Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

Pragmata review: Is a mid-range GPU enough for all the visual bells and whistles?

Combat meets hacking.

Shortly after Resident Evil Requiem, Capcom has already released its next hit, which has been very well received by both the press and the gaming community. We take a closer look at the many technical features and examine how the game performs.
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, Ninh Duy (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...
Gaming Laptop Desktop Gamecheck

Technology, settings & benchmark

Like Resident Evil Requiem, Pragmata is also based on Capcom’s in-house RE Engine, which rarely falls short of other well-known technical frameworks such as Unreal Engine 5. The sci-fi world stands out with detailed characters and stylish environments, most of which feature sharp textures. There is also little to criticize when it comes to effects.

The opening sequence, with its approach through space toward an abandoned station, is strongly reminiscent of Dead Space and evokes both fascination and unease. Thanks to its effective presentation, the atmosphere is generally quite dense. In terms of gameplay, Pragmata tries to set itself apart from the competition primarily through its engaging combat system. The interesting hacking mini-game mechanics give battles a certain dynamism and an unusual sense of momentum, although some players may feel slightly overwhelmed by the resulting multitasking.

Pragmata
Pragmata
Pragmata
Pragmata
Pragmata
Pragmata
Pragmata
Pragmata
Pragmata
Pragmata
Pragmata
Pragmata

Another highlight from a PC perspective is the extensive graphics menu, which - unsurprisingly - often takes its cues from Resident Evil Requiem. That said, we do not find the structure or implementation entirely ideal. For example, it is certainly good to have several presets, but these also change settings that presets usually leave untouched in other titles — most notably the resolution.

The built-in VRAM display, meanwhile, earns some points. According to the presets, the Performance setting requires 6 GB of video memory, the Balanced setting 8 GB, and the Quality setting a full 12 GB. This confirms the ongoing trend toward higher VRAM requirements and highlights the meager memory configurations of many graphics cards. In 2026, dedicated gamers should no longer choose a graphics card with only 8 GB, although other titles are even more wasteful with VRAM, such as Borderlands 4. On the other hand, the game is otherwise pleasantly compact: around 37 GB of storage space is surprisingly little for a modern AAA game.

Pragmata
Pragmata
Pragmata
Pragmata

From a purely technical perspective, Pragmata is packed with nearly every feature currently available, from ray tracing - which is enabled automatically starting with the Quality preset - to path tracing, including Ray Reconstruction, as well as frame generation and upscaling via DLSS and FSR. Changes also do not require a restart, which is very convenient. Even shortly after release, Pragmata already feels quite mature - as it should - in terms of performance, stability, loading times, and related aspects.

Quality Preset with Path Tracing and Ray Reconstruction
Quality Preset with Path Tracing and Ray Reconstruction
Quality Preset with Ray Tracing
Balanced preset
Minimum preset

For our benchmarks, we use the very beginning of the game, when the main character enters the complex for the first time. Using CapFrameX, we record an approximately 40-second sequence that transitions from a manual sprint into an automatic camera movement.

Results

FHD / 1,920 x 1,080

Considering the level of visual quality, we would describe the hardware requirements as moderate. With a current mid-range GPU on the level of the GeForce RTX 5060 laptop, even maximum settings are not a problem at Full HD; the VRAM issue only tends to become noticeable at higher resolutions. With DLSS Balanced enabled, even path tracing and Ray Reconstruction are feasible on the mobile RTX 5060, although the nearly 60 FPS are held back by occasional stutters

Pragmata
    1920x1080 Minimum Preset     1920x1080 Balanced Preset     1920x1080 Quality Preset     1920x1080 Quality Preset + DLSS Balanced + Path Tracing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
265 (103.1min, 180.4P0.1, 215P1) fps ∼100%
202 (89.9min, 129.7P0.1, 156.6P1) fps ∼100%
177.3 (75min, 119.2P0.1, 141.8P1) fps ∼100%
123.1 (87.3min, 89.8P0.1, 95.1P1) fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
XMG Neo 16 E25
244 (101.8min, 131P0.1, 191P1) fps ∼92%
188.8 (90min, 105.8P0.1, 138.8P1) fps ∼93%
159 (74.8min, 91.7P0.1, 118.1P1) fps ∼90%
115.2 (75.7min, 79.1P0.1, 87.7P1) fps ∼94%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
Tuxedo Stellaris 16
218 (20.9min, 94.6P0.1, 158.4P1) fps ∼82%
162.5 (54.4min, 77.1P0.1, 117.9P1) fps ∼80%
134 (54.9min, 71.5P0.1, 103.3P1) fps ∼76%
94.8 (50.7min, 57.8P0.1, 72.4P1) fps ∼77%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
XMG Fusion 16 M25
144.3 (89min, 106.2P0.1, 115.8P1) fps ∼54%
102.3 (63.4min, 75.9P0.1, 80.7P1) fps ∼51%
83 (61.7min, 64.9P0.1, 68.7P1) fps ∼47%
57.7 (8.01min, 32.8P0.1, 45.2P1) fps ∼47%

QHD / 2,560 x 1,440 (+ upscaling)

A combination of QHD resolution (2,560 x 1,440) and the Quality preset still does not require a high-end GPU. The RTX 5060 Laptop again reaches around 60 FPS here, with significantly better minimum FPS than with path tracing enabled. With DLSS Balanced, it even averages almost 80 FPS.

Pragmata
    2560x1440 Quality Preset     2560x1440 Quality Preset + DLSS Balanced
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
136.7 (73min, 103P0.1, 108.9P1) fps ∼100%
165.6 (102.9min, 116.1P0.1, 137.8P1) fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
XMG Neo 16 E25
120.1 (75.1min, 86.5P0.1, 94.6P1) fps ∼88%
148.7 (83min, 93.3P0.1, 111.7P1) fps ∼90%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
Tuxedo Stellaris 16
98.1 (56.3min, 72.9P0.1, 77.7P1) fps ∼72%
126.6 (68.1min, 77.2P0.1, 100.6P1) fps ∼76%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
XMG Fusion 16 M25
59.2 (46min, 46.9P0.1, 47.5P1) fps ∼43%
79.3 (43.3min, 56P0.1, 67.5P1) fps ∼48%

UHD / 3,840 x 2,160 (+ upscaling)

Only on 4K displays does the hardware gap really become apparent. While the aforementioned notebook RTX 5060 still achieves playable frame rates, at least with DLSS enabled, using the Quality preset without image optimizations requires at least a mobile RTX 5070 Ti for solid results.

Pragmata
    3840x2160 Quality Preset     3840x2160 Quality Preset + DLSS Balanced
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
79.7 (35.6min, 58.6P0.1, 61.6P1) fps ∼100%
114.9 (71.8min, 89.8P0.1, 97.4P1) fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
XMG Neo 16 E25
68.8 (48.1min, 50.5P0.1, 54P1) fps ∼86%
97.7 (34.1min, 73.4P0.1, 81.6P1) fps ∼85%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
Tuxedo Stellaris 16
55.3 (41.8min, 42.3P0.1, 43.9P1) fps ∼69%
80.2 (57.3min, 63.9P0.1, 67.4P1) fps ∼70%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
XMG Fusion 16 M25
31.3 (1.987min, 6.76P0.1, 24.3P1) fps ∼39%
48.4 (19.3min, 39.1P0.1, 40.9P1) fps ∼42%

(Multi) Frame Generation

Since the graphics demands are fairly moderate, Frame Generation is less necessary here than in other 2026 titles. As the table with the RTX 5080 laptop and RTX 5090 laptop shows, the technology delivers the expected performance gains, as usual, and can be particularly worthwhile on high-refresh-rate monitors.

3.840 x 2,160, Quality Preset DLSS Balanced DLSS Balanced + MFGx2 DLSS Balanced + MFGx4
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop 98 fps (1 % low: 69 fps) 148 fps (1 % low: 63 fps) 238 fps (1 % low: 52 fps)
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop 80 fps (1 % low: 60 fps) 123 fps (1 % low: 52 fps) 196 fps (1 % low: 42 fps)

Verdict - Capcom knows what it’s doing

Looking at the overall package, the developers have done a pretty good job - both with the technology and with the game itself. In most scenarios, notebook users do not necessarily need a true high-end system to enjoy the game. As usual, upscaling and Frame Generation can help when performance becomes tight.

Test systems

XMG Neo 16 E25 (RTX 5090 Laptop)
XMG Neo 16 E25 (RTX 5090 Laptop)
Tuxedo Stellaris 16 Gen7 (RTX 5080 Laptop)
Tuxedo Stellaris 16 Gen7 (RTX 5080 Laptop)
XMG Fusion 16 M25 (RTX 5060 Laptop)
XMG Fusion 16 M25 (RTX 5060 Laptop)

Overview

Because gaming benchmarks are very time-consuming and are sometimes delayed by activation restrictions, we can only present a limited number of results when the articles are published. More GPUs will follow.

Show Restrictions
PosModel< PrevNext >Pragmata
 Pragmata (2026)
low
1920x1080
Minimum Preset
med.
1920x1080
Balanced Preset
high
1920x1080
Quality Preset
QHD
2560x1440
Quality Preset
4K
3840x2160
Quality Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
359
284
255
211
139.2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
313
244
217
174.7
110.4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
292
227
194.8
152.3
93.1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
264
204
172.1
131.9
77.7
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
295
227
173.1
137.3
83
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT
287
224
176.1
136.2
79.9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
265
202
177.3
136.7
79.7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
244
188.8
159
120.1
68.8
AMD Radeon RX 9070
264
205
162.6
123.1
69.7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
218
162.5
134
98.1
55.3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
189.4
146.8
125.2
96
57.4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
176.9
133.4
108.6
78.6
43.2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
188.4n2
138.15n2
113.95n2
82.65n2
47.7
AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
179.9
132.8
102.4
75.4
40.8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
153.6
118.9
100.5
73.7
42.5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
147.9
108.8
91.6
65.2
32.7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
125.2
92.7
77.1
53.3
28.5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
108.6
81.9
67.3
28.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
144.3
102.3
83
59.2
31.3
PosModel< PrevNext >Pragmata
low med. high QHD 4K
Intel Arc B580
96.9
76.1
68.5
51.2
29.7
Intel Arc A770
45.8
39.9
35.9
30.3
20.3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
114.4
86.2
69.2
50.6
27.7
AMD Radeon 8060S
141.7
90.6
65.2
49.9
27.3
Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
40.1
29.6
21.9
AMD Radeon 840M
12.8
10.7
7.2
(-) * Smaller values are better. / n123 Number of benchmarks for this median value / * Approximate position

 

Legend
5Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.
Read all 4 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Pragmata review: Is a mid-range GPU enough for all the visual bells and whistles?
Florian Glaser, 2026-04-30 (Update: 2026-04-30)