Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
 
 
 
 

AMD Radeon R5 M330

The AMD Radeon R5 M330 is a low-end dedicated graphics card for laptops.  The core clock is pretty high with up to 1030 MHz, however, the bottleneck is the 64-bit DDR3 graphics memory (clocked at 1000 MHz, 2000 MHz effective).

Performance

Due to the higher core speed, the performance of the Radeon R5-M330 should be slightly above the AMD Radeon R5 M255 (see for gaming benchmarks). Therefore, very demanding games of 2014 and 2015 like Dragon Age: Inquisition or Assassin's Creed Unity may not be playable smoothly. For older or less demanding games the performance should be sufficient for low to medium detail settings. Detailed benchmarks will be listed below as soon as we get a sample with the Radeon M330 in house.

The 320 shaders can be used with OpenCL 1.2 for general-purpose calculations (as 5 compute units).

Features

Features of the R5 M330 include video decoding for MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, VC-1, MPEG-2, and Flash directly by the AMD GPU. Multi-View Codec (MVC) and MPEG-4 part 2 (DivX, xVid) HD videos are compatible as well.

The R5 series also supports automatic graphics switching between the integrated GPU and discrete GPU. Called Enduro, the technology supersedes AMD's Dynamic Switchable Graphics and is similar to Nvidia's Optimus. Furthermore, the M330 can directly support multiple monitors using Eyefinity Technology if Enduro is disabled.

Other features include ZeroCore for a reduced power consumption when the display is turned off and Power Gating to power down areas of the chip that are not used. 

The integrated HD audio processor is able to transmit HD Audio (TrueHD or DTS Master Audio) over HDMI and DisplayPort (e.g., for Blu-Ray videos). Additionally, it allows audio output simultaneously and in parallel to multiple devices with the new Discrete Digital Multipoint Audio (DDMA) feature.

Power consumption

The power consumption should be similar to R7 M255 or even a bit below and therefore suited for 13-inch laptops and larger.

ManufacturerAMD
Radeon R5 M300 Series
Radeon R5 M335 compare 320 @ 1.07 GHz64 Bit @ 2200 MHz
Radeon R5 M330 320 @ 1.03 GHz64 Bit @ 2000 MHz
Radeon R5 M320 compare 320 @ 0.86 GHz64 Bit @ 2000 MHz
Radeon R5 M315 compare 320 @ 0.97 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
CodenameExo Pro DDR3
ArchitectureGCN 1.0
Pipelines320 - unified
Core Speed1030 MHz
Memory Speed2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12
technology28 nm
FeaturesDirectX 12, Mantle, OpenGL 4.3, OpenCL 1.2, Vulkan
Date of Announcement07.05.2015
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.amd.com/en-us/products/graphi...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
4.2 pt (4%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180 -68%
...
Intel HD Graphics 5000 -6%
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) -6%
Intel HD Graphics 610 -3%
AMD FirePro M4100 -3%
AMD Radeon HD 8450G + Radeon HD 8570M Dual Graphics -3%
AMD Radeon R7 M270 -2%
AMD Radeon R6 (Kaveri) -2%
AMD Radeon HD 7570M -2%
AMD Radeon HD 8570M -1%
AMD Radeon R5 M330
AMD Radeon HD 8670M 0%
Intel HD Graphics 515 1%
Intel UHD Graphics 615 2%
AMD Radeon R7 (Kaveri) 4%
Intel Iris Graphics 5100 4%
Intel HD Graphics 4600 5%
NVIDIA Quadro K610M 6%
Intel HD Graphics 5500 6%
AMD Radeon HD 8470D 7%
...
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 2148%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 4010     avg: 4432     median: 4427 (6%)     max: 4784 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 4491     avg: 5017     median: 4897 (2%)     max: 5592 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 775     avg: 840     median: 843 (2%)     max: 915 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 828     avg: 913     median: 922 (2%)     max: 1010 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 27244     avg: 40168     median: 37116 (5%)     max: 59371 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1637     avg: 1794     median: 1782 (4%)     max: 1927 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1518     avg: 1684     median: 1689 (3%)     max: 1834 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 5662     avg: 5972     median: 5972 (11%)     max: 6282 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 +
3DMark 06
5662 Points (11%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
13.7 fps (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
7.8 fps (6%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
3 fps (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp11 sw-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
12 fps (15%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp11 proe-05 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
3.3 fps (14%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp11 maya-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
6.4 fps (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
13.5 fps (14%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp11 ensight-04 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
12.1 fps (6%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp11 catia-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
5.2 fps (6%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 5685     avg: 6607     median: 6386 (30%)     max: 7426 points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 21.69     avg: 23.2     median: 22.5 (10%)     max: 25.64 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 22.21     avg: 27.9     median: 28 (8%)     max: 32.5 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
292 Samples/s (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
597 Samples/s (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
690 points (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Need for Speed 2016

Need for Speed 2016

2016
low 1280x720
22.3 22.8 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.3 19.7 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Hitman 2016

Hitman 2016

2016
low 1280x720
8.6 22.1 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
4.3 15.9 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Division

The Division

2016
low 1280x720
19.6 21.4 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.4 14.1 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry Primal

Far Cry Primal

2016
low 1280x720
19  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
XCOM 2

XCOM 2

2016
low 1280x720
16.4 17.4 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Rise of the Tomb Raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider

2016
low 1024x768
17.3 20.6 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.7 12.6 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Rainbow Six Siege

Rainbow Six Siege

2015
low 1024x768
40.1 41.3 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.7 26.1 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Just Cause 3

Just Cause 3

2015
low 1024x768
23  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Star Wars Battlefront

Star Wars Battlefront

2015
low 1024x768
34.3 36.8 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.2 22.3 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.9  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fallout 4

Fallout 4

2015
low 1280x720
19.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Call of Duty: Black Ops 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 3

2015
low 1024x768
30.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
25.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 16

FIFA 16

2015
low 1280x720
51 51 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
34.5 37.1 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
World of Warships

World of Warships

2015
low 1366x768
47.7 49.1 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33.3 34.7 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Metal Gear Solid V

Metal Gear Solid V

2015
low 1024x768
40.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Mad Max

Mad Max

2015
med. 1366x768
17.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Batman: Arkham Knight

Batman: Arkham Knight

2015
low 1280x720
17  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Witcher 3

The Witcher 3

2015
low 1024x768
15.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.7  fps    + Compare