Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon 860M

AMD Radeon 860M

The Radeon 860M is a fairly powerful RDNA 3.5 architecture iGPU that debuted in early 2025 in Krakan Point APUs and a direct successor to the Radeon 760M. It packs just a few differences under the hood, such as faster caches; its 8 CUs/WGPs (512 unified shaders) run at up to 3,000 MHz.

DX12 Ultimate, ray tracing, AI image generation and other modern features are all supported here, as are many popular video codecs including first and foremost AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not HW-supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips. Miracast and FreeSync support is present. The iGPU can drive up to 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p60.

RDNA 3.5-based GPUs are projected to be fully supported by AMD until some time in 2027.

Performance

Its gaming performance is good enough for playing 2024 games in low graphics settings.

Power consumption

Krakan Point chips are a single-die design, meaning the iGPU is built with the same TSMC N4P process as the CPU cores for above average, as of late 2024, power efficiency.

AMD Radeon 800M Series

Radeon 890M compare 1024 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 880M compare 768 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 860M 512 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 840M compare 256 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 820M compare 128 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
CodenameKrackan Point
ArchitectureRDNA 3+
Pipelines512 - unified
Raytracing Cores8
Core Speed2900 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7500 MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2
technology4 nm
PCIe4
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1
FeaturesFreeSync, Miracast, SUHD 4320p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/VP9/AV1 encoding and decoding
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.06.2024
PredecessorRadeon 760M
CPU in Radeon 860MGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen AI 7 3508 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz3000 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 3508 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz3000 MHz
min. - max.? MHz3000 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
2.7 pt (8%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
min: 402     avg: 403.7     median: 403 (3%)     max: 406 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
min: 342     avg: 453.1     median: 487 (3%)     max: 559 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 2001     avg: 2386     median: 2431 (6%)     max: 2582 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 5570     avg: 5872     median: 6020 (7%)     max: 6025 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
11599 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3999     avg: 6343     median: 6526 (10%)     max: 7241 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 4449     avg: 6978     median: 7175 (7%)     max: 7935 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 210628     avg: 274850     median: 251748 (28%)     max: 362175 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1883     avg: 2808     median: 2967 (8%)     max: 3347 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1656     avg: 2503     median: 2638 (5%)     max: 2987 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
426961 Points (43%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
175093 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 22791     avg: 30484     median: 31650 (30%)     max: 33922 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 24614     avg: 38565     median: 39890 (10%)     max: 43959 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 27136     avg: 28170     median: 28169.5 (27%)     max: 29203 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 30202     avg: 31793     median: 31793 (12%)     max: 33384 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 6804     avg: 10875     median: 11147 (13%)     max: 12267 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 6901     avg: 10831     median: 11126 (9%)     max: 12149 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 24821     avg: 31982     median: 31981.5 (9%)     max: 39142 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 20346     avg: 26936     median: 26935.5 (15%)     max: 33525 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
68868 Points (75%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 15774     avg: 28292     median: 28291.5 (37%)     max: 40809 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x720 +
3DMark 06
14855 Points (19%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 +
3DMark 06
14920 Points (19%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
19.1 fps (6%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
101 fps (27%)
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
74.8 fps (8%)
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
23.4 fps (4%)
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
82.1 fps (14%)
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
98.6 fps (11%)
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
18.3 fps (6%)
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
75.8 fps (11%)
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
100 fps (11%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
79.8 fps (12%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
98.5 fps (12%)
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
44.3 fps (12%)
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
118 fps (13%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
18.3 fps (3%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
51.3 fps (18%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
31.3 fps (15%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
32.3 fps (9%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
53.4 fps (5%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
14.8 fps (9%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
46.5 fps (7%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
15.6 fps (3%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
26.8 fps (12%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
20.1 fps (13%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
18 fps (6%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4517     avg: 13699     median: 13698.5 (10%)     max: 22880 points
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 116.6     avg: 190.8     median: 162.8 (9%)     max: 258.07 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.9 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 16.89     avg: 24.2     median: 24.1 (9%)     max: 31.4 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 35.2     avg: 51.3     median: 51.3 (9%)     max: 67.4 fps
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 81.5     avg: 119.1     median: 119.1 (9%)     max: 156.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 97.2     avg: 135.5     median: 135.5 (13%)     max: 173.7 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
229.4 fps (5%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
289.7 fps (12%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
494.5 fps (4%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 68.3     avg: 154.2     median: 104.6 (3%)     max: 315 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
min: 3.64     avg: 4.4     median: 3.6 (1%)     max: 6.84 fps
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 22403     avg: 24478     median: 24475 (6%)     max: 27133 points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 26038     avg: 35462     median: 36404 (9%)     max: 38899 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 536     avg: 622     median: 621.5 (2%)     max: 707 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 974     avg: 1169     median: 1168.5 (2%)     max: 1363 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 6397     avg: 6712     median: 6711.5 (6%)     max: 7026 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39.5     avg: 57.9     median: 60.3 (8%)     max: 69.2 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 7.04     avg: 55.5     median: 65 (18%)     max: 85.3 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 32.8     avg: 61.2     median: 61.5 (8%)     max: 84.7 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.181     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (1%)     max: 0.3089 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
42.5 dB(A) (61%)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Borderlands 4

Borderlands 4

2025
low 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
11.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
8.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
60.4 65.4 68.1 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43.7 52.9 54.2 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.6 38 41.9 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.4 30.7 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
5.1
30.5
low 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
15.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
med. 1920x1080
high 1920x1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
22.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
low 1920x1080
19.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
44.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
24.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080 cinem.
14.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
14  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
11.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
61.3 64.5 67.2 72.9 73.9 77.2 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54.1 56.2 59.1 65.2 66 69.6 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44.3 45.1 48.2 48.7 51.8 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.8 10.4 10.6 11.4 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
18.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
33.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
26.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
26.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
24.3 30.4 35.6 36.1 37 37.1 38.7 40.4 40.4 42.8 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.9 21.9 27.7 28.3 29.5 29.9 31 32.8 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.3 17.1 18 18.7 21.7 22.4 22.8 23.6 24.3 25.5 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11 11.1 17.7 17.9 17.9 19 19.1 19.9 20.9 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
50.4
64.6
57.6
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
10.5
19.2
17.3
20.1
19.1
9.3
17.9
13.1
15.9
19.4
low 1920x1080
23.6 28.4 31.7 33.7 34 35.3 36 36.5 36.9 37 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.9 23.6 25.4 26.2 26.2 26.8 29 29.9 30.1 30.4 ~ 27 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.6 19.2 19.4 20.4 21 21.6 23 23.5 23.5 23.6 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.3 18.9 19.4 20 20.3 21.3 22.5 22.5 22.9 23.1 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
36.8
44.3
58
47.5
56.1
55.2
Low Preset FSR 2.2 Balanced 1920x1080
40.3
low 1920x1080
52.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
40.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
33.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
28.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset / Off 1280x720
92.1
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
88.5 141.5 147.8 153 157.8 165.4 165.9 171.3 177.3 ~ 152 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34.7 54.6 56.5 60.3 63.8 65 65.5 68.2 70.8 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.3 44.4 47.4 50.7 52.3 53.9 54.5 55.7 58.7 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.2 37.3 40 42.8 43.9 45.1 45.5 45.7 48.5 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
97 104 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47 52 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43 47 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40 44 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
47.1 52.9 57.6 60.2 64.1 65 66.3 69.5 73.6 77.2 77.6 79 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.5 41.6 44.7 45.7 47.5 49.8 52.3 55.6 58.4 59 59.7 61.9 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32.2 34.9 38 38.7 39.3 41.1 43.4 44.5 47.7 47.8 48.6 50.2 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
40.6 65 66.7 66.9 70.1 72.2 75.7 76.7 78.7 83.9 85.6 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.6 32.3 34 34.6 34.9 35.5 36.4 37.1 37.9 39.2 41.5 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.5 22.4 23.7 23.9 24.6 25.1 25.6 26.3 27.1 27.4 28.6 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
18.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
78.2 131.7 151.5 153.3 156.1 163.9 164.8 165.7 165.9 166.4 167.5 173.6 ~ 153 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
50.9 109.1 119.1 122.6 122.6 129.9 130.1 133.4 134.9 136.5 137.9 139.5 ~ 122 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.7 71.6 74.1 78.4 80.4 82.1 83.2 83.4 84.8 87.1 87.4 90 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39.8 63.6 66.6 72.2 73.7 74.2 77 77.1 78.1 78.7 79.7 79.8 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
143.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
90.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
45.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
28.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
54.9
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
125.1 145.1 163.1 165.9 169.9 170.9 171.5 171.8 172.5 173.2 173.8 ~ 164 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
113.6 133.7 153.3 157.2 157.4 158.6 160.5 164.3 ~ 150 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33.6 52.1 55.7 57.4 58.1 58.7 66.6 70 74.7 76 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.5 20.6 21.2 22.2 25.1 27.5 27.8 28 30.7 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
76.7
135.9
123.6
145.9
119.8
139.4
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
72.1
134.1
126
141.2
98.6
141.6
139.9
137.3
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Borderlands 413.611.18.52
F1 2565503918
Doom: The Dark Ages16.71311.7
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered15.814.514
Assassin's Creed Shadows171512
Kingdom Come Deliverance 23124.120.5
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle22.714.5
Stalker 219.316.712.6
Until Dawn44.527.117.6
Space Marine 224.920.518.9
Star Wars Outlaws14.91411.5
F1 2470624811
Senua's Saga Hellblade 218.414.610.7
Ghost of Tsushima33.526.422.4
Horizon Forbidden West26.723.215.9
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty36282117
Baldur's Gate 333272121
The Witcher 3 v452.140.233.928.1
Strange Brigade152605042
Far Cry 5101504542
X-Plane 11.11665142
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark71352518.4
Dota 2 Reborn1531227972
The Witcher 3143.390.945.628.4
GTA V1641506024
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
10
6
5
4
14
5
3
2
16
7
2
7
2
1
1





For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.34
log 26. 18:01:13

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 Oct 2025 05:35:13 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.032s ... 0.033s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.033s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.033s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12988 +0.03s ... 0.063s

#8 got single benchmarks 12988 +0.051s ... 0.114s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.114s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +1.252s ... 1.366s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.366s

#12 Got 355 rows for game benchmarks. +0.066s ... 1.433s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.433s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.014s ... 1.446s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.172s ... 1.618s

#16 return log +0.004s ... 1.623s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon 860M graphics card

AMD subnotebook in a tight three-way battle – Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K Review

AMD subnotebook in a tight three-way battle – Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K Review

Last year, the AMD-powered ZenBook 14 had a slight edge over the Intel version. This year, however, it also has to go up against its own strong predecessor. Let...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | AMD Radeon 860M | 14.00" | 1.2 kg
HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI laptop review: Redesigned inside and out

HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI laptop review: Redesigned inside and out

The EliteBook 8 G1a 16 represents a fresh start over last year's EliteBook 865 G10. In addition to the revised naming convention, the new model is thinner than ...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 | AMD Radeon 860M | 16.00" | 1.9 kg
Asus ExpertCenter PN54

Asus ExpertCenter PN54 - Business mini PC with AMD Ryzen AI 7 and modern features in the review

The Asus ExpertCenter PN54 presents itself as a compact mini PC with a modern AMD Ryzen AI 300 platform. In the test, we examine its performance, noise level, e...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | AMD Radeon 860M | 650 g
Dell 14 Plus 2-in-1 convertible review: AMD offers key advantage over Intel

Dell 14 Plus 2-in-1 convertible review: AMD offers key advantage over Intel

The Dell 14 Plus 2-in-1 replaces the older Inspiron 14 2-in-1 series with both a fresh new name and the latest processors from AMD and Intel. You might want to ...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | AMD Radeon 860M | 14.00" | 1.6 kg
Brilliant 1,100-nit OLED, but unexpected quality issues - Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14 G10 review

Brilliant 1,100-nit OLED, but unexpected quality issues - Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14 G10 review

The Yoga Slim 7 14 G10 is a slim everyday laptop with an AMD Ryzen processor and an impressive OLED panel with a 120 Hz frequency and a maximum brightness of 1,...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | AMD Radeon 860M | 14.00" | 1.2 kg

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » Strong AMD Zen5 CPU with pen and OLED for a low price: Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 laptop review

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  Review » 90 Hz OLED with AdobeRGB - Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14 G10 laptop review

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » A 1,100 nit OLED and AMD Zen 5 in a creator‘s laptop - The Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14 G10 review

Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » Asus Vivobook 16 laptop review: AI features at the forefront – genuine productivity boost or marketing hype?

Asus Vivobook S14 M5406KA: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S14 M5406KA

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14AKP10: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14AKP10

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10

Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-64: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-64

HP OmniBook X Flip NGAI 14-fk0000: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook X Flip Next Gen AI 14-fk0000

Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA, Ryzen AI 7 350: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA, Ryzen AI 7 350

HP Omnibook 7 Aero 13-bg: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 13.30", 1 kg
  External Review » HP Omnibook 7 Aero 13-bg

MSI Venture A16 AI+ A3HMG: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI Venture A16 AI+ A3HMG

Asus Vivobook 16 M1607KA: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 16 M1607KA

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606, Ryzen AI 7 350: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606, Ryzen AI 7 350

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406KA: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406KA

Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » Intel ZenBook 14 OLED features Wi-Fi 7 — but the AMD version delivers faster transfer speeds

   » Is the ZenBook 14 better with Intel or AMD this year?

HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » EliteBook 8 G1a 16: The touchscreen configuration is a no-go if you care about color accuracy

   » HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 is a significant upgrade over the EliteBook 865 G10 except in one key aspect

Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 0.7 kg
   » Asus ExpertCenter PN54 reviewed - what the mini PC with AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 can really do in everyday life

Dell 14 Plus 2-in-1: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » Dell 14 Plus 2-in-1 is missing some features found on the older Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1

   » Dell 14 Plus 2-in-1 AMD version is faster than Intel, but there's a catch

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » Lenovo's new OLED screens are excellent but the Yoga Slim 7 14's chassis quality leaves much to be desired

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » Careful with the affordable variant: Convertible laptop Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 shows risks of cheaper configurations

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *
Arc B 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU

Class 3

UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-01-20)