Notebookcheck Logo

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 laptop review: A well-rounded gaming package

When the wind god plays games. With a Core i9-12900H, RTX 3070 Ti, and DDR5 RAM, the Zephyrus M16 contains some powerful hardware. Our extensive test shows whether the gaming laptop is still able to impress toward the end of the Alder Lake and RTX 30xx generation.

The M16 (2022) GU603zw inherits from its predecessor of the same name, upgrading the package with a powerful i9 Alder Lake CPU and RTX 3070 Ti. All that comes in a fairly slim and compact 16-inch form factor with a 16:10 display (2,560 x 1,500 pixels) that just barely misses our list of best mobile gaming laptops, since it weighs only 75 grams (~2.6 oz) too much (>2 kg = 4.4 lb). This would have been the first 16-inch device in the list.

Since 16-inch gaming laptops with a 16:10 display are still the minority, we also include "conventional" 16:9 devices with similar hardware in our comparison. In addition to the predecessor, these are particularly the Schenker Vision 16 Pro and the Lenovo Legion 5 Pro, but also the Schenker XMG Focus 16 and the Corsair Voyager a1600.

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z (ROG Zephyrus M16 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-12900H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 90 W PL2 / Short Burst, 90 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 120 W TDP ( including 20 W Dynamic Boost), Geforce 528.24, MUX Switch + Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, 1x 16 GB Samsung DDR5-4800 plus 1x 16 GB soldered
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3), IPS, glossy: no, HDR, 165 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, 1024 GB 
, 960 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: headset port, Card Reader: MicroSD
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19.9 x 355 x 243 ( = 0.78 x 13.98 x 9.57 in)
Battery
90 Wh Lithium-Ion, 90WHrs, 4S1P, 4-cell Li-ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 720P HD IR camera for Windows Hello
Primary Camera: 1 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 2x 2W stereo speakers, Keyboard: Backlit chiclet keyboard with single-zone RGB, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.075 kg ( = 73.19 oz / 4.57 pounds), Power Supply: 761 g ( = 26.84 oz / 1.68 pounds)
Price
3000 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87.8 %
02/2023
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.1 kg19.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
85.6 %
07/2021
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2 kg20 mm16.00"2560x1600
87.8 %
11/2022
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1.7 kg17.1 mm16.00"2560x1600
87.7 %
10/2022
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.6 kg26.6 mm16.00"2560x1600
87 %
01/2023
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.2 kg24.3 mm16.00"2560x1600
86.6 %
12/2022
Corsair Voyager a1600
R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
2.4 kg19.9 mm16.00"2560x1600

Case - Slim 16-inch gaming laptop

Since practically nothing has changed in the case, we refer you to our test of the M16 from 2021, which gives detailed descriptions of the case, maintenance options, and input devices.

Size Comparison

359.9 mm / 14.2 inch 264.2 mm / 10.4 inch 26.6 mm / 1.047 inch 2.6 kg5.64 lbs359.5 mm / 14.2 inch 263.8 mm / 10.4 inch 24.3 mm / 0.957 inch 2.2 kg4.84 lbs356 mm / 14 inch 286.7 mm / 11.3 inch 19.9 mm / 0.783 inch 2.4 kg5.3 lbs355 mm / 14 inch 243 mm / 9.57 inch 20 mm / 0.787 inch 2 kg4.52 lbs355 mm / 14 inch 243 mm / 9.57 inch 19.9 mm / 0.783 inch 2.1 kg4.57 lbs353.7 mm / 13.9 inch 245.3 mm / 9.66 inch 17.1 mm / 0.673 inch 1.7 kg3.64 lbs297 mm / 11.7 inch 210 mm / 8.27 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Connection Equipment - HDMI 2.1 and Thunderbolt 4

Left: AC, HDMI 2.1 TMDS, GigabitLAN, USB-A 3.2 Gen2, USB-C/Thunderbolt 4 (incl. DP and PD), USB-C 3.2 Gen2 (incl. DP and PD), headset port
Left: AC, HDMI 2.1 TMDS, GigabitLAN, USB-A 3.2 Gen2, USB-C/Thunderbolt 4 (incl. DP and PD), USB-C 3.2 Gen2 (incl. DP and PD), headset port
Right: USB-A 3.2 Gen2, microSD card reader, Kensington Lock
Right: USB-A 3.2 Gen2, microSD card reader, Kensington Lock

SD Card Reader

The SC card reader is limited to microSD cards, but at least our AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60 fits snugly without sticking out. Compared to the predecessor, which already performed well, the speed is again slightly increased.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
138.1 (127.28min - 140.64max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=97, last 2 years)
97.6 MB/s -29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Intel Core i9-11900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
96 MB/s -30%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
84.86 MB/s -39%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro V60)
78.2 MB/s -43%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
77 (59.03min - 141.54max) MB/s -44%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
261.31 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Intel Core i9-11900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
187 MB/s -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=92, last 2 years)
120.5 MB/s -54%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
89.78 MB/s -66%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
86.79 MB/s -67%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro V60)
82.5 MB/s -68%

Communication

Asus uses the Intel AX211 module, which also supports the 6-Ghz network. Compared to the MediaTek module from the predecessor, the transfer rates increase significantly. The performance is very constant.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Corsair Voyager a1600
Qualcomm WCN685x
1875 (859min - 1931max) MBit/s +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1596 (1559min - 1632max) MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1569 (594min - 1673max) MBit/s -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
MediaTek RZ616
1483 (1373min - 1637max) MBit/s -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (648 - 1878, n=75, last 2 years)
1473 MBit/s -8%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (632 - 1851, n=174)
1369 MBit/s -14%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Corsair Voyager a1600
Qualcomm WCN685x
1780 (896min - 1840max) MBit/s +32%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1576 (1508min, 1508P1 - 1653max) MBit/s +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1347 (1002min - 1458max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1793, n=150, last 2 years)
1266 MBit/s -6%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (464 - 1861, n=189)
1244 MBit/s -8%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1655 (1550min - 1681max) MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1637 (829min - 1653max) MBit/s -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
MediaTek RZ616
1576 (1546min - 1644max) MBit/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (853 - 1788, n=77, last 2 years)
1505 MBit/s -9%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (883 - 1857, n=173)
1488 MBit/s -10%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Qualcomm WCN685x
886 (444min - 941max) MBit/s -46%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1694 (1645min, 1645.58P1 - 1715max) MBit/s +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1619 (1564min - 1655max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1890, n=156, last 2 years)
1399 MBit/s -14%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=189)
1394 MBit/s -14%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Qualcomm WCN685x
852 (425min - 931max) MBit/s -47%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1596 (1559-1632)
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti MediaTek RZ616; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1483 (1373-1637)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1655 (1550-1681)
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti MediaTek RZ616; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1575 (1546-1644)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø548 (470-602)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø697 (360-761)

Webcam

ColorChecker
16.8 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
16 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
29.5 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z: 19.46 ∆E min: 3.32 - max: 29.53 ∆E

Display - 16 inches with QHD+ and 165 Hz

Even though it shares the same basic specs (16 in, IPS, 16:10, 2,560 x 1,600, 165 Hz) with the predecessor, Asus uses a different panel now. Instead of using a panel from AU Optronics, this time it comes from BOE. While the panel is even slightly brighter (481 nits), the brightness distribution is more uneven, and the brightness decreases considerably toward the left bottom corner in particular. Due to a significantly improved black value, the contrast value increases positively.

The response times are relatively fast, although the predecessor responded even faster here. PWM is not used for brightness control, and some slight screen bleeding is only apparent in dark scenes.

Grainy subpixels due to a matte overlay
Grainy subpixels due to a matte overlay
Minimal screen bleeding
Minimal screen bleeding
498
cd/m²
534
cd/m²
527
cd/m²
464
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
483
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 534 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 481 cd/m² Minimum: 28.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 484 cd/m²
Contrast: 2367:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.53 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 3.53
ΔE Greyscale 1.74 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
83.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
AU Optronics AUOC199, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
N160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
BOE NE16oQDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Corsair Voyager a1600
BOE0A3B, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Display
-15%
-15%
-14%
-14%
Display P3 Coverage
92.8
68.7
-26%
67.3
-27%
68.3
-26%
68.7
-26%
sRGB Coverage
98.5
96.7
-2%
96.1
-2%
96.6
-2%
98.2
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
83.1
70
-16%
69.5
-16%
70.6
-15%
70.1
-16%
Response Times
39%
-37%
-51%
-62%
-36%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
7.6 ?(3.4, 4.2)
4.8 ?(2, 2.8)
37%
14.3 ?(6.8, 7.5)
-88%
14.4 ?(7.6, 6.8)
-89%
16.4 ?(7.4, 9)
-116%
13 ?(7, 6)
-71%
Response Time Black / White *
10 ?(4.6, 5.4)
6 ?(2, 4)
40%
8.6 ?(3.9, 4.7)
14%
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
-12%
10.8 ?(5, 5.8)
-8%
10 ?(5, 5)
-0%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-28%
-34%
-11%
-40%
-21%
Brightness middle
497
448
-10%
364
-27%
522.8
5%
460
-7%
355
-29%
Brightness
481
446
-7%
347
-28%
503
5%
442
-8%
340
-29%
Brightness Distribution
82
86
5%
89
9%
84
2%
89
9%
91
11%
Black Level *
0.21
0.48
-129%
0.3
-43%
0.41
-95%
0.32
-52%
0.53
-152%
Contrast
2367
933
-61%
1213
-49%
1275
-46%
1438
-39%
670
-72%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.53
2.76
22%
3.3
7%
2.47
30%
3.65
-3%
2.43
31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.15
7.09
-15%
6.6
-7%
6.56
-7%
7.49
-22%
4.31
30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
3.53
2.86
19%
2.5
29%
0.61
83%
3.65
-3%
1.14
68%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.74
3.1
-78%
5.2
-199%
3
-72%
5.87
-237%
2.62
-51%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.153 102%
2.14 103%
2.27 97%
2.42 91%
2.28 96%
CCT
6418 101%
6826 95%
6331 103%
6719 97%
6711 97%
6909 94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
87
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
Total Average (Program / Settings)
6% / -16%
-29% / -30%
-26% / -17%
-39% / -38%
-24% / -22%

* ... smaller is better

Asus advertises 100% coverage of the DCI-P3 color space, but we measure "only" 92.8%. The AdobeRGB color space is still covered to 83%. At least in the test field of our selected competitors, this still results in the top position. Overall, the display is also suited for professional editing of pictures and videos.

sRGB
sRGB
Display P3
Display P3
AdobeRGB
AdobeRGB

In the state of delivery, the panel is already well calibrated. At only 1.74, the DeltaE value of the gray scale is particularly low. In the ColorChecker, our Portrait Display Calman Color Calibration tool measures slightly higher deviations. An additional calibration doesn't improve these values further, but rather messes up the grayscale that is already very good.

Grayscale
Grayscale
Saturation
Saturation
ColorChecker
ColorChecker

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.6 ms rise
↘ 5.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.4 ms rise
↘ 4.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17803 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Despite the good brightness of the display, you should still avoid direct sunlight outdoors and make sure you look at the screen straight from the front, since otherwise the visibility drops quickly.

The display contents can be read easily even from extreme viewing angles. When looking at the screen from the sides, the brightness is lower than when looking from top or bottom viewing angles.

Performance - 120-Watt RTX 3070-Ti slightly below average

The ROG Zephyrus is available in various equipment configurations. The M16 is also supposed to be available with an Intel CPU of the 13th generation and RTX 40xx soon, while our test unit still uses a Core i9-12900H and RTX 3070 Ti.

Alternatively, almost anything is possible starting from the RTX 3050 Ti up to the RTX 3080 Ti. With the processor, you currently have the choice between the i7-12700H and our top model. The equipment is completed by 32 GB of RAM, but there are also numerous options available here.

Test Conditions

The Asus Armoury Crate software allows you to adjust various settings in the laptop, so the user should become familiar with this. It offers the options to look for device updates, select colorful and dynamic Aura wallpapers, or control the performance.

The manufacturer offers three performance modes (Quiet, Performance, and Turbo) and also gives the option to control the performance using the Windows performance modes or even set several power limits yourself in a manual mode - options that are lacking with many other manufacturers.

3 performance modes plus Windows plus manual mode
3 performance modes plus Windows plus manual mode
Manual CPU adjustments
Manual CPU adjustments
Manual GPU adjustments
Manual GPU adjustments

Since in Turbo mode, the laptop is already very loud during idle operation, we run all the benchmark in the "Performance" mode. The "Quiet" mode is only used for the battery tests - there is no separate power saving mode.

Even though the software itself is well organized, various translation errors or incomplete sentences (in the German language version) still prevent a good overall impression.

Aura wallpapers
Aura wallpapers
Dynamic wallpaper: Here the left side is brighter, and later, the blue on the right side
Dynamic wallpaper: Here the left side is brighter, and later, the blue on the right side
Translation mistake: Incomplete sentence (in the German version)
Translation mistake: Incomplete sentence (in the German version)
Another incomplete (German) sentence
Another incomplete (German) sentence

Processor

Performance mode: 84 W
Performance mode: 84 W
Turbo mode: 99 W
Turbo mode: 99 W
Battery operation: 40 W
Battery operation: 40 W

Asus has already announced the M16 with Intel Gen13. Until that becomes available, we are currently still using an Intel Core i9-12900H in our test unit. The high-end CPU offers 6 Performance and 8 Efficiency cores. The Performance cores have a clock speed of up to 5 GHz, and the basic clock speed of the Efficiency cores is 1.8 GHz. Since only the P cores support hyperthreading, we get a total of 12 threads.

In the Cinebench loop, the constant performance is very stable, with the maximum TDP reaching about 84 watts in the Performance mode. The performance of the i7-12700H in the very powerful XMG Focus 16 turns out even slightly better in the beginning. But after the 4th run the latest, its performance drops below that of our M16, which also beats the Ryzen 7 6800 in the Legion 5.

By the way, instead of 84 watts, a powerful 99 watts are available in Turbo mode! During battery operation, this is only about 40 watts, with the performance dropping correspondingly.

Across all tests, the 2022 M16 is about 20% faster than the predecessor with an i9-11900H.

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

0135270405540675810945108012151350148516201755189020252160229524302565Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2532 (2431.02-2585.82)
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H: Ø2351 (2324.37-2366.02)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2440 (2338.36-2692.88)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
81.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
76.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H
74.2 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
 
72.2 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
67.2 pt
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
67.1 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
63.5 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H -2!
Intel Core i9-11900H
61.1 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=223, last 2 years)
19900 Points +25%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H
17378 Points +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
15870 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (7359 - 19648, n=26)
15137 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
14660 (14400.8min - 14660.4max) Points -8%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
13445 Points -15%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
12979 Points -18%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
1871 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=221, last 2 years)
1824 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1634 - 1921, n=26)
1822 Points -3%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
1802 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H
1775 Points -5%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
1554 Points -17%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
1543 Points -18%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=221, last 2 years)
7566 Points +25%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H
6358 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
6053 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (2681 - 7471, n=26)
5705 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
5661 Points -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Intel Core i9-11900H
5160 Points -15%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
5152 Points -15%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
4994 Points -17%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
715 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (624 - 738, n=26)
705 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=221, last 2 years)
702 Points -2%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
699 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H
689 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Intel Core i9-11900H
603 Points -16%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
599 Points -16%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
596 Points -17%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=226, last 2 years)
3140 Points +21%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
2756 (2001.6min - 2029.74max) Points +7%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
2030 (2001.6min - 2029.74max) Points -22%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H
2693 (2338.36min - 2692.88max) Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
2586 (2431.02min - 2585.82max) Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1395 - 3077, n=26)
2468 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
2366 (2324.37min - 2366.02max) Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Intel Core i9-11900H
2211 (1875.21min - 2210.56max) Points -15%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
2161 Points -16%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=225, last 2 years)
269 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
263 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (235 - 277, n=27)
262 Points 0%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
261 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H
256 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
248 Points -6%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
245 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Intel Core i9-11900H
236 Points -10%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
261 Seconds * -34%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Intel Core i9-11900H
243 Seconds * -25%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (160 - 451, n=27)
233 Seconds * -19%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
227 Seconds * -16%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
213 Seconds * -9%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H
211 Seconds * -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=218, last 2 years)
197.4 Seconds * -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
195 Seconds *
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=220, last 2 years)
78482 MIPS +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
66057 MIPS
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
64817 MIPS -2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H
64403 MIPS -3%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
62024 MIPS -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (34684 - 76677, n=27)
60674 MIPS -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Intel Core i9-11900H
54156 MIPS -18%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
51281 MIPS -22%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
6192 MIPS
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=220, last 2 years)
6164 MIPS 0%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
5858 MIPS -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (5302 - 6289, n=27)
5845 MIPS -6%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
5805 MIPS -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
5803 MIPS -6%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H
5764 MIPS -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Intel Core i9-11900H
5582 MIPS -10%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=225, last 2 years)
13839 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
12753 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H
12058 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (8519 - 14376, n=30)
11903 Points -7%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
10846 Points -15%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
10355 Points -19%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
10040 Points -21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Intel Core i9-11900H
9663 Points -24%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
1841 Points
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
1821 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2210, n=225, last 2 years)
1819 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1631 - 1892, n=30)
1797 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H
1737 Points -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Intel Core i9-11900H
1624 Points -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
1566 Points -15%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
1481 Points -20%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=221, last 2 years)
21.6 fps +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
18.9 fps
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
18.5 fps -2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H
18 fps -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (8.05 - 22.5, n=27)
17 fps -10%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
16.8 fps -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Intel Core i9-11900H
15 fps -21%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
13.8 fps -27%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
57.2 s * -36%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
52.8 s * -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=217, last 2 years)
49.5 s * -17%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H
44.1 s * -5%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
43.3 s * -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (36.8 - 59.8, n=27)
42.5 s * -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
42.2 s *
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Intel Core i9-11900H
40.5 s * +4%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Intel Core i9-11900H
0.544 sec * -25%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
0.4897 sec * -13%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
0.4894 sec * -12%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4685 sec * -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=220, last 2 years)
0.4684 sec * -8%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4582 sec * -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (0.4218 - 0.506, n=27)
0.4543 sec * -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4352 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2586 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
276 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
263 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
93.6 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
89.5 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
86.3 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
81.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
77.1 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
 
66.9 pt
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
66.5 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H -9!
Intel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
0 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (3069 - 60169, n=216, last 2 years)
19192 KRay/s +25%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
17031 KRay/s +11%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
15798 KRay/s +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
15387 KRay/s
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
15068 KRay/s -2%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
12459 KRay/s -19%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (4074 - 18289, n=27)
11029 KRay/s -28%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
105987 Points +41%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
99931 Points +33%
Average of class Gaming
  (18567 - 252486, n=216, last 2 years)
96250 Points +28%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
81613 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
74919 Points
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
62698 Points -16%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (22307 - 93236, n=27)
54619 Points -27%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 10389, n=216, last 2 years)
4420 MB/s +25%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3902 MB/s +10%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3634 MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3545 MB/s
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
3410 MB/s -4%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1378 - 4215, n=27)
3031 MB/s -14%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2895 MB/s -18%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 200651, n=216, last 2 years)
110691 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
106322 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
105420 Points
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
105203 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
102320 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (78172 - 111241, n=27)
100507 Points -5%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
89788 Points -15%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
13039 Points +37%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
12842 Points +35%
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 32988, n=216, last 2 years)
12328 Points +29%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
9727 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9538 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (5709 - 10410, n=27)
8982 Points -6%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8476 Points -11%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
58327 Points +60%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
54778 Points +50%
Average of class Gaming
  (10291 - 134044, n=216, last 2 years)
48934 Points +34%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
38369 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
36496 Points
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
31038 Points -15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (11257 - 45581, n=27)
28295 Points -22%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
137383 MB/s +7%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
135448 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
128492 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=216, last 2 years)
108450 MB/s -16%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (31935 - 151546, n=27)
86319 MB/s -33%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
76636 MB/s -40%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
61160 MB/s -52%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2409, n=216, last 2 years)
1230 MB/s +24%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
1116 MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
993 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (449 - 1193, n=27)
928 MB/s -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
901 MB/s -9%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
866 MB/s -13%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
835 MB/s -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Intel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s -100%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (1518 - 31796, n=216, last 2 years)
10371 KRay/s +25%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8856 KRay/s +6%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
8438 KRay/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8316 KRay/s
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8034 KRay/s -3%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
6644 KRay/s -20%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (2235 - 10511, n=27)
6122 KRay/s -26%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
42660 MPixel/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
42574 MPixel/s
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=217, last 2 years)
37306 MPixel/s -12%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (20960 - 48269, n=28)
36499 MPixel/s -14%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
30182 MPixel/s -29%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
30047 MPixel/s -29%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
29687 MPixel/s -30%

System Performance

In the PCMark, the combination of i9 and RTX 3070 Ti takes the lead in all benchmarks, but this is also the level of performance that is expected. The same goes for the CrossMark benchmarks.

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
7871 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7087 - 8072, n=6)
7712 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=192, last 2 years)
7614 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7549 Points -4%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7208 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7134 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7097 Points -10%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10936 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10266 - 11663, n=6)
10807 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=191, last 2 years)
10744 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10544 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10472 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10150 Points -7%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9970 Points -9%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10187 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9402 - 10742, n=6)
10153 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9929 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 11833, n=191, last 2 years)
9744 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9479 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9113 Points -11%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8983 Points -12%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
11881 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11759 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=191, last 2 years)
11541 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10009 - 12541, n=6)
11364 Points -4%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11350 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10097 Points -15%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9777 Points -18%
CrossMark / Overall
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1884 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2334, n=165, last 2 years)
1881 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1664 - 2044, n=6)
1871 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1657 Points -12%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1648 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1643 Points -13%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1415 Points -25%
CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1797 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=165, last 2 years)
1790 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1591 - 1968, n=6)
1784 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1600 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1592 Points -11%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1582 Points -12%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1379 Points -23%
CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2514, n=165, last 2 years)
2050 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2004 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1797 - 2148, n=6)
2004 Points 0%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1829 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1816 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1746 Points -13%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1599 Points -20%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1803 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1514 - 2069, n=6)
1759 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=165, last 2 years)
1698 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1481 Points -18%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1419 Points -21%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1363 Points -24%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1060 Points -41%
PCMark 10 Score
7871 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
63157 MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
63102 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 92565, n=216, last 2 years)
60079 MB/s -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (34438 - 74264, n=27)
58806 MB/s -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
51182 MB/s -19%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
49972 MB/s -21%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
44959 MB/s -29%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
67051 MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
66149 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 90647, n=216, last 2 years)
64143 MB/s -4%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (36365 - 74642, n=27)
61558 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
51778 MB/s -23%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
51270 MB/s -24%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
46043 MB/s -31%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
66275 MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
65336 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (21619 - 103259, n=216, last 2 years)
62196 MB/s -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (32276 - 67858, n=27)
59067 MB/s -11%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
55307 MB/s -17%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
55214 MB/s -17%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
48054 MB/s -27%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
95.2 ns * -8%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
92.5 ns * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
91.2 ns * -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 152.5, n=212, last 2 years)
88.6 ns * -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
88 ns *
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
87.1 ns * +1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (74.7 - 118.1, n=26)
85.6 ns * +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Intel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC Latencies

LatencyMon unfortunately already finds the first latencies when starting the software, even if there are no additional actions. When opening the browser with multiple tabs, the latencies increase further.

Our 4K/60-fps YouTube video is also not reproduced without any dropped frames (6). However, the latency values are not particularly high overall and lower than in the XMG Focus 16, for example. On the other hand, they become evident earlier.

YouTube test
YouTube test
LatencyMon Main
LatencyMon Main
LatencyMon Drivers
LatencyMon Drivers
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1994.6 μs * -111%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
960 μs * -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
945.7 μs *
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
776 μs * +18%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
773 μs * +18%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
747.7 μs * +21%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Solution

Our test model uses a PCIe Gen4 SSD from Micron with 1 TB of storage. In our list of best SSDs, it places at rank 74, so there are also many faster models. The benchmarks confirm decent values for the storage solution. However, the measured values of the Samsung storage in the predecessor or the Legion 5, are faster.

The SSD isn't quite able to maintain its performance in the long run, but the performance drop is only small.

AS SSD
AS SSD
AS SSD Copy
AS SSD Copy
Crystaldiskmark 6
Crystaldiskmark 6
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6585 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4887 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 724 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 579 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 60.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 247 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 2360 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 2313 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
88 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
87.9 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
80 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
79.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
75.3 pt
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
 
72.6 pt
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
62.5 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
62.2 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4229 (4208.75min - 4229.47max) MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4101 (4091.33min - 4100.54max) MB/s +9%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3788 (3770.05min - 3788.09max) MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3764 (3540.2min - 3763.76max) MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3664 (3617.8min - 3664.36max) MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=191, last 2 years)
3500 MB/s -7%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
  (1306 - 4343, n=23)
3283 MB/s -13%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3207 (3148.45min - 3206.84max) MB/s -15%
seq write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4767 (4365.51min - 4766.62max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4158 (4130.89min - 4157.81max) MB/s -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4030 (4011.22min - 4030.01max) MB/s -15%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
  (2416 - 4954, n=23)
3856 MB/s -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=191, last 2 years)
3749 MB/s -21%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3481 (3471.23min - 3481.48max) MB/s -27%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3377 (3301.76min - 3376.79max) MB/s -29%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2974 (2933.08min - 2974.1max) MB/s -38%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7090 (6255.18min - 7089.92max) MB/s +8%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6861 (5902.16min - 6860.74max) MB/s +5%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6789 (5989.89min - 6788.74max) MB/s +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6593 (6284.75min - 6592.61max) MB/s +1%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
  (6207 - 6734, n=23)
6571 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6550 (5497.59min - 6549.73max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (2268 - 16089, n=191, last 2 years)
6279 MB/s -4%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6099 (5570.64min - 6098.73max) MB/s -7%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5216 (5094.91min - 5216.3max) MB/s +7%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5048 (5040.92min - 5048.44max) MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5033 (5015.97min - 5032.74max) MB/s +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4969 (4945.26min - 4969.12max) MB/s +2%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4939 (4914.28min - 4939.19max) MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4876 (4374.87min - 4876.3max) MB/s
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
  (4259 - 4991, n=23)
4807 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=191, last 2 years)
4721 MB/s -3%
4k q1 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
81.1 (79.64min - 81.05max) MB/s +9%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
79.8 (79.31min - 79.75max) MB/s +7%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
75 (74.44min - 75.02max) MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
74.3 (71.59min - 74.33max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=191, last 2 years)
67.5 MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
59.4 (59.37min - 59.41max) MB/s -20%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
  (39.2 - 74.3, n=23)
59.4 MB/s -20%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
58.6 (57.33min - 58.61max) MB/s -21%
4k q1 t1 write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
264 (263.57min - 264.44max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 421, n=191, last 2 years)
223 MB/s -16%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
194.2 (193.1min - 194.16max) MB/s -26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
190 (189.88min - 190.32max) MB/s -28%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
  (125.8 - 273, n=23)
189.4 MB/s -28%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
156.4 (153.47min - 156.39max) MB/s -41%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
140.8 (138.42min - 140.84max) MB/s -47%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
138 (136.39min - 138max) MB/s -48%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4178 (4170.63min - 4178.12max) MB/s +46%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4056 (4048.94min - 4055.97max) MB/s +42%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3340 (3040.22min - 3340.46max) MB/s +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2855 (2482.75min - 2854.87max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=191, last 2 years)
2576 MB/s -10%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
  (636 - 2868, n=23)
2075 MB/s -27%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1404 (1371.85min - 1404.22max) MB/s -51%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
895 (882.72min - 894.69max) MB/s -69%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3559 (3517.38min - 3559.2max) MB/s +32%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3478 (3468.35min - 3478.1max) MB/s +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2694 (2561.51min - 2693.92max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2605 (2378.14min - 2604.93max) MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=191, last 2 years)
2127 MB/s -21%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
  (328 - 2786, n=23)