 Ti. With the processor, you currently have the choice between the i7-12700H and our top model. The equipment is completed by 32 GB of RAM, but there are also numerous options available here.

Test Conditions

The Asus Armoury Crate software allows you to adjust various settings in the laptop, so the user should become familiar with this. It offers the options to look for device updates, select colorful and dynamic Aura wallpapers, or control the performance.

The manufacturer offers three performance modes (Quiet, Performance, and Turbo) and also gives the option to control the performance using the Windows performance modes or even set several power limits yourself in a manual mode - options that are lacking with many other manufacturers.

3 performance modes plus Windows plus manual mode

Since in Turbo mode, the laptop is already very loud during idle operation, we run all the benchmark in the "Performance" mode. The "Quiet" mode is only used for the battery tests - there is no separate power saving mode.

Even though the software itself is well organized, various translation errors or incomplete sentences (in the German language version) still prevent a good overall impression.

Dynamic wallpaper: Here the left side is brighter, and later, the blue on the right side

Translation mistake: Incomplete sentence (in the German version)

Processor

Asus has already announced the M16 with Intel Gen13. Until that becomes available, we are currently still using an Intel Core i9-12900H in our test unit. The high-end CPU offers 6 Performance and 8 Efficiency cores. The Performance cores have a clock speed of up to 5 GHz, and the basic clock speed of the Efficiency cores is 1.8 GHz. Since only the P cores support hyperthreading, we get a total of 12 threads.

In the Cinebench loop, the constant performance is very stable, with the maximum TDP reaching about 84 watts in the Performance mode. The performance of the i7-12700H in the very powerful XMG Focus 16 turns out even slightly better in the beginning. But after the 4th run the latest, its performance drops below that of our M16, which also beats the Ryzen 7 6800 in the Legion 5.

By the way, instead of 84 watts, a powerful 99 watts are available in Turbo mode! During battery operation, this is only about 40 watts, with the performance dropping correspondingly.

Across all tests, the 2022 M16 is about 20% faster than the predecessor with an i9-11900H.

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2532 (2431.02-2585.82)

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H: Ø2351 (2324.37-2366.02)

Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2440 (2338.36-2692.88)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	82.2 pt ∼82%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H	80 pt ∼80%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	79.8 pt ∼80%
Average of class Gaming	75.8 pt ∼76%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	72.3 pt ∼72%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	71.6 pt ∼72%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	68.2 pt ∼68%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H ^-2! Intel Core i9-11900H	65.6 pt ∼66%

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	17378 Points ∼100% +10%
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34521, n=236, last 2 years)	16269 Points ∼94% +3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (7647 - 19648, n=22)	15902 Points ∼92% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	15870 Points ∼91%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	14660 (14400.8^min - 14660.4^max) Points ∼84% -8%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	13445 Points ∼77% -15%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	12979 Points ∼75% -18%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	1871 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1698 - 1921, n=22)	1838 Points ∼98% -2%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	1802 Points ∼96% -4%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	1775 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2169, n=234, last 2 years)	1675 Points ∼90% -10%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	1554 Points ∼83% -17%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1543 Points ∼82% -18%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	6358 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=237, last 2 years)	6145 Points ∼97% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	6053 Points ∼95%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2922 - 7471, n=22)	5985 Points ∼94% -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5661 Points ∼89% -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	5160 Points ∼81% -15%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	5152 Points ∼81% -15%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	4994 Points ∼79% -17%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	715 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (653 - 738, n=22)	712 Points ∼100% 0%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	699 Points ∼98% -2%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	689 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming (169 - 825, n=237, last 2 years)	646 Points ∼90% -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	603 Points ∼84% -16%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	599 Points ∼84% -16%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	596 Points ∼83% -17%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	2756 (2001.6^min - 2029.74^max) Points ∼100% +7%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	2030 (2001.6^min - 2029.74^max) Points ∼74% -22%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	2693 (2338.36^min - 2692.88^max) Points ∼98% +4%
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=240, last 2 years)	2609 Points ∼95% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	2586 (2431.02^min - 2585.82^max) Points ∼94%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1561 - 3077, n=22)	2578 Points ∼94% 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2366 (2324.37^min - 2366.02^max) Points ∼86% -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	2211 (1875.21^min - 2210.56^max) Points ∼80% -15%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	2161 Points ∼78% -16%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (243 - 277, n=23)	264 Points ∼100% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	263 Points ∼100%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	261 Points ∼99% -1%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	256 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 312, n=241, last 2 years)	251 Points ∼95% -5%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	248 Points ∼94% -6%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	245 Points ∼93% -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	236 Points ∼89% -10%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	261 Seconds * ∼100% -34%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	243 Seconds * ∼93% -25%
Average of class Gaming (91 - 1259, n=238, last 2 years)	234 Seconds * ∼90% -20%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	227 Seconds * ∼87% -16%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (160 - 415, n=22)	215 Seconds * ∼82% -10%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	213 Seconds * ∼82% -9%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	211 Seconds * ∼81% -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	195 Seconds * ∼75%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	66057 MIPS ∼100%
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=234, last 2 years)	65912 MIPS ∼100% 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	64817 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	64403 MIPS ∼97% -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (37614 - 76677, n=22)	63631 MIPS ∼96% -4%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	62024 MIPS ∼94% -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	54156 MIPS ∼82% -18%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	51281 MIPS ∼78% -22%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	6192 MIPS ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5302 - 6289, n=22)	5869 MIPS ∼95% -5%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	5858 MIPS ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=235, last 2 years)	5817 MIPS ∼94% -6%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	5805 MIPS ∼94% -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5803 MIPS ∼94% -6%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	5764 MIPS ∼93% -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	5582 MIPS ∼90% -10%

Geekbench 5.4 / Multi-Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	12753 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (8519 - 14376, n=23)	12461 Points ∼98% -2%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	12058 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=233, last 2 years)	11605 Points ∼91% -9%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	10846 Points ∼85% -15%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	10355 Points ∼81% -19%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	10040 Points ∼79% -21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	9663 Points ∼76% -24%

Geekbench 5.4 / Single-Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	1841 Points ∼100%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	1821 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1647 - 1892, n=23)	1815 Points ∼99% -1%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	1737 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2139, n=233, last 2 years)	1689 Points ∼92% -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	1624 Points ∼88% -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1566 Points ∼85% -15%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	1481 Points ∼80% -20%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	18.9 fps ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	18.5 fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=238, last 2 years)	18.2 fps ∼96% -4%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (9.16 - 22.5, n=22)	18.1 fps ∼96% -4%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	18 fps ∼95% -5%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	16.8 fps ∼89% -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	15 fps ∼79% -21%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	13.8 fps ∼73% -27%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	57.2 s * ∼100% -36%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	52.8 s * ∼92% -25%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=234, last 2 years)	50.8 s * ∼89% -20%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	44.1 s * ∼77% -5%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	43.3 s * ∼76% -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (38 - 59.8, n=22)	43.3 s * ∼76% -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	42.2 s * ∼74%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	40.5 s * ∼71% +4%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	0.544 sec * ∼100% -25%
Average of class Gaming (0.375 - 4.47, n=234, last 2 years)	0.503 sec * ∼92% -16%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	0.4897 sec * ∼90% -13%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	0.4894 sec * ∼90% -12%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4685 sec * ∼86% -8%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4582 sec * ∼84% -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (0.4218 - 0.503, n=22)	0.4486 sec * ∼82% -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	0.4352 sec * ∼80%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2586 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

276 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

263 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	94.3 pt ∼94%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	90.8 pt ∼91%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	86.3 pt ∼86%
Average of class Gaming	83.2 pt ∼83%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	81.9 pt ∼82%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H	72.6 pt ∼73%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	70.4 pt ∼70%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H ^-9! Intel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	0 pt ∼0%

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	17031 KRay/s ∼100% +11%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	15798 KRay/s ∼93% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	15387 KRay/s ∼90%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	15068 KRay/s ∼88% -2%
Average of class Gaming (2585 - 55084, n=212, last 2 years)	14773 KRay/s ∼87% -4%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	12459 KRay/s ∼73% -19%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (4074 - 18289, n=22)	11115 KRay/s ∼65% -28%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	105987 Points ∼100% +41%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	99931 Points ∼94% +33%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	81613 Points ∼77% +9%
Average of class Gaming (12439 - 234848, n=212, last 2 years)	77594 Points ∼73% +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	74919 Points ∼71%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	62698 Points ∼59% -16%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (22307 - 93236, n=22)	54800 Points ∼52% -27%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	3902 MB/s ∼100% +10%
Average of class Gaming (629 - 9930, n=212, last 2 years)	3654 MB/s ∼94% +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3634 MB/s ∼93% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3545 MB/s ∼91%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	3410 MB/s ∼87% -4%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1378 - 4215, n=22)	3158 MB/s ∼81% -11%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2895 MB/s ∼74% -18%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	106322 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	105420 Points ∼99%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	105203 Points ∼99% 0%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (78668 - 111241, n=22)	103601 Points ∼97% -2%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	102320 Points ∼96% -3%
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 186519, n=212, last 2 years)	101368 Points ∼95% -4%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	89788 Points ∼84% -15%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	13039 Points ∼100% +37%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	12842 Points ∼98% +35%
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 30810, n=212, last 2 years)	11114 Points ∼85% +17%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	9727 Points ∼75% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9538 Points ∼73%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5709 - 10410, n=22)	9371 Points ∼72% -2%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	8476 Points ∼65% -11%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	58327 Points ∼100% +60%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	54778 Points ∼94% +50%
Average of class Gaming (7135 - 124377, n=212, last 2 years)	41358 Points ∼71% +13%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	38369 Points ∼66% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	36496 Points ∼63%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	31038 Points ∼53% -15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (11257 - 45581, n=22)	28698 Points ∼49% -21%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	137383 MB/s ∼100% +7%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	135448 MB/s ∼99% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	128492 MB/s ∼94%
Average of class Gaming (18146 - 236139, n=212, last 2 years)	105146 MB/s ∼77% -18%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (31935 - 151546, n=22)	90046 MB/s ∼66% -30%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	76636 MB/s ∼56% -40%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	61160 MB/s ∼45% -52%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	1116 MB/s ∼100% +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	993 MB/s ∼89%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (449 - 1193, n=22)	974 MB/s ∼87% -2%
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2231, n=226, last 2 years)	960 MB/s ∼86% -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	901 MB/s ∼81% -9%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	866 MB/s ∼78% -13%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	835 MB/s ∼75% -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	0 MB/s ∼0% -100%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	8856 KRay/s ∼100% +6%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	8438 KRay/s ∼95% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	8316 KRay/s ∼94%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	8034 KRay/s ∼91% -3%
Average of class Gaming (1437 - 29473, n=212, last 2 years)	8023 KRay/s ∼91% -4%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	6644 KRay/s ∼75% -20%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2235 - 10511, n=22)	6214 KRay/s ∼70% -25%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	42660 MPixel/s ∼100% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	42574 MPixel/s ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (20960 - 48269, n=23)	36969 MPixel/s ∼87% -13%
Average of class Gaming (8341 - 52949, n=213, last 2 years)	31511 MPixel/s ∼74% -26%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	30182 MPixel/s ∼71% -29%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	30047 MPixel/s ∼70% -29%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	29687 MPixel/s ∼70% -30%

System Performance

In the PCMark, the combination of i9 and RTX 3070 Ti takes the lead in all benchmarks, but this is also the level of performance that is expected. The same goes for the CrossMark benchmarks.

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7871 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (7087 - 8072, n=6)	7712 Points ∼98% -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7549 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming (4477 - 9331, n=193, last 2 years)	7268 Points ∼92% -8%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7208 Points ∼92% -8%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	7134 Points ∼91% -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7097 Points ∼90% -10%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10936 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10266 - 11663, n=6)	10807 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10544 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10472 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming (7334 - 12176, n=192, last 2 years)	10464 Points ∼96% -4%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	10150 Points ∼93% -7%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9970 Points ∼91% -9%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10187 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (9402 - 10742, n=6)	10153 Points ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9929 Points ∼97% -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9479 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Gaming (6161 - 11833, n=192, last 2 years)	9461 Points ∼93% -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9113 Points ∼89% -11%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8983 Points ∼88% -12%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	11881 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	11759 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10009 - 12541, n=6)	11364 Points ∼96% -4%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11350 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming (5288 - 16424, n=192, last 2 years)	10585 Points ∼89% -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10097 Points ∼85% -15%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9777 Points ∼82% -18%

CrossMark / Overall
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1884 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1664 - 2044, n=6)	1871 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Gaming (974 - 2295, n=117, last 2 years)	1842 Points ∼98% -2%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1657 Points ∼88% -12%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1648 Points ∼87% -13%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1643 Points ∼87% -13%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1415 Points ∼75% -25%

CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1797 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1591 - 1968, n=6)	1784 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Gaming (907 - 2166, n=117, last 2 years)	1762 Points ∼98% -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1600 Points ∼89% -11%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1592 Points ∼89% -11%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1582 Points ∼88% -12%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1379 Points ∼77% -23%

CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2004 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1797 - 2148, n=6)	2004 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Gaming (1027 - 2514, n=117, last 2 years)	1988 Points ∼99% -1%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1829 Points ∼91% -9%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1816 Points ∼91% -9%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1746 Points ∼87% -13%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1599 Points ∼80% -20%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1803 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1514 - 2069, n=6)	1759 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 2275, n=117, last 2 years)	1690 Points ∼94% -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1481 Points ∼82% -18%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1419 Points ∼79% -21%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1363 Points ∼76% -24%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1060 Points ∼59% -41%

PCMark 10 Score		7871 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	63157 MB/s ∼100%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	63102 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (34438 - 74264, n=22)	58799 MB/s ∼93% -7%
Average of class Gaming (18074 - 80776, n=212, last 2 years)	52754 MB/s ∼84% -16%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	51182 MB/s ∼81% -19%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	49972 MB/s ∼79% -21%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	44959 MB/s ∼71% -29%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	67051 MB/s ∼100%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	66149 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (36365 - 74642, n=22)	61346 MB/s ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming (20318 - 89096, n=212, last 2 years)	56622 MB/s ∼84% -16%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	51778 MB/s ∼77% -23%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	51270 MB/s ∼76% -24%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	46043 MB/s ∼69% -31%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	66275 MB/s ∼100%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	65336 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (32276 - 66275, n=22)	58343 MB/s ∼88% -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	55307 MB/s ∼83% -17%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	55214 MB/s ∼83% -17%
Average of class Gaming (15975 - 80441, n=212, last 2 years)	53735 MB/s ∼81% -19%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	48054 MB/s ∼73% -27%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	95.2 ns * ∼100% -8%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	92.5 ns * ∼97% -5%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	91.2 ns * ∼96% -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	88 ns * ∼92%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	87.1 ns * ∼91% +1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (88 - 118.1, n=21)	85 ns * ∼89% +3%
Average of class Gaming (76.2 - 135.3, n=226, last 2 years)	73.9 ns * ∼78% +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	0 ns * ∼0% +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC Latencies

LatencyMon unfortunately already finds the first latencies when starting the software, even if there are no additional actions. When opening the browser with multiple tabs, the latencies increase further.

Our 4K/60-fps YouTube video is also not reproduced without any dropped frames (6). However, the latency values are not particularly high overall and lower than in the XMG Focus 16, for example. On the other hand, they become evident earlier.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1994.6 μs * ∼100% -111%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	960 μs * ∼48% -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	945.7 μs * ∼47%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	776 μs * ∼39% +18%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	773 μs * ∼39% +18%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	747.7 μs * ∼37% +21%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Solution

Our test model uses a PCIe Gen4 SSD from Micron with 1 TB of storage. In our list of best SSDs, it places at rank 74, so there are also many faster models. The benchmarks confirm decent values for the storage solution. However, the measured values of the Samsung storage in the predecessor or the Legion 5, are faster.

The SSD isn't quite able to maintain its performance in the long run, but the performance drop is only small.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6585 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4887 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 724 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 579 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 60.3 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 247 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 2360 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 2313 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	88.1 pt ∼88%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	88 pt ∼88%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	80.1 pt ∼80%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	79.7 pt ∼80%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	70.1 pt ∼70%
Average of class Gaming	69.2 pt ∼69%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	62.6 pt ∼63%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	62.3 pt ∼62%

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4229 (4208.75^min - 4229.47^max) MB/s ∼100% +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4101 (4091.33^min - 4100.54^max) MB/s ∼97% +9%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3788 (3770.05^min - 3788.09^max) MB/s ∼90% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3764 (3540.2^min - 3763.76^max) MB/s ∼89%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3664 (3617.8^min - 3664.36^max) MB/s ∼87% -3%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (1306 - 4343, n=19)	3297 MB/s ∼78% -12%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3207 (3148.45^min - 3206.84^max) MB/s ∼76% -15%
Average of class Gaming (834 - 6045, n=194, last 2 years)	3151 MB/s ∼75% -16%
seq write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4767 (4365.51^min - 4766.62^max) MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4158 (4130.89^min - 4157.81^max) MB/s ∼87% -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4030 (4011.22^min - 4030.01^max) MB/s ∼85% -15%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (2416 - 4954, n=19)	3789 MB/s ∼79% -21%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3481 (3471.23^min - 3481.48^max) MB/s ∼73% -27%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3377 (3301.76^min - 3376.79^max) MB/s ∼71% -29%
Average of class Gaming (399 - 9108, n=193, last 2 years)	3365 MB/s ∼71% -29%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2974 (2933.08^min - 2974.1^max) MB/s ∼62% -38%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7090 (6255.18^min - 7089.92^max) MB/s ∼100% +8%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6861 (5902.16^min - 6860.74^max) MB/s ∼97% +5%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6789 (5989.89^min - 6788.74^max) MB/s ∼96% +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6593 (6284.75^min - 6592.61^max) MB/s ∼93% +1%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (6207 - 6734, n=19)	6564 MB/s ∼93% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6550 (5497.59^min - 6549.73^max) MB/s ∼92%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6099 (5570.64^min - 6098.73^max) MB/s ∼86% -7%
Average of class Gaming (1620 - 16089, n=194, last 2 years)	5546 MB/s ∼78% -15%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5216 (5094.91^min - 5216.3^max) MB/s ∼100% +7%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5048 (5040.92^min - 5048.44^max) MB/s ∼97% +4%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5033 (5015.97^min - 5032.74^max) MB/s ∼96% +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4969 (4945.26^min - 4969.12^max) MB/s ∼95% +2%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4939 (4914.28^min - 4939.19^max) MB/s ∼95% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4876 (4374.87^min - 4876.3^max) MB/s ∼93%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (4543 - 4991, n=19)	4820 MB/s ∼92% -1%
Average of class Gaming (86.2 - 14571, n=194, last 2 years)	4146 MB/s ∼79% -15%
4k q1 t1 read
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	81.1 (79.64^min - 81.05^max) MB/s ∼100% +9%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	79.8 (79.31^min - 79.75^max) MB/s ∼98% +7%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	75 (74.44^min - 75.02^max) MB/s ∼92% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	74.3 (71.59^min - 74.33^max) MB/s ∼92%
Average of class Gaming (23.3 - 97.4, n=194, last 2 years)	65.8 MB/s ∼81% -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	59.4 (59.37^min - 59.41^max) MB/s ∼73% -20%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (39.2 - 74.3, n=19)	59.2 MB/s ∼73% -20%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	58.6 (57.33^min - 58.61^max) MB/s ∼72% -21%
4k q1 t1 write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	264 (263.57^min - 264.44^max) MB/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 421, n=193, last 2 years)	211 MB/s ∼80% -20%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	194.2 (193.1^min - 194.16^max) MB/s ∼74% -26%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (125.8 - 273, n=19)	192.9 MB/s ∼73% -27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	190 (189.88^min - 190.32^max) MB/s ∼72% -28%
Schenker Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	156.4 (153.47^min - 156.39^max) MB/s ∼59% -41%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	140.8 (138.42^min - 140.84^max) MB/s ∼53% -47%
Schenker XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	138 (136.39^min - 138^max) MB/s ∼52% -48%

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit in comparison
Toshiba Satellite W30Dt-A-100 (min) A4-1200, Radeon HD 8180	33
...
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2563
Schenker Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2567
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2580
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2586
HP Envy 16 h0112nr i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2590
MSI Crosshair 15 R6E B12UGZ-050 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2595
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2604.2
...
(max) TR Pro 3995WX, Radeon Pro W6800	9706