Notebookcheck Logo

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

The Intel UHD Graphics 16 EUs (Jasper Lake, Gen. 11) is an integrated graphics card in the Jasper Lake Celeron SoCs for laptops and small desktops. It is the low end GPU version in the Jasper Lake series (Celeron Dual-Cores) and offers only 16 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units / Shader Blocks). It offers no dedicated graphics memory and the clock rate depends on the processor model. At launch there are two Celeron models (N4500 with 6W and N4505 with 10W) clocked at 350 - 750 MHz.

Thanks to the improved architecture and more EUs, the UHD Graphics is clearly faster than the old Gemini Lake SoCs (e.g. UHD Graphics 600).

A special new feature of the Gen11 graphics card is the new Variable Rate Shading (VRS) support. With it game designers can decide where to spend shading time and e.g. shade object in the background or behind fog with less resolution (up to using only one source for a 4x4 block). With this technique early results show up to 1.3x performance in Unreal Engine POC and 1.2x speedup in Civ 6. Up to now VRS is only supported by the new Nvidia Turing architecture (GTX 1650 and up).

Another improved hardware piece is the integrated video de- and encoder that was improved significantly according to Intel. They did not specify any more details, but the previous generation was able to decode VP9 and H.265/HEVC in Main10 profile with 10 bit color depth using the dedicated hardware.

The Jasper Lake SoCs and therefore the integrated GPU are manufactured in the 10nm process (like Ice Lake probably) at Intel that should be comparable to the 7nm process of TSMC.

Gen. 11 Series

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) compare 64 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compare 32 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) compare 64 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) compare 48 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) compare 32 @ 0.35 - 0.9 GHz
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU) compare 32 @ 0.4 - 0.85 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) compare 24 @ 0.35 - 0.8 GHz
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) compare 16 @ 0.25 - 0.85 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 24 @ 0.35 - 0.8 GHz
CodenameGen. 11
ArchitectureGen. 11
Pipelines24 - unified
Core Speed350 - 800 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5, OpenCL 1.2
Power Consumption4.8 - 10 Watt
technology10 nm
Displays3 Displays (max.)
FeaturesQuickSync
Date of Announcement11.01.2021
PredecessorUHD Graphics 600
CPU in UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Celeron N5095A4 x 2000 MHz, 15 W450 MHz750 MHz
Intel Celeron N50954 x 2000 MHz, 15 W450 MHz750 MHz
Intel Celeron N62112 x 1200 MHz, 6.5 W250 MHz750 MHz
min. - max.250 - 450 MHz750 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.3 pt (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 43067     avg: 44131     median: 43609.5 (4%)     max: 46236 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 3022     avg: 4251     median: 4596.5 (4%)     max: 4845 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 4210     avg: 4863     median: 4910.5 (1%)     max: 5217 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 378     avg: 595     median: 626 (1%)     max: 658 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 392     avg: 613     median: 645 (1%)     max: 679 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 591     avg: 935     median: 975.5 (1%)     max: 1028 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 554     avg: 819     median: 854 (1%)     max: 894 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 5796     avg: 6344     median: 6438 (8%)     max: 6704 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 11.8     avg: 24.5     median: 26.2 (2%)     max: 28.9 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 7.8     avg: 12.7     median: 12.7 (1%)     max: 17.5 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 11.1     avg: 14.4     median: 15.2 (2%)     max: 16 Watt
05101520Tooltip
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
12.7 Watt (5%)
0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
0 (!)
low 1920x1080
5.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
7.7
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
19  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
16.2 16.2 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.5 6.6 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6 6.5 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
10.1 10.8 11 13.2 13.3 15.1 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7.5 8.4 9 9.2 9.2 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.1 7.9 8.3 8.6 8.6 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
2.2 6.9 6.9 6.9 7.1 7.2 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
3.2 3.3 3.3 ~ 3 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
2.3 2.3 ~ 2 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
18.9 36.2 47.7 57.3 58.3 58.6 61.2 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.7 22 22.8 26.6 26.9 26.9 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.6 11.8 11.8 11.8 12 12 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.8 10.8 10.9 10.9 11.2 11.2 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
4 13.5 14 ~ 11 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
0 (!) 25.1 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
57.6  fps    + Compare