Notebookcheck Logo

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

The Intel UHD Graphics 16 EUs (Jasper Lake, Gen. 11) is an integrated graphics card in the Jasper Lake Celeron SoCs for laptops and small desktops. It is the low end GPU version in the Jasper Lake series (Celeron Dual-Cores) and offers only 16 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units / Shader Blocks). It offers no dedicated graphics memory and the clock rate depends on the processor model. At launch there are two Celeron models (N4500 with 6W and N4505 with 10W) clocked at 350 - 750 MHz.

Thanks to the improved architecture and more EUs, the UHD Graphics is clearly faster than the old Gemini Lake SoCs (e.g. UHD Graphics 600).

A special new feature of the Gen11 graphics card is the new Variable Rate Shading (VRS) support. With it game designers can decide where to spend shading time and e.g. shade object in the background or behind fog with less resolution (up to using only one source for a 4x4 block). With this technique early results show up to 1.3x performance in Unreal Engine POC and 1.2x speedup in Civ 6. Up to now VRS is only supported by the new Nvidia Turing architecture (GTX 1650 and up).

Another improved hardware piece is the integrated video de- and encoder that was improved significantly according to Intel. They did not specify any more details, but the previous generation was able to decode VP9 and H.265/HEVC in Main10 profile with 10 bit color depth using the dedicated hardware.

The Jasper Lake SoCs and therefore the integrated GPU are manufactured in the 10nm process (like Ice Lake probably) at Intel that should be comparable to the 7nm process of TSMC.

Gen. 11 Series

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) compare 64 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compare 32 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) compare 64 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) compare 48 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) compare 32 @ 0.35 - 0.9 GHz
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU) compare 32 @ 0.4 - 0.85 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) compare 24 @ 0.35 - 0.8 GHz
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) compare 16 @ 0.25 - 0.85 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 24 @ 0.35 - 0.8 GHz
CodenameGen. 11
ArchitectureGen. 11
Pipelines24 - unified
Core Speed350 - 800 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5, OpenCL 1.2
Power Consumption4.8 - 10 Watt
technology10 nm
Displays3 Displays (max.)
FeaturesQuickSync
Date of Announcement11.01.2021
PredecessorUHD Graphics 600
CPU in UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Celeron N50954 x 2000 MHz, 15 W450 MHz750 MHz
Intel Celeron N62112 x 1200 MHz, 6.5 W250 MHz750 MHz
Intel Celeron N45052 x 2000 MHz, 10 W450 MHz750 MHz
Intel Celeron N45002 x 1100 MHz, 6 W350 MHz750 MHz
min. - max.250 - 450 MHz750 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.3 pt (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 43067     avg: 44131     median: 43609.5 (5%)     max: 46236 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 3022     avg: 4251     median: 4596.5 (5%)     max: 4845 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 4210     avg: 4863     median: 4910.5 (1%)     max: 5217 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 378     avg: 595     median: 626 (1%)     max: 658 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 392     avg: 613     median: 645 (1%)     max: 679 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 591     avg: 935     median: 975.5 (1%)     max: 1028 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 554     avg: 819     median: 854 (1%)     max: 894 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 5796     avg: 6344     median: 6438 (8%)     max: 6704 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 11.8     avg: 24.5     median: 26.2 (2%)     max: 28.9 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 11.1     avg: 14.4     median: 15.2 (2%)     max: 16 Watt
05101520Tooltip
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
12.7 Watt (5%)
0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
0 (!)
low 1920x1080
5.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
7.7
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
19  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
16.2 16.2 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.5 6.6 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6 6.5 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
10.1 10.8 11 13.2 13.3 15.1 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7.5 8.4 9 9.2 9.2 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.1 7.9 8.3 8.6 8.6 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
2.2 6.9 6.9 6.9 7.1 7.2 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
3.2 3.3 3.3 ~ 3 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
2.3 2.3 ~ 2 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
18.9 36.2 47.7 57.3 58.3 58.6 61.2 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.7 22 22.8 26.6 26.9 26.9 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.6 11.8 11.8 11.8 12 12 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.8 10.8 10.9 10.9 11.2 11.2 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
4 13.5 14 ~ 11 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
0 (!) 25.1 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
57.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
48.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 22
Elden Ring5.18
F1 202119
Total War: Three Kingdoms15.2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider7
Strange Brigade1676
Far Cry 57
X-Plane 11.111298
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark632
Dota 2 Reborn48241211
The Witcher 311
GTA V13255.59
Counter-Strike: GO57.648.117.8
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
10
2

5
1

5


2








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 18. 13:16:54

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.038s ... 0.039s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.039s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.039s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10644 +0.027s ... 0.066s

#7 got single benchmarks 10644 +0.031s ... 0.097s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.097s

#9 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.567s ... 0.665s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.044s ... 0.709s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.709s

#12 Got 74 rows for game benchmarks. +0.011s ... 0.72s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.72s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.009s ... 0.729s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.288s ... 1.017s

#16 return log +0.064s ... 1.081s

Notebook reviews with Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) graphics card

HP Chromebook 15a in review

HP Chromebook 15a (2023) Review: Bare minimum internet machine for students and casual surfers

The HP Chromebook 15a aims to be an affordable entry into the online world for students and those who are looking for a cheap internet access device. Despite it...
Intel Celeron N4500 | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) | 15.60" | 1.7 kg
Intel NUC11 Essential Kit - Atlas Canyon

Intel NUC11 Essential Kit alias Atlas Canyon with Intel Pentium Silver N6005 and Intel Celeron N4505 review

Intel's NUC11 Essential Kit is based on an Intel Jasper Lake SoC and is perfect for office work. We took a closer look at the mini PC with an Intel Pentium Silv...
Intel Celeron N4505 | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) | | 535 g
Ace Magician T8Pro

Ace Magician T8Pro review: Budget mini PC for office use

The Ace Magician T8Pro is an extremely compact office PC released by Minipc Union. The Jasper Lake SoC inside is only capable of running basic tasks. In this re...
Intel Celeron N5095 | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) | | 209 g
GEEKOM MiniAir 11 Hands-on Review

GEEKOM MiniAir 11 Hands-on Review

The GEEKOM MiniAir 11 is tiny, even by mini PC standards. Despite its small package, it is a competent PC for basic home and work tasks.
Intel Celeron N5095 | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) | | 524 g
Beelink U59 Mini-S mini PC review: The super inexpensive Intel NUC HTPC alternative

Beelink U59 Mini-S mini PC review: The super inexpensive Intel NUC HTPC alternative

The Beelink U59 Mini-S is cheap enough to be a respectable alternative to the typical smart TV dongles or media players from Google, Amazon, Apple, or Roku espe...
Intel Celeron N5095 | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) | | 279 g

Beelink U59: Intel Celeron N5095, 0.3 kg
  Review » Intel Celeron N5095 Jasper Lake benchmarked: Beelink U59 mini PC review

Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA: Intel Celeron N4500, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  Review » Asus BR1100FKA in review: Affordable and shockproof convertible

Asus Chromebook CX1400: Intel Celeron N4500, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Chromebook CX1400

Acer Aspire 1 A115-32-C96U: Intel Celeron N4500, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 1 A115-32-C96U

HP Chromebook 15a-na0012TU: Intel Celeron N4500, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP Chromebook 15a-na0012TU

Asus Vivobook Go 14 Flip TP1400KA-EC040WS: Intel Celeron N4500, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook Go 14 Flip TP1400KA-EC040WS

HP Chromebook 14a-na1012ns: Intel Celeron N4500, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Chromebook 14a-na1012ns

Acer Aspire 3 A315-35-C8XU: Intel Celeron N4500, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 3 A315-35-C8XU

Samsung Galaxy Chromebook2 360: Intel Celeron N4500, 12.40", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Chromebook2 360

Asus Vivobook Go 14X E410MA-EB1272WS: Intel Celeron N4500, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook Go 14X E410MA-EB1272WS

Asus Chromebook Flip CR1 CR1100FKA-BP0023: Intel Celeron N4500, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Chromebook Flip CR1 CR1100FKA-BP0023

Lenovo Flex 3i Chromebook 11-82N30012HA: Intel Celeron N4500, 11.60", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Flex 3i Chromebook 11-82N30012HA

Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-C1CG: Intel Celeron N4500, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-C1CG

Acer Aspire 1 A114-33-C51G: Intel Celeron N4500, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 1 A114-33-C51G

Asus BR1100CKA-GJ0303RA: Intel Celeron N4500, 11.60", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus BR1100CKA-GJ0303RA

Samsung Galaxy Chromebook Go 14 XE340XDA-KA1US: Intel Celeron N4500, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Chromebook Go 14 XE340XDA-KA1US

CTL Chromebook NL72: Intel Celeron N4500, 11.60", 1.3 kg
  External Review » CTL Chromebook NL72

Chuwi Hi10 Go: Intel Celeron N4500, 10.10", 0.7 kg
  External Review » Chuwi Hi10 Go

Acer Chromebook 317 CB317-1H-C994: Intel Celeron N4500, 17.30", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Chromebook 317 CB317-1H-C994

Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA: Intel Celeron N4500, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA

   » Asus BR1100FKA: Robust, but with limited application scenarios

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) GPU - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2021-01-12)