
90 Hz OLED with AdobeRGB - Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14 G10 laptop review
The 14-inch device for creatives.
Lenovo has updated its Yoga Pro 7, giving the 10th generation an AMD processor as well as a new 14.5-inch OLED display that even covers the AdobeRGB color space completely and is calibrated straight out of the box.Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by Daisy Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
Verdict - The AdobeRGB OLED inside the Yoga Pro 7 14 is a unique feature
The Yoga Pro 7 14 remains a good all-rounder in its 10th generation. In addition to slight improvements to its features (additional USB port, second M.2 slot, Wi-Fi 7), its new OLED screen with AdobeRGB coverage and extremely accurate color profiles is particularly impressive. If you want to work in the AdobeRGB space on the go, this is the right choice for you.
Its cooling works very effectively and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350's performance is generally fine, but the advantage of the high power limits isn't that great with this processor. The optional Ryzen AI 9 365 (including the faster Radeon 880M GPU) should benefit significantly more from the 70 watts. Furthermore, the Yoga stays almost silent in battery-saving mode. One problem, however, is its 100-watt power supply unit, which is simply not sufficient under full load.
Pros
Cons
Price and availability
Table of Contents
The Yoga Pro 7 14 enters its 10th generation and uses a familiar case, the latest processors from AMD and a new display. We have tested the Yoga Pro 7 14AKP10 model (MRSP approx. $1,600) with the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, 32 GB RAM, a 1-TB SSD and a new OLED display (90 Hz & AdobeRGB).
Specifications
Case & connectivity
Its case hardly differs from that of the predecessor model. The aluminum case (in either turquoise or gray) continues to boast good stability and build quality. The laptop's hinges do a good job and their maximum opening angle is almost 180 degrees. The camera bump is quite discreet and fingerprints don't seem to be a major problem. On the inside, however, the design has changed somewhat and the new Yoga Pro 7 has a lot in common with the IdeaPad Pro 5 14, which we recently tested.
In terms of ports, a second USB-A port has been added on the right-hand side of the device, while its two USB 4.0 ports remain unchanged. Its WLAN module supports Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 and during our test, it proved to be super fast. The laptop's webcam has also been upgraded to a 5 MP sensor. It supports Studio Effects, and our test device is a Copilot+ laptop.
Networking | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |

Sustainability
The Yoga Pro 7 meets several environmental standards (e.g. Energy Star, EPEAT Gold, Carbon Neutral) and uses partially recycled aluminum. Its packaging is completely plastic-free.
Input devices - 1.5 mm travel
The keyboard (1.5 mm travel) feels comfortable to type on with precise keystrokes—although it's still a little loud. Its blue keys with white lettering are easy to read and its two-stage white backlighting, which can be activated by a sensor, helps in dark environments. The ClickPad (13.5 x 8 cm) offers good gliding properties and the mechanical clicks aren't all too loud.
Display - 2.9K OLED with AdobeRGB coverage
The Yoga Pro 7 14 G10 is only available with one OLED panel. It is 14.5 inches in size and has a somewhat unusual resolution of 2,944 x 1,840 pixels (16:10) and a frequency of 90 Hz. Subjectively, the reflective panel's (no touchscreen) picture quality is excellent and we noted no raster effect. Its response times are very fast, but we measured PWM flickering at a frequency of 360 Hz. Neither brightness nor color temperature can be adjusted via sensor.
In terms of brightness, the OLED screen has an advantage over the old models. In SDR mode, it averaged 475 cd/m² during our test, which, together with its low black level, resulted in high contrast levels. In HDR mode, the maximum we noted was 982 cd/m² when displaying small image sections and still a good 823 cd/m² when showing an almost completely white image.
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 474 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
98.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 LEN145WQ+, OLED, 2944x1840, 14.5", 90 Hz | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Samsung ATNA40YK11-0 (SDC4181), OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 90 Hz | SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA ATNA40CT02-0 (SDC41A0), OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 MNE007ZA3-5, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 LEN145WQ+, OLED, 3072x1920, 14.5", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | -18% | 1% | -18% | -3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 97.1 | 99.9 3% | 71 -27% | 99.9 3% | 70.3 -28% | 98 1% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 99.6 0% | 99.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98.1 | 97.6 -1% | 72.8 -26% | 97.2 -1% | 71.9 -27% | 88.1 -10% |
Response Times | -45% | -3753% | -128% | -3638% | -18% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.45 ? | 0.8 ? -78% | 26.3 ? -5744% | 1.3 ? -189% | 26.7 ? -5833% | 0.44 ? 2% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.72 ? | 0.8 ? -11% | 13.4 ? -1761% | 1.2 ? -67% | 11.1 ? -1442% | 0.61 ? 15% |
PWM Frequency | 360 | 60 ? | 240 ? | 240 ? | ||
PWM Amplitude * | 33 | 56 -70% | ||||
Screen | -52% | 1% | -12% | -10% | 3% | |
Brightness middle | 474 | 500 5% | 421 -11% | 385 -19% | 516 9% | 400 -16% |
Brightness | 475 | 499 5% | 412 -13% | 382 -20% | 518 9% | 403 -15% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 97 -1% | 90 -8% | 95 -3% | 95 -3% | 97 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.01 | 0.32 | 0.03 | 0.37 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 3.55 -173% | 1.3 -0% | 1.99 -53% | 1.7 -31% | 1 23% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.9 | 6.38 -120% | 2.4 17% | 3.69 -27% | 3.2 -10% | 2.8 3% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 2.2 -29% | 1.4 18% | 0.8 53% | 2.3 -35% | 1.3 24% |
Gamma | 2.19 100% | 1.94 113% | 2.14 103% | 2.204 100% | 2.25 98% | 2.23 99% |
CCT | 6690 97% | 6405 101% | 6446 101% | 6474 100% | 6942 94% | 6586 99% |
Contrast | 50000 | 1316 | 12833 | 1395 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.55 | 1.1 | 1.79 | 1.1 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -32% /
-36% | -1257% /
-687% | -46% /
-29% | -1222% /
-672% | -6% /
-4% |
* ... smaller is better
We analyzed the panel using the professional CalMAN software. Lenovo states that the display is already calibrated at the factory, which we were able to confirm. There are accurate profiles for all three color spaces (sRGB, P3 & AdobeRGB), which are almost completely covered. You can therefore edit images without any problems. We were unable to improve the display any further with our own calibration.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.72 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4 ms rise | |
↘ 0.32 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.24 ms rise | |
↘ 0.21 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.3 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 360 Hz Amplitude: 33 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 360 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 360 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8437 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Performance - AMD Ryzen AI & 32 GB RAM
Lenovo offers the Yoga Pro 7 14 with either the Ryzen AI 7 350 (Krackan Point, Radeon 860M) or the Ryzen AI 9 365 (Strix Point, Radeon 880M), each with 32 GB of RAM (LPDDR5x-8000, onboard).
Testing conditions
Lenovo offers three different energy profiles (battery-saving, auto, performance), which are linked to the Windows settings. We ran the following benchmarks in performance mode. For simple tasks, however, battery-saving mode is also completely sufficient, resulting in a practically silent device.
Energy profile | CPU TDP | Cinebench 2024 Multi | Time Spy Graphics | max. fan noise emissions |
---|---|---|---|---|
Battery-saving mode | 24/20 watts | 672 points | 2,515 points | 24 dB(A) |
Auto | 62/50 watts | 930 points | 2,866 points | 39.2 dB(A) |
Performance | 85/70 watts | 973 points | 2,987 points | 45.4 dB(A) |
Processor - Ryzen AI 7 350
The Ryzen AI 7 350 has 8 cores (16 threads), whereby four slower Zen 5c cores (max. 3.5 GHz, less cache) are used in addition to four Zen 5 cores (max. 5 GHz). Its power limits are very high at 85/70 watts, but the Ryzen AI 7 still came behind models such as the Ryzen AI 9 365 or the Core Ultra 7 255H in the benchmarks, as expected. Its performance remained stable under continuous load and in battery mode.
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (14383 - 17899, n=7) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (1943 - 2006, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2165, n=74, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (5483 - 6990, n=6) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (761 - 784, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 826, n=69, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (2419 - 2660, n=6) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (204 - 305, n=6) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 322, n=70, last 2 years) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=71, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (182 - 246, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (48124 - 63807, n=6) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11668 - 77867, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (6042 - 6162, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2643 - 6442, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (10774 - 14028, n=6) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2244 - 17489, n=75, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (2836 - 2882, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (960 - 3820, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (9997 - 12458, n=6) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 17218, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (1955 - 2135, n=6) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (726 - 2350, n=66, last 2 years) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (19 - 22.9, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (50.4 - 66.5, n=6) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.403 - 1.456, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (0.403 - 0.4189, n=6) |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (22795 - 27796, n=6) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1135 - 32888, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (87919 - 107379, n=6) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5218 - 123315, n=68, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (3764 - 4322, n=6) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (67317 - 77400, n=6) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (10579 - 115682, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (12671 - 13677, n=6) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (46152 - 57717, n=6) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (3341 - 65433, n=68, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (56915 - 84817, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (1042 - 1138, n=6) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (164.9 - 1379, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (12177 - 14991, n=6) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 64588, n=68, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (25283 - 47405, n=6) |
System performance
The Yoga Pro 7 14 performed well during the synthetic system tests and didn't not reveal any problems. The device also impressed during real-world use with fast response times and no hangs.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (6982 - 7671, n=5) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (10801 - 12222, n=5) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (9363 - 11406, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (9674 - 10040, n=5) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5435 - 10623, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (8842 - 10028, n=5) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 12442, n=57, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (1696 - 2005, n=5) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 2038, n=67, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (1624 - 1869, n=5) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1918, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (1887 - 2236, n=5) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (372 - 2396, n=67, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (1401 - 1784, n=5) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (295 - 328, n=5) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 482, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (249 - 275, n=5) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 348, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (265 - 1104, n=75, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (436 - 437, n=5) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7416 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (38001 - 106997, n=6) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14554 - 109035, n=68, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (44209 - 63650, n=6) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (42604 - 107869, n=6) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15709 - 117898, n=68, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.2 - 187.8, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (87.7 - 103.3, n=6) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC latencies
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 |
* ... smaller is better
Storage device
The Yoga is equipped with a compact M.2 2242 SSD from SK hynix (PVC10, 1 TB). In general, the performance of the PCIe 4.0 SSD is very good, but it didn't remain completely stable under prolonged load. Thanks to a free M.2-2280 slot (PCIe 4.0), the laptop's storage capacity can be expanded easily and cost-effectively.
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Graphics card
The Ryzen AI 7 350 is equipped with the integrated Radeon 860M graphics card, which ranks behind the faster Radeon 880M/890M and the Arc Graphics 140V/140T in terms of its pure performance. Its performance is perfectly sufficient for everyday multimedia use, but if you'd like to play the odd game or two, we would recommend the configuration with the faster Ryzen AI 9 365 together with the Radeon 880M, as you simply have a little more performance reserves in this case. The GPU's performance remains completely stable under prolonged load and in battery mode.
3DMark 11 Performance | 12124 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7229 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3347 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 487 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 2571 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | 2556 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 1127, n=71, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Radeon 860M (283 - 381, n=5) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA |
* ... smaller is better
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (8.48 - 31.4, n=50, last 2 years) |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 173.8 | 153.3 | 76 | 30.7 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 167.5 | 139.5 | 84.8 | 78.7 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 83.9 | 39.2 | 27.4 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 73.6 | 58.4 | 47.8 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 177.3 | 70.8 | 58.7 | 48.5 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 37 | 30.1 | 23.6 | 22.9 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 42.8 | 32.8 | 25.5 | 20.9 |
Emissions & energy
Noise emissions
The laptop's fan noise depends largely on the selected energy profile. During simple tasks, the Yoga stays very quiet in all three modes (or the fans even remain completely deactivated). It is particularly impressive that its two fans operate with a barely audible noise of 24 dB(A) in battery-saving mode, even under full load. If desired, you can have a virtually silent device in this scenario. In performance mode, on the other hand, the fans rev up quickly under heavy load and reach a clearly audible 45.5 dB(A), while in auto mode, the maximum is 39.2 dB(A). There were no other electronic noises on our test device during our test.
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.5 / 23.5 / 23.5 dB(A) |
Load |
| 45.5 / 45.5 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 Radeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Micron 2550 512GB | SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 Arc 140T, Ultra 7 255H, YMTC PC411-1TB | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2550 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TGE | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | 3% | 2% | 5% | 3% | |
off / environment * | 23.5 | 25 -6% | 24.7 -5% | 24 -2% | 23.8 -1% | 23.8 -1% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.5 | 25 -6% | 24.7 -5% | 24 -2% | 23.8 -1% | 23.8 -1% |
Idle Average * | 23.5 | 26 -11% | 24.7 -5% | 25 -6% | 23.8 -1% | 23.8 -1% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.5 | 29 -23% | 26.3 -12% | 27 -15% | 23.8 -1% | 23.8 -1% |
Load Average * | 45.5 | 40 12% | 37.6 17% | 40 12% | 30 34% | 44.6 2% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 45.5 | 40 12% | 37.6 17% | 39 14% | 42.2 7% | 35.9 21% |
Load Maximum * | 45.5 | 41 10% | 37.6 17% | 40 12% | 45.3 -0% | 44.6 2% |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
The advantage of the laptop's fast fans is its lower surface temperatures under load, because although the processor operates at a constant 70 watts, we only measured slightly more than 40 °C at a few points. Its case remains very cool during simple tasks regardless, so you can easily rest the Yoga on your thighs in all situations. The stress test again showed that the 70 watts for the processor could be kept stable.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.7 °C / 83.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-0.5 °C / -0.9 F).
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V | SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -2% | -6% | -18% | -6% | -2% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 43.1 | 41 5% | 41.7 3% | 49 -14% | 41.9 3% | 42 3% |
Maximum Bottom * | 41.4 | 45 -9% | 50.1 -21% | 59 -43% | 52.1 -26% | 40.6 2% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.5 | 26 2% | 27.1 -2% | 28 -6% | 26.3 1% | 28.2 -6% |
Idle Bottom * | 26.8 | 28 -4% | 27.7 -3% | 29 -8% | 27.4 -2% | 28.9 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
Speakers
The laptop's sound system consists of four modules (two tweeters/woofers at 2 watts each). Its maximum volume is somewhat low, but the sound is still very good and spatial. In this discipline, the Yoga is also ahead of the comparison devices.
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Power consumption
Now we come to a weak point of the Yoga Pro 7 14, because the high performance of its processor in performance mode unfortunately overtaxes the 100-watt power supply. Although we noted no problems when gaming, the power supply was too weak in the stress test and the battery had to make up the difference. After an hour, the battery capacity was reduced by 10%. Lenovo should really have included a 130-watt power supply.
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N, OLED, 2944x1840, 14.5" | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, Micron 2550 512GB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T, YMTC PC411-1TB, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, Micron 2550 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TGE, OLED, 3072x1920, 14.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 28% | 8% | -6% | 1% | 6% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.4 | 5 7% | 4.6 15% | 6 -11% | 5.2 4% | 5.5 -2% |
Idle Average * | 7.4 | 6 19% | 7.8 -5% | 8 -8% | 9.3 -26% | 7.6 -3% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.9 | 10 -27% | 8 -1% | 14 -77% | 10.3 -30% | 7.9 -0% |
Load Average * | 65.7 | 36 45% | 71.7 -9% | 76 -16% | 56.5 14% | 77.9 -19% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 85.3 | 41.6 51% | 71.4 16% | 58.6 31% | 70 18% | 63 26% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 84.7 | 38.2 55% | 68.5 19% | 61.9 27% | 65 23% | 61.5 27% |
Load Maximum * | 105.1 | 60 43% | 83 21% | 94 11% | 101.8 3% | 94.8 10% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
Runtimes
Despite its large 84 Wh battery, the laptop's runtimes are only average. Managing just under 11 hours in the WLAN test at 150 cd/m² (corresponds to 62% of our test device's maximum SDR brightness) and just over 7 hours at full brightness, its results weren't bad, but most competitors simply lasted a little longer.
Notebookcheck total rating
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10
- 04/19/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Possible alternatives compared
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,069.99 Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AHP9-202... 2. $882.00 Lenovo Yoga 7i 2-in-1 Laptop... 3. $2,099.95 Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16"" Lapt... List Price: 1399€ | 1.6 kg | 17.4 mm | 14.50" 2944x1840 239 PPI OLED | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1200 EUR | 1.3 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 1200€ | 1.5 kg | 17 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI IPS | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,199.99 List Price: 1400 EUR | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 Intel Core Ultra 7 255H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $12.98 Puccy 2 Pack Touch Pad Film ... 2. $18.98 Puccy 2 Pack Back Protector ... 3. $20.98 Puccy 2 Pack Film Protector,... List Price: 1090€ | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ⎘ AMD Radeon 880M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,069.99 Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AHP9-202... 2. $1,679.00 LENOVO Yoga Pro 9i Laptop, I... 3. $1,399.99 Lenovo Yoga 9i 2-in-1 Laptop... List Price: 1599€ | 1.5 kg | 18 mm | 14.50" 3072x1920 250 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.