Notebookcheck

AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

AMD Vega 11

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 is an integrated GPU in the Ryzen desktop APUs (e.g. Ryzen 5 2400G) that were launched early 2018. The graphics card is based on the Vega architecture (5th generation GCN) and has all 11 CUs (=704 shaders) clocked at up to 1240 MHz (Ryzen 5 2400G). The GPU benefits from fast dual-channel DDR4-2400 RAM (contrary to DDR4-2133 single-channel, which is also possible).

The Vega architecture offers some improvements over the Polaris generation and now supports DirectX 12 Feature Level 12_1. More information is available in our dedicated article about the Raven Ridge architecture.

According to a first 3DMark Fire Strike that was published by AMD, the Vega 11 offers a similiar theoretical performance as the older dedicated Radeon R9 M280X. In games the missing dedicated graphics memory may however prove to be a bottleneck. Therefore, modern and demanding games will only be playable in lowest settings and the APU is mostly intended for lower demanding games like Overwatch, Dota 2, ...

Thanks to the 14nm process and clever power-saving features, the power consumption is comparatively low. The high TDP of 65 Watt of the APU however should lead to a much higher power consumption compared to the mobile APUs with 15 Watt TDP.

ManufacturerAMD
AMD Radeon RX Vega Series
RX Vega 64 (compare) 4096 @ 1630 MHz2048 Bit @ 945 MHz
RX Vega 56 (compare) 3584 @ 1138 - 1474 (Boost) MHz409.6 Bit @ 800 MHz
Vega Mobile (compare) 1792 2048 Bit
Vega M GH (compare) 1536 @ 1063 - 1190 (Boost) MHz
Vega M GL / 870 (compare) 1280 @ 931 - 1011 (Boost) MHz
WX Vega M GL (compare) 1280 @ 931 - 1011 (Boost) MHz
Vega 11 704 @ 1240 (Boost) MHz
Vega 10 (compare) 640 @ 1300 (Boost) MHz
Vega 8 (compare) 512 @ 1100 (Boost) MHz
Vega 6 (compare) 384 @ 1100 (Boost) MHz
Vega 3 (compare) 192 @ 1000 (Boost) MHz
CodenameVega Raven Ridge
ArchitectureVega
Pipelines704 - unified
Core Speed1240 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12_1
Transistor Count4500 Million
technology14 nm
FeaturesTiled Rasterization, Shared Memory (up to Dual-Channel DDR4-2400)
Date of Announcement26.10.2017
CPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G4 x 3600 MHz, 65 W? MHz1250 MHz
AMD Ryzen 7 2800H4 x 3300 MHz, 35 W? MHz1300 MHz
min. - max.? - ? MHz1250 - 1300 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
1212 Points (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
1085 Points (8%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 151173     avg: 163387     median: 163590 (31%)     max: 175397 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
104446 Points (14%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 14139     avg: 14827     median: 15019 (25%)     max: 15323 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 20847     avg: 21332.7     median: 20848 (11%)     max: 22303 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 2911     avg: 3128.5     median: 3169.5 (12%)     max: 3264 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 3476     avg: 3523     median: 3494 (9%)     max: 3599 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
128491 Points (17%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 5042     avg: 5465     median: 5591.5 (18%)     max: 5635 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 5475     avg: 5504.8     median: 5490.5 (11%)     max: 5549 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
min: 447     avg: 465     median: 465 (9%)     max: 483 Samples/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
min: 1019     avg: 1074     median: 1074 (10%)     max: 1129 Samples/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
min: 3392     avg: 3425     median: 3425 (12%)     max: 3458 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test - Power Consumption (external Monitor) 1280x720 *
min: 78.7     avg: 89.3     median: 89.3 (21%)     max: 99.9 Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra 1920x1080 *
min: 74.7     avg: 82.6     median: 82.6 (19%)     max: 90.5 Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra - Power Consumption *
90.5 Watt (20%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
1240 MHz (30%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark 1.19 GPU Stress Test 1280x720
1240 MHz (74%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailled information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
37.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
58.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
The Division 2

The Division 2

2019
low 1280x720
62  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dirt Rally 2.0

Dirt Rally 2.0

2019
low 1280x720
121.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
44.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Anthem

Anthem

2019
low 1280x720
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
Far Cry New Dawn

Far Cry New Dawn

2019
low 1280x720
39  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

2019
low 1280x720
64.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
32.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

2018
low 1280x720
39.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Darksiders III

Darksiders III

2018
low 1280x720
79.6  fps    + Compare