Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon 890M

AMD Radeon 890M

The Radeon 890M is the most powerful AMD iGPU, as of mid 2024. It features 16 RDNA 3.5 architecture CUs (1024 unified shaders) running at up to 2,900 MHz. Ray tracing, AI image generation and other modern features are all supported here, as are the most popular video codecs including first and foremost AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not HW-supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

The AMD iGPU is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors simultaneously. It also supports Miracast and FreeSync. RDNA 3.5-based iGPUs are projected to be fully supported by AMD until some time in 2027.

Performance

Performance-wise, the graphics adapter can be as slow as the Arc 8 or as fast as the RTX 2050 Laptop depending on the benchmark or game. On average, the 890M finds itself very close to the GTX 1650 Laptop making it possible to play 2024 AAA games at 1080p with most settings set to Low. Baldur's Gate 3 is playable on medium settings, as are several other 2023 games.

Power consumption

Strix Point chips are a single-die design, meaning the iGPU is built with the same TSMC N4P process as the CPU cores for very decent, as of mid 2024, power efficiency.

The 890M delivers as much performance as an entry-level desktop graphics card while consuming just 10 to 20 Watts.

AMD Radeon 800M Series

Radeon 890M 1024 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 880M compare 768 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 860M compare 512 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 840M compare 256 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
CodenameStrix Point
ArchitectureRDNA 3+
Pipelines1024 - unified
Core Speed2900 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7500 MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2
technology4 nm
PCIe4
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1
FeaturesFreeSync, Miracast, SUHD 4320p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/VP9/AV1 encoding and decoding
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.06.2024
CPU in Radeon 890MGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 37512 x 2000 MHz, 54 W? MHz2900 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 37512 x 2000 MHz, 54 W? MHz2900 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 37012 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz2900 MHz
min. - max.? MHz? - 2900 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.4 pt (10%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 3287     avg: 3792     median: 3840 (10%)     max: 4073 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 2942     avg: 3430     median: 3452 (7%)     max: 3676 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 468363     avg: 472995     median: 472994 (48%)     max: 477626 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 219697     avg: 234396     median: 224543 (26%)     max: 258947 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 34977     avg: 38341     median: 38501 (36%)     max: 40338 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 50120     avg: 54080     median: 54704 (13%)     max: 58319 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 7387     avg: 8435     median: 8460 (13%)     max: 9188 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 7999     avg: 9072     median: 9145 (8%)     max: 10037 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 258024     avg: 321503     median: 325729 (36%)     max: 408901 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 6855     avg: 7239     median: 7239 (8%)     max: 7623 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 29220     avg: 30739     median: 30556 (29%)     max: 32625 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 34992     avg: 38114     median: 38596 (15%)     max: 40270 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 12491     avg: 14356     median: 14816 (18%)     max: 15873 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 12641     avg: 15003     median: 15366 (12%)     max: 16800 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 39557     avg: 43434     median: 44384 (13%)     max: 46360 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 34479     avg: 38139     median: 38847 (21%)     max: 41091 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 58138     avg: 59420     median: 59419.5 (65%)     max: 60701 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 45168     avg: 47309     median: 46785 (61%)     max: 49973 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 27.7     avg: 29.6     median: 29.5 (9%)     max: 31.6 fps
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 146     avg: 149.5     median: 149.5 (18%)     max: 153 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 51.6     avg: 52.8     median: 52.8 (15%)     max: 53.9 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 151     avg: 153.5     median: 153.5 (16%)     max: 156 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 29.4     avg: 29.8     median: 29.8 (5%)     max: 30.2 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 64.3     avg: 65.8     median: 65.8 (23%)     max: 67.2 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 40.7     avg: 41     median: 41 (20%)     max: 41.2 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 42.6     avg: 44.6     median: 44.6 (12%)     max: 46.5 fps
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
min: 68.7     avg: 70.3     median: 70.3 (7%)     max: 71.9 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
min: 15.2     avg: 16.6     median: 17.1 (11%)     max: 17.5 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
min: 55.9     avg: 59.5     median: 59.6 (9%)     max: 62.9 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
min: 15.5     avg: 24.1     median: 28.3 (4%)     max: 28.5 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
min: 34.1     avg: 36.2     median: 36.8 (17%)     max: 37.6 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
min: 23.1     avg: 25.7     median: 26.6 (17%)     max: 27.3 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
min: 21.9     avg: 24.6     median: 25.2 (8%)     max: 26.8 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 16665     avg: 21064     median: 22867 (16%)     max: 23660 points
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 207     avg: 256.2     median: 260 (15%)     max: 304 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.9 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
39.7 fps (15%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
84.6 fps (15%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
194 fps (14%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 575     median: 104.6 (3%)     max: 3908 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
min: 3.64     avg: 78     median: 3.6 (1%)     max: 546 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 26531     avg: 38590     median: 40510 (11%)     max: 43082 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 35560     avg: 43623     median: 45723 (11%)     max: 48393 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 886     avg: 954     median: 966.5 (3%)     max: 998 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 1529     avg: 1598     median: 1581 (3%)     max: 1702 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 9395     avg: 11044     median: 11376.5 (9%)     max: 12026 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 50     avg: 61.5     median: 61 (8%)     max: 73.1 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.8     avg: 59.8     median: 59.8 (8%)     max: 73.7 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
min: 0.4613     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (47%)     max: 0.677 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 49.2     avg: 58.8     median: 54.7 (17%)     max: 76.2 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.7     avg: 64.4     median: 68.8 (9%)     max: 79.2 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.3083     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (1%)     max: 0.4176 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Doom: The Dark Ages

Doom: The Dark Ages

2025
low 1920x1080
20.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered

The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered

2025
low 1920x1080
49.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
29.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
8.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
116 126.8 ~ 121 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
59.5 66.3 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
32.3 35.9 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
25 29.2 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.5 22.8 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
lowest, FSR Quality, Frame Generation 1920x1080
58.9
44.3
lowest, XeSS Quality 1920x1080
31.1
low 1920x1080
19.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10.8 14.2 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset + Quality FSR 1920x1080
27.9
low 1920x1080
29.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
low 1920x1080
25.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
38.5
low 1920x1080
69  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
62  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Preset 1280x720
112
low 1920x1080
50.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
32.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
71.2
low 1920x1080
41.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
34.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
30.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
24.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
56.7
low 1920x1080
22.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (Super Resolution off) 1280x720
35.9
low 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
28.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
22.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
44.7
low 1920x1080 cinem.
16  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
14.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
12.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
low 1280x720 cinem.
23.7
low 1920x1080
31 51 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24 40 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18 31 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18 18 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
QHD FSR 2560x1440
18  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
52
low FSR 68 1280x720
66
low 1920x1080
51.6 64.2 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
38.3 40.6 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
30.2 34.1 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
25 30.6 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
110.7
low 1920x1080
59.1 67.5 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
35 42.7 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
27.8 33.7 ~ 31 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
23.6 28.8 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
103.3
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
0 (!) 68.4 82.4 87.2 87.5 104.6 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!) 72.8 75.4 77.6 91.9 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!) 50.9 53.4 53.4 58.5 66 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!) 12.5 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
6.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset + Quality FSR 16xAF 2560x1440
11.2
low 1920x1080
20.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
34.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28 30.3 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.4 27.4 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.7 20.7 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very High Preset + Quality FSR 2560x1440
26.4
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1920x1080
26 30.6 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24.7 27.3 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.8 21.1 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.7 19.9 ~ 17 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
60.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
44.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
38  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
30.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
48  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
41.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
31.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
30.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
26.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
23.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Palworld

Palworld

2024
low 1920x1080
81.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
62.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
36.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
30.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
209  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
168.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
160.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
75.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
59.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
43.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
94.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
69.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
60.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
46.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
77  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
64  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
21.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
26.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
90.3 99.7 100 101.4 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
67.9 74 81.9 82.6 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
48.3 50.7 63.2 63.7 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.3 42.2 54.4 54.7 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
171.5
low 1920x1080
52  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
117.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
90.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
52.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
35.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
40 43.7 44.4 44.5 46 46 46 48.1 48.9 49.2 49.6 49.9 50.5 51.5 52.5 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31.3 32.3 34.7 35.5 35.5 36.3 36.7 38.1 38.2 38.3 39.4 39.6 40.5 40.7 40.9 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24.9 25.4 26.8 27.4 28.1 28.7 28.7 28.9 29.3 30.1 30.4 30.8 30.9 31.6 32.3 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.1 23.8 24.1 24.4 25.1 25.4 25.5 25.5 25.5 26.2 26.6 26.8 27 27.8 28.4 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
76.7
82.2
85.1
72.5
80.3
77.1
82.6
78.3
74
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
5.2
6.4
8.2
7.3
5.5
7.5
Steam Deck 1280x800
81
77.7
60
Ultra Preset (FSR2 on) 1920x1080
32.3
29.4
26.7
30.6
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
19.5
25.3
20.9
24.9
27
25.1
23.8
24.2
17.4
24.9
24.7
22.8
low 1920x1080
35 35.8 38.8 40.2 41.1 41.3 43.7 44.1 44.5 44.6 44.8 45.2 46 47.1 48.5 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
29.1 29.2 31.5 31.8 33.6 34.1 34.2 34.5 35.4 35.8 36.4 36.9 37.5 37.7 37.9 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24.1 25.6 26.8 28.2 28.5 28.5 28.6 28.8 28.9 29 29.4 30.2 30.8 30.9 31.2 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
24 24.9 25.5 27.9 28.1 28.3 28.4 28.4 29.1 29.1 29.6 30 30.7 31.1 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
64.2
58.9
73.4
55.2
67.9
59.4
60.7
68
65.1
Low Preset FSR 2.2 Balanced 1920x1080
41.9
47.8
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
62.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
53.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
46.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
38.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
49.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
43.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
40.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
33.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1920x1080
31.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
72.8 88.3 106.3 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
69.3 76.4 96.5 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55.6 58.6 70.3 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.1 12.3 17 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1920x1080
93.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
65.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
59.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
42.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
36.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
81 99.2 101.6 106 106.3 107.3 110.1 110.5 111.2 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
76.8 90.6 94.5 96.1 97.1 98.2 100.3 100.8 102.9 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64.2 67.8 71.6 72.3 72.7 74.3 76.8 77 78.1 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.7 19 19.7 20.1 20.2 20.9 21.2 22 22 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
178.8
186.8
173.2
176.1
164.3
160.9
med. 1920x1080
high 1920x1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
68.1 80 84.4 85.2 86.9 88.3 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
52.2 53.8 60.7 62.1 62.3 62.4 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.9 36.1 39.5 41.2 41.4 41.8 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28.1 29.4 31.6 32.5 33 34.1 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
172.1
170.3
148.2
161.5
139.5
104.3
low 1280x720
194.2 207 ~ 201 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
119.8 119.9 ~ 120 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
79 82.8 ~ 81 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
77.6 78.3 ~ 78 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
172.6
171.6
low 1280x720
160  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
77  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
69  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
91
low 1280x720
179.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
61.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
114  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
46 49 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44 45 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37 39 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
59
80
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
165.1 166.8 174.4 179.7 180.7 182.9 186.1 186.7 189.2 191.3 193 195.7 199.8 ~ 184 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
70.8 71.1 71.5 74.5 75.7 76.3 76.9 77.7 77.8 79 79.5 80.6 82 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
58.7 59.7 60.2 63.8 63.8 64.3 64.8 65.2 65.9 66.7 67.8 68.6 69.8 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.5 49.8 51.4 54.2 54.2 54.6 54.6 55.7 56.1 56.5 57.6 58.4 59.7 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
75 80 81 92 92 93 98 98 98 98 101 ~ 91 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
42 45 50 55 57 57 58 58 59 59 60 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
39 42 46 53 53 53 53 53 54 54 55 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
33 36 40 50 50 50 50 51 51 52 52 ~ 47 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
65.1 66.5 71.6 71.7 73.7 77.3 78.2 79.1 81 82.6 85.1 87 88.8 91.1 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54.4 54.9 55 56 58.6 59.4 60 60.7 62.4 65 67.6 67.9 68.6 69.9 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42.2 44 44.2 45.4 45.6 46.2 46.2 46.7 47.3 50.5 51.1 51.6 53.3 53.3 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
73 75.5 75.5 78.9 81.9 82.9 83.7 85.5 86 88.8 92.8 93.7 94.6 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
37 38.3 39.1 43.9 44 44.5 45.1 45.2 45.4 45.6 46.3 47.5 48.4 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.6 27.8 28.6 30.8 31.2 31.5 31.6 32.3 32.5 32.9 33.2 33.3 34.4 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
22.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
127.5 132.3 135.4 142.7 153.6 154.3 155.6 158.1 161.1 166.6 167.6 170.6 171.3 171.8 175.6 ~ 156 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
104.7 112.7 121.4 123.1 123.7 125.7 126.7 127.7 128 129.7 133.2 133.6 134.1 135.7 138.8 ~ 127 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34.8 35.8 35.8 37.9 45.7 46.4 46.6 47.7 90 90.6 91.6 92.1 93.4 99.2 100 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32.4 33.1 33.6 36 43.6 44.7 44.8 45.1 79.7 82 82.5 83.3 85 87.4 89.8 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
155 164 167 169 173 ~ 166 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
109.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
48 51 52 55 57.7 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
31 32 33 34 36.7 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
66.9
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
149.1 151 157.8 158.6 161 161.3 164.5 166.1 166.2 166.6 167 167.2 168.9 172.7 174.3 ~ 163 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
129.6 145.9 150.1 151.3 152.7 154.1 154.9 157 157.2 158.9 159.9 160.8 161.5 ~ 153 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
68.4 71.2 71.9 73.5 74 74.7 76.5 78.2 78.8 79 79.1 79.5 79.5 79.9 80.2 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.7 30.3 30.4 31 31.1 31.4 31.5 31.6 31.9 32.2 32.3 32.4 32.8 33.2 33.3 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
146.1
143.2
145.5
139.7
127.8
140.4
134.2
139.9
130.2
136.7
139.1
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
150.4
146.6
150.9
139.9
137
142.2
138.6
141.6
131.4
136.7
140.5
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Doom: The Dark Ages20.317.315.8
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered49.329.219.78.54
Civilization 71216334
Monster Hunter Wilds272114
Kingdom Come Deliverance 219.916.313
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle29.118.8
Stalker 225.421.818.6
Call of Duty Black Ops 669624337
Until Dawn50.332.522.116.4
God of War Ragnarök41.134.330.624.9
Final Fantasy XVI22.722.718.8
Space Marine 23428.726.922.6
Star Wars Outlaws1614.712.5
Black Myth: Wukong41322518
Once Human58393228
The First Descendant63393126
F1 2472644766.46
Senua's Saga Hellblade 220.816.612.6
Ghost of Tsushima34.6292320
Dragon's Dogma 2
Horizon Forbidden West28261917
Last Epoch60.444.93830.2
Skull & Bones48413426
Helldivers 241.631.930.126.8
Enshrouded23.222.920.314.5
Palworld81.562.336.230.1
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown209168.4160.3
Ready or Not75.359.843.827.5
The Finals94.669.960.246.2
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora22201712
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 202377644943
Alan Wake 221.620.219.8
Lords of the Fallen26.123.918.713.2
Total War Pharaoh98775647
Assassin's Creed Mirage52444232
Counter-Strike 2117.390.752.335.8
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty47372926
Baldur's Gate 343342928
Lies of P62.553.946.338.4
The Crew Motorfest40363026
Armored Core 649.843.340.133.1
Atlas Fallen
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart31.82621.520.9
F1 2389816214
Resident Evil 4 Remake
Company of Heroes 393.165.349.849.1
Atomic Heart59.34626.821.3
Returnal32302622
Hogwarts Legacy42.636.824.819.3
F1 22104957320
Ghostwire Tokyo44.743.1
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands82593931
Farming Simulator 222011208178
Forza Horizon 5160776935
Total War: Three Kingdoms179.361.637.325.2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider11448453823
Strange Brigade184766555
Far Cry 591555047
X-Plane 11.11786148
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark84443122.8
Dota 2 Reborn1561276660
The Witcher 3166109.25333
GTA V1631537632
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
13
18
19
8
16
23
16
4
22
27
8
1
28
18
2
1
3





For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 23. 00:47:53

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 22 May 2025 05:32:33 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.037s ... 0.037s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.037s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.037s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12524 +0.034s ... 0.071s

#8 got single benchmarks 12524 +0.059s ... 0.13s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.13s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.971s ... 1.1s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.101s

#12 Got 886 rows for game benchmarks. +0.169s ... 1.269s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.269s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.042s ... 1.312s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.512s ... 1.823s

#16 return log +0.005s ... 1.828s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon 890M graphics card

The affordable mini PC with an AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 that costs less than $700 - Detailed review of the Acemagic F3A

The affordable mini PC with an AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 that costs less than $700 - Detailed review of the Acemagic F3A

The Acemagic F3A unites AMD-Ryzen-AI-9-HX-370 power with a compact size—at a fair price. We analyzed how well the mini PC performed against the competition in o...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | AMD Radeon 890M | 1 kg
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 review: It just keeps getting faster

Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 review: Skip the Intel version for better performance

Framework is squeezing as much as it can from its aging design all in the name of sustainability. It's working better than expected for the most part in terms o...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | AMD Radeon 890M | 13.50" | 1.3 kg
XL gaming handheld, tablet and laptop: OneXplayer X1 Pro review

XL gaming handheld, tablet and laptop: OneXplayer X1 Pro review

The OneXplayer X1 Pro unites a gaming handheld, tablet and laptop in one device. Its powerful performance, brilliant 10.95-inch 2.5K display and versatile featu...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | AMD Radeon 890M | 10.95" | 928 g
Minisforum AI X1 Pro

Minisforum AI X1 Pro review: An all-round mini PC for the office, multimedia, gaming and creative tasks

The Minisforum AI X1 Pro is an impressively performant compact mini PC. It promises sufficient power for work, light gaming and creative applications thanks to ...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | AMD Radeon 890M | 1.4 kg
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI review: Supercharged business laptop with AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX

HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI review: Supercharged business laptop with AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX

The AMD Zen 5 CPU makes the EliteBook X G1a 14 AI a powerhouse of a laptop especially for a business subnotebook without needing to sacrifice battery life or er...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 | AMD Radeon 890M | 14.00" | 1.5 kg

GMK EVO-X1: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 0.6 kg
  Review » GMKtec EVO-X1 mini PC review: New boxy design with Oculink and Ryzen AI 9

GPD Pocket 4: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 8.80", 0.8 kg
  Review » GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 handheld PC review: Small, fast, and oh so adorable

Minisforum EliteMini AI370: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 0.5 kg
  Review » Minisforum EliteMini AI370 review: The mini PC sets new standards with an AMD Zen 5 Strix Point APU

Beelink SER9: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 0.8 kg
  Review » Beelink SER9 review: AMD Zen 5 makes this mini PC faster than ever

HP OmniBook Ultra 14: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 performance debut: HP OmniBook Ultra 14 laptop review

Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED laptop review: Successful performance of the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
  Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point CPU analysis - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 versus Intel Core Ultra, Apple M3 and Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point CPU analysis - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 versus Intel Core Ultra, Apple M3 and Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
  Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point iGPU analysis - Radeon 890M versus Intel Arc Graphics, Apple M3 and Qualcomm Adreno X1-85

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
  Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point iGPU analysis - Radeon 890M versus Intel Arc Graphics, Apple M3 and Qualcomm Adreno X1-85

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » AMD Zen 5 Strix Point iGPU analysis - Radeon 890M versus Intel Arc Graphics, Apple M3 and Qualcomm Adreno X1-85

  Review » Asus Zenbook S 16 laptop review - The first Copilot+ laptop with AMD Zen 5 inside a 1.3-cm-thick case

HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI

MSI Stealth A16 AI+ A3XVGG, HX 370: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth A16 AI+ A3XVGG, HX 370

HP OmniBook Ultra 14: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook Ultra 14

HP EliteBook X G1a: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook X G1a

Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606

ONEXPLAYER X1 Pro GA15H-HX370-32GB-1TB-H: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 10.95", 0.9 kg
   » OneXplayer X1 Pro: Nintendo Switch on steroids

Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » Asus Vivobook S 14 (S5406) OLED laptop with 17-hour battery life drops back to record low price after 33% cut

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 1.5 kg
   » "Open-Box Excellent" Asus Zenbook S 16 with Ryzen AI 9 365 APU and 120 Hz OLED panel is now enjoying 41% price cut

Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED laptop with 32 GB of RAM and super long battery life enjoys 33.3% price cut

   » Long-lasting Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED laptop with efficient Lunar Lake APU is back on sale

   » Asus Vivobook S 16 (M506KA) and Vivobook S 14 (M5406WA) debut with new AMD Krackan Point APUs and OLED displays

   » Asus Vivobook S 16 (S5606CA) launched with latest Intel Core Ultra 200H Arrow Lake mobile CPUs and Lumina OLED display

HP OmniBook Ultra 14: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » HP OmniBook Ultra 14 with Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and 32 GB RAM drops below $1,150 for a limited time

Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED laptop with newest Lunar Lake CPU and long battery life is back on sale at lowest price to date

   » Portable Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED laptop with latest Intel Lunar Lake SoC and 16 GB RAM is on sale at 32% discount

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
   » Latest Asus ProArt PX13 OLED creator laptop with Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 drops to lowest price ever

   » Strix Point APU handheld performance simulation: Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 shines in gaming even when tested at just 17 W

Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
   » Strix Point APU handheld performance simulation: Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 shines in gaming even when tested at just 17 W

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 1.5 kg
   » Strix Point APU handheld performance simulation: Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 shines in gaming even when tested at just 17 W

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-07-31)