Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon RX 540

AMD Radeon RX 540

The AMD Radeon RX 540 is mobile mid-range graphics card for laptops based on the Polaris 12 chip (most likely). It is manufactured in an improved 14 nm FinFET process at Globalfoundries. The performance should be between the Radeon Pro 450 and 455 in the MacBook Pro 2016 range that is also based on the Polaris architecture. AMD specifies the RX 450 at 1.2 TFLOPS (Pro 450 1 TFLOP, Pro 455 1.3 TFLOPs). Compared to Nvidia graphics cards, the gaming performance should be between the GeForce GTX 950M and GTX 960M.

The features of the Radeon RX 540 are identical to the faster RX 460 and all other Polaris chips. See more details on the Polaris architecture here.

The power envelope of the faster Radeon Pro 460 is rated at 35 Watt according to the AMD blog post. Due to the slower specs, the Radeon RX 540 use slightly less.

Radeon RX 500 Series

Radeon RX 590 compare 2304 @ 1.47 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Radeon RX 580 compare 2304 @ 1.26 - 1.34 GHz256 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Radeon RX 570 compare 2048 @ 1.17 - 1.24 GHz256 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop) compare 2304 @ 1 - 1.08 GHz256 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) compare 2048 @ 0.93 - 1.21 GHz256 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) compare 1024 @ 1.17 - 1.28 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop) compare 1024 @ 1.09 - 1.29 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop) compare 640 @ 1.29 - 1.48 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon RX 540X compare 512 @ 1.22 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon RX 540 512 @ 1.22 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
CodenamePolaris 12
ArchitecturePolaris
Pipelines512 - unified
Core Speed1219 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed6000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL Vulkan
Power Consumption75 Watt
technology14 nm
FeaturesDisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready, HDMI 2.0, AMD FreeSync
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement21.03.2017
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
1.7 pt (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2495     avg: 3053     median: 3059 (5%)     max: 3488 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 14964     avg: 16481     median: 15818 (21%)     max: 18661 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 57.5     avg: 58.2     median: 58.2 (8%)     max: 58.8 Watt
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
54  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
56  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Anthem

Anthem

2019
low 1280x720
24  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
40  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
63  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Hitman 2

Hitman 2

2018
low 1280x720
29  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
55  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
low 1280x720
62  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
32 42 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12 25 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
29.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
32.8 41 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.1 15 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.4 12 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
11 24.5 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
3 9.2 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
2 4.1 ~ 3 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
89.2 180 ~ 135 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.1 70 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.3 55 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.4 35 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
42.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
25  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
62.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
27.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
22 55 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10 29 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Destiny 2

Destiny 2

2017
low 1280x720
34.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
ELEX

ELEX

2017
low 1280x720
30.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
25.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
39 98 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14 39 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10 27 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
FIFA 18

FIFA 18

2017
low 1280x720
115.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
40.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
55 92 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22 40 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16 28 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF 1366x768
68
low 1280x720
52 75 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.2 31 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.4 26 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1366x768
46
low 1280x720
65.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
63  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
103.9 150 ~ 127 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
32.7 63 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.2 42 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.8 27 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF 1366x768
79
low 1280x720
152.9 182 ~ 167 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53 86 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31 58 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Performance 1920x1080
102
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
92.2 108 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.9 71 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.3 58 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.7 40 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF FXAA 1366x768
91
low 1280x720
51.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
70  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset (Resolution Scale Mode off) FXAA 1366x768
58
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
64  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
84.9 135 ~ 110 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34.6 61 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.8 36 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.4 15 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium / Off FXAA 1366x768
88
low 1280x720
45  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset TXAA 1920x1080
22
low 1280x720
99.7 174 ~ 137 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
49.9 137 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.8 70 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1920x1080
89
low 1280x720
54.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
74  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
52  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1920x1080
40
Mafia 3

Mafia 3

2016
low 1280x720
42  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1920x1080
25
low 1280x720
40 48 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26.8 35 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14 19 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 2xAF 1920x1080
22
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
83.6 95 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
50.9 78 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32 52 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.3 36 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium (Render Scale 100 %) 2xAF FXAA 1920x1080
63
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
29.7 70 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
23.5 54 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.5 28 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1920x1080
40
low 1280x768
36  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.5 20 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.4 18 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
53  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
47  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium / Off 4xAF 1920x1080
37
low 1280x720
43.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
50.8 59 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.6 38 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.3 20 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9 16 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
105.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
56.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1366x768
93.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
62.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
74.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
62.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
48 50.8 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.3 37 39 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
8 13.2 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6 7.8 ~ 7 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
74.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
63.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
63  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
50.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
44.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
147 150.7 ~ 149 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
74.9 78 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
61 62.3 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.2 36 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
139 145 ~ 142 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
62 75.9 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
59.5 61 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.7 34 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Anno 1800541811
The Division 25639378
Anthem242017
Far Cry New Dawn40181716
Battlefield V63312921
Hitman 22918128
Shadow of the Tomb Raider55262116
F1 201862402821
Monster Hunter World60252117
Far Cry 537192117
X-Plane 11.1129.823.319.7
Kingdom Come: Deliverance3713107
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark1863
Fortnite135463422
Star Wars Battlefront 242.911.29.1
Need for Speed Payback2513.910.7
Call of Duty WWII62.827.712.8
Assassin´s Creed Origins39202215
Destiny 234.418.815.5
ELEX30.315.310.9
The Evil Within 225.711.19.8
Middle-earth: Shadow of War69271920
FIFA 18115.854.840.240
Ark Survival Evolved40.610.510.4
F1 201774312221
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)64232019
Team Fortress 265.5636054
Dirt 4127483018
Rocket League1677045
Prey100554229
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III51.424.622.220
Mass Effect Andromeda70342015
For Honor6420.518.914.8
Resident Evil 7110482713
Dishonored 245293118
Farming Simulator 17137934659
Battlefield 154.230.812.210.7
Civilization VI74523223
Mafia 3423222
Deus Ex Mankind Divided4431179
Overwatch89644227
Doom50392025
Ashes of the Singularity361615
Hitman 201653472019
The Division43.721.29.9
Rise of the Tomb Raider55301613
Rainbow Six Siege105.556.32821.1
World of Warships93.762.132.725.2
Dota 2 Reborn74.462.547.138.3
The Witcher 34935117
GTA V74.963.716.76.2
Thief6350.344.438
BioShock Infinite149766227
Tomb Raider142696032
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
6
22
20
6
25
20
9
38
13
3
33
6







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 16. 15:31:58

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.083s ... 0.084s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.084s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.084s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 7952 +0.034s ... 0.118s

#7 got single benchmarks 7952 +0.029s ... 0.147s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.147s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.758s ... 0.905s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.905s

#11 Got 271 rows for game benchmarks. +0.02s ... 0.924s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.924s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.043s ... 0.967s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.718s ... 2.686s

#15 return log +0.042s ... 2.728s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon RX 540 graphics card

Intel NUC8i3CYSM Review

Intel NUC8i3CYSM Review

There has been a 10-nm CPU on the market since late 2018. Intel has put a Cannon Lake-based chip in the Intel NUC8i3CYSM, but has it jumped the gun by doing so?...
Intel Core i3-8121U | AMD Radeon RX 540 | | 660 g
Dell Latitude 7424 Rugged Extreme (i7-8650U, RX540) Laptop Review

Dell Latitude 7424 Rugged Extreme (i7-8650U, RX540) Laptop Review

The Latitude 7424 Rugged Extreme is an absolute tank. The Latitude 7424 wraps a competent computer in a dust-tight and water-resistant shell that can take a bea...
Intel Core i7-8650U | AMD Radeon RX 540 | 14.00" | 3.5 kg
Dell Latitude 5420 Rugged (i7-8650U, AMD RX 540) Laptop Review

Dell Latitude 5420 Rugged (i7-8650U, AMD RX 540) Laptop Review

Rugged Notebooks aren't known for their svelte profiles, but the Dell Latitude 5420 Rugged tries to trim things down while maintaining the durability of the Lat...
Intel Core i7-8650U | AMD Radeon RX 540 | 14.00" | 2.8 kg
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G (Ryzen 5 2500U, Radeon RX 540, SSD, FHD) Laptop Review

Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G (Ryzen 5 2500U, Radeon RX 540, SSD, FHD) Laptop Review

Hit the brakes. The Swift 3 SF315-41G is a multimedia allrounder by Acer that relies on the combination of a Raven Ridge APU and a dedicated AMD graphics unit. ...
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U | AMD Radeon RX 540 | 15.60" | 2.2 kg

Dell Latitude 5424 Rugged: Intel Core i5-8350U, 14.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Dell Latitude 5424 Rugged

Dell Latitude 5420 Rugged, 8650U, RX540: Intel Core i7-8650U, 14.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Dell Latitude 5420 Rugged, 8650U, RX540

Dell Latitude 7424 Rugged Extreme: Intel Core i7-8650U, 14.00", 3.5 kg
  External Review » Dell Latitude 7424 Rugged Extreme, 8650U, RX540

Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ICN: Intel Core i3-8121U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ICN

Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR

Lenovo Ideapad 330S-15IKB-81F5009JMX: Intel Core i7-8550U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 330S-15IKB-81F5009JMX

HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JY07ES: Intel Core i7-8550U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JY07ES

HP EliteBook 850 G5-3RS15UT: Intel Core i7-8550U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook 850 G5-3RS15UT

Acer Aspire 5 A515-41G-17E9: AMD FX-9800P, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A515-41G-17E9

Samsung Notebook 9 Pro NP940X5M: Intel Core i7-7500U, 15.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Samsung Notebook 9 Pro NP940X5M-X01US

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > AMD Radeon RX 540 GPU - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2017-09- 5)