Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile is a professional workstation graphics card for laptops. It is based on the consumer Radeon RX 550 and therefore uses the same Polaris 12 chip (codename Lexa). The 640 shaders (10 compute units = CUs) are clocked at 1082 MHz.

The AMD Radeon Pro (formerly known as FirePro) is the counterpart to the Quadro series from Nvidia and offers certified drivers for professional 3D applications (CAD and DCC).

The WX3200 uses the Polaris architecture (4. generation of GCN) that was introduced in 2016 with the RX 400 series. For more information on the features and specifications of the Polaris architecture, visit our in depth article here.

Radeon Pro WX Series

Radeon Pro WX 7100 compare 2304 @ 1.24 GHz256 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 4150 compare 896 @ 1.05 GHz128 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 4130 compare 640 @ 1.05 GHz128 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 3200 640 @ 1.08 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 2100 compare 512 @ 1.22 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
CodenamePolaris 12
ArchitecturePolaris
Pipelines640 - unified
Core Speed1082 MHz
Memory Speed6000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL Vulkan
technology14 nm
FeaturesDisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready, HDMI 2.0
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement26.09.2019

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
1.2 pt (4%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1039     avg: 1059     median: 1059 (3%)     max: 1079 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 938     avg: 956     median: 955.5 (2%)     max: 973 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 28712     avg: 105833     median: 105833 (11%)     max: 182954 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
62128 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 11941     avg: 11960     median: 11960 (11%)     max: 11979 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 18780     avg: 18866     median: 18866 (5%)     max: 18952 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2822     avg: 2871     median: 2871 (4%)     max: 2920 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 3088     avg: 3156     median: 3156 (3%)     max: 3224 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
78927 Points (9%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 4592     avg: 4657     median: 4657 (6%)     max: 4722 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 4256     avg: 4338     median: 4337.5 (3%)     max: 4419 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
12538 Points (4%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 16054     avg: 16329     median: 16329 (21%)     max: 16604 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
13.4 fps (4%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 39.3     avg: 40.4     median: 40.4 (10%)     max: 41.43 fps
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 27.78     avg: 31.5     median: 31.5 (5%)     max: 35.12 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 16.24     avg: 17.8     median: 17.7 (3%)     max: 19.25 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 7.42     avg: 8.1     median: 8.1 (2%)     max: 8.83 fps
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 19.07     avg: 22     median: 22 (6%)     max: 24.84 fps
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 1.44     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (1%)     max: 1.69 fps
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 30.39     avg: 34.2     median: 34.1 (14%)     max: 37.9 fps
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 23.13     avg: 27.6     median: 27.6 (5%)     max: 32.08 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
29 fps (4%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 42.53     avg: 43.6     median: 43.6 (12%)     max: 44.6 fps
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 49.48     avg: 57.8     median: 57.8 (6%)     max: 66.1 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 16.69     avg: 18     median: 18 (3%)     max: 19.38 fps
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 11.26     avg: 11.5     median: 11.5 (2%)     max: 11.8 fps
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 29.43     avg: 37.3     median: 37.3 (4%)     max: 45.21 fps
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 1.88     avg: 2     median: 2 (1%)     max: 2.15 fps
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 29.71     avg: 37.2     median: 37.2 (5%)     max: 44.68 fps
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 32.53     avg: 38.9     median: 38.9 (4%)     max: 45.35 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 32.36     avg: 33.8     median: 33.8 (5%)     max: 35.17 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
9857 points (7%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
57.4 fps (19%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 74     avg: 76.5     median: 76.5 (4%)     max: 79 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
495 Samples/s (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
921 Samples/s (2%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
649 points (1%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 50.4     avg: 50.7     median: 50.7 (11%)     max: 51 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra
min: 0.1843     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (18%)     max: 0.2222 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 34.2     avg: 34.8     median: 34.8 (50%)     max: 35.3 dB(A)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
42.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
59  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
55.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
40.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
31.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
65.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
43  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
25 25.4 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.6 16.7 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.1 15.2 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
26.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
50.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
36.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
98 103 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
86 87 ~ 87 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
48 49.1 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.7 45 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
9.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
58.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26.5 35.6 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.3 18 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.4 11.2 ~ 10 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
5.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Thief

Thief

2014
med. 1366x768
36.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
34.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
186.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
90.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
81.6 83.1 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.2 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
184.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
98.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
71.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Control42.412.58.3
F1 201959332515
Total War: Three Kingdoms55.515.39.94
Rage 240.916.814.110
Metro Exodus31.114107
Apex Legends65.924.315.113.2
Far Cry 543201817
X-Plane 11.11251715
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark26.39.76.3
Rise of the Tomb Raider50.636.2218.54
Dota 2 Reborn1018749359.4
The Witcher 358.13115105.2
Thief36.434.919.9
BioShock Infinite186.690.48230
Tomb Raider184.698.571.835
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
8
2
2
8
4
3
11
2
2
8
3




2


For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 02. 20:16:06

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 01 Aug 2025 05:45:49 +0200 +0.008s ... 0.008s

#4 composed specs +0.052s ... 0.06s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.06s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.06s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9941 +0.126s ... 0.186s

#8 got single benchmarks 9941 +0.047s ... 0.232s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.232s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +1.415s ... 1.647s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.647s

#12 Got 69 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 1.655s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.655s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.014s ... 1.669s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.313s ... 1.982s

#16 return log +0.015s ... 1.996s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2019-09-26)