Verdict
The IdeaPad Pro 5 14 scores points above all with its stylish metal chassis. The silver-grey surfaces are largely sturdy and give the device a premium feel. There is also little to criticise when it comes to the display. Although the high-resolution 16:10 OLED screen is prone to reflections, there is nothing to fault in terms of colour-space coverage, contrast or response times. Thanks to its generous 92 Wh battery, the battery life is also impressive.
The new Ryzen AI 7 450, meanwhile, leaves us with mixed feelings. On the one hand, it can certainly hold its own against Intel's competitors. Compared with the older Ryzen AI 7 350, however, performance has barely improved, as we will show over the course of the review. The input devices are good in typical Lenovo fashion, while the port selection can be described as solid, though not quite as generous as on some Yoga Slim laptops.
Pros
Cons
Price and availability
The tested Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 with the Ryzen AI 7 450 is available for around €1,000, although it is currently only listed by very few retailers. Prices and availability may vary depending on the region and retailer.
- $1,279.99Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16" 2.8K OLED 120Hz Touchscreen Laptop Computer, AI PC, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050, 32GB LPDDR5 RAM, 1TB SSD, Wi-Fi 7, Windows 11 Pro
- $1,649.99Lenovo Legion Pro 5 AI Gaming Laptop 16.0" 165Hz OLED WQXGA Display (AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX, GeForce RTX 5060 8GB, 32GB DDR5, 1TB M.2 PCIe SSD, RGB KB, WiFi 7, Webcam, Bluetooth 5.4, Win 11 Pro)
- $799.99Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 with AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 Processor, 14” WUXGA IPS Touchscreen Display, Wi-Fi 7, 16GB LPDDR5X Memory, 1TB SSD, FHD/IR Hybrid Camera, Digital Pen, Backlit KYB, and Win 11 Home
Its competitors include other 14-inch notebooks costing less than €1,500, such as its direct predecessor, the IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10, and devices based on the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, including the Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED and the Acer Swift 14 AI.
Specifications
Case
The well-built chassis weighs 1.4 kg, making it neither particularly light nor particularly heavy for a 14-inch device. The design is rather understated and therefore looks good in any environment. The lid's opening angle is also convincing, although the display cannot be opened a full 180°.
Connectivity
Four USB ports are more than adequate given the size of the notebook, especially as the two Type-C ports support the latest USB 4 standard, including Power Delivery and DisplayPort. They are joined by an audio jack, an HDMI output and a full-size, medium-speed SD card reader. The Wi-Fi 7 module from Realtek also meets expectations. The Full HD webcam, which has a manual shutter, delivers above-average sharpness, although its colour accuracy is not ideal. The case can be opened after removing five Torx screws. Photos of the internals can be found further below.
SD card reader
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (23.7 - 188, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Communication
Webcam
Maintenance
Input devices
The white-backlit chiclet keyboard offers a usable typing experience and a fairly successful layout. Lenovo combines flat keys with keys that have a slight downward curve. The touchpad, measuring approx. 13.5 x 8 cm, is quite generously sized for the 14-inch class and usually works reliably, although clicks feel and sound somewhat rattly. Its gliding properties are acceptable.
Display
One of the highlights of the IdeaPad Pro 5 14 is its high-contrast and extremely sharp OLED panel, which has a resolution of 2,880 x 1,800 pixels, a 120 Hz refresh rate and HDR support. Its only real weakness is its highly reflective surface, especially when used outdoors. The measured brightness is perfectly sufficient for indoor use, with an average of 490 cd/m² broadly matching the manufacturer's specification. Further plus points include the generous colour-space coverage, with even AdobeRGB almost fully covered, and the already fairly accurate colours in the factory state. Viewing angles and response times are typical of an OLED panel.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 485 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.31 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
calibrated: 1.78
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
94.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.244
CCT: 6383 K
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Samsung ATNA40YK11-0 (SDC4181), OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 90 Hz | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 LG Philips 140WUX, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | -3% | 1% | -24% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.8 | 99.9 0% | 98.4 -1% | 99.9 0% | 64 -36% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 95.3 -5% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 94.4 | 94.5 0% | 87.8 -7% | 97.6 3% | 66.2 -30% |
| Response Times | 23% | 22% | -5% | -5583% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 1.6 ? | 0.39 ? 76% | 0.4 ? 75% | 0.8 ? 50% | 57.7 ? -3506% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.5 ? | 0.49 ? 2% | 0.49 ? 2% | 0.8 ? -60% | 38.8 ? -7660% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 600 ? | 1200 ? | 1200 ? | 60 ? | |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 20 | 22 -10% | 22 -10% | ||
| Screen | 12% | 19% | -22% | 0% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 485 | 473 -2% | 478 -1% | 500 3% | 561.2 16% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 490 | 474 -3% | 484 -1% | 499 2% | 505 3% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 99 1% | 97 -1% | 97 -1% | 85 -13% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.01 | 0.22 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.31 | 1.2 48% | 1 57% | 3.55 -54% | 2.09 10% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.93 | 3.8 45% | 2.3 67% | 6.38 8% | 4.37 37% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.78 | 2.55 -43% | 1.09 39% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 1.5 -15% | 1.4 -8% | 2.2 -69% | 2.5 -92% |
| Gamma | 2.244 98% | 2.27 97% | 2.25 98% | 1.94 113% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 6383 102% | 6214 105% | 6521 100% | 6405 101% | 6760 96% |
| Contrast (:1) | 50000 | 2551 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 12% /
12% | 13% /
14% | -9% /
-13% | -1869% /
-936% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.26 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.24 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.28 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.32 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 600 Hz Amplitude: 20 % | ≤ 80 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 600 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 80 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 600 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7801 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Performance
In the subnotebook segment, the IdeaPad Pro 5 sits in the mid-range. Although the 14-inch model's RAM cannot be upgraded, its 32 GB of LPDDR5X memory should be sufficient for most users for quite some time. The installed 1 TB SSD is only a 2242-format model, although Lenovo has included a spare M.2 slot with support for 2280-format drives.
Test conditions
The Fn+Q key combination can be used to choose between four different profiles, three of which we checked as examples (see table). As with the predecessor, all final measurements were carried out in performance mode.
| Mode | Battery saving | Adaptive | Performance |
| Cyberpunk 2077 Noise | 32 dB(A) | 44 dB(A) | 46 dB(A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 Frame rate (FHD/Ultra) | 17.5 fps | 19 fps | 19.2 fps |
| GPU Power Draw | ~20 W | ~54 W | ~56 W |
| CPU PL1 | 20 W | 54 W | 65 W |
| CPU PL2 | 30 W | 65 W | 65 W |
| Cinebench R15 Multi Score | 1939 Points | 2698 Points | 2737 Points |
Processor
The Ryzen AI 7 450 turns out to be only a slightly tuned version of the older Ryzen AI 7 350, with a minimally higher clock speed and the option of faster RAM, up to 8,533 MHz. It therefore comes as little surprise that the new IdeaPad performs virtually on a par with its predecessor. Pleasingly, the eight-core processor, which can handle up to 16 threads, maintained impressively consistent performance throughout the Cinebench loop.
Cinebench R15 multi-core endurance test
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1135 - 32888, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5218 - 123315, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (3341 - 65433, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 96917, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (164.9 - 1379, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (n=1) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 85600, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
System performance
In the system tests, the 14-inch device manages to secure first place among the comparison devices, although the differences compared with the older IdeaPad Pro 5 are once again rather small.
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, AMD Radeon 860M | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU -5! | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4920 - 9939, n=46, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8552 - 11646, n=46, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5435 - 16606, n=46, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5722 - 13779, n=46, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 2356, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 2277, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (372 - 2743, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1854, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 530, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 378, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (234 - 1104, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 8612 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14554 - 131023, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 127174, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (n=1) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15709 - 135141, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6.1 - 159.9, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC latencies
The latencies are higher than on the predecessor, but still remain within acceptable limits.
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
* ... smaller is better
Storage devices
The review device's NVMe SSD comes from Kioxia and delivers consistently strong results even over longer periods, both when writing and reading.
* ... smaller is better
Sustained read performance: DiskSpd read loop, queue depth 8
GPU performance
Not much has really changed when it comes to the iGPU either. The Radeon 860M can certainly hold its own against Intel's competing Arc Graphics 130V, especially in games, as we will see shortly. Interestingly, the older IdeaPad Pro 5 14 was slightly faster, at least in the 3DMark tests.
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 45893 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 219296 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 36424 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5891 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2681 points | |
Help | ||
Gaming performance
Users who do not want to play demanding games and are happy with moderate resolutions and settings should be quite satisfied with the Radeon 860M. Well-optimised titles such as ARC Raiders run smoothly at 1,920 x 1,080 pixels with low to medium settings. If performance becomes tight in other games, using FSR may help.
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 179.7 | 171.8 | 80.3 | 32.8 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 183.5 | 149.1 | 100.4 | 89.4 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 81.6 | 64 | 50.5 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 37.7 | 31.4 | 23.3 | 21.9 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 43.4 | 33.7 | 25.8 | 19.2 |
| The Outer Worlds 2 (2025) | 23.9 | 18.9 | 13.3 | |
| ARC Raiders (2025) | 67.9 | 38.4 | 26.1 | |
| Anno 117: Pax Romana (2025) | 28.7 | 19.2 | 14.3 | |
| Resident Evil Requiem (2026) | 39 | 21.6 | 19.7 | |
| Death Stranding 2 (2026) | 22.7 | 18.9 | 15.2 | |
| Crimson Desert (2026) | 27.6 | 14.9 | 14.1 |
| Crimson Desert | |
| 1920x1080 Minimum Preset | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14 - 31.1, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.38 - 19, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Death Stranding 2 | |
| 1920x1080 Portable Preset | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (10.6 - 28.1, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8.73 - 19.5, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Resident Evil Requiem | |
| 1920x1080 Lowest Settings (no upscaling) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 860M (21.4 - 39, n=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (20.3 - 39, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| 1920x1080 Normal Settings (no upscaling) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (13.3 - 23.8, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| The Outer Worlds 2 | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 860M (14.5 - 23.9, n=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (13.4 - 23.9, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 860M (11.8 - 18.9, n=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (9.91 - 18.9, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS comparison
Emissions
Noise emissions
In performance mode, the cooling system can become clearly audible. Under load, the two fans reached up to 48 dB(A), which is roughly on a par with the predecessor. When idling, the IdeaPad Pro 5 14 is pleasantly quiet, and the fans remain off most of the time.
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24 / 25 / 26 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 46 / 48 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 450, Radeon 860M | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | 2% | 10% | 2% | 12% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24 | 23.6 2% | 24 -0% | 24.2 -1% | 25 -4% | 23 4% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24 | 23.6 2% | 24 -0% | 24.2 -1% | 25 -4% | 23 4% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 25 | 23.6 6% | 24 4% | 24.2 3% | 26 -4% | 23 8% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 26 | 23.6 9% | 27.2 -5% | 24.2 7% | 29 -12% | 23.1 11% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 46 | 46.5 -1% | 44.1 4% | 28.8 37% | 40 13% | 30.8 33% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 46 | 48.9 -6% | 44.1 4% | 37.6 18% | 40 13% | 35.4 23% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 48 | 48.9 -2% | 44.1 8% | 45.6 5% | 41 15% | 45.9 4% |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
A similar picture emerges in terms of temperatures, with the 14-inch device becoming slightly warmer than the older model at up to 45 °C.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (+0.2 °C / 0.4 F).
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 450, Radeon 860M | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 10% | 7% | 8% | 7% | 22% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 44 | 42.2 4% | 44 -0% | 38.4 13% | 41 7% | 37.8 14% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 45 | 42.4 6% | 42.9 5% | 49.7 -10% | 45 -0% | 38.6 14% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 30 | 25.4 15% | 26.5 12% | 25.1 16% | 26 13% | 21.2 29% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 30 | 25.7 14% | 26.7 11% | 25.8 14% | 28 7% | 21.4 29% |
* ... smaller is better
Stress test
The stress test using FurMark and Prime95 did not put the cooling system under too much strain. After a while, the Ryzen AI 7 450 settled at just over 80 °C.
Speakers
The sound quality proves decent, with the usual weaknesses in the bass range, but is unlikely to generate much enthusiasm.
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Power management
Power consumption
The IdeaPad Pro 5 14 is surprisingly frugal when idling, even undercutting its predecessor with a consumption of 4 to 6 watts versus 5 to 7 watts. Under load, the included 100-watt power adapter supplied up to 98 watts.
| Off / Standby | 0.4 / 0.8 Watt |
| Idle | 4.1 / 4.8 / 5.9 Watt |
| Load |
68 / 98 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 450, Radeon 860M | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -15% | -7% | 22% | 10% | 37% | 2% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 4.1 | 5.1 -24% | 5.2 -27% | 2.7 34% | 5 -22% | 1.6 61% | 3.78 ? 8% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 4.8 | 6.8 -42% | 7.8 -63% | 6.7 -40% | 6 -25% | 3.7 23% | 6.6 ? -38% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 5.9 | 6.9 -17% | 8.1 -37% | 6.9 -17% | 10 -69% | 3.9 34% | 7.93 ? -34% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 68 | 71.7 -5% | 64.3 5% | 34.5 49% | 36 47% | 36 47% | 41.8 ? 39% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 81.7 | 84.8 -4% | 65.4 20% | 43 47% | 41.6 49% | 50.9 38% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 80.6 | 83.5 -4% | 64 21% | 41.9 48% | 38.2 53% | 47.7 41% | |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 98 | 104.8 -7% | 68.5 30% | 62.7 36% | 60 39% | 80 18% | 64.7 ? 34% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
Battery life
Battery life is one of the 14-inch device's absolute strengths, not least thanks to its generous 92 Wh capacity. By comparison, its competitors only offer 65 to 84 Wh. In our Wi-Fi test with the brightness reduced to 150 cd/m², the device lasted almost 15 hours, which is a very respectable result.
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 450, Radeon 860M, 92.5 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, 84 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, 70 Wh | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 75 Wh | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 65 Wh | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 70 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -6% | -32% | 16% | -15% | -2% | -5% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 14.8 | 13.9 -6% | 10.1 -32% | 17.2 16% | 12.6 -15% | 14.5 -2% | 14 ? -5% |
| H.264 (h) | 19.6 | 15.9 | 20 | 15.8 ? | |||
| Load (h) | 0.9 | 1 | 2.9 | 1.942 ? |
Notebookcheck overall rating
Buyers can hardly go wrong with the IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11. The 14-inch model does not make any glaring mistakes and scores at least well in most categories.
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11
- 04/23/2026 v8
Florian Glaser
Total Sustainability Score: Possible alternatives at a glance
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 86.9%  | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $1,279.99 Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16" 2.8... 2. $1,649.99 Lenovo Legion Pro 5 AI Gamin... 3. $799.99 Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 with... List Price: 1040 EUR | 1.4 kg | 15.7 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
2. 87.4%  | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 989€ | 1.4 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
3. 85.3%  | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,059.99 Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X AI PC La... 2. $859.00 Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X Laptop w... 3. $892.99 Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X Copilot ... List Price: 1299€ | 1.2 kg | 13.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
4. 85.9%  | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1099€ | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED |
5. 83.5%  | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1200 EUR | 1.3 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
6. 84.8%  | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 Intel Core Ultra 7 355 ⎘ Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,889.99 Dell XPS 14 Premium Laptop D... 2. $1,599.99 Dell XPS 13 9350 AI Business... 3. $1,899.00 Dell XPS 14 9440 14.5" Noteb... List Price: 1600 USD | 1.5 kg | 15.2 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
