Notebookcheck

The Bureau: XCOM Declassified Benchmarked

Florian Glaser (translated by Ariana Brodsky), 08/31/2013

A mix of action and tactics. Can a reworked niche title like The Bureau: XCOM Declassified compete with other PC games? Innumerable reviews have answered this question. We will take a closer look at the game's hardware demands and graphics. Should notebook users be concerned about performance, or can a weaker device handle the game?

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team!

Currently wanted: 
News Editor - Details here

The Bureau: XCOM Declassified Logo

For the original German article, see here.

Graphics

A long development and restructuring phase does not seem to have helped 2K Games' ambitious project. Many game reviews not only criticize the second-rate graphics, but also the mediocre AI and the boring, choppy, somewhat annoying game structure.

We enjoyed the first part of The Bureau: XCOM Declassified more than we expected based on the scores awarded by the international community (Metacritic: 67%). The game gained points for us not only for its good 60s scenario, stylistically reminiscent of Mafia 2, L.A. Noire and BioShock, but also for its grippingly staged introduction and interesting gameplay. But we only toured the first level in search of a good benchmark sequence, so we cannot make a conclusive judgement.

The Bureau is based on Epic's Unreal Engine 3, which was expanded for modern effects like ambient occlusion and tesselation. The start options allow you to start the game either in DirectX 11 or in DirectX 9 mode, which owners of older notebooks will be happy to hear. Despite the fact that the game borrows from modern technologies, the graphics are rather antiquated. As we have already seen with the Unreal Engine 3, many textures are spongy and lacking in detail. The good character models (nice facial expressions) and the atmospheric effects (smoke, water, fire, light, particles etc.) can only do so much to make up for this shortcoming. Whether you appreciate the grain filter, which is activated by default, is a matter of taste.

This brings us to our next subject: The graphics menu. For use on a PC, the graphics menu is relatively comprehensive. Alongside global presets (Low, Medium & High), there are also a variety of individual controls that can be set manually. These controls allow the game's performance to be optimized for specific hardware.

2K Games even integrated a PhysX option that is also available on AMD notebooks. A short test with the GeForce GTX 680M and Radeon HD 7970M revealed - unsurprisingly - that AMD loses more speed. While the GTX 680M only lost a few fps (3-7% in our benchmark sequence), the HD 7970M was considerably more bogged down (-2% @ Ultra setting, -36% @ High setting). With this in mind, we decided to deactivate PhysX altogether. Firstly, the comparison is fairer that way. Secondly, the various quality settings scale better.

In general, the engine is not perfect. Problem 1: At high settings, the visual enhancements are not radical enough to make up for the decrease in performance. Problem 2: Depending on the game level, the display refresh rate can fluctuate tremendously. Even high-end notebooks and desktop PCs frequently fall under 30 fps at maximum settings. Problem 3: The current Fraps version 3.5.99 simply refuses to work in DirectX 11 mode. Fraps 3.5.9 does not reveal any irregularities. Problem 4: AMD systems in particular still have to deal with crashes and various bugs.

However, we are pleased that all the options can be adjusted from directly within the game. Only a PhysX change requires a restart. The "Max Smoothed Framerate" proves to be a double-edged sword. Limiting the maximum refresh rate can make the game run more smoothly and reduce noise. On the other hand, the game can only reach a certain cap value in the benchmarks. In order to coax more frames out of the notebooks, we raised the setting from 60 to 120.

Low Settings
Low Settings
Medium Settings
Medium Settings
High Settings (PhysX Off)
High Settings (PhysX Off)
Ultra Settings (PhysX Off)
Ultra Settings (PhysX Off)
Low Settings
Low Settings
Medium Settings
Medium Settings
High Settings (PhysX Off)
High Settings (PhysX Off)
Ultra Settings (PhysX Off)
Ultra Settings (PhysX Off)

Benchmark

As mentioned, our benchmark sequence is in the first chapter, which bears the fitting name: "Invasion!" The about 30-second passage includes tons of effects, from smoke over fire to other particles. The effects make the passage demanding. Because this is a third-person title and the battles can be paused, about 30 fps on average is sufficient to render the game fluidly.

Results

In DirectX 9 mode and at low details, The Bureau is not very demanding at all. Entry-level graphics cards like the Intel HD Graphics 4000 manage about 40 fps at 1024x768 pixels (the HD 3000 cannot run the game at a playable frame rate, unfortunately). Middle class GPUs at the level of the GeForce GT 740M can also handle normal details and 1366x768 pixels in DirectX 11 mode.

Those who want to play XCOM Declassified at high presets should have a high-end model like the GeForce GTX 765M or GTX 670MX at their command. Only expensive luxury cards, like the Radeon HD 8970M or GeForce GTX 780M, can tackle 1920x1080 pixels and all of the settings on maximum.

Speaking of the HD 8970M: With the brand new Catalyst 13.8 Beta2, AMD's top model was slower than the otherwise weaker HD 7970M. A driver downgrade to version 13.4 improved the situation (the same goes for Splinter Cell: Blacklist).

Benchmark Table: The Bureau: XCOM Declassified
Benchmark Table: The Bureau: XCOM Declassified

Verdict

Even if you can argue about its graphics and gaming quality, The Bureau definitely has its appeal. The title is no stock product -- it tries to enrich the PC market with fresh ideas and aims. The rather unflattering reviews show that the project did not quite go as planned. Still, we did notice the genre mix during our benchmark test.

Test Systems

Our four main test devices were courtesy of Schenker Technologies (mysn.de):

  • W503 (Core i7-4700MQ, 8 GB DDR3, GeForce GTX 765M, GTX 770M, GTX 780M, Radeon HD 8970M & HD Graphics 4600)
  • M503 (Core i7-4702MQ, 8 GB DDR3, GeForce GT 750M)
  • XMG P502 (Core i7-3610QM, 8 GB DDR3, GeForce GTX 660M, GTX 670MX, GTX 675MX, GTX 680M, Radeon HD 7970M & HD Graphics 4000)
  • Xesia M501 (Core i7-2630QM, 8 GB DDR3, GeForce GT 630M & HD Graphics 3000)

A further thank you goes to Crucial for the 480 GB M500, on which Windows 7 Professional 64-bit is installed.

GPU drivers used: Nvidia 326.80 Beta, AMD 13.8 Beta2 (13.4 @ HD 8970M), Intel 9.17.10.3223 and 9.18.10.3165.

From left to right: Schenker Xesia M501, M503, XMG P502 & W503
From left to right: Schenker Xesia M501, M503, XMG P502 & W503

Overview

Show Restrictions
Pos      Model                                     The Bureau: XCOM Declassified
 The Bureau: XCOM Declassified (2013)
low
1024x768
DX9, Low Preset
med.
1366x768
DX11, Medium Preset
4xAF
high
1366x768
DX11, High (PhysX Off)
16xAF
ultra
1920x1080
DX11, High (PhysX Off)
16xAF
 70NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
121.8
121.2
91.1
45.4
 71AMD Radeon HD 7970
121.8
121.4
69.9
44.2
 90NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
121.9
121.2
66.3
34.8
 92NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
121.7
120.7
60
35.2
 98NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
120
120
92.1
53.5
 100NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
120
118
65
36
 102AMD Radeon HD 8970M
119.8
119.7
63.2
32.4
 108NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
121.7
116.4
59.9
30.2
 112AMD Radeon HD 7970M
121.7
112.9
55
26.8
 116NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
122
111.4
72.3
45
 132NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
121.7
105.3
40.6
24.3
 135NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
97.1
58.4
40.6
 141NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
121.7
91.1
41.5
25.7
 147NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
100.5
71.452
43.952
322
 157NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
119.6
84.7
39.52
23.952
 172AMD Radeon HD 7770
118.6
57.9
24.6
14.9
 183NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
119.6
84.4
33.8
17.4
 185NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
107.1
65.3
39.2
28.4
 193AMD Radeon HD 8870M
60.8
30
15.7
Pos      Model                                     The Bureau: XCOM Declassified
lowmed.highultra
 206NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
105.4
57.1
24.8
14.8
 208AMD Radeon HD 8850M
39.8
27.8
20.8
 210AMD Radeon R9 M265X
61.5
53.1
34.3
21.5
 220NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
77.3
52.2
21
10.8
 227NVIDIA GeForce 940M
49.1
44.9
30.5
18.7
 238NVIDIA GeForce 840M
48.952
42.52
27.652
7.4
 240NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
59.58
49.05
20.91
11.18
 245Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
60.6
39.6
25.2
14.6
 247NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
43.1
32.4
14.4
 252NVIDIA GeForce 830M
45.7
39.7
26.9
 262NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
37.9
33.3
21.1
 264NVIDIA GeForce 825M
39.4
34.2
22.7
 276NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M
39.952
31.62
23.552
15.2
 280AMD Radeon HD 8750M
49.9
33.1
22.4
12.5
 283AMD Radeon R7 M265
49.1
30.4
20.9
 287NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
67.7
39.7
18.4
10.1
 306AMD Radeon R7 M260
36
20.6
12.9
 328AMD Radeon HD 8670D
55
26
11
7
 332AMD Radeon R6 (Kaveri)
19.8
13.1
9.1
 352AMD Radeon HD 8570D
48
26.6
11.5
6.4
Pos      Model                                     The Bureau: XCOM Declassified
lowmed.highultra
 357AMD Radeon HD 8670M
28.2
17.1
 359AMD Radeon HD 7660D
49
28.4
11.7
6.6
 377AMD Radeon HD 8650G
29.5
19.6
12.9
 382NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
48.7
25.7
11.3
6.6
 383AMD Radeon HD 7560D
47.9
21.1
13.2
9.4
 388AMD Radeon R5 M255
40.5
24.3
15.6
9.8
 391NVIDIA GeForce 820M
35.3
29.1
20.2
 395NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
32.1
26.1
11
 400AMD Radeon R5 M230
27
18.4
15.1
 410Intel Iris Graphics 5100
31.6
20.8
12.1
6.6
 415Intel HD Graphics 4600
39.8
17.1
9.7
6.6
 417Intel HD Graphics 5500
16.6
13.9
10.8
6.2
 426AMD Radeon R5 (Kaveri)
19.6
11.2
8.6
 430AMD Radeon HD 7660G
39.4
18.4
7.8
5
 456AMD Radeon HD 7610M
34
19
9
5
 458AMD Radeon HD 8470D
31
20.5
9
 466Intel HD Graphics 4400
16.4
10.8
 507AMD Radeon HD 7480D
29.4
15.1
7.1
4.2
 508Intel HD Graphics 4000
38.2
16.4
8.9
5.9
 516AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)
19.1
12.4
8.8
Pos      Model                                     The Bureau: XCOM Declassified
lowmed.highultra
 517AMD Radeon R4 (Beema)
19.3
11.7
8.3
 518AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
18.8
11.5
8.1
 520Intel HD Graphics 4200
11.9
8.2
6.6
 529AMD Radeon HD 8450G
19.7
11.9
7.7
 533AMD Radeon HD 8400
18.4
10.8
 547AMD Radeon HD 8330
16.5
10.3
 580Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)
15.9
8.9
 603AMD Radeon HD 8280
14.4
9
 613AMD Radeon HD 8250
12.37
7.43
3.29
 619Intel HD Graphics 3000
18.12
 637AMD Radeon HD 8210
9.9
 682Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
10.2
6.1
* Smaller values are better. / * Approximate position

 

Legend
5Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
123Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Quality journalism is paid by advertising. We show the least amount of ads possible. Adblock users see more ads. Please, switch off ad blockers.

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Archive of our own reviews > The Bureau: XCOM Declassified Benchmarked
Florian Glaser, 2013-08-31 (Update: 2018-05-15)