Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon 860M

AMD Radeon 860M

The Radeon 860M is a fairly powerful RDNA 3.5 architecture iGPU that debuted in early 2025 in Krakan Point APUs and a direct successor to the Radeon 760M. It packs just a few differences under the hood, such as faster caches; its 8 CUs/WGPs (512 unified shaders) run at up to 3,000 MHz.

DX12 Ultimate, ray tracing, AI image generation and other modern features are all supported here, as are many popular video codecs including first and foremost AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not HW-supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips. Miracast and FreeSync support is present. The iGPU can drive up to 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p60.

RDNA 3.5-based GPUs are projected to be fully supported by AMD until some time in 2027.

Performance

Its gaming performance is good enough for playing 2024 games in low graphics settings.

Power consumption

Krakan Point chips are a single-die design, meaning the iGPU is built with the same TSMC N4P process as the CPU cores for above average, as of late 2024, power efficiency.

AMD Radeon 800M Series

Radeon 890M compare 1024 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 880M compare 768 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 860M 512 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 840M compare 256 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
CodenameKrackan Point
ArchitectureRDNA 3+
Pipelines512 - unified
Raytracing Cores8
Core Speed2900 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7500 MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2
technology4 nm
PCIe4
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1
FeaturesFreeSync, Miracast, SUHD 4320p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/VP9/AV1 encoding and decoding
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.06.2024
PredecessorRadeon 760M
CPU in Radeon 860MGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen AI 7 3508 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz3000 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 3508 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz3000 MHz
min. - max.? MHz3000 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
2.7 pt (8%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1883     avg: 2937     median: 3147 (8%)     max: 3347 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1656     avg: 2626     median: 2868 (6%)     max: 2987 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
22791 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
24614 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3999     avg: 6314     median: 6715 (10%)     max: 7241 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 4449     avg: 6910     median: 7335 (7%)     max: 7935 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
210628 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 5570     avg: 5872     median: 6020 (7%)     max: 6025 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 6804     avg: 10859     median: 11800 (14%)     max: 12267 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 6901     avg: 10803     median: 11680 (9%)     max: 12149 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
24821 Points (7%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
20346 Points (11%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
15774 Points (21%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x720 +
3DMark 06
14855 Points (19%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 +
3DMark 06
14920 Points (19%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
4517 points (3%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 145.7     avg: 220.9     median: 238 (14%)     max: 253 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.9 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 16.89     avg: 24.2     median: 24.1 (9%)     max: 31.4 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 35.2     avg: 51.3     median: 51.3 (9%)     max: 67.4 fps
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 81.5     avg: 119.1     median: 119.1 (9%)     max: 156.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 97.2     avg: 135.5     median: 135.5 (13%)     max: 173.7 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
229.4 fps (5%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
289.7 fps (12%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
494.5 fps (4%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 230.8     median: 315 (8%)     max: 315 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 22403     avg: 24794     median: 24584 (6%)     max: 27133 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 26038     avg: 35242     median: 36748 (9%)     max: 38899 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
536 Samples/s (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
974 Samples/s (2%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
6397 points (5%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 47     avg: 59.4     median: 61.5 (8%)     max: 65.9 Watt
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 54.5     avg: 71     median: 65.4 (19%)     max: 85.3 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 58     avg: 71.2     median: 65.7 (8%)     max: 84.7 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.181     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (1%)     max: 0.2984 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
61.3 72.9 77.2 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54.1 65.2 69.6 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
48.7 51.8 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.4 10.6 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
24.3 37.1 40.4 40.4 42.8 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.9 28.3 29.9 31 32.8 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.3 22.4 23.6 24.3 25.5 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.1 17.9 19.1 19.9 20.9 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
10.5
19.2
17.3
20.1
19.1
low 1920x1080
23.6 34 36 36.9 37 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.9 26.2 29 29.9 30.1 ~ 27 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.6 20.4 23 23.5 23.6 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.3 20 22.5 22.9 23.1 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
36.8
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
88.5 165.4 171.3 177.3 ~ 151 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34.7 65 68.2 70.8 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.3 53.9 55.7 58.7 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.2 45.5 45.7 48.5 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
97 104 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47 52 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43 47 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40 44 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
52.9 66.3 73.6 77.2 77.6 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41.6 52.3 58.4 59 59.7 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34.9 43.4 47.7 47.8 48.6 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
40.6 66.7 78.7 83.9 85.6 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.6 35.5 37.9 39.2 41.5 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.5 23.7 27.1 27.4 28.6 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
78.2 164.8 165.9 166.4 167.5 ~ 149 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
50.9 122.6 134.9 137.9 139.5 ~ 117 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.7 80.4 82.1 83.4 84.8 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39.8 74.2 77 78.1 78.7 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
125.1 169.9 172.5 173.2 173.8 ~ 163 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
113.6 153.3 157.2 157.4 160.5 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33.6 57.4 70 74.7 76 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.5 22.2 27.8 28 30.7 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
76.7
135.9
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
72.1
134.1
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2470635011
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty37282218
Baldur's Gate 334272121
Strange Brigade151604941
Far Cry 5101504542
X-Plane 11.11705444
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark713524
Dota 2 Reborn1491177670
GTA V1631486224
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
4
3
2
3
3
1
3
4
2
4
2
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 06. 14:24:00

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 04 Jul 2025 05:34:58 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.026s ... 0.027s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.027s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12988 +0.027s ... 0.054s

#8 got single benchmarks 12988 +0.018s ... 0.072s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.072s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.789s ... 0.861s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.861s

#12 Got 144 rows for game benchmarks. +0.032s ... 0.893s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.893s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.898s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.076s ... 0.974s

#16 return log +0.008s ... 0.982s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon 860M graphics card

Brilliant 1,100-nit OLED, but unexpected quality issues - Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14 G10 review

Brilliant 1,100-nit OLED, but unexpected quality issues - Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14 G10 review

The Yoga Slim 7 14 G10 is a slim everyday laptop with an AMD Ryzen processor and an impressive OLED panel with a 120 Hz frequency and a maximum brightness of 1,...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | AMD Radeon 860M | 14.00" | 1.2 kg
Strong AMD Zen5 CPU with pen and OLED for a low price: Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 laptop review

Strong AMD Zen5 CPU with pen and OLED for a low price: Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 laptop review

A thousand US dollars are an important psychological mark for buyers. Lenovo's IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 is below it. For this comparably low amount of money, yo...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | AMD Radeon 860M | 14.00" | 1.5 kg
90 Hz OLED with AdobeRGB - Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14 G10 laptop review

90 Hz OLED with AdobeRGB - Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14 G10 laptop review

Lenovo has updated its Yoga Pro 7, giving the 10th generation an AMD processor as well as a new 14.5-inch OLED display that even covers the AdobeRGB color space...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | AMD Radeon 860M | 14.50" | 1.6 kg
A 1,100 nit OLED and AMD Zen 5 in a creator‘s laptop -  The Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14 G10 review

A 1,100 nit OLED and AMD Zen 5 in a creator‘s laptop - The Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14 G10 review

With the IdeaPad Pro 5 14, Lenovo is offering a compact multimedia laptop with a fast Ryzen 7 processor from AMD, a 120 Hz, 2.8K OLED and an HDR brightness of u...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | AMD Radeon 860M | 14.00" | 1.4 kg
Asus Vivobook 16 laptop review: AI features at the forefront – genuine productivity boost or marketing hype?

Asus Vivobook 16 laptop review: AI features at the forefront – genuine productivity boost or marketing hype?

Priced at €999, the Vivobook 16 might not excel in display quality, ports, or other features, but the new AI processors certainly deliver a hefty dose of market...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | AMD Radeon 860M | 16.00" | 1.9 kg

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406KA: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406KA

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » Lenovo's new OLED screens are excellent but the Yoga Slim 7 14's chassis quality leaves much to be desired

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » Careful with the affordable variant: Convertible laptop Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 shows risks of cheaper configurations

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-01-20)