Notebookcheck

AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo)

AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo)

The AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) is an integrated graphics card in the low-end Carrizo APUs. At launch in mid 2015 the R6 was used in the AMD A10-8700P and A8-8600P with 384 GCN shaders and 720 resp. 800 MHz clock rate (Boost?). Depending on the configured TDP (ranging from 12 to 35 Watt) and used main memory (up to DDR3-2133 in dual channel mode supported) the performance can differ greatly. 

Architecture and Features

The Radeon R6 is using the third generation GCN architecture (sometimes also called GCN 1.2) similar to the desktop Tonga chip. Therefore, it offers DirectX 12 (FL 12_0) hardware support and advanced color compression that leads to 5-7% improvement in games. Furthermore, the shaders can be used with Mantle, OpenGL and OpenCL. HSA 1.0 is supported to easily run code on CPU and GPU cores together.

The improved video decoder UVD 6 (Unified Video Decoder) is now able to decode HVEC / H.265 in up 4K in hardware. Furthermore, the VCE (Video Codec Engine) was improved for faster transcodes of H.264.

More information on architecture and features of the Carrizo chips can be found in our launch article.

Performance

The gaming performance of the integrated R6 depends on the configured TDP (12 - 35 Watt) of the chip. The difference from a 15 Watt A8 to a 35 Watt A10 e.g. can be 49% (3DMark 11, see scores below). Demanding games like Evolve or Far Cry 4 will struggle to achieve fluent frame rates. However, less demanding games like Counter-Strike: GO may even run in high detail settings (see the Kaveri R7 GPU for benchmarks).

Power Consumption

Depending on the configured TDP the chip may be used in thin and light machines (12 - 20 Watt range) or normal sized laptops (35 Watt TDP).

ManufacturerAMD
Radeon R (Carrizo) Series
Radeon R7 (Carrizo) compare 512 @ 800 MHz64/128 Bit
Radeon R6 (Carrizo) 384 @ 800 MHz64/128 Bit
Radeon R5 (Carrizo) compare 256 @ 800 MHz64/128 Bit
CodenameCarrizo
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0
Pipelines384 - unified
Core Speed800 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit
Shared Memoryyes
DirectXDirectX 12 (FL 12_0)
Transistor Count2410 Million
technology28 nm
FeaturesUVD 6, VCE
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement04.06.2015
CPU in Radeon R6 (Carrizo)GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD A10-8700P4 x 1800 MHz, 12 - 35 W? MHz800 MHz
AMD Pro A10-8700B4 x 1800 MHz, 12 - 35 W? MHz800 MHz
AMD A8-8600P4 x 1600 MHz, 12-35 W? MHz720 MHz
AMD Pro A8-8600B4 x 1600 MHz, 12-35 W? MHz720 MHz
min. - max.? MHz720 - 800 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
5.1 pt (5%)
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) -71%
...
AMD Radeon R5 M330 -7%
Intel UHD Graphics 615 -7%
Intel HD Graphics 4600 -5%
Intel Iris Graphics 5100 -5%
AMD Radeon R7 (Kaveri) -4%
Intel HD Graphics 5500 -4%
NVIDIA Quadro K610M -4%
AMD Radeon HD 8470D -3%
NVIDIA NVS 5200M -2%
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo)
AMD Radeon R7 M260X 0%
AMD Radeon R5 M335 1%
AMD Radeon R5 M430 2%
AMD Radeon HD 8730M 4%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 5%
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) 6%
Intel HD Graphics 615 6%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M 6%
AMD Radeon R5 M255 7%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop) 1817%
0%
100%
3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
300 Points (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
274 Points (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 42842     avg: 52058     median: 53702.5 (10%)     max: 57983 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
min: 26331     avg: 33965     median: 35055 (5%)     max: 39418 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 3248     avg: 3864     median: 3524 (5%)     max: 4564 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 4033     avg: 5564     median: 4717 (2%)     max: 7296 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 666     avg: 845     median: 842 (3%)     max: 1100 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 764     avg: 913     median: 909 (2%)     max: 1068 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 37735     avg: 45682     median: 44503 (6%)     max: 54461 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 1297     avg: 1582     median: 1550 (4%)     max: 2359 points
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 1288     avg: 1452     median: 1437.5 (3%)     max: 1767 points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 +
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 +
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
29.4 fps (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
28.1 fps (8%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
min: 130     avg: 138     median: 137.5 (1%)     max: 145 Samples/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
min: 290     avg: 302     median: 301.5 (3%)     max: 313 Samples/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
min: 778     avg: 883     median: 918 (3%)     max: 953 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

FIFA 17

FIFA 17

2016
low 1280x720
26.8 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.5 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Deus Ex Mankind Divided

Deus Ex Mankind Divided

2016
low 1280x720
13  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
No Man's Sky

No Man's Sky

2016
low 1280x720
10.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Mirror's Edge Catalyst

Mirror's Edge Catalyst

2016
low 1280x720
6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
2.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
26.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
13.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Ashes of the Singularity

Ashes of the Singularity

2016
low 1280x768
11.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Need for Speed 2016

Need for Speed 2016

2016
low 1280x720
11.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Hitman 2016

Hitman 2016

2016
low 1280x720
6.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
3.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Division

The Division

2016
low 1280x720
12.3 15.1 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.5 8.9 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry Primal

Far Cry Primal

2016
low 1280x720
10 17 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
XCOM 2

XCOM 2

2016
low 1280x720
11.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
3.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Rise of the Tomb Raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider

2016
low 1024x768
14.2 16.8 17 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Rainbow Six Siege

Rainbow Six Siege

2015
low 1024x768
37.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Just Cause 3

Just Cause 3

2015
low 1024x768
15.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Star Wars Battlefront

Star Wars Battlefront

2015
low 1024x768
20.5 21.6 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.8 16.8 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Assassin's Creed Syndicate

Assassin's Creed Syndicate

2015
low 1024x768
11.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fallout 4

Fallout 4

2015
low 1280x720
18.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Call of Duty: Black Ops 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 3

2015
low 1024x768
17.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
27.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
2.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 16

FIFA 16

2015
low 1280x720
44.2 55.1 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
28.5 33.7 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
World of Warships

World of Warships

2015
low 1366x768
39.7 50.1 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.2 38.7 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.5 17.3 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.4 10.6 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Metal Gear Solid V

Metal Gear Solid V

2015
low 1024x768
49.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare