Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

The Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake with 64 EUs) is an integrated graphics card in the Ice Lake SoCs (10th generation core 10xxG7) for laptops. It offers no dedicated graphics memory (no eDRAM cache like the Intel Iris Graphics 655 predecessor of the Coffee Lake SoCs). The clock rate depends on the processor model. At launch it looks like all models have a 300 MHz base clock and only differ in the boost clock (1050 - 1100 MHz). Another difference is the TDP as it can be configured from 12 - 25 Watt in the 15 Watt U-models and maybe even higher in the 25 Watt models that will come later.

The performance should be slightly above a AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 integrated GPU in the Ryzen 7 3000 series processors. e.g. Intel showed a Intel Iris Plus G7 against a Ryzen 7 3700U both configured at 25 Watt TDP and the Ice Lake GPU was able to beat the Vega 10 slightly in all games. Compared to the previous generation, Intel talks about a 2x performance improvement but wont specify the exact model. All in all the GPU should be positioned in the entry level of dedicated GPUs (Nvidia GeForce MX150 level?) and therefore most suited for less demanding games like Fortnite, Rainbow 6 Siege, or Rocket League at reduced details. The theoretical performance of the Chip is specified with 1.12 TFLOPS (FP32) and 2.25 TFLOPS (FP16) when running at 1.1 GHz.

Compared to the older Gen.9 graphics (e.g., UHD Graphics 620 in Whiskey Lake), Gen.11 is using a wider architecture and also has 3 MB dedicated L3 cache near the GPU.

A special new feature of the Gen11 graphics card is the new Variable Rate Shading (VRS) support. With it game designers can decide where to spend shading time and e.g. shade object in the background or behind fog with less resolution (up to using only one source for a 4x4 block). With this technique early results show up to 1.3x performance in Unreal Engine POC and 1.2x speedup in Civ 6. Up to now VRS is only supported by the new Nvidia Turing architecture (GTX 1650 and up).

Another improved hardware piece is the integrated video de- and encoder that was improved significantly according to Intel. They did not specify any more details, but the previous generation was able to decode VP9 and H.265/HEVC in Main10 profile with 10 bit color depth using the dedicated hardware.

The Iris Plus G7 supports three display pipes that can each output 5K60 signals (via DisplayPort 1.4 HBR3 or HDMI 2.0b). Combining two pipes, the chip is capable to output 8k content.

The Ice Lake SoCs and therefore the integrated GPU are manufactured in the modern 10nm process at Intel that should be comparable to the 7nm process of TSMC.

Gen. 11 Series

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 64 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compare 32 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) compare 64 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) compare 48 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) compare 32 @ 0.35 - 0.9 GHz
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU) compare 32 @ 0.4 - 0.85 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) compare 24 @ 0.35 - 0.8 GHz
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) compare 16 @ 0.25 - 0.85 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) compare 24 @ 0.35 - 0.8 GHz
CodenameIce Lake G7 Gen. 11
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake
Pipelines64 - unified
Core Speed300 - 1100 (Boost) MHz
Memory TypeDDR4
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5
Power Consumption12-25 Watt
technology10 nm
FeaturesQuickSync
Date of Announcement28.05.2019
CPU in Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i5-1038NG74 x 2000 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1050 MHz
Intel Core i7-1068G74 x 2300 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1100 MHz
Intel Core i7-1065G74 x 1300 MHz, 15 W300 MHz1100 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz1050 - 1100 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
1.3 pt (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 587     avg: 840     median: 892 (3%)     max: 963 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 526     avg: 744     median: 791 (2%)     max: 851 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 101443     avg: 139526     median: 145594 (17%)     max: 152365 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 13522     avg: 55230     median: 57777 (7%)     max: 68277 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 6616     avg: 12054     median: 12848.5 (14%)     max: 14796 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 7024     avg: 15496     median: 16713 (4%)     max: 18881 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1298     avg: 2400     median: 2559.5 (5%)     max: 2925 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1418     avg: 2594     median: 2743 (3%)     max: 3156 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 13797     avg: 71013     median: 74928.5 (9%)     max: 88374 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 8615     avg: 9308     median: 9230 (4%)     max: 10157 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 2137     avg: 4186     median: 4436 (6%)     max: 4958 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 2112     avg: 3996     median: 4187 (4%)     max: 4630 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 8821     avg: 14725     median: 16163.5 (21%)     max: 17752 Points
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
specvp13 snx-03 +
specvp13 showcase-02 +
specvp13 medical-02 +
specvp13 maya-05 +
specvp13 energy-02 +
specvp13 creo-02 +
specvp13 catia-05 +
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 8356     avg: 10332     median: 10554 (7%)     max: 11797 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 34.72     avg: 45.2     median: 43.8 (15%)     max: 52.5 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 38.4     avg: 62.8     median: 65.2 (4%)     max: 74.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.8     avg: 97.9     median: 97.8 (98%)     max: 99.3 %
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 1527     avg: 2348     median: 2532 (3%)     max: 2708 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 17.7     avg: 28.6     median: 28 (4%)     max: 39.4 Watt
05101520253035404550Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 18.5     avg: 30.2     median: 30 (4%)     max: 42.3 Watt
0510152025303540Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 24.5     avg: 37.8     median: 40.4 (9%)     max: 48.2 Watt
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.146     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (22%)     max: 0.2813 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.2222     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (23%)     max: 0.2806 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 33.4     avg: 38.4     median: 39.2 (63%)     max: 43.4 dB(A)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
min: 520     avg: 860     median: 820 (32%)     max: 1274 MHz
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Ready or Not

Ready or Not

2023
low 1920x1080
19.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
EA Sports WRC

EA Sports WRC

2023
low 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset LowAA 1280x720
25.3
Total War Pharaoh

Total War Pharaoh

2023
low 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
75.3
EA Sports FC 24

EA Sports FC 24

2023
low 1920x1080
23.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
37.1
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

2023
low 1920x1080
32.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
44.2
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

2023
low 1920x1080
10.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
16.7
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
12.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
19.3
low 1920x1080
14.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
22.7
Dead Island 2

Dead Island 2

2023
low 1920x1080
20.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset Low TAA 1280x720
37.4
low 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1280x720
37.4
low 1920x1080
8.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 1280x720
15.6
low 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
11.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
23.9
low 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset Low TAA 1280x720
17.2
low 1920x1080
7.5 (!)  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
11.4 (!)
low 1920x1080
24.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
36.6
low 1920x1080
14.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (without FSR Upscaling) 1280x720
21.6
low 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
17.3
low 1920x1080
8.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
10.5
low 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
15.4
low 1920x1080
38.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
63.6
low 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Settings 1280x720
20.1
low 1920x1080
17.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
26.8
low 1920x1080
15.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
12.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
24.7
low 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset (with Fixed Resolution Quality) 1280x720
32
low 1280x720
28  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
18
low 1280x720
19  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
14
low 1280x720
46.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (DX12) 1920x1080
29.7
low 1280x720
41.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
25.9
FIFA 21

FIFA 21

2020
low 1280x720
105.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
55.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
26  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
40.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
47.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
21.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
25.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
45  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
56.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
22.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
30.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
29.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
0 (!) 21 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
13.8 14.5 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9 9.2 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
0 (!) 39.6 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
0 (!) 62.1 63.7 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33 34.6 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.4 28.8 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
26.7 30.1 31.8 37 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.7 13.8 16 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.7 8.7 10 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
20.9 25.3 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7.1 8.2 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
35 35 50 62 63 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22 22 23 27 31 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19 20 25 27 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12 13 17 21 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
42.6 43.4 50.9 63.3 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12 12.8 13.1 13.8 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.9 7.5 7.6 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5 5.6 ~ 5 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
13.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
19 19 41 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
27  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
58.6 64.5 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20 21.9 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.5 17.4 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anthem

Anthem

2019
low 1280x720
12  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
32  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
16.9 17.1 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.9 9.1 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
32.8 49.9 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.5 20.3 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.4 14.8 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
13.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
7.9 26.7 43 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.4 20.6 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14 17.2 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
22  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15.6 19 21 26 26 27 28 28 29 29 30 31 33 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14 14 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
18
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
47.7 50.7 53.9 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.5 21.4 21.4 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.4 17.3 17.3 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
22  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
11 22 22 26 30 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
9 12 12 15 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9 11 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10 11 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
13
17
14
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
92.9 220.2 ~ 157 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.6 37.1 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
16.4 21.5 22.8 23 23.1 24 25.9 27.6 28.2 28.4 29.5 31.7 33 33.6 33.6 34.3 38.9 42.9 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.4 11.6 11.7 11.7 12.5 13.5 15.2 15.5 16.3 17.5 18.1 18.7 18.7 18.9 20.7 20.9 22.3 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.8 10.9 11 11.3 11.9 12.1 12.6 12.6 15.3 16.1 17.2 17.3 17.3 17.3 17.6 19.2 19.4 19.7 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
26.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
17.3 18.1 18.2 20.2 20.3 20.7 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9 9.3 9.6 10.8 10.9 11.3 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.6 7.6 7.6 8.1 9.6 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
77  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
32.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
27.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Destiny 2

Destiny 2

2017
low 1280x720
29.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
ELEX

ELEX

2017
low 1280x720
23.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
29 33 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14 17 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11 13 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
97.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
92  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
63.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
22.1 45.5 67.3 79 85.5 87.9 93.2 95.7 96.1 98.9 100 107.1 114 115 119 123 ~ 91 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24.9 30 44 45.6 45.6 48 52.8 53.6 61 62.1 62.6 62.6 64.8 67.5 68.5 71.3 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.1 28.9 29.7 31.4 33.8 34 38.3 39.6 42.8 43.1 43.2 44.3 44.7 45.6 48.5 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Performance 1920x1080
74.6
77
54
112.6
90.7
76.9
49.9
52.4
43.1
75.7
55.2
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
45.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
16.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
45.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
62.6 68.4 77.8 90 91.4 92.7 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
44.1 52.1 53.8 56 64 67.7 ~ 56 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
29.7 30.5 31.9 32.9 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.9 19 19.7 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium (Render Scale 100 %) 2xAF FXAA 1920x1080
28.1
28.1
37.9
46.3
31.1
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
41.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1920x1080
13.4
low 1024x768
19.5 38.9 42.4 45.7 49.2 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.3 23.4 26.9 28.7 30 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.9 13.6 14.7 15.4 16 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.3 10.5 12.6 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
98.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
61.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1366x768
92  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
57  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
60  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
54.4 54.8 56.3 59.4 70.9 71.5 77.8 80.2 80.5 82.7 88 92.4 93.9 94.7 96 96.6 97.2 98.5 101 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29 30.7 32.6 39.1 45.3 45.6 48.6 50.2 51 52.7 52.7 54.4 54.6 56 59.2 59.9 60 62.5 62.8 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.5 19 20.5 26.4 26.7 28.6 28.8 29.2 29.4 30.1 30.7 31.7 32.1 32.8 33.2 34.2 34.3 36.4 38.5 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.4 17.7 19.8 24.7 24.7 26.6 26.6 27.4 27.6 28 28.1 28.4 29.2 29.3 30 31.8 33 35.7 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
28.2 29.9 32.5 38.7 41.1 43.9 47.5 49 50.3 50.5 50.7 52.7 53.4 54 54.2 54.3 54.9 56 56.4 58 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
20.8 21.9 28.9 29.2 31 31.4 32.4 33.1 33.5 33.8 34 34.4 34.6 34.7 34.8 35.8 36.3 36.8 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.9 12.8 13.3 13.8 15.7 17 17 18 18 18.1 18.2 18.4 18.5 18.7 18.9 19.1 19.6 20.1 ~ 17 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
5.1 5.9 7.2 7.4 7.8 8.8 9 9.1 9.4 9.4 9.6 9.9 10 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
24.8 42.8 50.9 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33.1 43.5 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.7 13.3 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.9  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
21.1
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
175.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
70.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
48.6 55.6 79.6 81.9 89.4 89.8 91.3 91.6 99.6 104.2 104.2 104.2 104.6 109.6 111.9 112.2 112.5 112.6 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.8 33.5 47.9 48.9 49.8 52.7 58.3 58.6 60.4 65.4 65.5 66.8 68.3 68.6 70.7 71.9 72.8 73 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21.1 29.1 39.9 42.9 43.6 47.3 49 50.4 50.9 55.5 55.5 56.7 58.1 59.9 60.2 60.4 61.2 61.5 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.8 10.9 13.5 16.3 16.4 17.3 18.5 19.2 19.4 19.7 19.8 20.9 21.1 21.3 21.7 22 22.1 22.6 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
321.1 358.2 ~ 340 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
98.1 100.9 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
61.6 64.8 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
100.2 141.7 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
64.4 77.2 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
41.4 49.4 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.8 27.4 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
105  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
33.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
154.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
111.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
71.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
127.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
101.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
81.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
75.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
45.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
29.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Ready or Not19.816.9
EA Sports WRC12.4
Total War Pharaoh392513
EA Sports FC 2423.9
Counter-Strike 232.127.712.8
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty10.3
Lies of P12.7
Armored Core 614.611.9
Dead Island 220.516.512.4
Company of Heroes 318.6
Sons of the Forest8.54
Atomic Heart15.211.6
Hogwarts Legacy11.2
Dead Space Remake7.53
High On Life24.113.412
The Callisto Protocol14.1
Need for Speed Unbound12.8
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection8.51
The Quarry11
Vampire Bloodhunt38.222.619.116.8
Ghostwire Tokyo13.8
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands17.7
Elden Ring15.512.7
Rainbow Six Extraction2317
Forza Horizon 52815
Riders Republic19
Back 4 Blood46.62017.1
Alan Wake Remastered41.920.516.7
FIFA 21105.355.150.941.1
Mafia Definitive Edition2612
Serious Sam 440.47.4
Crysis Remastered47.723.66.9
Flight Simulator 202021.69.7
Death Stranding25.716.214.411.1
F1 202045241711
Gears Tactics56.219.612.18.3
Doom Eternal22.812.312.1
Hunt Showdown30.713.49.9
Escape from Tarkov29.318.517.6
Red Dead Redemption 21110.6
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order11.99.9
Need for Speed Heat1498.9
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 20190
GRID 20192020.317.1
FIFA 2042342723.1
Borderlands 3311496.6
Control2384.9
F1 201949252316
Total War: Three Kingdoms501375
Rage 213.4118.9
Anno 18002615.6
The Division 227
Dirt Rally 2.0622117
Anthem127.56.2
Far Cry New Dawn3217
Metro Exodus1796.7
Apex Legends41181414.5
Just Cause 413.38.97.5
Battlefield V261816
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey24
Forza Horizon 42213
Shadow of the Tomb Raider261413
Strange Brigade51201715.2
Monster Hunter World229.39
Far Cry 522121011
World of Tanks enCore1572616.2
X-Plane 11.11291615
Kingdom Come: Deliverance26.41210.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark19108
Fortnite7732.325.115.4
Star Wars Battlefront 227.710.89.6
Destiny 229.420.4
ELEX23.714.410.9
Middle-earth: Shadow of War311612
Team Fortress 297.29263.230.1
Rocket League915438
Prey45.418.214.8
Ghost Recon Wildlands16.39.9
For Honor45.917.115.412.3
Resident Evil 70
Overwatch80563119
Doom41.220.4
Rise of the Tomb Raider39251410
Rainbow Six Siege98.261.533.627.7
World of Warships925731.123.9
Metal Gear Solid V606031.118.1
Dota 2 Reborn81502927
The Witcher 34832178
GTA V4038134.9
Sims 4175.470.137.827.6
BioShock Infinite95595018
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm3401006330.6
Tomb Raider121714525
Guild Wars 210533.213.9
Counter-Strike: GO154.7111.271.539.2
Diablo III127.6101.581.950.5
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim75.645.429.915.3
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
51
24
13
6
58
11
8
47
10
4
27
5







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 16. 17:31:44

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.052s ... 0.053s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.053s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.053s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9866 +0.032s ... 0.085s

#7 got single benchmarks 9866 +0.102s ... 0.187s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.187s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.847s ... 1.034s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.034s

#11 Got 705 rows for game benchmarks. +0.071s ... 1.105s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.105s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.066s ... 1.171s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +2.599s ... 3.77s

#15 return log +0.057s ... 3.828s

Iris Plus G7 versus Vega 10 at 25W (by Intel)
Iris Plus G7 versus Vega 10 at 25W (by Intel)
Iris Plus G7 versus Whiskey Lake UHD Graphics at 15W (by Intel)
Iris Plus G7 versus Whiskey Lake UHD Graphics at 15W (by Intel)

Notebook reviews with Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) graphics card

Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA laptop with Full-HD IPS and passive cooling

Asus VivoBook 17 (F712JA) review: Affordable 17-inch laptop with passive cooling

The Asus VivoBook is an affordable multimedia laptop with a sharp 17-inch display, semi-passive cooling of the CPU, and good speakers. But is this sufficient to...
Intel Core i7-1065G7 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 17.30" | 2.2 kg
Infinix INBook X2 laptop review: The thinner and lighter INBook X1 Pro

Infinix INBook X2 laptop review: The thinner and lighter INBook X1 Pro

The InBook X2 is 20 percent lighter and 13 percent smaller than last year's InBook X1 Pro and with additional QoL updates such as a keyboard backlight and brigh...
Intel Core i7-1065G7 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 14.00" | 1.2 kg
Infinix INBook X1 Pro Laptop Review: Surprisingly Solid All Around

Infinix INBook X1 Pro Laptop Review: Surprisingly Solid All Around

After dabbling in budget Android smartphones for years, Infinix is now ready for its leap of faith into the laptop world. Its debut INBook X1 Pro retails for on...
Intel Core i7-1065G7 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 14.00" | 1.5 kg
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA Laptop Review: The Microsoft Surface Alternative

Asus Zenbook S UX393JA Laptop Review: The Microsoft Surface Alternative

The ZenBook S series is moving away from the standard 16:9 aspect ratio to the more office-friendly 3:2. Results are impressive and definitely worth a look if y...
Intel Core i7-1065G7 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 13.90" | 1.4 kg
Acer Spin 5 SP513 Laptop Review: Sensibly Optimized and Balanced 13-Inch Convertible

Acer Spin 5 SP513 Laptop Review: Sensibly Optimized and Balanced 13-Inch Convertible

With the new Acer Spin 5 SP513, the manufacturer optimizes the 13.5-inch model of the versatile convertible. With Intel Ice Lake, the hardware has improved cons...
Intel Core i7-1065G7 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 13.50" | 1.2 kg

LG Gram 17 17Z90N-V.AA77G: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 17.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » LG Gram 17 17Z90N Review: A light and mobile 17-inch laptop with a 16:10 display

Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.1 kg
  Review » Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA in Review: 1100-gram Subnotebook with Excellent Battery Life

LG Gram 15Z90N: Intel Core i5-1035G7, 15.60", 1.1 kg
  Review » The LG Gram 15 Laptop Review: Featherlight 15-inch laptop with a great display

HP 15s-fq1440ng: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  Review » Office laptop HP 15s-fq1440ng in the test: hardware deceives - potential wasted

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen: Intel Core i5-1038NG7, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  Review » MacBook Pro 13 2020 in Review: Apple's subnotebook only gets the mandatory update

LG Gram 14Z90N: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1 kg
  Review » LG Gram 14Z90N Laptop Review: Lightweight at the Cost of Performance

Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.40", 1.2 kg
  Review » Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD Laptop Review: 16:10 is the New 16:9

Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5: Intel Core i5-1030NG7, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  Review » Apple MacBook Air 2020 Core i5 Review – The best MacBook you can get? – No

Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.40", 1.2 kg
  Review » Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7 Laptop Review: New Chassis Design is More Exciting than the New CPU

Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  Review » Lenovo IdeaPad S340-15 Laptop Review: Cheap Core i7 Ice Lake Comes with a Performance Cost

Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7: Intel Core i5-1035G7, 13.50", 1.3 kg
  Review » Sayonara, Alcantara: Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13.5-inch Core i5 Review

Microsoft Surface Pro 7: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 12.30", 0.8 kg
  Review » Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Review: An i7 Upgrade with Extra GPU Performance

Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.50", 1.2 kg
  Review » Fully Loaded Acer Swift 3 SF313 with Ice Lake Processor in Review

Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15-inch Core i7 Review: Better with Ice Lake

HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  Review » HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx Convertible Review: Powered by Intel Ice Lake

Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Review: The 14-inch Consumer Convertible to Beat

Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  Review » Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Laptop Review: The Cheaper GeForce MX150 is Faster

Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Laptop Review: Premium Ice Lake convertible is a strong competitor for the Dell XPS 13

Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.40", 1.3 kg
  Review » Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7-1065G7 Review: Faster Than Any XPS 13 Before It

Infinix INBook X2: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix INBook X2

LG Gram 14Z90N: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » LG Gram 14Z90N

Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IIL05-81X100FASP: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IIL05-81X100FASP

Infinix INBook X1 Pro: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Infinix INBook X1 Pro

Asus F415JA-EK398: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus F415JA-EK398

HP Envy x360 15m-ed0023dx: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP Envy x360 15m-ed0023dx

LG Gram 17Z90N-V.AP75A8: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 17.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » LG Gram 17Z90N-V.AP75A8

HP 14s-dq1021ns : Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP 14s-dq1021ns

HP 15s-fq1086ns: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP 15s-fq1086ns

HP 15s-fq1152ns: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP 15s-fq1152ns

HP 15s-fq1087ns: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP 15s-fq1087ns

HP 15s-fq1151ns: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP 15s-fq1151ns

Acer Spin 5 SP513-54N-77UH: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.50", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Spin 5 SP513-54N-77UH

HP Envy x360 15-ed0019ur: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP Envy x360 15-ed0019ur

LG Gram 14Z90N-V-AP52B: Intel Core i5-1035G7, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » LG Gram 14Z90N-V-AP52B

Dell Inspiron 14 5401-PXC2V: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 14 5401-PXC2V

Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-78W6: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.50", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-78W6

Acer Spin 5 SP513-54N-74V2: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.50", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Spin 5 SP513-54N-74V2

HP Envy 13-ba0006na: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 13-ba0006na

Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363JA-XB71T: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363JA-XB71T

LG Gram 14Z90N-V-AR53B: Intel Core i5-1035G7, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » LG Gram 14Z90N-V-AR53B

Acer Swift 3 SF314-57-735H: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF314-57-735H

Acer Swift 3 Pro SF313-52-70L2: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.50"
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 Pro SF313-52-70L2

HP 15s-fq1168ns: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP 15s-fq1168ns

Acer Swift 3 SF314-57-77MU: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF314-57-77MU

LG Gram 15Z90N-V-AA78B: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.60", 1.1 kg
  External Review » LG Gram 15Z90N-V-AA78B

LG Gram 17 17Z90N-V.AA55D: unknown, 17.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » LG Gram 17 17Z90N-V.AA55D

Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL-81Q9000NMH: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL-81Q9000NMH

HP 15s-fq1090ns: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP 15s-fq1090ns

Asus ZenBook 14 UX425JA-BM040R: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 14 UX425JA-BM040R

HP Envy 13-ba0002nt: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 13-ba0002nt

HP Envy 13-ba0047tu: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 13-ba0047tu

LG Gram 17 17Z90N-V.AA55G: Intel Core i5-1035G7, 17.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » LG Gram 17 17Z90N-V.AA55G

LG Gram 17 17Z90N-V.AA77G: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 17.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » LG Gram 17 17Z90N-V.AA77G

Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 13.3-930QCG-K01SE: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 13.3-930QCG-K01SE

LG Gram 14Z90N-V.AR53Y: Intel Core i5-1035G7, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » LG Gram 14Z90N-V.AR53Y

Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA

LG Gram 15Z90N-V: Intel Core i5-1035G7, 15.60", 1.1 kg
  External Review » LG Gram 15Z90N-V

Asus ZenBook 14 UX425JA-HM046T: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 14 UX425JA-HM046T

Acer Swift 3 SF314-57-730G: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF314-57-730G

Acer Spin 5 SP513-54N-79EY: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.50", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Spin 5 SP513-54N-79EY

HP Spectre x360 13-aw0031ng: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre x360 13-aw0031ng

Acer Spin 5 SP513-54N-70GZ: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.50", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Spin 5 SP513-54N-70GZ

Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-700D: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-700D

HP Pavilion 15-cs3019nr: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 15-cs3019nr

HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx

Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-740Y: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.50", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-740Y

HP 15s-fq1112ns: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP 15s-fq1112ns

HP 15s-fq1092ns: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP 15s-fq1092ns

Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.40", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD

HP 14s-dq1014ns: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP 14s-dq1014ns

HP Spectre x360 13-aw0361no: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre x360 13-aw0361no

Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15 NP950QCG-K01CA: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.60", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15 NP950QCG-K01CA

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen: Intel Core i5-1038NG7, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2.3GHz i7 10th-Gen: Intel Core i7-1068G7, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2.3GHz i7 10th-Gen

LG Gram 17Z90N-V.AA77G: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 17.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » LG Gram 17Z90N-V.AA77G

HP Spectre x360 13-aw0205tu: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre x360 13-aw0205tu

Acer Swift 3 SF314-57-710U: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF314-57-710U

HP Spectre x360 13-aw0362no: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre x360 13-aw0362no

Apple MacBook Air 2020 i7: Intel Core i7-1060NG7, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Apple MacBook Air 2020 i7

Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.40", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7

HP Envy 13-aq1195nr: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 13-aq1195nr

LG Gram 17 Z90N-R.AAS9U1: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 17.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » LG Gram 17 Z90N-R.AAS9U1

HP Spectre x360 13-aw0053na: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre x360 13-aw0053na

Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5: Intel Core i5-1030NG7, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5

HP 15s-fq1043ns: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP 15s-fq1043ns

HP Spectre x360 13-aw0106nc: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre x360 13-aw0106nc

HP Spectre x360 13-aw0272no: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre x360 13-aw0272no

Microsoft Surface Pro 7: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 12.30", 0.8 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Pro 7

Acer Spin 5 SP513-54N-79EY: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Spin 5 SP513-54N-79EY

Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-76PY: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-76PY

Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7: Intel Core i5-1035G7, 13.50", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7

HP 15s-fq1023ns: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP 15s-fq1023ns

Dell XPS 13 9300 (2020): Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.40", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 13 9300 (2020)

Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL-81Q90022GE: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL-81Q90022GE

Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.50", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7

HP Spectre X360 13-aw0016no: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre X360 13-aw0016no

Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9

HP Pavilion 15-cs3012ns: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 15-cs3012ns

HP Spectre x360 13-aw0000ns: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre x360 13-aw0000ns

HP Spectre x360 13-aw0002tu: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre x360 13-aw0002tu

Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7

Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL-81Q9004GMH: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL-81Q9004GMH

Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15, i7-1065G7: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15, i7-1065G7

Dell Inspiron 15 3593, i7-1065G7: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 15 3593, i7-1065G7

Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 i5 1035G7: Intel Core i5-1035G7, 13.50", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13, i5-1035G7

Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.40", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7

Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus

HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx

Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13, Core i7-1065G7: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.50", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13, Core i7-1065G7

Microsoft Surface Pro 7, Core i7-1065G7: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 12.30", 0.8 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Pro 7, Core i7-1065G7

Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL

Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7

Dell XPS 13 7390 (2-in-1): Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.40", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 13 7390 (2-in-1)

Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 17.30", 2.2 kg
   » Asus VivoBook 17 (F712JA) test: Affordable 17-inch laptop with semi-passive cooling

Infinix INBook X2: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » Infinix InBook X2 adds features not found on the InBook X1 Pro, but performance hasn't changed

Asus Zenbook S UX393JA: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.90", 1.4 kg
   » Uh oh, now laptops are beginning to drop the 3.5 mm audio jack

LG Gram 17 17Z90N-V.AA77G: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 17.00", 1.4 kg
   » The LG Gram 17 is able to run almost silently

   » The LG Gram 17 is able to run almost silently

Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30", 1.1 kg
   » The lightweight, compact Asus Zenbook UX325JA also comes with a bright display

LG Gram 15Z90N: Intel Core i5-1035G7, 15.60", 1.1 kg
   » LG Gram 15 Laptop is ultralight and ultraportable

HP 15s-fq1440ng: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.60", 1.6 kg
   » Two-class society at HP - no recommendation for the HP 15s-fq1440ng

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen: Intel Core i5-1038NG7, 13.30", 1.4 kg
   » The new MacBook Pro 13 is pretty boring, but still very good

   » Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 has arrived: Ice Lake only improves GPU performance, would AMD's Ryzen be the better choice?

LG Gram 14Z90N: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1 kg
   » LG Gram 14 costs $1600 USD, somehow manages to be one of the slowest Core i7 Ice Lake laptops you can buy

Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.40", 1.2 kg
   » Dell XPS 13 9300 FHD version is brighter than the 4K UHD version and other interesting differences

Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5: Intel Core i5-1030NG7, 13.30", 1.3 kg
   » MacBook Air 2020: Why does Apple sabotage the Air?

   » The new 2020 MacBook Air Core i5 has arrived: Faster CPU, but still way too loud

   » Apple MacBook Air 2020: Retina Display still uses PWM

Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.40", 1.2 kg
   » The XPS 13 9300 display can be 20 percent brighter than what Dell is letting on, but you'll need a few clicks to enable it

Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.60", 1.8 kg
   » $700 Core i7-1065G7 vs. $1400 Core i7-1065G7: What's the difference?

Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.50", 1.2 kg
   » The Acer Swift 3 is so much more than just a visual upgrade

Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7: Intel Core i5-1035G7, 13.50", 1.3 kg
   » Microsoft is discounting its Surface Laptop 3 13.5-inch with Core i5 CPU, 8 GB RAM and 128 GB to $800

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) Laptop GPU
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2019-05-31)