Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon 840M

AMD Radeon 840M

The Radeon 840M is a fairly powerful RDNA 3.5 architecture iGPU that debuted in early 2025 in Krakan Point APUs and a direct successor to the Radeon 740M. It packs just a few differences under the hood, such as faster caches; its 4CUs/WGPs (256 unified shaders) run at up to 2,900 MHz.

DX12 Ultimate, ray tracing, AI image generation and other modern features are all supported here, as are many popular video codecs including first and foremost AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not HW-supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips. Miracast and FreeSync support is present. The iGPU can drive up to 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p60.

RDNA 3.5-based GPUs are projected to be fully supported by AMD until some time in 2027.

Performance

Its gaming performance is good enough for playing 2024 games in low graphics settings. Looking at the specs, the 840M should be slightly faster than the average Radeon 740M.

Power consumption

Krakan Point chips are a single-die design, meaning the iGPU is built with the same TSMC N4P process as the CPU cores for above average, as of late 2024, power efficiency.

AMD Radeon 800M Series

Radeon 890M compare 1024 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 880M compare 768 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 860M compare 512 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 840M 256 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 820M compare 128 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
CodenameKrackan Point
ArchitectureRDNA 3+
iGPUIntegrated Graphics
Pipelines256 - unified
Raytracing Cores4
Core Speed2900 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7500 MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2
Man. Technology4 nm
PCIe4
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1
FeaturesFreeSync, Miracast, SUHD 4320p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/VP9/AV1 encoding and decoding
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.06.2024
PredecessorRadeon 740M
CPU in Radeon 840MGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen AI 5 3406 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz2900 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 3406 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz2900 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI 7 3456 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz2900 MHz
min. - max.? MHz2800 - 2900 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
2.1 pt (6%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
min: 130     avg: 136     median: 136 (1%)     max: 142 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3473     avg: 4379     median: 4513 (7%)     max: 5208 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 3706     avg: 4732     median: 4854 (4%)     max: 5606 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 236090     avg: 245441     median: 245440 (27%)     max: 254791 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1517     avg: 1687     median: 1663 (4%)     max: 1928 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1335     avg: 1493     median: 1479 (3%)     max: 1705 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 20257     avg: 23380     median: 23369.5 (22%)     max: 26645 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 27616     avg: 31174     median: 30542 (8%)     max: 37360 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 6985     avg: 7913     median: 7968 (10%)     max: 8814 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 6676     avg: 7559     median: 7520.5 (6%)     max: 8453 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
28720 Points (8%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
24793 Points (14%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 31375     avg: 33164     median: 33164 (43%)     max: 34953 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
20280 points (14%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 129.3     avg: 148.8     median: 145 (8%)     max: 181.3 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.9 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
25 fps (9%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
56 fps (10%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
139.4 fps (10%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
104.6 fps (3%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.6 - Geekbench 6.6 GPU OpenCL
min: 11984     avg: 13173     median: 13254 (3%)     max: 14132 points
Geekbench 6.6 - Geekbench 6.6 GPU Vulkan
min: 20105     avg: 21707     median: 21880 (5%)     max: 22833 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
367 Samples/s (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
720 Samples/s (1%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4356 points (4%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 47     avg: 53.6     median: 53.6 (7%)     max: 59.4 Watt
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 47.8     avg: 52.2     median: 51.1 (14%)     max: 57.3 Watt
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39.9     avg: 48.2     median: 48.2 (6%)     max: 54.8 Watt
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.2007     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (1%)     max: 0.2374 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Pragmata

Pragmata

2026
low 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
10.3 10.6 ~ 10 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
8.7 9.1 ~ 9 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
8.2 8.2 ~ 8 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
13.5 14 ~ 14 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
7.4 7.7 ~ 8 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.8 6.8 ~ 7 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
20.3 21.1 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
11.7 13.3 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
8.9 9.2 ~ 9 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
33 41 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28 36 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17 25 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
14.4 17.2 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.5 11.4 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7 8.1 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
32.8 39.8 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.7 27.4 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.3 18.5 ~ 17 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
13.4 16.4 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
9.9 12.2 ~ 11 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
7.6 8.9 ~ 8 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
8.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
5.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
8.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
6.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
9.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
78.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
39.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
23.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
low 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
25.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080 cinem.
7.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
6.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
5.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
38.8 44 45.8 48.4 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38 39 45 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27 27.3 32.4 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.6 6.8 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
8.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
20.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
18.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
22.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1920x1080
162.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
113.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
84.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
68  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
29.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
21 23.5 23.7 24.8 25.9 26.3 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.2 17.1 17.8 18.4 19.1 19.7 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.8 13.6 14.8 15.2 15.4 15.8 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.9 11 12.2 12.4 12.6 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
45.4
37.5
45.5
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
11.6
9.6
11
9.5
10.6
10.8
low 1920x1080
19.8 20.1 20.6 22.7 23.1 23.9 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.5 17.5 17.6 18.6 18.7 19 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.8 13.3 13.4 13.5 14.2 14.3 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.4 11.7 12.5 12.8 14 14.3 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
38.7
32.8
39.9
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
112.7 128.8 129.8 131.9 ~ 126 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39.7 48.1 48.6 50.6 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32.7 40.1 40.2 41.1 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28.4 33.5 34.2 34.5 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
47.7 52.5 53 57.3 59 63.1 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
37.7 38.7 39.9 42 42.9 46.7 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.2 34 34 34 36.5 39.1 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
46.5 57.3 57.4 61.1 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.6 24.7 25.6 27 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.7 16.8 18.2 20.4 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
124.6 134.5 136.8 139.1 160.6 167.5 ~ 144 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
103.2 105.9 109.5 121.1 124.5 127.2 ~ 115 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
59.8 60 63.7 71.4 73.7 80.1 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54.2 56.5 57.9 62.6 66 67.7 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
130.6 148.8 151.9 155 163.2 164.1 ~ 152 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
115.1 130 135.8 151.5 ~ 133 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.7 45.4 46.1 47 50.2 52.4 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.7 14.3 18.3 19.3 21.5 22.7 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
120.2
91
126.4
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
123.4
83.3
125.3
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Pragmata12.810.77.2
Death Stranding 21098
Crimson Desert1487
Resident Evil Requiem21139
Call of Duty Black Ops 7373221
Anno 117: Pax Romana16108
ARC Raiders362517
The Outer Worlds 215118
Borderlands 48.717.45.84
F1 25433424
Doom: The Dark Ages8.156.33
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered10.99.59
Assassin's Creed Shadows12119
Civilization 778.539.120.1
Monster Hunter Wilds12.49.8
Kingdom Come Deliverance 223.817.113.9
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle13.8
Stalker 211.910.18.1
Until Dawn25.916.110.5
Space Marine 215.913.812.2
Star Wars Outlaws7.56.635.29
F1 244441296
Senua's Saga Hellblade 210.58.786.43
Ghost of Tsushima20.115.913.2
Horizon Forbidden West18.215.410.6
Dragon's Dogma 215.311.3
Helldivers 222.516.714.7
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown162.8113.5
Counter-Strike 284.46829.6
Cyberpunk 207724181512
Baldur's Gate 322181313
Strange Brigade126473933
X-Plane 11.11554135
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark562518
Dota 2 Reborn1441156861
GTA V1521334718
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
24
6
2
3
24
6
2
2
27
3
2
4
1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Amazon Logo
  • $829.00
    HP OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 16" FHD+ Touch Screen Laptop |AMD Ryzen AI 5 340|AMD Radeon 840M | Copilot|Backlit|Meteor Silver| 16GB RAM DDR5 | 512GB SSD |Windows 11 Home|Bundle with Stylus Pen
  • $379.99
    Dell 2025 14 Plus 2-in-1 14” WUXGA Touch Laptop 6-Core AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 AMD Radeon 840M Graphics 16GB LPDDR5 512GB SSD USB-C w/DP WiFi BE BT Webcam HDMI1.4 Backlit KB Fingerprint Windows 11 Home
  • $739.00
    Lenovo 2025 Yoga 7 2-in-1 16” WUXGA IPS Touch Laptop 6-Core AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 Radeon 840M Graphics 16GB LPDDR5 512GB SSD USB-C w/DP WiFi BE BT Webcam HDMI2.1 Backlit KB Fingerprint Windows 11 Home
  • $698.99
    Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 2-in-1 Laptop 14" WUXGA Touch AMD 8-core Ryzen AI 7 350 Up to 50 Tops (>i7-12700H) 16GB RAM 1TB SSD Backlit for Creator Business Professional Win11 Copilot+ AI
  • $679.97
    Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 Copilot+ PC 16" WUXGA Touchscreen Laptop|AMD Ryzen AI 5 340|AMD Radeon 840M|Fingerprint|Backlit| 16GB RAM DDR5 | 512GB SSD | Windows 11 Home | Bundle with USB 3.0 Hub

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 12. 00:29:13

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 11 Jun 2026 09:47:24 +0200 +0.004s ... 0.004s

#4 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.026s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.026s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.026s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12990 +0.054s ... 0.079s

#8 got single benchmarks 12990 +0.033s ... 0.112s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.112s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +2.277s ... 2.389s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 2.389s

#12 Got 253 rows for game benchmarks. +0.029s ... 2.418s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 2.418s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.024s ... 2.442s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.373s ... 2.814s

#16 return log +0.553s ... 3.368s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon 840M graphics card

The ultimate all-rounder? Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14 G11 Convertible review

The ultimate all-rounder? Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14 G11 Convertible review

Lenovo has designed the Yoga 7a 2-in-1 as a mobile device for almost every conceivable scenario. Whether as a tablet or a classic notebook, the 14-incher offers plenty of options for use. We picked up a model with the brand-new Ryzen AI 5 435 and conducted various comparisons.
AMD Ryzen AI 5 435, Radeon 840M, 14", 1.4 kg
HP EliteBoard G1a AI review: A PC hidden in plain sight

HP EliteBoard G1a AI review: A PC hidden in plain sight

The EliteBoard can potentially clean up your cable spaghetti and be a huge space saver in the office — we just wish it were a little bigger with a few more ports.
AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340, Radeon 840M, 771 g
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14 review

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14 Laptop Review: Slim at any price

The slim edition of Lenovo's popular Yoga series comes with an elegant and particularly thin chassis. We look at which aspects work, which ones suffer, and how the fresh Ryzen AI 7 445 processor performs in our review.
AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, Radeon 840M, 14", 1.2 kg
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15 review: Ryzen AI 5 430 performance debut

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15 review: Ryzen AI 5 430 performance debut

As one of the very few 15.3-inch convertible laptops, the new IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15 targets entry-level users while still providing the latest AMD Zen 5 CPUs and even 165 Hz OLED for not that much extra.
AMD Ryzen AI 5 430, Radeon 840M, 15.3", 1.8 kg
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16AGP11 review: Latest AMD Ryzen AI 7 refresh lags behind Intel

Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16AGP11 review: Latest AMD Ryzen AI 7 refresh lags behind Intel

The Yoga 7 2-in-1 16 is back for 2026 with the exact same external design as the original 2023 model. Instead, new CPU and display options help to distinguish this latest model from earlier configurations — sometimes for the worst.
AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, Radeon 840M, 16", 1.8 kg

Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 laptop review: Zen 5 takes a shot at Intel

Asus VivoBook 18 M1807GA: AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, 18.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 18 M1807GA

Lenovo IdeaPad 5a 2-in-1 14AGP11: AMD Ryzen AI 5 430, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5a 2-in-1 14AGP11

Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 16AGP11: AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 16AGP11

Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11

Asus Zenbook 14 UM3406GA: AMD Ryzen AI 5 430, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14 UM3406GA

Asus Vivobook S14 M3407GA: AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S14 M3407GA

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 AI 5 430: AMD Ryzen AI 5 430, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP10: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, 14.00", 0 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP10

HP OmniBook X Flip NGAI 14-fk0000ng: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook X Flip NGAI 14-fk0000ng

Dell 14 Plus DB14255: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Dell 14 Plus DB14255

Acer Swift Air 16 SFA16-61M: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, 16.00", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Air 16 SFA16-61M

HP OmniBook 3 NGAI 15-fn0000: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook 3 NGAI 15-fn0000

HP OmniBook 5 NGAI 16-ag1000: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook 5 NGAI 16-ag1000

Dell 14 Plus 2-in-1, Ryzen AI 5 340: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Dell 14 Plus 2-in-1, Ryzen AI 5 340

HP EliteBoard G1a AI: AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340, 0.8 kg
   » HP EliteBoard G1a is missing the one feature that every other keyboard has

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11: AMD Ryzen AI 5 430, 15.30", 1.8 kg
   » Our first Ryzen AI 5 430 benchmarks are in and they're a mixed bag

   » OLED upgrade is almost a no-brainer for the new Lenovo IdeaPad 5a 2-in-1 15

Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16AGP11: AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, 16.00", 1.8 kg
   » HP OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 16 sale undercuts the new Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 by over $700

   » AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 disappoints in first in-house benchmarks

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

M5 Max 32-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

M4 9-Core GPU *
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-02-18)