Notebookcheck

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile is a professional workstation graphics card for laptops. It is based on the consumer Radeon RX 550 and therefore uses the same Polaris 12 chip (codename Lexa). The 640 shaders (10 compute units = CUs) are clocked at 1082 MHz.

The AMD Radeon Pro (formerly known as FirePro) is the counterpart to the Quadro series from Nvidia and offers certified drivers for professional 3D applications (CAD and DCC).

The WX3200 uses the Polaris architecture (4. generation of GCN) that was introduced in 2016 with the RX 400 series. For more information on the features and specifications of the Polaris architecture, visit our in depth article here.

ManufacturerAMD
Radeon Pro WX Series
Radeon Pro WX 7100 compare 2304 @ 1243 MHz256 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 4150 compare 896 @ 1053 MHz128 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 4130 compare 640 @ 1053 MHz128 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 3200 640 @ 1082 MHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 2100 compare 512 @ 1219 MHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
CodenamePolaris 12
ArchitecturePolaris
Pipelines640 - unified
Core Speed1082 MHz
Memory Speed6000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4096 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12
technology14 nm
FeaturesDisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready, HDMI 2.0
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement26.09.2019

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
11.5 pt (12%)
3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
min: 1039     avg: 1059     median: 1059 (7%)     max: 1079 Points
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
min: 938     avg: 956     median: 955.5 (6%)     max: 973 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 28712     avg: 105833     median: 105833 (19%)     max: 182954 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 11941     avg: 11960     median: 11960 (18%)     max: 11979 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 18780     avg: 18866     median: 18866 (10%)     max: 18952 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 2822     avg: 2871     median: 2871 (10%)     max: 2920 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 3088     avg: 3156     median: 3156 (8%)     max: 3224 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 4592     avg: 4657     median: 4657 (12%)     max: 4722 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 4256     avg: 4338     median: 4337.5 (8%)     max: 4419 points
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 12
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 +
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 +
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 +
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 +
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 +
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 +
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 +
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 +
3ds Max (3dsmax-05) 1900x1060 +
SPECviewperf 13 Solidworks (sw-04) +
Siemens NX (snx-03) +
Showcase (showcase-02) +
Medical (medical-02) +
Maya (maya-05) +
Energy (energy-02) +
Creo (creo-02) +
Catia (catia-05) +
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) +
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra - Power Consumption *
min: 50.4     avg: 50.7     median: 50.7 (11%)     max: 51 Watt
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
42.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
59  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
55.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
40.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
31.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
65.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
43  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
25 25.4 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.6 16.7 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.1 15.2 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.