Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro P3000

NVIDIA Quadro P3000

The Nvidia Quadro P3000 is a mobile high-end workstation graphics card for notebooks. Similar to the consumer GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), it is based on the GP106 chip with 1280 shaders. The graphics card is designed for the Kaby Lake generation and is the successor to the Quadro M3000M (Maxwell). However, the P3000 is equipped with 6 GB GDDR5 video memory (at a lower bandwidth), while GTX 1060 is available with 3 or 6 GB. The clock rates range from 1088 MHz (base) to 1215 MHz (typical Boost) to 1240 MHz (max.).

The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers, which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.

Performance

The theoretical performance should be on par with the GTX 1060 (if the clocks did not take a massive hit), so the GPU should be significantly faster than the previous M3000M.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro P3000 is 75 Watts TGP (including memory) or 55.3 W TDP according to Nvidia, so the card is suited for 15-inch notebooks or larger.

Quadro P Series

Quadro P5200 compare 2560 @ 1.32 - 1.57 GHz256 Bit @ 7216 MHz
Quadro P4200 compare 2304 @ 1.22 - 1.48 GHz256 Bit @ 7132 MHz
Quadro P5000 compare 2048 @ 1.16 - 1.51 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P5000 Max-Q compare 2048 @ 1.1 - 1.37 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P4000 compare 1792 @ 1.2 - 1.23 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P4000 Max-Q compare 1792 @ 1.11 - 1.24 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P3200 compare 1792 @ 0.71 - 1.23 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P3000 1280 @ 1.09 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P3000 Max-Q compare 1280 @ 1.08 - 1.24 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P2000 compare 768 @ 1.22 - 1.47 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P2000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 1.22 - 1.47 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P1000 compare 512 @ 1.49 - 1.52 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P620 compare 512 @ 1.18 - 1.44 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
CodenameN17E-Q1
ArchitecturePascal
Pipelines1280 - unified
Core Speed1088 - 1215 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7008 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory16 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5
Power Consumption75 Watt
technology16 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement11.01.2017
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.5 pt (10%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 8003     avg: 8156     median: 8155.5 (12%)     max: 8308 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 9022     avg: 9256     median: 9255.5 (9%)     max: 9489 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
126996 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
2999 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
2864 Points (6%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 316202     avg: 331998     median: 331998 (34%)     max: 347794 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
121766 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 24508     avg: 24681     median: 24681 (23%)     max: 24854 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 61574     avg: 63332     median: 63331.5 (16%)     max: 65089 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 10738     avg: 11351     median: 11229 (14%)     max: 12086 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 11162     avg: 12583     median: 12105 (9%)     max: 14483 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
33390 Points (10%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
36405 Points (20%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 +
3DMark 06
29440 Points (38%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
50.9 fps (15%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
51.2 fps (31%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
50.6 fps (29%)
specvp11 sw-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
54.4 fps (41%)
specvp11 proe-05 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
19.5 fps (23%)
specvp11 maya-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
57.6 fps (43%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
56.3 fps (60%)
specvp11 ensight-04 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
59.3 fps (28%)
specvp11 catia-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
50.3 fps (27%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 102.9     avg: 117.4     median: 107.3 (27%)     max: 141.9 fps
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 71.8     avg: 88.2     median: 73.3 (11%)     max: 119.4 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 54     avg: 54.7     median: 54.8 (10%)     max: 55.3 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 29.32     avg: 33.1     median: 29.8 (8%)     max: 40.22 fps
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 64.6     avg: 72.8     median: 67.7 (18%)     max: 86.1 fps
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 7.6     avg: 8     median: 7.7 (7%)     max: 8.78 fps
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 85.6     avg: 93.2     median: 87 (35%)     max: 107.1 fps
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 92.3     avg: 104.1     median: 96.5 (16%)     max: 123.6 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 5873     avg: 6514     median: 6835 (5%)     max: 6835 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 92.3     avg: 101.1     median: 96 (32%)     max: 114.9 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 100.7     avg: 128.2     median: 113.4 (7%)     max: 170.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
165.8 fps (16%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
249.9 fps (5%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
328.6 fps (14%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
712 fps (6%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 1805     avg: 1815     median: 1814.5 (7%)     max: 1824 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 3317     avg: 3352     median: 3351.5 (6%)     max: 3386 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 6501     avg: 6556     median: 6556 (5%)     max: 6611 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
82.7 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
84.5 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 89.1     avg: 101.8     median: 101.8 (22%)     max: 114.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra
min: 0.2972     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (30%)     max: 0.3704 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
0.4 fps per Watt (31%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 35.8     avg: 38.7     median: 38.7 (55%)     max: 41.6 dB(A)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Prey

Prey

2017
ultra 1920x1080
89.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
84  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
9.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
107.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
48.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
19.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
199.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
81.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
57.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
24.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
120.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
114.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
68.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
30.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
143.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
136.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
66.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
53.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
165.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
139.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
68.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
60.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
25.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Mafia 3

Mafia 3

2016
high 1920x1080
36.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1920x1080
40
low 1280x720
103.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
77.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
ultra 1920x1080
89.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Doom

Doom

2016
ultra 1920x1080
73  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
52.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
176.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
107  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
59.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50.3 53.6 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
278.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
189.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
107.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
78.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
34.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
180.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
156.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
82.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
70.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
27.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Fallout 4

Fallout 4

2015
ultra 1920x1080
51.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
73  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
167.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
103.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
59.1 66 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31.2 33 34 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
21.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
233.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
129.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
80.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
71.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
61.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Thief

Thief

2014
ultra 1920x1080
65  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
67.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
231.9 291.2 ~ 262 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
203.7 242.1 ~ 223 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
184.7 233.2 ~ 209 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
89.8 92.1 107.9 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Prey89.3
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III8441.228.725.49.6
Ghost Recon Wildlands107.753.748.42619.5
For Honor199.787.181.657.324.8
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare120.8114.279.968.730.9
Titanfall 2143.8136.866.353.921.1
Battlefield 1165.8139.568.760.625.1
Mafia 336.5
Deus Ex Mankind Divided103.777.643.322.914.5
Overwatch89.9
Doom73
Ashes of the Singularity52.547.8
Rise of the Tomb Raider176.410759.45221
Rainbow Six Siege278.2189.5107.378.834.9
Star Wars Battlefront180.9156.482.570.327.4
Fallout 451.9
Metal Gear Solid V60
Batman: Arkham Knight7349
The Witcher 3167.2103.6633321.8
Dirt Rally233.9129.880.771.661.8
Thief65
Metro: Last Light67.5
BioShock Infinite26222320997
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


3
10

3
5
6
1
5
9
1
3
6
12



9
2
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 07. 17:12:28

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 07 Nov 2025 05:37:39 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.035s ... 0.036s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.036s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.036s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7665 +0.027s ... 0.064s

#8 got single benchmarks 7665 +0.014s ... 0.077s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.077s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.803s ... 0.88s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.88s

#12 Got 85 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.886s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.886s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.012s ... 0.899s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.147s ... 1.046s

#16 return log +0.005s ... 1.051s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *
Arc B 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU

Class 3

UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2017-01-12)