Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon 840M

AMD Radeon 840M

The Radeon 840M is a fairly powerful RDNA 3.5 architecture iGPU that debuted in early 2025 in Krakan Point APUs and a direct successor to the Radeon 740M. It packs just a few differences under the hood, such as faster caches; its 4CUs/WGPs (256 unified shaders) run at up to 2,900 MHz.

DX12 Ultimate, ray tracing, AI image generation and other modern features are all supported here, as are many popular video codecs including first and foremost AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not HW-supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips. Miracast and FreeSync support is present. The iGPU can drive up to 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p60.

RDNA 3.5-based GPUs are projected to be fully supported by AMD until some time in 2027.

Performance

Its gaming performance is good enough for playing 2024 games in low graphics settings. Looking at the specs, the 840M should be slightly faster than the average Radeon 740M.

Power consumption

Krakan Point chips are a single-die design, meaning the iGPU is built with the same TSMC N4P process as the CPU cores for above average, as of late 2024, power efficiency.

AMD Radeon 800M Series

Radeon 890M compare 1024 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 880M compare 768 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 860M compare 512 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 840M 256 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 820M compare 128 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
CodenameKrackan Point
ArchitectureRDNA 3+
Pipelines256 - unified
Raytracing Cores4
Core Speed2900 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7500 MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2
technology4 nm
PCIe4
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1
FeaturesFreeSync, Miracast, SUHD 4320p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/VP9/AV1 encoding and decoding
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.06.2024
PredecessorRadeon 740M
CPU in Radeon 840MGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 4406 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz2900 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI 5 3406 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz2900 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 3406 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz2900 MHz
min. - max.? MHz2800 - 2900 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
2.1 pt (6%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
5208 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
5606 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
236090 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
1928 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1705 Points (3%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
26645 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
37360 Points (9%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
8814 Points (11%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
8453 Points (6%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
28720 Points (8%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
24793 Points (14%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
34953 Points (46%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
20280 points (14%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
181.3 fps (11%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.9 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
25 fps (9%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
56 fps (10%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
139.4 fps (10%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
104.6 fps (3%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
13004 points (3%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
22639 points (6%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
367 Samples/s (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
720 Samples/s (1%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4356 points (4%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
53.9 Watt (7%)
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
54.8 Watt (15%)
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
52.6 Watt (7%)
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
0.2 fps per Watt (1%)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Call of Duty Black Ops 7

Call of Duty Black Ops 7

2025
low 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Anno 117: Pax Romana

Anno 117: Pax Romana

2025
low 1920x1080
17.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
39.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
16.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
12.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
8.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
5.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
8.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
6.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
9.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
78.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
39.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
23.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
low 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
25.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080 cinem.
7.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
6.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
5.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
8.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
20.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
18.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
22.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1920x1080
162.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
113.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
84.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
68  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
29.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
24.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
11.6
low 1920x1080
23.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
131.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
59  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
61.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
167.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
124.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
73.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
66  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
163.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
151.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Call of Duty Black Ops 7413625
Anno 117: Pax Romana17.211.48.1
ARC Raiders39.821.715.3
The Outer Worlds 216.412.28.9
Borderlands 48.717.45.84
F1 25433424
Doom: The Dark Ages8.156.33
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered10.99.59
Assassin's Creed Shadows12119
Civilization 778.539.120.1
Monster Hunter Wilds12.49.8
Kingdom Come Deliverance 223.817.113.9
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle13.8
Stalker 211.910.18.1
Until Dawn25.916.110.5
Space Marine 215.913.812.2
Star Wars Outlaws7.56.635.29
F1 24443827
Senua's Saga Hellblade 210.58.786.43
Ghost of Tsushima20.115.913.2
Horizon Forbidden West18.215.410.6
Dragon's Dogma 215.311.3
Helldivers 222.516.714.7
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown162.8113.5
Counter-Strike 284.46829.6
Cyberpunk 207724.818.415.212.2
Baldur's Gate 323.118.613.312.8
Strange Brigade131.950.641.134.2
X-Plane 11.11594236.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark61.125.616.7
Dota 2 Reborn167.5124.573.766
GTA V163.2151.545.418.3
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
20
5
3
3
20
6
1
3
23
3
2
3
1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Amazon Logo
  • $748.98
    HP OmniBook X Flip 2 in 1 Laptop, 16" 2K IPS Touchscreen, AMD Ryzen AI 5 340(Beat i7-1355U), 16GB LPDDR5X 1TB SSD, AMD Radeon 840M Graphics, Wi-Fi 6E, 5MP IR Privacy Camera, AI Copilot+ PC, Win 11
  • $569.00
    HP OmniBook X Flip Copilot+ AI PC 2-in-1 Laptop | 16" WUXGA Touch (400nits) | AMD 6-core Ryzen AI 5 340 (Up to 50 Tops) | 16GB DDR5 512GB SSD | Backlit 5MP IR Privacy Camera Win11Pro w/DLCA Accessory
  • $749.99
    Dell Pro 16 Plus PB16255 AI Powered Laptop 16.0" WUXGA (AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, 16GB LPDDR5X, 512GB SSD, AMD Radeon 840M, Bluetooth 5.4, Wi-Fi 7, Win 11 Pro)
  • $929.99
    Dell Pro 16 Plus PB16255 AI Powered Laptop 16.0" WUXGA (AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, 16GB LPDDR5X, 1TB PCIe SSD, AMD Radeon 840M, Win 11 Pro)
  • $589.99
    HP OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 16" FHD+ Touch Screen Laptop |AMD Ryzen AI 5 340|AMD Radeon 840M | Copilot|Backlit|Meteor Silver| 16GB RAM DDR5 | 512GB SSD |Windows 11 Home|Bundle with Stylus Pen

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 24. 11:57:12

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 22 Jan 2026 05:37:10 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.03s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.03s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12990 +0.029s ... 0.059s

#8 got single benchmarks 12990 +0.013s ... 0.073s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.073s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.53s ... 0.603s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.603s

#12 Got 98 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 0.613s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.613s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.016s ... 0.629s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.168s ... 0.797s

#16 return log +0.696s ... 1.493s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon 840M graphics card

Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 laptop review: Zen 5 takes a shot at Intel

Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 laptop review: Zen 5 takes a shot at Intel

The Yoga 7 2-in-1 from Lenovo is not only—as its name suggests—an extremely versatile laptop, but is also available in various configurations. We grabbed a mode...
AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 | AMD Radeon 840M | 14.00" | 1.4 kg

HP OmniBook X Flip NGAI 14-fk0000ng: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook X Flip NGAI 14-fk0000ng

Dell 14 Plus DB14255: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Dell 14 Plus DB14255

Acer Swift Air 16 SFA16-61M: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, 16.00", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Air 16 SFA16-61M

HP OmniBook 3 NGAI 15-fn0000: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook 3 NGAI 15-fn0000

HP OmniBook 5 NGAI 16-ag1000: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook 5 NGAI 16-ag1000

Dell 14 Plus 2-in-1, Ryzen AI 5 340: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Dell 14 Plus 2-in-1, Ryzen AI 5 340

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Intel Graphics 2 Xe3
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-01-21)