Battlefield Hardline Benchmarked

1, 2, Police. Hardline is a breath of fresh air for the Battlefield series: the single-player experience is radically different from that of the predecessors. Our focus will be on the hardware requirements of the new first-person shooter.

Florian Glaser, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Vinay Pradhan), Published 03/24/2015 🇩🇪

For the original German article, see here.

Game Engine

Unlike Battlefield 4, Hardline was not developed by DICE. Visceral Games, the studio which delivered the Dead Space series, developed the majority of the new FPS. Although the series has changed developers, Hardline employs the same engine which made its predecessors a success: Frostbite 3.

In comparison to other ego shooters, the game is very detailed: characters, levels, etc. The effects are wonderful as well: whether it be water, particles, reflections or lighting. In fact, Hardline is a step ahead of the competition in almost every category. The only games which have a chance of standing their ground are Ryse: Son of Rome and Crysis 3.

Fans of the Frostbite 3 engine love its destroyable environment. Skirmishes will often result in broken windows and walls, which make firefights quite intense. This feature sets the Battlefield series apart from the rest of the commonplace games belonging to the action genre.

The Battlefield series has long been applauded for its jaw-dropping sounds and the latest installment carries on this proud tradition. The amazing sound system of Hardline promises to fully immerse the gamer in a way that few other competitors can. The cinematic cutscenes and explosive gameplay are brought to life by the realistic soundscape. Sadly, the campaign of Hardline cannot match the standards set by the engine and sound system. At first, the story is quite interesting and the game has a lot of potential, but as we progress through the virtual world, we feel like the story becomes "worn out." All-in-all, the single-player campaign is neither a full-blown success nor a failure.

The graphics should satisfy most gamers. At first glance, the video options are almost identical to Battlefield 4. The left side offers controls for the resolution, the brightness, the field of view and special features, which are not to be found in most ego shooters (for example, a colorblind mode). The right side offers options to regulate around 10 graphics settings, which includes: Ambient Occlusion (SSAO, HBAO), Anti-aliasing (MSAA), textures, etc. Thanks to the 4 presets "Low," "Medium," "High" and "Ultra," the gamer can quickly find suitable game settings.

Annoying: according to the menu, most settings require a restart. This would not be quite so bad if the game would load faster on HDDs. Furthermore, the cutscenes are limited to 30 fps and cannot be skipped (harder to find suitable benchmark sequences).

The main flaw would be the lacking Fraps support. Here are the steps required to make the recording software work: open Notepad, type in "RenderDevice.PresentAsync 0" (without quotes) and save the file as "user.cfg" in the main directory of Hardline (file type: All Files, not .txt). After these tweaks, Fraps should run fine.

Benchmark

As previously mentioned, it was quite hard to find a suitable benchmark sequence which would be easy to run for our technical writers (when they check how well the game runs during their notebook reviews) and would deliver consistent results (multiplayer is not an option). In the end, we decided to use the start of the sixth campaign mission: "Out of Business." After a long cutscene, the player is sent to inspect a car dealership. Our benchmark runs a total of 30 seconds and leads up to the entrance of the building. To ensure consistent results, we followed the path of our companion (see video).

▶ load Youtube video

Results

Considering the great visuals of the game, the hardware requirements are quite reasonable. If you have an entry-level device, with a graphics card ranging from the HD Graphics 4600 up to GeForce GT 740M, then you can run the game at low details and a resolution of 1024x768 pixels. New all-rounder notebooks boasting graphics cards like the GeForce GT 750M and above will be able to run the game at the preset "Medium" and 1366x768 pixels.

For the FHD resolution of 1920x1,080 pixels and the "High" preset we recommend at least a GeForce GTX 850M/765M. It would be easier to run at these settings with a GTX 860M. Ultra details and 4x AA will require a high-end GPU such as the GeForce GTX 870M/GTX 780M or higher. The benchmark sequence runs at above 35 fps with these top-notch GPUs.

Hardline is not very demanding on the CPU - at least in the campaign. In multiplayer, the CPU is required more. Overall, we find Frostbite 3 to be very well optimized. Other engines (Assassin's Creed Unity?) are far more demanding.

Note: owners of AMD GPUs can enjoy the Mantle API. We only use DirectX 11 to record the performance with Fraps.

Battlefield Hardline
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality (DX11) AA:4x MS 1920x1080 High Graphics Quality (DX11) 1366x768 Medium Graphics Quality (DX11) 1024x768 Low Graphics Quality (DX11)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980, 3770K Desktop-PC	92.9 (84^min) fps ∼53% 129.7 (118^min) fps ∼66% 167.4 (156^min) fps ∼83% 182.5 (168^min) fps ∼91%
AMD Radeon R9 290X, 4790K Sapphire Radeon R9 290X Tri-X OC	84 (74^min) fps ∼48% 122 (112^min) fps ∼62% 179 (149^min) fps ∼89% 176 (147^min) fps ∼88%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 4700MQ Schenker W504	67 (60^min) fps ∼38% 103.9 (96^min) fps ∼53% 161.1 (148^min) fps ∼80% 175 (159^min) fps ∼87%
AMD Radeon R9 280X, 3770K Desktop-PC	62 (55^min) fps ∼35% 94.4 (84^min) fps ∼48% 126.9 (107^min) fps ∼63% 149.5 (119^min) fps ∼74%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 4700MQ Schenker W504	51.4 (45^min) fps ∼29% 83.4 (77^min) fps ∼43% 146.2 (134^min) fps ∼73% 169.8 (150^min) fps ∼84%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M, 4700MQ Schenker W504	45.9 (41^min) fps ∼26% 73 (67^min) fps ∼37% 144.1 (134^min) fps ∼72% 173 (154^min) fps ∼86%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M, 4700MQ Schenker W503	41.9 (38^min) fps ∼24% 65.8 (60^min) fps ∼34% 130.2 (122^min) fps ∼65% 168.3 (157^min) fps ∼84%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M, 4700MQ Schenker W504	36.4 (33^min) fps ∼21% 59.3 (54^min) fps ∼30% 124.7 (117^min) fps ∼62% 163.2 (150^min) fps ∼81%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M, 4700MQ Schenker W503	27.2 (24^min) fps ∼15% 43.4 (39^min) fps ∼22% 90.3 (84^min) fps ∼45% 123.2 (114^min) fps ∼61%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M, 4700MQ Schenker W504	26.5 (23^min) fps ∼15% 44.5 (40^min) fps ∼23% 96 (88^min) fps ∼48% 133.1 (125^min) fps ∼66%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M, 4340M Schenker M504	20.8 (15^min) fps ∼12% 34.8 (31^min) fps ∼18% 82.9 (75^min) fps ∼41% 114.7 (106^min) fps ∼57%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M, 4700MQ Schenker W503	20.7 (18^min) fps ∼12% 34.2 (31^min) fps ∼18% 72.4 (68^min) fps ∼36% 100.6 (92^min) fps ∼50%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M, 4702MQ Schenker M503	11.9 (10^min) fps ∼7% 19.6 (17^min) fps ∼10% 42.3 (38^min) fps ∼21% 60.6 (55^min) fps ∼30%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200, 4750HQ SCHENKER S413	8.6 (6^min) fps ∼5% 17 (13^min) fps ∼9% 38.7 (29^min) fps ∼19% 54 (39^min) fps ∼27%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M, 2637M Acer Aspire M3-581TG	8.3 (3^min) fps ∼5% 15.1 (12^min) fps ∼8% 32.7 (29^min) fps ∼16% 45 (35^min) fps ∼22%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M, 4200M HP Envy 15-j011sg	7.9 (6^min) fps ∼4% 14.1 (11^min) fps ∼7% 32.2 (29^min) fps ∼16% 45 (41^min) fps ∼22%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M, 4200M MSI CX61-i572M	9.7 (0^min) fps ∼5% 22 (0^min) fps ∼11% 31.3 (0^min) fps ∼16%
AMD Radeon HD 8650G, A10-5750M Pumori Test Platform (A10-5750M)	5.1 (3^min) fps ∼3% 9 (7^min) fps ∼5% 21.1 (18^min) fps ∼10% 30 (25^min) fps ∼15%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M, 3720QM Asus N56VM	5.5 (4^min) fps ∼3% 8.9 (7^min) fps ∼5% 18.5 (15^min) fps ∼9% 29 (23^min) fps ∼14%
Intel HD Graphics 4600, 4700MQ Schenker W503	5.3 (3^min) fps ∼3% 9.2 (7^min) fps ∼5% 22.1 (18^min) fps ∼11% 32.1 (27^min) fps ∼16%
Intel Iris Graphics 5100, 4258U Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10	5.9 (4^min) fps ∼3% 9.2 (7^min) fps ∼5% 23.6 (20^min) fps ∼12% 31.9 (28^min) fps ∼16%

Test Systems

Four of our test systems are from Schenker Technologies (mysn.de):

W504 (Core i7-4700MQ, 8 GB DDR3, GeForce GTX 860M, GTX 870M, GTX 880M, GTX 970M, GTX 980M, Radeon R9 M290X)
W503 (Core i7-4700MQ, 8 GB DDR3, GeForce GTX 765M, GTX 770M, GTX 780M)
M504 (Core i5-4340M, 8 GB DDR3, GeForce GTX 850M)
M503 (Core i7-4702MQ, 8 GB DDR3, GeForce GT 750M)

These notebooks run Windows 7 (64-bit).

Three test systems were provided by Nvidia:

HP Envy 15-j011sg (Core i5-4200M, 12 GB DDR3, GeForce GT 740M)
MSI CX61-i572M281BW7 (Core i5-4200M, 8 GB DDR3, GeForce GT 720M)
Acer Aspire Timeline Ultra M3-581TG (Core i7-2637M, 4GB DDR3, GeForce GT 640M)

Intel adds one more:

Schenker S413 (Core i7-4750HQ, 8 GB DDR3, Iris Pro Graphics 5200)

The desktop PCs use CPUs/APUs from Intel and AMD, SSDs from Micron, Intel and Samsung, motherboards from Intel and Asus and graphics cards from Nvidia and AMD.

GPU drivers: Nvidia 347.88, AMD 14.12, Intel 15.36.18.64.4156

Overview

Loading Comments

Comment on this article

Editor of the original article: Florian Glaser - Managing Editor Gaming Laptops - 637 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2009

I discovered my interest in computers in my childhood, growing up with MS-DOS and Windows 3.1 in the early 1990s. I was especially fascinated with computer games, even from an early age. From Monkey Island through Lands of Lore to Doom, I tried every game I could get my hands on. I have been working for Notebookcheck since 2009 with my focus mostly being on high-performance gaming laptops.

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Archive of our own reviews > Battlefield Hardline Benchmarked

Florian Glaser, 2015-03-24 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Pos	Model	< Prev Next > Battlefield Hardline (2015)
Pos	Model	low 1024x768 Low Graphics Quality (DX11)	med. 1366x768 Medium Graphics Quality (DX11)	high 1920x1080 High Graphics Quality (DX11)	ultra 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality (DX11) 4x MSAA
131	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile				90
144	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)	198.4	197.9	195.4	176.1
156	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile			79	46.2
177	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti				116
186	AMD Radeon R9 Nano				105
187	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980	182.5	167.4	129.7	92.9
199	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)	174.25ⁿ²	171.15ⁿ²	153.2ⁿ²	98.95ⁿ²
201	AMD Radeon R9 390X	169.5	162.8	128.2	92.2
202	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M SLI	163.1	155	122.8ⁿ²	99.5ⁿ²
207	AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop)			115	86
233	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970	176	171.1	129.1	78.4
257	AMD Radeon R9 290X	176	179	122	84
259	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI			105.2	71.9
264	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M	170.7ⁿ²	161.5ⁿ²	101.4ⁿ⁴	68.8ⁿ⁴
273	AMD Radeon R9 280X	149.5	126.9	94.4	62
274	AMD Radeon R9 380	183.4	181.9	92.6	61.4
275	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960	163.1	157.2	95.8	58.3
283	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M	169.8ⁿ³	143ⁿ³	83.5ⁿ⁵	53.4ⁿ⁵
287	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680	173	152	85	54
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Battlefield Hardline
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra
296	AMD Radeon R9 M295X	110.3	94.3	58.4	38.9
300	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	91.8	89.7	79.8	52.6
303	AMD Radeon R7 370	104.9	104.2	68.2	42.54
305	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M	173	144.1	73	45.9
309	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950	92	91.2	77	47.3
318	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M	168.3	130.2	65.8	41.9
319	NVIDIA Quadro K5100M	184.5	145.5	58.9	37.7
324	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M	130ⁿ³	119ⁿ³	61.9ⁿ³	39.1ⁿ³
328	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M	163.2	124.7	59.3	36.4
339	AMD Radeon R9 M390	161	138	56	36.8
349	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M	144.3ⁿ⁹	108.65ⁿ¹⁰	50.6ⁿ¹¹	31.9ⁿ¹⁰
367	NVIDIA GeForce MX150	79.3	78.1	43.6	28.5
374	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M	123.2	90.3	43.4	27.2
380	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M	133.1	96	44.5	26.5
388	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M	109.6ⁿ³	111.7ⁿ³	36.55ⁿ⁴	22.9ⁿ³
394	AMD Radeon R9 M385X	60.5	39.7	25.8
396	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M	116.65ⁿ²	84.35ⁿ²	35.85ⁿ²	21ⁿ²
400	AMD Radeon R9 M280X	41.3	36.5	30.8	19.8
405	NVIDIA GeForce 945M	117.8	89.8	32.3	20.4
406	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M	100.6	72.4	34.2	20.7
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Battlefield Hardline
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra
433	NVIDIA Quadro K3100M	115.9	83.4	33.6	21.9
435	AMD Radeon R9 M370X	103.2	67.3	27.6	18.5
475	NVIDIA GeForce 845M	50.7	32.2	14	9.3
488	NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M	60.6	42.3	19.6	11.9
491	NVIDIA GeForce 940MX	64.6	56.5
492	NVIDIA Quadro M520	81.1	74.2	30.4	19.6
493	NVIDIA Quadro K1100M	63.6	43.9	17.3	11
495	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)	58	51.9	21.4	14
496	NVIDIA GeForce 940M	59.3ⁿ⁵	46.3ⁿ⁶	17.75ⁿ⁶	10.55ⁿ⁴
498	NVIDIA GeForce 930MX	83.1	57.4	19.4	11.8
505	AMD Radeon R9 M375	59.3	43.5	17.7
515	AMD Radeon R7 M370	72.4	52.5	19.4	12.8
528	NVIDIA GeForce 840M	71.7	50.2	18	10.7
534	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200	50.9ⁿ²	36.4ⁿ²	16ⁿ²	8.6ⁿ²
535	AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)	54	37.1	15	9.5
543	NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M	45	32.2	14.1	7.9
545	NVIDIA GeForce 930M	58.75ⁿ²	43ⁿ²	16.9ⁿ²
547	AMD Radeon 530	63	45.1	16.3
552	NVIDIA GeForce 830M	58.55ⁿ²	41.3ⁿ²	15.9ⁿ²	9.45ⁿ²
555	NVIDIA GeForce 920MX	65.1	44.6	15.6
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Battlefield Hardline
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra
556	Intel Iris Graphics 540	59	50	19.5	10.4
578	AMD Radeon R7 M260X	48.5	34.2	12.1	7.8
587	AMD Radeon R7 M270	47.35ⁿ²	34.25ⁿ²	14.65ⁿ²	9.3ⁿ²
588	AMD Radeon R7 M265	53.3	42	17.3	10.8
592*	AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)	37.7	32.1	12.9
593	NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M	45	32.7	15.1	8.3
594	AMD Radeon R7 (Carrizo)	37.15ⁿ²	26.7ⁿ²	8.45ⁿ²	6
595	AMD Radeon R7 (Kaveri)	31.9	20.6	10.3	7
596	AMD Radeon R8 M365DX	26.6	19.9	11.6	8.8
600	AMD Radeon R7 M360	33.6	29.9	12.5	7.4
602	NVIDIA GeForce 920M	42.2ⁿ³	30ⁿ³	12.7ⁿ³	7.3ⁿ³
605	AMD Radeon R8 M445DX	37.7	29.3	14	8.3
613	AMD Radeon R7 M260	49.3	34.7	11.6
614	AMD Radeon R7 M340	39.6	31.7	13	7.9
619	AMD Radeon R6 M340DX	47.6	33	10.1	6.4
629	Intel HD Graphics 530	46.65ⁿ²	32.1ⁿ²	12.85ⁿ²	7.1
632	AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)	22.8	12.8
633	Intel UHD Graphics 620	41.1	34	12	7.2
634	Intel HD Graphics 620	43.4	31.1	11.6
635	AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo)	34.5	22.4	8.2	5.5
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Battlefield Hardline
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra
669	Intel HD Graphics 5600	37.8	26.8	10.8	6
695	AMD Radeon HD 8650G	30	21.1	9	5.1
700	NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M	29	18.5	8.9	5.5
703	AMD Radeon R5 M335	47.6	33.2	10.2	6.3
704	AMD Radeon R5 M330	37.5	26.4	9
705	AMD Radeon R5 M430	45.8	31.4
706	AMD Radeon R5 M255	51.2	45.6	13.3	8.1
709	NVIDIA GeForce 910M	7.9	7.6	6.1	5.9
711	Intel HD Graphics 520	42ⁿ⁵	27.9ⁿ⁵	10.1ⁿ⁵	5.4ⁿ³
712	Intel Iris Graphics 6100	42.5ⁿ²	26.5ⁿ²	9.4ⁿ²	5.5
714	NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M	31.3	22	9.7
716	AMD Radeon R5 M240	45.1	32.8
728	Intel HD Graphics 6000	35.3	26.9	9.1
731	Intel Iris Graphics 5100	31.9	23.6	9.2	5.9
735	Intel HD Graphics 4600	30.95ⁿ²	21.7ⁿ²	9.55ⁿ²	5.3
737	Intel HD Graphics 5500	24.8ⁿ⁴	19.7ⁿ³	8.1ⁿ³	3.9ⁿ²
770	Intel HD Graphics 615	19.7	15.5
778	Intel HD Graphics 5000	20.8	15.1	7	4.3
812	Intel HD Graphics 515	24ⁿ²	19.3ⁿ²	7.55ⁿ²	4.1
814	Intel HD Graphics 610	23.3	18.4
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Battlefield Hardline
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra
815	Intel HD Graphics 4400	29.3	20.7
817	Intel HD Graphics 510	31.5	22.2
848	Intel UHD Graphics 605	10.9	9.5	4
849	Intel HD Graphics 505	7.3	6.9
850	Intel HD Graphics 5300	15.3	11	5	3.1
859	Intel HD Graphics 4000	21.2
863	AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)	15.1	12
865	AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)	24.3	17.3
866	AMD Radeon R4 (Beema)	21.6	14.6
869	AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)	6.7	4.9
870	Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell)	23.9	16.4
903	AMD Radeon HD 8350G	18.7	11.8
904	AMD Radeon HD 8330	15.3	9.1
927	Intel HD Graphics (Braswell)	13.2	8.7
932	AMD Radeon HD 7420G	9.5	8.6
941	Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)	15.9	11.2
967	AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)	22.4	15.6
1053	Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	7.3	5.1

Legend
5	Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
	May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
	May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?	Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
	Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.