Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730

The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730 is a mobile performance class graphic card for laptops with native DirectX 11 support. Despite the name, the HD chip does not stem from the desktop HD 5700 series but is just a faster Mobility Radeon HD 5650 with 400 shader cores. Compared to the Mobility HD 5750, the 5730 has no GDDR5 support, but a higher core speed.

As the other HD 5600/5700 cards, the HD 5730 offers Avivo HD for HD video acceleration, 8-channel HD audio output over HDMI 1.3, Eyefinity for up to 6 monitors (if the laptop features DisplayPorts) and Direct Compute 11 support.

The performance should be a bit better than a GeForce GTS 250M in the middle-performance class. This means all modern games (of 2009) should run fluently on this graphics card in medium to high detail settings with lower resolution settings (e.g. 1366x768).

Compared to desktop graphics cards, the HD 5730 should be similar to a Radeon 5570 (except the desktop version uses faster GDDR5).

Mobility Radeon HD 5600/5700 Series

Mobility Radeon HD 5770 compare 400 @ 0.65 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Mobility Radeon HD 5750 compare 400 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 1600 MHz
Mobility Radeon HD 5730 400 @ 0.65 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Mobility Radeon HD 5650 compare 400 @ 0.45 - 0.65 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
CodenameMadison
ArchitectureTerascale 2
Pipelines400 - unified
Core Speed650 MHz
Memory Speed800 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3, GDDR3
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Power Consumption26 Watt
technology40 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement07.01.2010
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.amd.com/us/products/notebook/...

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 3786     avg: 3812     median: 3809 (1%)     max: 3829 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 3130     avg: 3224     median: 3243 (2%)     max: 3313 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 20713     avg: 26162     median: 23762 (25%)     max: 34011 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 21585     avg: 22372     median: 22378 (12%)     max: 22899 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 12192     avg: 13817     median: 14132 (15%)     max: 14387 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 7226     avg: 7258     median: 7265 (10%)     max: 7282 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 +
3DMark 06
min: 7632     avg: 7915     median: 8024 (11%)     max: 8060 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
min: 6.7     avg: 6.8     median: 6.7 (85%)     max: 6.9 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
min: 6.7     avg: 6.8     median: 6.7 (85%)     max: 6.9 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4359     avg: 5454     median: 5418.5 (4%)     max: 6532 points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 20.49     avg: 21.9     median: 21.6 (8%)     max: 23.88 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
46.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
41.7  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
37.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Metro 2033

Metro 2033

2010
low 800x600
61 66 ~ 64 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1360x768
28 33 ~ 31 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1600x900
13 14.8 ~ 14 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Battlefield: Bad Company 2

Battlefield: Bad Company 2

2010
low 1024x768
82.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
48.8 50.9 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
33.7 35.1 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
CoD Modern Warfare 2

CoD Modern Warfare 2

2009
med. 1024x768
47.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
37.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
66.7 67.4 ~ 67 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
37.5 38.3 39 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
26.3 27.6 28 ~ 27 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
46.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
33.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
med. 1024x768
60.2  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
32.8 38 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
109.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1280x1024
38.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
med. 1024x768
80.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1280x1024
53.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
28.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 2

Far Cry 2

2008
low 640x480
111.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1024x768
50.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.