Notebookcheck

NVIDIA Quadro P5000

NVIDIA Quadro P5000

The Nvidia Quadro P5000 is a mobile high-end workstation graphics card for notebooks. Similar to the consumer GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), it is based on a slimmed-down GP104 chip with 2048 shaders. The graphics card is designed for the Kaby Lake generation and is the successor to the Quadro M5000M (Maxwell). However, the P5000 is equipped with 16 GB GDDR5 video memory (at a lower bandwidth), while GTX 1070 is limited to 8 GB. The clock rates range between 1164 MHz (base) to 1506 MHz (typical Boost) and up to 1657 MHz (max.). 

The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers, which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.

Performance

The theoretical performance should be on par with the GTX 1070 (if the clocks did not take a massive hit), so the GPU should be significantly faster than the previous M5000M. Even the old M5500M could be beaten.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro P5000 is similar to the old Quadro M5000M at 100 Watts TGP (max power consumption incl. memory) resp. 73.4 W TDP according to Nvidia. The card is therefore suited for large 17-inch notebooks.

ManufacturerNVIDIA
Quadro P Series
Quadro P5200 compare 2560 @ 1316 - 1569 MHz256 Bit @ 7216 MHz
Quadro P4200 compare 2304 @ 1215 - 1480 MHz256 Bit @ 7132 MHz
Quadro P5000 2048 @ 1164 - 1506 MHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P5000 Max-Q compare 2048 @ 1101 - 1366 MHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P4000 compare 1792 @ 1202 - 1228 MHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P4000 Max-Q compare 1792 @ 1113 - 1240 MHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P3200 compare 1792 @ 708 - 1202 - 1228 MHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P3000 compare 1280 @ 1088 - 1215 MHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P3000 Max-Q compare 1280 @ 1075 - 1240 MHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P2000 compare 768 @ 1215 - 1468 MHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P2000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 1215 - 1468 MHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P1000 compare 512 @ 1493 - 1519 MHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P620 compare 512 @ 1177 - 1442 MHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
CodenameN17E-Q5
ArchitecturePascal
Pipelines2048 - unified
Core Speed1164 - 1506 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed6006 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory16384 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0
technology16 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement11.01.2017
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro-for-...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
41.5 pt (43%)
3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
min: 4823     avg: 4836     median: 4836 (102%)     max: 4738 Points
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
min: 2898     avg: 3882.5     median: 3882.5 (89%)     max: 4378 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
310648 Points (85%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 28992     avg: 29216.3     median: 28999 (73%)     max: 29658 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 83316     avg: 90787.7     median: 86679 (101%)     max: 86193 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 12298     avg: 12367.3     median: 12363 (103%)     max: 11956 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 14665     avg: 14773.7     median: 14666 (106%)     max: 13827 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 59012     avg: 208837     median: 208837 (28%)     max: 358662 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 16158     avg: 16403.7     median: 16450 (94%)     max: 16603 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 19569     avg: 20096     median: 20096 (106%)     max: 18967 points
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 +
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Extreme HD DirectX 1920x1080
min: 73.9     avg: 74.4     median: 74.4 (91%)     max: 74.8 fps
SPECviewperf 11
Siemens NX 1920x1080 +
Tcvis 1920x1080 +
SolidWorks 1920x1080 +
Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080 +
Maya 1920x1080 +
Lightwave 1920x1080 +
Ensight 1920x1080 +
Catia 1920x1080 +
SPECviewperf 12
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 +
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 +
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 +
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 +
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 +
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 +
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 +
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 +
3ds Max (3dsmax-05) 1900x1060 +
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 +
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
min: 448.1     avg: 448.1     median: 448.1 (110%)     max: 408.3999938964844 fps
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
min: 262.2     avg: 262.2     median: 262.2 (121%)     max: 217 fps
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
min: 2299     avg: 2312.3     median: 2301 (24%)     max: 2337 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
min: 4322     avg: 4334     median: 4323 (40%)     max: 4357 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
min: 11533     avg: 11544     median: 11544 (120%)     max: 9659 Points
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra 1920x1080 *
min: 141.8     avg: 147.9     median: 147.9 (43%)     max: 154 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra - Power Consumption *
min: 145.9     avg: 147.2     median: 147.2 (69%)     max: 148.5 Watt
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

med. 1920x1080
83.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
76.5 76.7 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42.8 42.9 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
27.5 27.6 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
med. 1920x1080
127.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
121.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
95.1 95.3 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
37.6 38.4 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
107  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
98.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
40.8 41.2 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
70.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
24  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
97.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
84 84.8 90 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
35.8 36 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
118.5 119 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
44 44.2 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
97.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51.5 fps 53.4 fps