F1 24 review: Laptop and desktop benchmarks
Test systems
We currently carry out our gaming benchmarks using these devices. Clicking on the photos will take you to the respective manufacturer's website. More details on their specifications are listed at the end of the article.
Tech
Compared to last year's version of the game—F1 23 (which also had a benchmark article)—not much has been changed from a tech standpoint. Even in 2024, the EGO engine created by developer Codemasters still looks good, but it no longer generates any real enthusiasm. Its detailed and stylish vehicles look particularly good.
The game's graphics menu is also almost 1:1 identical to its predecessor. More than 20 advanced options are available within the main tab, all of which can be conveniently adjusted via presets—the same as before. Numerous settings are hidden inside the Video Mode submenu, which, in addition to resolution and picture mode, also contains controls for Vsync, frame rate limit, anisotropic filtering and edge smoothing. Codemasters has given the game support for TAA, DLSS, FSR and XeSS, and Frame Generation is also on board. It additionally masters ray tracing, which is automatically activated with the Ultra High level selected. F1 24 can also be launched in VR mode if desired.
Although the underlying technology is mature by now, we were faced with the odd problem during our test. Crashes and error messages occurred from time to time and changes to its resolution sometimes didn't work reliably. The game also took quite a long time to start (partly due to the many infographics).
Benchmark
We again had the option to display the frame rate during the measurement and at the end, a somewhat more detailed evaluation was displayed (see video and screenshots). We would describe the game as playable from 40fps.
Results
FHD (1,920 x 1,080)
As long as you do without ray tracing, F1 24 is rather harmless when it comes to how graphically demanding it is. Entry-level models such as the iGPUs Radeon 780M and Intel Arc 8 are sometimes enough to achieve 1,920 x 1,080 pixels using the preset High. For ultra settings including ray tracing in Full HD, we recommend at least an RTX 4050, i.e. a mid-range graphics card.
F1 24 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX | |
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H | |
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS | |
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Ultra 7 155H | |
AMD Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS |
QHD (2,560 x 1,440)
You also don't need a top-of-the-range model when using QHD displays. A combination of 2,560 x 1,440 pixels and maximum details runs smoothly enough with a GeForce RTX 4070 or better.
F1 24 | |
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX | |
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H | |
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS |
UHD (3,840 x 2,160)
4K monitors are where the wheat gets separated from the chaff. 3,840 x 2,160 pixels and the Ultra High preset require Nvidia's current top performer, the GeForce RTX 4090. Thankfully, things look much better with upscaling activated. An RTX 4070 is sufficient for DLSS Quality in 4K.
F1 24 | |
3840x2160 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x 3840x2160 Ultra High Preset + Quality DLSS AF:16x 3840x2160 Ultra High Preset + Quality FSR AF:16x | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX | |
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H | |
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS |
Overview
Test system details
Laptop | Graphics card | Processor | RAM |
---|---|---|---|
XMG Neo 16 E23 | Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @175 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6X) | Intel Core i9-13900HX | 2 x 16 GB DDR5 |
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23 | Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 @175 W TGP (12 GB GDDR6X) | Intel Core i9-13950HX | 2 x 16 GB DDR5 |
XMG Pro 15 E23 | Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6) | Intel Core i9-13900HX | 2 x 16 GB DDR5 |
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23 | Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6) | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS | 2 x 8 GB DDR5 |
Medion Erazer Scout E20 | Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 @100 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6) | Intel Core i7-13700H | 2 x 8 GB DDR5 |
Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | AMD Radeon RX 7600S (8 GB GDDR6) & AMD Radeon 780M | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS | 2 x 8 GB DDR5 |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14 | Intel Arc 8 | Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | 2 x 16 GB DDR5 |
Tower PC | Graphics card | Processor | RAM |
---|---|---|---|
Asus ROG Strix Z790-F | Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 (16 GB GDDR6X) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT (20 GB GDDR6) |
Intel Core i9-13900K | 2 x 24 GB DDR5 G.Skill |
4K monitor | Operating system | Nvidia driver | AMD driver | Intel driver |
---|---|---|---|---|
Philips Evnia 329M1RV | Windows 11 | 555.85 | 24.5.1 | 101.5534 |