Notebookcheck Logo

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) Review – Pascal has arrived

The GTX 1080 is a high-end graphics card which was announced in May 2016 and is based on the new Pascal architecture. We were able to review the Founders Edition from Nvidia and put it through our benchmarks.
gtx980 vs gtx1080

The GeForce GTX 1080 from Nvidia is the first consumer chip with the Pascal architecture and 16 nm FinFET. The new architecture promises significant efficiency improvements and some new features. We have a look at the latter in our article about the Pascal architecture here. This article focuses on the features and the performance of the desktop GeForce GTX 1080 based on the GP104, more precisely the Founders Edition from Nvidia. This version was designed and built by Nvidia and replaces the old "reference design". The Founders Edition, however, can be seen as a higher-quality version and is much more expensive at $699 (without taxes) compared to the less expensive 1080 cards, which will start at $599 (without taxes) according to Nvidia.

The Founders Edition uses high-quality materials, a vapor chamber cooling and a high-quality PCB. It is shipped with a single 8-pin power connector and offers 3x DisplayPort 1.4 ("ready"), one HDMI 2.0b and a dual-link DVI port. 8 GB GDDR5X video memory is also sufficient for today's standards.

Our test system for the following benchmarks is an Intel Core i7-4790K (not overclocked) on an Asus Z97-Deluxe motherboard, 16 GB DDR3-2133, Samsung SSD 840 Pro, OCZ Trion 100 and HGST 1 TB HDD.


The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 is a fast desktop graphics card based on the Pascal architecture. It was announced in May 2016 and offers all 2,560 shader of the used GP104 chip. Furthermore, the GPU is coupled with 8 GB GDDR5X graphics memory using a 256 Bit interface (10 GHz, 320 GB/s). The chip is manufactured at TSMC in 16nm (FinFET). The TDP is specified at 180 Watt and therefore slightly higher than the predecessor, the GTX 980 with 165 Watt.

GeForce GTX 1000 Series

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti compare 3584 @ 1.48 - 1.6 GHz352 Bit @ 11000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop) compare 5120 @ 1.56 - 1.73 GHz256 Bit @ 10000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Desktop) compare 3840 @ 1.51 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop) compare 4096 @ 1.44 - 1.65 GHz256 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) 2560 @ 1.61 - 1.73 GHz256 Bit @ 10000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile compare 2560 @ 1.57 - 1.73 GHz256 Bit @ 10000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) compare 2432 @ 1.61 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) compare 1920 @ 1.51 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 1.1 - 1.28 GHz256 Bit @ 10000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile compare 2048 @ 1.44 - 1.65 GHz256 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q compare 2048 @ 1.1 - 1.27 GHz256 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop) compare 1280 @ 1.51 - 1.71 GHz192 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile compare 1280 @ 1.4 - 1.67 GHz192 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q compare 1280 @ 1.06 - 1.34 GHz192 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile compare 768 @ 1.49 - 1.62 GHz128 Bit @ 7000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) compare 768 @ 1.29 - 1.39 GHz128 Bit @ 7008 MHz
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q compare 768 @ 1.15 - 1.29 GHz128 Bit @ 7000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) compare 640 @ 1.35 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 7008 MHz
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile compare 640 @ 1.35 - 1.49 GHz128 Bit @ 7000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q compare 640 @ 1 - 1.14 GHz128 Bit @ 7000 MHz
GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) compare 384 @ 1.23 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 6000 MHz
CodenamePascal GP104
ArchitecturePascal
Pipelines2560 - unified
Core Speed1607 - 1733 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed10000 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5X
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5
Power Consumption180 Watt
Transistor Count7.2 Billion
technology16 nm
FeaturesMulti-Projection, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor, 500-Watt system power recommended
Date of Announcement06.05.2016
v1.26
log 26. 02:41:19

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 start showIntegratedCPUs +0.071s ... 0.072s

#4 return log +0.016s ... 0.087s

Synthetic Benchmarks

We primarily use the popular 3DMark series from Futuremark for the synthetic benchmarks. The new GTX 1080 is just behind two GTX 980 cards in an SLI configuration inside the MSI GT80S 6QF. SLI scales very well in the 2013 tests, but the SLI configuration is roughly on par with the GTX 1080 in the older 3DMark 11. However, the GTX 1080 can take the lead in Unigine Heaven 4.0. If you count all GPU benchmarks, the 980 SLI has an advantage of 6%.

A single GTX 980 is obviously clearly beaten by the Pascal-based GTX 1080; the Schenker XMG U716, for example, falls behind by around 40%. This difference is also maintained in Unigine Heaven. The Radeon R9 Fury (desktop) is a bit faster than the GTX 980 but is also clearly behind the new Pascal card (-33%).

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
30045 Points +2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
29443 Points
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
23057 Points -22%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
17543 Points -40%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
SCHENKER XMG U716, Intel Core i7-6700
17050 Points -42%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS, Intel Core i7-6700K
12967 Points -56%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
23351 Points +15%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
20268 Points
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
16961 Points -16%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
14580 Points -28%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
SCHENKER XMG U716, Intel Core i7-6700
12691 Points -37%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS, Intel Core i7-6700K
9963 Points -51%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
147015 Points +14%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
129042 Points
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
98958 Points -23%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
80439 Points -38%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
SCHENKER XMG U716, Intel Core i7-6700
75213 Points -42%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS, Intel Core i7-6700K
62938 Points -51%
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
5358 Points +11%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
4841 Points
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
3918 Points -19%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
3552 Points -27%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
SCHENKER XMG U716, Intel Core i7-6700
2977 Points -39%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS, Intel Core i7-6700K
2297 Points -53%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
9994 Points
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
7817 Points -22%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
6951 Points -30%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS, Intel Core i7-6700K
4673 Points -53%
Unigine Heaven 4.0 - Extreme Preset DX11
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
137.7 fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
129.5 fps -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
110 fps -20%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
SCHENKER XMG U716, Intel Core i7-6700
78.1 fps -43%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
77.1 fps -44%

Gaming Benchmarks

GTX 1080 – particularly well-suited for VR
Well-suited for VR

Much more interesting is obviously the gaming performance in the 4K resolution with high details. The SLI scaling does not always work really well, so the GeForce GTX 980 SLI in the MSI GT80S 6QF falls behind the new GTX 1080 by 14% on average. A single GTX 980 is 41% slower; the R9 Fury performs a bit better with a deficit of 31%, but it cannot keep up with the GTX 1080, either. The mobile GeForce GTX 980M is clearly beaten and falls behind by 57%. All tested games were smoothly playable with these settings.

Need for Speed 2016 - 3840x2160 High / On AA:FX
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
61 (47min - 75max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
48 (37min - 58max) fps -21%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
40.3 (34min - 48max) fps -34%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-6700K
34 (27min) fps -44%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
26 (20min) fps -57%
Hitman 2016 - 3840x2160 High / On AA:FX AF:8x
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
42 (34min - 53max) fps
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
38.9 (26min - 46max) fps -7%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
37.7 (26min - 46max) fps -10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
32.6 (24min - 42max) fps -22%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-6700K
26.2 (19min) fps -38%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
18.4 (15min) fps -56%
The Division - 3840x2160 High Preset AF:8x
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
48.5 (19min - 65max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
39.8 (14min - 51max) fps -18%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
34.5 (19min - 51max) fps -29%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-6700K
27.7 (10min) fps -43%
Far Cry Primal - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:SM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
49 (46min - 53max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
40 (37min - 44max) fps -18%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
37 (33min - 42max) fps -24%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-6700K
29 (27min) fps -41%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
20 (18min) fps -59%
XCOM 2 - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:8x
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
30.4 (27min - 34max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
25 (24min - 28max) fps -18%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
22 (19min - 24max) fps -28%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-6700K
18.7 (17min) fps -38%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
50 fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
47.8 (43min - 54max) fps -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
40.6 (36min - 46max) fps -19%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
32.4 (29min - 37max) fps -35%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-6700K
27.9 (25min) fps -44%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
20.8 (19min) fps -58%
Just Cause 3 - 3840x2160 High / On AA:FX AF:8x
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
62 (56min - 67max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
48 (42min - 52max) fps -23%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-6700K
36.6 (33min) fps -41%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
36.3 (33min - 41max) fps -41%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
23.6 (20min) fps -62%
Star Wars Battlefront - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
67 (58min - 79max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
62.6 fps -7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
53 (46min - 64max) fps -21%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
50 (43min - 60max) fps -25%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-6700K
40.4 (35min) fps -40%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
27.9 (23min) fps -58%
Assassin's Creed Syndicate - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
47.3 (44min - 51max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
37.7 fps -20%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
37.4 (35min - 41max) fps -21%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
31.5 (29min - 37max) fps -33%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-6700K
27.6 (26min) fps -42%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
20.7 (18min) fps -56%
Fallout 4 - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
55.6 fps +3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
54 (42min - 66max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
46 (37min - 56max) fps -15%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
38.7 (30min - 49max) fps -28%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
24 (18min) fps -56%
Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 - 3840x2160 High / On AA:FX
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
60.8 fps +5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
58 (50min - 67max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
47.5 (41min - 55max) fps -18%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
36.4 (30min - 44max) fps -37%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
24.8 (10min) fps -57%
Anno 2205 - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:4x
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
67 (64min - 70max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
52.2 (49min - 55max) fps -22%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
35.4 fps -47%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
34.3 (32min - 36max) fps -49%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
23.8 (20min) fps -64%
World of Warships - 3840 x 2160 Very High Preset AA:High FX AF:16x
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
109 (81min - 150max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
87 (64min - 132max) fps -20%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
64 (50min - 82max) fps -41%
Dirt Rally - 3840x2160 High Preset
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
126 (99min - 154max) fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
109 (88min - 139max) fps -13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
85.6 fps -32%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
81 (53min - 104max) fps -36%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
58.6 (45min) fps -53%
GTA V - 3840x2160 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:FX AF:8x
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
79 fps +11%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
71.2 (11.6min - 170max) fps
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
46.6 fps -35%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
41.4 (15min) fps -42%
Battlefield 4 - 3840x2160 High Preset
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
91.6 fps +2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
90 fps
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
70 (63min - 84max) fps -22%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
56 (49min - 65max) fps -38%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Schenker W504, Intel Core i7-4700MQ
35.2 (30min) fps -61%

4K and Maximum Details?

After the promising benchmarks in 4K and high settings, there was the question of whether the GTX 1080, as the fastest single chip GPU, is powerful enough for modern titles at the highest settings, Anti-Aliasing and 3840x2160 pixels. This was the case for Need for Speed 2016 (46 fps), The Division (39 fps), Star Wars Battlefront (61 fps) and Battlefield 4 (58 fps). Only Anno 2205 (24 fps), Doom (ultra 51 fps, min 41) and Crysis 3 (31 fps) were close calls. This means the performance is still not sufficient enough to avoid stutters in very demanding scenes. Still, you can easily enjoy the 4K resolution with a slight reduction in respect of AA or details.

More gaming benchmarks and additional resolutions are listed at the end of this article where you can also find general information about the GPU.

Battlefield 4 in 4k and Ultra setting – 64 players Multiplayer – smooth gameplay
Battlefield 4 in 4k and Ultra setting – 64 players Multiplayer – smooth gameplay
Star Wars Battlefront in 4k and Ultra setting – 64 players Multiplayer – smooth gameplay
Star Wars Battlefront in 4k and Ultra setting – 64 players Multiplayer – smooth gameplay

Boost Clock and Load Performance

Thanks to GPU Boost 3.0, the graphics card can reach much higher clocks until it hits the internal temperature limit. The Founders Edition starts with a high clock of 1797 MHz and 142 fps in The Witcher 3 but drops to 1696 MHz (base clock 1607 MHz according to Nvidia) after 5 minutes. The GPU is steady at 82 °C and the frame rate dropped to 134 fps (-6%). The memory clock on the other hand was maintained at 5005 MHz (10,010 MHz effective). We also noticed a slight performance drop over time in Metro last Light. 141 fps (FHD Ultra) dropped to 138 fps in the third run (-4%), but it will finally level off at 139 fps (we tested 10 runs).

All in all, you have to expect a performance drop of up to 6% depending on the application.

DirectX 12

Praised as a new miracle weapon (by AMD in particular), we now finally have the first games with DirectX 12. However, we can see that the Nvidia driver was already extremely well-optimized and the use of DirectX 11 actually comes with small performance gains in many cases. Ashes of Singularity at "crazy" settings and 4K, for example, was a bit faster with DirectX 11 at 41.6 vs. 40.8 fps. We also measured a small performance advantage for DX 11 for Rise of the Tomb Raider. Hitman still produced graphics errors with the review driver 368.13 in DX12, so we waived a comparison (Nvidia says they are working on a fix until the launch). The theoretical potential of DirectX 12 is shown by the 3DMark 2013 Overhead Test. An 11x result speaks for itself.

Compute Performance

The 1080 cannot beat two GTX 980 cards in the LuxMark render test, because the scaling of the two GPUs just works too well in this case. The R9 Fury and a single GTX 980 on the other hand are clearly beaten. It seems the ComputeMark could not utilize both GTX 980 cards, so the 1080 manages an impressive advantage of 73 and 79%, respectively. The R9 Fury is also 25% slower but can take the lead in Fluid 3DTex.

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
Room GPUs-only
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
3660 Samples/s +57%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
2490 Samples/s +7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
2327 Samples/s
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Eurocom Sky DLX7, Intel Core i7-6700K
1938 Samples/s -17%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
1566 Samples/s -33%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS, Intel Core i7-6700K
1407 Samples/s -40%
Sala GPUs-only
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
5814 Samples/s +23%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
4708 Samples/s
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
3919 Samples/s -17%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
3125 Samples/s -34%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Eurocom Sky DLX7, Intel Core i7-6700K
3077 Samples/s -35%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS, Intel Core i7-6700K
2319 Samples/s -51%
ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
6191 Points
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
4270 Points -31%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Eurocom Sky DLX7, Intel Core i7-6700K
3229 Points -48%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
3091 Points -50%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
3082 Points -50%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS, Intel Core i7-6700K
2418 Points -61%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
3646 Points
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
3233 Points -11%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
2710 Points -26%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Eurocom Sky DLX7, Intel Core i7-6700K
1960 Points -46%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
1854 Points -49%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS, Intel Core i7-6700K
1461 Points -60%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
3284 Points
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
2602 Points -21%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
2479 Points -25%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Eurocom Sky DLX7, Intel Core i7-6700K
1926 Points -41%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
1856 Points -43%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS, Intel Core i7-6700K
1564 Points -52%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
1758 Points
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
1382 Points -21%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
1114 Points -37%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Eurocom Sky DLX7, Intel Core i7-6700K
1031 Points -41%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
1020 Points -42%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS, Intel Core i7-6700K
760 Points -57%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
1860 Points +8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
1730 Points
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
1531 Points -12%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
1070 Points -38%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Eurocom Sky DLX7, Intel Core i7-6700K
1059 Points -39%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS, Intel Core i7-6700K
783 Points -55%
1024x600 Normal, Score
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
16610 Points
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC, Intel Core i7-4790K
12373 Points -26%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro, Intel Core i7-4790K
11890 Points -28%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Eurocom Sky DLX7, Intel Core i7-6700K
9204 Points -45%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
8892 Points -46%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS, Intel Core i7-6700K
6986 Points -58%

Professional Applications

Using a consumer GPU for professional applications is tempting. The price differences to the Quadro cards are often very big, but the GeForce drivers are not certified and also pretty limited in some cases. Depending on the driver version (for notebooks in particular), the performance can fluctuate significantly. We took a "good" GTX 980 in the Schenker XMG U716 and a "bad" one in the GT72S as an example, because they differ a lot in Maya, for instance. Both cards offer a similar DirectX performance, but the different driver versions result in these big differences. By the way, the 980 SLI did not have an advantage over a single 980. The professional M5000M and even the M3000M are much faster is some tests like Siemens NX, despite the slower hardware. Still, the performance of the GTX 1080 with the driver version 368.13 was good in general.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Intel Core i7-4790K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)
MSI GT80S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
SCHENKER XMG U716, Intel Core i7-6700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
MSI GT72S 6QF, Intel Core i7-6820HK
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
MSI WT72-6QM, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
SCHENKER W706, Intel Core i7-6700
SPECviewperf 12
-37%
-35%
-43%
101%
37%
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)
67.7
50.8
-25%
49.23
-27%
43.23
-36%
101
49%
92
36%
1900x1060 Siemens NX (snx-02)
8.67
6.05
-30%
6.11
-30%
5.69
-34%
86.9
902%
52
500%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)
112
61.2
-45%
59.3
-47%
52.1
-53%
44.14
-61%
37
-67%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)
45.6
30.18
-34%
30.94
-32%
29.57
-35%
31.35
-31%
22
-52%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)
163
88.9
-45%
107
-34%
75.2
-54%
69.6
-57%
61
-63%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)
10.4
6.8
-35%
7.17
-31%
5.61
-46%
6.86
-34%
4.8
-54%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)
60.9
35.42
-42%
34.82
-43%
32.6
-46%
81.3
33%
66
8%
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)
86.3
52.2
-40%
53.6
-38%
49.52
-43%
94.4
9%
77
-11%

Video Decoder

DXVAChecker GTX 1080
DXVAChecker GTX 1080

The new video decoder was also convincing in our review. Both 2K H.264 as well as 4K H.264 playback was smooth at high frame rates and the CPU load was low (4K 100 Mbps 138 fps, 4% CPU). HEVC was no problem, either (1080p at 565 fps, 4% CPU and 4K 267 fps at 1% CPU).

Thanks to 12-bit HEVC decoding and new security features, the GTX 1080 is one of the first cards certified according to PlayReady 3.0 (SL3000) and can therefore be used for 4K streaming (e.g. Netflix) in Windows 10. More information about Pascal's video decoding and encoding is available in our in-depth analysis of Pascal.

Emissions of the Founders Edition

The Founders Edition of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 is conveniently restrained in terms of emissions. We can hardly notice a difference to the (admittedly pretty loud) CPU cooler at a distance of 15 cm when the desktop is idling. We can measure about 41 dB (for PSU and CPU fan) with and without the GPU. The curve in the lower diagram even shows that the CPU fan is actually a bit louder in some cases with the activated integrated GPU. The system noise is increased up to 49.4 dB (2355 rpm) under load in FurMark and 48.5 dB (2200 rpm) in The Witcher 3 under sustained load. Still, the noise characteristics are convenient and never annoying.

We did notice annoying coil whining at frame rates above 200 fps though. It gets really unpleasant above 400 fps, but this should not be an issue for most users.

Our test system consumes 66 Watts without dedicated graphics card on the Windows 10 desktop with one 4K monitor connected. This value is raised by 8 Watts to 74 Watts with the GTX 1080. HWiNFO sensors show 8.8 Watts for the GTX 1080, which supports our measurement. Using an XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro we measure 85 Watt. The Asus Strix GTX 980Ti needs 1 Watt more with 86 Watts. As the typical 980 is about 3 to 8 Watts better than the AMD R9 Fury, the GTX 1080 should easily beat its predecessor in idle too.

Using The Witcher 3, we can measure 322 Watts at the socket at first (248 Watts more than idle). HWiNFO shows 175 Watts for the GPU. The value levels off at 302 Watts after 5 minutes (HWiNFO shows 160 Watts for the GPU, 34 Watts for the CPU). The recommended 500-Watt PSU should therefore be sufficient. Using the R9 Fury, we get around 350 Watts (constant) in the same scene. The Asus Strix 980 Ti (overclocked by Asus) is using even more with about 397 Watt.

yellow: without GPU; green: 1080 idle; red 1080 during FurMark
yellow: without GPU; green: 1080 idle; red 1080 during FurMark
Attention different scaling for comparison: yellow: ambient noise, PC off; green: idle; red: load
Attention different scaling for comparison: yellow: ambient noise, PC off; green: idle; red: load
The graphics card gets very warm at up to 68 °C.
The graphics card gets very warm at up to 68 °C.
The situation is better around the cooler.
The situation is better around the cooler.

Verdict Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition

Pascal in the GTX 1080 – a successful product
Pascal in the GTX 1080 – a successful product

After numerous benchmarks and measurements, we can congratulate Nvidia for Pascal with a clear conscience. The graphics card has a similar power consumption, but there is a significant performance jump. Even two GTX 980s SLI can be slightly beaten on average in the gaming benchmarks. The desktop 980Ti and Titan X are also beaten. Gaming in 4K with the GTX 1080 is usually possible at high settings. A notebook version is probably just a matter of time, similar to the GTX 980.

The high-quality Founders Edition from Nvidia convinces with convenient noise levels and high-quality materials. Only the future will tell if it can compete with third-party models. The price will probably be average, but more expensive cards will certainly be shipped with higher clocks.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
9.8 pt (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 6423     avg: 6926     median: 6902 (20%)     max: 7922 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 6867     avg: 7227     median: 7185 (19%)     max: 7592 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 358774     avg: 417948     median: 421474 (48%)     max: 470072 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 27092     avg: 30829     median: 31475 (34%)     max: 35343 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 79091     avg: 115297     median: 119971 (32%)     max: 129042 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 13278     avg: 16733     median: 16623 (29%)     max: 20814 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 15834     avg: 20727     median: 21408.5 (24%)     max: 22887 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 255021     avg: 272250     median: 272250 (33%)     max: 289478 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 15758     avg: 20943     median: 21289.5 (30%)     max: 26308 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 19910     avg: 28484     median: 29263 (25%)     max: 32126 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
94578 Points (98%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
176008 Points (92%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
269 fps (89%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
specvp12 snx-02 +
specvp12 showcase-01 +
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
specvp12 maya-04 +
specvp12 energy-01 +
specvp12 creo-01 +
specvp12 catia-04 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 229.7     avg: 280.4     median: 267.5 (38%)     max: 357 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 243.1     avg: 280.3     median: 273.5 (38%)     max: 331 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.2477     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (24%)     max: 0.3867 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.26
log 26. 02:41:20

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 getting avg benchmarks for device 7311 +0.028s ... 0.029s

#4 got single benchmarks 7311 +0.033s ... 0.063s

#5 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.063s

#6 min, max, avg, median took s +1.066s ... 1.129s

#7 return log +0s ... 1.129s

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

2023
ultra 1920x1080
46.6  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
27.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
11  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Steam Deck 1280x720
126.9
Ultra Preset (FSR on) 1920x1080
58.9
ultra 1920x1080
55.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
37.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
18.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
58  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
37  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
23  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
68.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
62.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.7  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
26.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
236  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
201  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
174  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
121  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
91.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
53.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
QHD 2560x1440
60   fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
30.2  fps    + Compare
low 1280x720
152  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
96.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
34.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
114  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
108  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
105  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
80.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
41.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
128  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
120  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
109  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
89.4  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
66.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
37.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
204  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
134  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
124  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
102  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
74.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
42.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Maximum Settings with Raytracing T2X Filmic SMAA 1920x1080
38.4
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
208  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
151  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
121  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
92.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
70.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
46.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
150  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
105  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
95  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
71  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
51  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
29  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
287  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
276  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
261  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
259  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
247  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
172  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
142  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
118  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
89.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
70.2  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
49.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
26.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
233  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
88.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
67.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
41.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
19.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Quality Preset & High Ray Tracing Preset (DX12) 1920x1080
17.4
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
246  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
206  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
166  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
125  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
99  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
63  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
94.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
67.4  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
44.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
224  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
116  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
100  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
98.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
63.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
30.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
107  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
105  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
86.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47.2  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
38.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
204  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
140  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
114  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
92  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
63  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
34  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
285  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
154  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
129  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
81.8  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
64.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
40  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anthem

Anthem

2019
low 1280x720
135  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
117  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
99.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
94  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
66.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
35.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
128  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
111  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
108  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
98  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
82  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
47  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
161  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
94.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
69.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
57.8  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
45.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
28.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
144  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
132  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
130  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
89.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
46.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
180  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
135  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
109  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
99 103 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
74.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
38.1 40.5 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
244  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
160  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
142  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
116 127 ~ 122 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
81 86.7 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
40.1 43.2 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
191  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
166  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
142  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
118 128 ~ 123 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
97.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
49.4 55.8 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
307  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
237  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
191  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
165  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
123  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
66.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
59.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
59.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
49.3 54.2 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Hitman 2

Hitman 2

2018
low 1280x720
84.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
84  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
75.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
73 73.3 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
72.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
38.8 46.1 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
165  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
145  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
130  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
126  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
89.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
42.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
102  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
92  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
83  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
58 67 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
48 50 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31 34 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
171  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
140  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
137  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
112  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
93  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
65  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
FIFA 19

FIFA 19

2018
low 1280x720
324  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
320  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
291  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
290  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
282  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
184  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
131  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
108  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
104  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
88 95 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
64  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
30 34 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
low 1280x720
213  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
186  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
143  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
109  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
90  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
57  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
109  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
101  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
96.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
88.7  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
56.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
27.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
60  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
44.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
138  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
118  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
113  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
100 107 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
72 82 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
40 43 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
ultra 1920x1080
179  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
118  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
59.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
102  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
88  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
75.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
66.1 69 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
144  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
123  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
98.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
75  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
53.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
27.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
160  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
108  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
54.7 69 77.2 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
30.4 34 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
327  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
285  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
199  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
146  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
95.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
45.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
189  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
158  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
133  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
93.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
46.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
162  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
149  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
135  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
102  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
54.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
260  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
246  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
158  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
134  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
107  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
66.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
288  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
195  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
152  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
134  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
88.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
52.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
101  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
93  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
91  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
75 78 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
66  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
37 40 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Destiny 2

Destiny 2

2017
low 1280x720
168  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
165  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
160  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
89.9 145 ~ 117 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
77.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
40.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ELEX

ELEX

2017
low 1280x720
122  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
122  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
122  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
97  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
64.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
32.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
108  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
82.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
77.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
65.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
32.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset FXAA + TAA 2560x1440
55.7
low 1280x720
170  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
154  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
84 129 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
69 92 102 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
38 40 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset TAA 2560x1440
71
FIFA 18

FIFA 18

2017
low 1280x720
364  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
351  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
319  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
315  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
210  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1366x768
356
low 1280x720
128  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
91.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
70.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47.2 48 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
17.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset (100 % Resolution Scale) 1366x768
127
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
234  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
177  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
81 148 ~ 115 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
62 110 120 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
61  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF 1366x768
181
low 1280x720
130  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
123  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
113  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
96.4 97 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33.4 34.4 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1366x768
124
4K 3820x2160
161  fps    + Compare
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
339  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
240  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
77.5 186 ~ 132 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
55.6 88 109 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
67  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF 1366x768
243
low 1280x720
250  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
250  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
221 246 ~ 234 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
106  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Performance 1920x1080
250
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
144  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
142  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
123.2 140 141 ~ 135 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
70.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF FXAA 1366x768
144
low 1280x720
176  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
110  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
81.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
73  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
25.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium / On (100 % Gameplay Resolution) MediumAA 1366x768
116
low 1280x720
163  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
138  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
105  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
94.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
44.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset (Resolution Scale Mode off) FXAA 1366x768
148
low 1280x720
200  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
120  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
110  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
62.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
42.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset FXAA 1366x768
148
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
305  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
198  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
189  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
138 139 ~ 139 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
54.9 60.5 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF TAA 1366x768
271
low 1280x720
519  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
313  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
212  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
176  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
59.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium / Off FXAA 1366x768
477
low 1280x720
148  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
140  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
110  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
73.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
46.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
121  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
113  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
96  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
82  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
47.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
124  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
116  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
83  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra / On T2X SMAA 3840x2160
52.6
low 1280x720
144  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
144  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
141 143 ~ 142 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
59 65 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
160  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
200  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
193  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
162  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
147 148 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
70.6 70.7 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
90.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
73.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
66.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
66 66.7 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
65.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1920x1080
73.9
Mafia 3

Mafia 3

2016
high 1920x1080
57.8 63 63 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
25.9 27.8 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1920x1080
FIFA 17

FIFA 17

2016
ultra 1920x1080
377  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
213 219 ~ 216 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
51.4 55 55.9 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
30.8 36.9 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
133  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
64.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
58.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
193  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
175  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
135  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
121 121 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
47 49 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF 1920x1080
162
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
296  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
293  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
284  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
149 196 ~ 173 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
104 113 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium (Render Scale 100 %) 2xAF FXAA 1920x1080
293
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
175  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
171  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
145  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
130 137 160 ~ 142 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
56.5 72 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1920x1080
158
med. 1920x1080
high 1920x1080
65.3 78 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
41.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
extreme 3840x2160
51.1
low 1280x720
129  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
141  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
126  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
104  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
61  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
75 78 90 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
42 52 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
95 102 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
48.5 51.2 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
154  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
141  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
125  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
106 107 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
49 50 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
XCOM 2

XCOM 2

2016
low 1280x720
128  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
105  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
91  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
30.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TrilinearAF 1920x1080
123
low 1024x768
244  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
201  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
131  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
76.8 110 112 112 112 125 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
47.8 50 53 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
198 208 211 ~ 206 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
82 85 85 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset 16xAF TAA 3840x2160
74
low 1024x768
159  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
165  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
134  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
122  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
62  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
200  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
200  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
192  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
171  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
67  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
57  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
47.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Fallout 4

Fallout 4

2015
high 1920x1080
147  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
86.9 127 129 ~ 114 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
54 57 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
150  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
58  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
188  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
176  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
151  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59 61 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
67 75 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
FIFA 16

FIFA 16

2015
low 1280x720
370  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
208  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1366x768
235  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
194  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
167  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
162  fps    + Compare
4K 3840 x 2160
109 112 ~ 111 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
60  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Mad Max

Mad Max

2015
med. 1366x768
327  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
239  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
215  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
77  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
79.3 177 ~ 128 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
58 149 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
62.3 142 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
58.6 141 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
129  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
med (1/3) 1920x1080
147
high 1920x1080
ultra 1920x1080
57 97 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
ultra 1920x1080
40.7 76.4 81 82 94 ~ 75 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
55 56.5 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) 3840x2160
36.4
low 1024x768
382  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
189  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
152  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
135  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
126  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
178  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
170  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
151 153 ~ 152 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
80 85.9 86 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
71.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
71.2 73.9 74.8 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
37.9
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
170
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
177
low 1024x768
275  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
161  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
118 129 ~ 124 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
298  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
221  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
200  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
200  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
200  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
176  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
90  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
360  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
319  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
291 307 ~ 299 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
113.4 181 184 ~ 159 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
265  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
179  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
176  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
138  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
100  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
272  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
ultra 1920x1080
91  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty46.627.511
Baldur's Gate 355.837.118.9
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022583723
Flight Simulator 202068.462.34933.726.314.9
F1 202023620117412191.653.3
Gears Tactics6030.2
Red Dead Redemption 215296.464.341.134.721.3
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order11410810580.941.8
Need for Speed Heat12812010989.466.137.2
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 201920413412410274.342.3
GRID 201920815112192.170.946.9
Ghost Recon Breakpoint15010595715129
FIFA 20287276261259247172
Borderlands 314211889.270.249.426.5
Control23388.467.141.419.7
F1 20192462061661259963
Total War: Three Kingdoms94.467.444.322
Rage 222411610098.963.430.8
Anno 180010710586.847.238.221.8
The Division 2204140114926334
Dirt Rally 2.028515412981.864.740
Anthem13511799.49466.635.9
Far Cry New Dawn128111108988247
Metro Exodus16194.969.957.845.228.3
Apex Legends14414413213089.746.9
Just Cause 418013510910174.339
Darksiders III2441601421228442
Battlefield V19116614212397.953
Farming Simulator 1930723719116512366.7
Fallout 76606059.959.959.752
Hitman 284.38475.97372.342
Call of Duty Black Ops 416514513012689.242.8
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey1029283634933
Forza Horizon 41711401371129365
FIFA 19324320291290282184
Shadow of the Tomb Raider131108104926432
F1 20182131861431099057
Monster Hunter World10910196.188.756.927.4
The Crew 2606060606044.7
Far Cry 51381181131047742
World of Tanks enCore17911859.4
X-Plane 11.111028875.368
Kingdom Come: Deliverance14412398.37553.427.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark1601086732
Fortnite32728519914695.345.7
Star Wars Battlefront 218915814413393.146.4
Need for Speed Payback16214914413510254.3
Call of Duty WWII26024615813410766.1
Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus28819515213488.952.1
Assassin´s Creed Origins1019391776639
Destiny 216816516011777.140.1
ELEX1221221229764.232.7
The Evil Within 210882.977.165.332.7
Middle-earth: Shadow of War1701541078839
FIFA 18364351319315210
Ark Survival Evolved12891.370.14817.6
F1 20172341771159761
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)1301231139734
Team Fortress 2161
Dirt 43392401328467
Rocket League250250234106
Prey14414414213570.9
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III17611081.47325.7
Mass Effect Andromeda16313810594.944.7
Ghost Recon Wildlands20012011062.642.8
For Honor30519818913958
Resident Evil 751931321217659.8
Watch Dogs 214814011073.546.7
Dishonored 2121113968247.3
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare12411683
Titanfall 214414414414262
Farming Simulator 1760160
Battlefield 120019316214871
Civilization VI90.173.566.16665.2
Mafia 36127
FIFA 17377216
Deus Ex Mankind Divided5434
No Man's Sky13364.758.5
Mirror's Edge Catalyst19317513512148
Overwatch296293284173109
Doom17517114514264
Ashes of the Singularity69.57241.6
Need for Speed 201612914112610461
Hitman 20168147
The Division9950
Far Cry Primal15414112510750
XCOM 2128105914830.4
Rise of the Tomb Raider24420113110850
Rainbow Six Siege20684
Just Cause 315916513412262
Star Wars Battlefront20020019217167
Assassin's Creed Syndicate5747.3
Fallout 414711456
Call of Duty: Black Ops 315058
Anno 22051881761516071
FIFA 16370208
World of Warships235194167162111
Metal Gear Solid V6060
Mad Max32723921577
Dota 2 Reborn128104102100129
Batman: Arkham Knight9977
The Witcher 373.77556
Dirt Rally382189152135126
GTA V1781701528471.973
Dragon Age: Inquisition275161124
Alien: Isolation298221
Thief92
Battlefield 420020020017690
Metro: Last Light103
BioShock Infinite360319299159
Tomb Raider265
Crysis 3179176138100
Counter-Strike: GO272
Supreme Commander - FA Bench91
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


11
72


29
55

2
41
50

12
55
38
2
13
33
3
16
54
25
9

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 26. 02:41:26

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 before gaming benchmark output +0.001s ... 0.002s

#4 Got 629 rows for game benchmarks. +0.105s ... 0.107s

#5 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.107s

#6 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.09s ... 0.197s

#7 benchmarks composed for output. +5.292s ... 5.489s

#8 return log +0.006s ... 5.495s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) Review – Pascal has arrived
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-11- 8)