Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The Nvidia RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, not to be confused with the A2000, P2000 or T2000, is a mid-range professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 3,072 CUDA cores and 8 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. It would be fair to say that this is a GeForce RTX 4060 (Laptop) in disguise; consequently, the former is powered by the same AD107 chip as the latter, and is fast enough to handle any triple-A game at 1080p with Ultra quality settings. Brought into existence in 2023, the RTX 2000 leverages TSMC's 5 nm process and Nvidia's Ada Lovelace architecture to achieve very decent performance combined with moderate power consumption. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for the card is very wide at 35 W to 140 W leading to bizarre performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same product.

Quadro series graphics cards ship with much different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional users rather than gamers. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation, certified drivers - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.

Architecture and Features

Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here (up to 16,384 versus 10,752); under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache, an optimized ray tracing routine (a different way is employed to determine what is transparent and what isn't), and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI applications.

The RTX 2000 features 24 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 96 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 3,072 CUDA cores. Increase those numbers by 50%, and you get an RTX 3000 Ada Generation - as long as we disregard clock speed differences, of course. Unlike costlier Ada Generation professional laptop graphics cards, the RTX 2000 comes with 8 GB of non-ECC VRAM; the lack of error correction makes this card less suitable for super-important tasks and round-the-clock operation. Much like it is with the RTX 3000 Ada Generation, the VRAM is 128-bit wide and delivers a decent bandwidth of ~256 GB/s.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol, just like Ampere-based cards. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however, DP 1.4a video outputs can potentially prove to be a bottleneck down the line.

Performance

The average RTX 2000 Ada in our extensive database is much closer to the RTX 4050 Laptop than it is to the RTX 4060 Laptop.

Nvidia's marketing materials mention "up to 14.5 TFLOPS" of performance, a significant downgrade compared to 20 TFLOPS delivered by the RTX 3000 Ada Generation.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the TGP power target of the RTX 2000 Ada is.

Power consumption

Nvidia no longer divides its laptop graphics cards into Max-Q and non-max-Q models. Instead, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs, and the range can sometimes be shockingly wide. This is especially the case for the RTX 2000, as the lowest value recommended for it sits at just 35 W while the highest is 300% higher at 140 W. The slowest system built around an RTX 2000 Ada can easily be half as fast as the fastest one. This is the kind of delta that we've already seen on consumer-grade laptops featuring the latest GeForce RTX cards.

Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the RTX 2000 is built with makes for very decent energy efficiency, as of mid 2023.

RTX Ada Generation Laptop GPU Series

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 2048 64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
ArchitectureAda Lovelace
Pipelines3072 - unified
TMUs96
ROPs32
Raytracing Cores24
Tensor / AI Cores96
CacheL2: 32 MB
Memory Speed16000 effective = 2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth256 GB/s
APIDirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
technology5 nm
PCIe4
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement21.03.2023
Link to Manufacturer Pageimages.nvidia.com
PredecessorRTX A2000 Laptop GPU

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 7813     avg: 8763     median: 8849 (26%)     max: 9628 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 18177     avg: 20223     median: 19987 (35%)     max: 22505 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 20340     avg: 22325     median: 22039 (25%)     max: 24596 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 25876     avg: 27504     median: 27558 (38%)     max: 29077 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 26968     avg: 30077     median: 30262 (26%)     max: 33001 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 51     avg: 85.7     median: 51 (8%)     max: 155 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 25     avg: 26.3     median: 26 (10%)     max: 28 Seconds
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 173.89     avg: 181.1     median: 174.7 (47%)     max: 194.75 fps
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 315.35     avg: 333.9     median: 330 (37%)     max: 356.29 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 79.97     avg: 85.9     median: 82.8 (18%)     max: 95.04 fps
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 103.3     avg: 126.4     median: 110.7 (23%)     max: 165.27 fps
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 271.86     avg: 280.7     median: 276.7 (31%)     max: 293.61 fps
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 46.29     avg: 48.4     median: 49.4 (16%)     max: 49.58 fps
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 249.3     avg: 258.6     median: 261.4 (38%)     max: 265.15 fps
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 257.86     avg: 293.4     median: 309.5 (34%)     max: 312.95 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 155.94     avg: 179.7     median: 182.5 (32%)     max: 200.54 fps
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
min: 191.93     avg: 205.4     median: 198.6 (39%)     max: 225.76 fps
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 315.31     avg: 341.5     median: 327.9 (53%)     max: 381.32 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 50.48     avg: 66.6     median: 57.2 (59%)     max: 92.01 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 309.59     avg: 331.5     median: 329.5 (48%)     max: 355.25 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 73.7     avg: 84.5     median: 84.6 (38%)     max: 95.09 fps
specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k +
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 223     avg: 290.3     median: 295 (17%)     max: 353 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 196.8     median: 196.8 (1%)     max: 289 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 19217     avg: 46136     median: 46136 (15%)     max: 73055 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 75.1     avg: 94.2     median: 87.9 (12%)     max: 119.5 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 84.4     avg: 109.1     median: 101.5 (14%)     max: 141.5 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 87.9     avg: 112.5     median: 104.7 (23%)     max: 144.9 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Assassin's Creed Mirage

Assassin's Creed Mirage

2023
low 1920x1080
113  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
103  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
97  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
76  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
58  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

2023
low 1920x1080
85.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
64.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
29.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
134.1
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
21.6
Ultra Preset (FSR on) 1920x1080
60.6
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
201 202 ~ 202 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
191.1 192.1 ~ 192 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
142.1 147 ~ 145 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44.4 49.2 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
27.6 31.6 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
241
low 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
27  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
101  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
80  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
53  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
38  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
166.7 213 ~ 190 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
151.8 193.2 ~ 173 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
119.9 138.5 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44.2 52.8 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
28.9 34.2 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
259
low 1920x1080
119.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
110.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
77.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
62.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
43.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
101  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
81  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
72  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
65  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
41  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
157  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
121  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
104  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
87  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
63  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
353  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
230  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
186.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
99.2  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
74.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
332 408 459 ~ 400 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
183 228 231 ~ 214 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
148.4 182.5 184.2 ~ 172 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
132.5 158.2 158.4 ~ 150 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
94.1 103.9 107.5 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
151 175 ~ 163 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
110 130 ~ 120 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
102 120 ~ 111 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
95 113 ~ 104 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
63 81 ~ 72 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
80.6 149.2 156.5 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
73 131.6 133.5 ~ 113 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52.5 103.4 108.9 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
173.3 199.2 ~ 186 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
93.5 111.2 120.3 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
67.7 83.5 84.2 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
50.3 61.3 63.7 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
155 178.4 188.2 ~ 174 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
140.8 153.1 168.7 ~ 154 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
136.9 143.9 160.7 ~ 147 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
132 133.4 150.2 ~ 139 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
336.4 390 424 ~ 383 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
219 261 291 ~ 257 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
127.9 164 184.5 ~ 159 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
65.5 79.6 95.6 ~ 80 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
65  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
176.3 178.1 185.2 ~ 180 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
170.6 173.4 181.3 ~ 175 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
157.7 163.6 171.9 173 ~ 167 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
86.2 98 101.6 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
60.6 69 74.6 76.8 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
171.6
180.7
172.3
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
176.9
178.6
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Assassin's Creed Mirage113103977658
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty85.464.555.248.329.9
F1 232021921454730
Star Wars Jedi Survivor4945424027
Hogwarts Legacy10180645338
F1 221901731294932
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands119.8110.577.362.343.5
Cyberpunk 2077 1.610181726541
Far Cry 61571211048763
F1 2021353230186.699.274.9
Strange Brigade400214172150102
Far Cry 516312011110472
X-Plane 11.1112911388
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark1861087858
Dota 2 Reborn174154147139
The Witcher 33832571598065
GTA V1801751679570
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
5
11

1
7
9

2
8
7

5
8
2
2
7
6



For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 27. 14:55:55

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.047s ... 0.048s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.048s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11601 +0.014s ... 0.062s

#7 got single benchmarks 11601 +0.017s ... 0.079s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.079s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.933s ... 1.012s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.012s

#11 Got 147 rows for game benchmarks. +0.078s ... 1.089s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.09s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.012s ... 1.102s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.84s ... 1.942s

#15 return log +0.044s ... 1.986s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU graphics card

Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 Laptop Review: Improved with 165 Hz screen & Nvidia RTX 2000 Ada

Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 Laptop Review: Improved with 165 Hz screen & Nvidia RTX 2000 Ada

The second generation of the Lenovo ThinkPad P16 builds upon the strengths of the first model. The ThinkPad P16 G2 adds a fast 165 Hz screen and the Nvidia RTX ...
Intel Core i7-13700HX | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | 16.00" | 3 kg
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 workstation review: Excellent alternative to the ThinkPad P15v

HP ZBook Power 15 G10 workstation review: Excellent alternative to the ThinkPad P15v

The ZBook Power 15 G10 is one of the few 15.6-inch workstations to ship with both AMD Zen 4 Pro CPUs and Nvidia RTX Ada GPUs. If you don't mind missing out on 4...
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | 15.60" | 2 kg
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 laptop in review - Mobile workstation replaces the ThinkPad X1 Extreme

Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 laptop in review - Mobile workstation replaces the ThinkPad X1 Extreme

Lenovo no longer offers the ThinkPad X1 Extreme. Instead, the identically built ThinkPad P1 Gen 6 takes over the tasks as a powerful multimedia computer or mobi...
Intel Core i9-13900H | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | 16.00" | 1.9 kg

HP ZBook Power 15 G10, PRO 7940HS: AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » HP ZBook Power 15 G10, PRO 7940HS

Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE: Intel Core i9-13900H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE

Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE: Intel Core i7-13700HX, 16.00", 3 kg
   » ThinkPad P16 G2: Lenovo should offer more SSD storage slots

Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE: Intel Core i9-13900H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » The ThinkPad X1 Extreme is now a thing of the past, instead, the ThinkPad P1 is now available

   » Lenovo's ThinkPad X1 Extreme is history, from now on you only get the ThinkPad P1

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-03- 1)