Notebookcheck

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M is a high-end DirectX 11-compatible graphics card for laptops unveiled in March 2014. Similar to the GTX 880M, it is based on the 28 nm GK104 chip (Kepler architecture), but features less shader cores (1344 instead of 1536) as well as smaller and slower memory (6 GB GDDR5).

Architecture

The Kepler architecture is the successor to the Fermi architecture that first appeared in laptops with the GeForce 400M series. The GK104 Kepler core offers eight shader blocks, called SMX, that are clocked at the same speed as the central core. In the GTX 870M, only seven blocks are active for a total of 1344 CUDA cores and 112 TMUs. The chip can access up to 6 GB of GDDR5 memory (1250 MHz, 5000 MHz effective) connected via a 192-bit interface.

Performance

Compared to the old GeForce GTX 770M, the GTX 870M offers significantly more performance thanks to its higher clock rate and the additional shaders. Therefore, the 870M is just slightly slower than the GTX 680MX and the Radeon R9 M290X. The GPU has enough power to run demanding games of 2013/2014 (e.g. Battlefield 4 or Thief) fluently in FullHD resolution and very high detail settings.

Features

The feature set includes support for up to 4 active displays. Furthermore, high resolution monitors of up to 3840x2160 pixels can be connected using DisplayPort 1.2 or HDMI 1.4a (if available). HD-Audio codecs, such as Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD, can be transmitted via bitstream mode through the HDMI port. However, as most laptops will feature Optimus, the integrated GPU will likely have direct control over the display ports and may limit the feature set available by the Nvidia Kepler cards.

The 5th generation PureVideo HD video processor (VP5) is also integrated in the GK104 core and offers hardware decoding of HD videos. Common codecs such as MPEG-1/2, MPEG-4 ASP, H.264 and VC1/WMV9 are fully supported up to 4K resolutions while VC1 and MPEG-4 are supported up to 1080p. Two streams can be decoded in parallel for features such as Picture-in-Picture. Another novelty is the inclusion of a dedicated video encoding engine similar to Intel QuickSync that can be accessed by the NVENC API.

New features of the GTX 800M series include Battery Boost (longer battery life while playing games), Shadowplay (recording of in-game videos) and Game Stream (stream PC games on the Nvidia Shield console).

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the GeForce GTX 870M should be similar to the the GTX 780M, leading to a TDP of at least 100 W. Therefore, only large desktop replacements can handle the power demands of a GTX 870M.

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce GTX 800M Series

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

3072 @ 954 MHz2x 256 Bit @ 5000 MHz

GeForce GTX 860M SLI

1280 @ 1029 MHz2x 128 Bit @ 5000 MHz

GeForce GTX 880M

1536 @ 954 MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 870M 1344 @ 941 MHz192 Bit @ 5000 MHz

GeForce GTX 860M

640 @ 1029 MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz

GeForce GTX 850M

640 @ 876 MHz128 Bit @ 2000 - 5000 MHz
CodenameN15P-GT
ArchitectureKepler
Pipelines1344 - unified
Core Speed *941 MHz
Memory Speed *5000 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory6144 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Transistors3540 Million
technology28 nm
FeaturesBattery Boost, GameStream, ShadowPlay, GPU Boost 2.0, Optimus, PhysX, CUDA, SLI, GeForce Experience
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement12.03.2014
* The specified clock rates are only guidelines for the manufacturer and can be altered by them.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Ref. Match 64Bit
0% 100%
min: 99.6      avg: 99.6 (100%)     median: 99.6 (100%)     max: 99.6 Points
Cinebench R15 - OpenGL 64Bit
0% 100%
min: 83.13      avg: 93.4 (64%)     median: 93.8 (64%)     max: 100.38 Points
3DMark (2013) - Fire Strike Standard Graphics 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 4558      avg: 4691.5 (25%)     median: 4694 (26%)     max: 4802 Points
3DMark (2013) - Fire Strike Standard Score 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 4198      avg: 4283 (32%)     median: 4294 (33%)     max: 4384 Points
3DMark (2013) - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
0% 100%
min: 27174      avg: 30512.6 (26%)     median: 31322 (27%)     max: 32151 Points
3DMark (2013) - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
0% 100%
min: 15688      avg: 16661 (61%)     median: 16787 (61%)     max: 17139 Points
3DMark (2013) - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
0% 100%
min: 32608      avg: 293680 (39%)     median: 195973.5 (26%)     max: 750165 Points
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - DX 11, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080
0% 100%
min: 64.4      avg: 64.7 (38%)     median: 64.7 (38%)     max: 65 fps
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
0% 100%
min: 4416      avg: 6637.8 (29%)     median: 7156 (32%)     max: 7270 points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
0% 100%
min: 4831      avg: 6729 (37%)     median: 7120 (39%)     max: 7178 points
3DMark Vantage - P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024
0% 100%
min: 23913      avg: 23989 (47%)     median: 23989 (47%)     max: 24065 Points
3DMark Vantage - P Result no PhysX 1280x1024
0% 100%
min: 23833      avg: 23974.7 (50%)     median: 24035 (50%)     max: 24056 Points
3DMark 06
0% 100%
min: 25112      avg: 25112 (66%)     median: 25112 (66%)     max: 25112 Points
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - high, Tesselation (normal), DirectX11 1280x1024
0% 100%
min: 81.5      avg: 83.8 (45%)     median: 83.8 (45%)     max: 86 fps
SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060
0% 100%
min: 5.12      avg: 5.1 (10%)     median: 5.1 (10%)     max: 5.12 fps
SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060
0% 100%
min: 1.41      avg: 1.4 (2%)     median: 1.4 (2%)     max: 1.41 fps
SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060
0% 100%
min: 17.72      avg: 17.7 (36%)     median: 17.7 (36%)     max: 17.72 fps
SPECviewperf 12 - Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060
0% 100%
min: 1.7      avg: 1.7 (7%)     median: 1.7 (7%)     max: 1.7 fps
SPECviewperf 12 - Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060
0% 100%
min: 17.48      avg: 17.5 (21%)     median: 17.5 (21%)     max: 17.48 fps
SPECviewperf 12 - Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060
0% 100%
min: 20.35      avg: 20.4 (91%)     median: 20.4 (91%)     max: 20.35 fps
SPECviewperf 12 - Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060
0% 100%
min: 62.97      avg: 63 (86%)     median: 63 (86%)     max: 62.97 fps
SPECviewperf 12 - Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060
0% 100%
min: 14      avg: 14 (25%)     median: 14 (25%)     max: 14 fps
Cinebench R11.5 - OpenGL 64Bit
0% 100%
min: 54.08      avg: 57.1 (47%)     median: 56.6 (46%)     max: 60.66 Points
Cinebench R10 - Shading 32Bit
0% 100%
min: 10324      avg: 10324 (71%)     median: 10324 (71%)     max: 10324 Points
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailled information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

The Crew

The Crew

2014
low 1280x720
60  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
60  fps      Compare
high 1920x1080
59.8  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36.3  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dragon Age: Inquisition
low 1024x768
110.3  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
85.7  fps      Compare
high 1920x1080
37.2  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.3  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 4

Far Cry 4

2014
low 1024x768
100.8  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
93.4  fps      Compare
high 1920x1080
42.2  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32.9  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Assassin's Creed Unity
low 1024x768
64.4  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
51.3  fps      Compare
high 1920x1080
26.2  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.8  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare
low 1024x768
113.6  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
75.3  fps      Compare
high 1920x1080
53.6  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.8  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Civilization: Beyond Earth
low 1024x768
142.5  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
81.1  fps      Compare
high 1920x1080
51.4  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45.1  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
132  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
124  fps      Compare
high 1920x1080
121  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
98  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
The Evil Within
low 1024x768
64.5  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
61.2  fps      Compare
high 1920x1080
38.2  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Ryse: Son of Rome
low 1024x768
84.8  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
64.9  fps      Compare
high 1920x1080
32.4  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.1  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Alien: Isolation
low 1024x768
205.9  fps      Compare
med. 1366x768
145.7  fps      Compare
high 1920x1080
77.9  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
55.9  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor
low 1280x720
142  fps      Compare
med. 1344x756
84.9  fps      Compare
high 1920x1080
50.2  fps      Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.9  fps      Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Fifa 15

Fifa 15

2014
low 1280x720
267.8  fps      Compare